Last 50 Years Of Nelson Council Go Down In History
For its 50th and 100th anniversaries, the council had commissioned histories of the preceding 50 years.
In 2023, the council agreed to write a third to mark its sesquicentenary – or 150th anniversary.
That latest instalment, Welcome to Whakatū Nelson City Council 1974–2024, was launched on Thursday afternoon at the Elma Turner Library.
Written by local historian Dr Paul Christoffel, the book covers everything from the council's acceptance of Melrose House as a gift in 1975 to the public consultation on its controversial housing intensification in 2024.
It was Christoffel's first foray into documenting the history of local government and he said it was 'bloody hard work'.
'When I came into this, I thought, 'oh, it's only 50 years, that won't be such a big deal'. But what I gradually discovered was the enormous amount of stuff that councils do, it's just quite phenomenal.'
It took him about 18 months to write – 'quite a short space of time' in terms of history books – and he said 'an awful lot' had to be left out.
One such piece of information that wasn't featured in the book, but had captured Christoffel's attention, was one radio segment featuring then-council officer Pat Dougherty, who would, years later, become the council's chief executive.
Dougherty had gone on the radio to defend the council's plans to build Tantragee Water Treatment Plant from callers opposed to the plan when he heard a familiar voice.
'He said: 'is that you, Peter?'' Christoffel said.
'He recognized his voice, even though he didn't say who he was, and it was the former mayor, Peter Malone!'
Though once controversial at the time, the construction of the water treatment plant is one such achievement lauded within the history book and was a key highlight for Mayor Nick Smith.
'The most striking feature for me on this issue is just how much our city has progressed over the last 50 years,' Smith said.
He reflected on how, in 1974, the city's water was rationed and regarded as some of the worst in the country.
However, with the construction of the Maitai Dam and the water treatment plant, Nelson's water was now 'some of the best and most secure in the country', Smith said.
'[The book] is actually an important reflection on the people, the projects, and the progress that our city has made.'
However, he added that the book had nearly not happened, with it being deemed 'hardly a priority' following the August 2022 storm event.
Had it not been for the advocacy of the Nelson Historical Society and the City of Nelson Civic Trust, Smith wouldn't have renewed the idea which was eventually unanimously supported by the council.
Councillor Mel Courtney, who also sat on the council during its centenary celebrations 50 years ago, thought it was important to chronicle the past.
'Documenting council's rich history gives us a sense of who we are, where we came from, and where we're going,' he said.
About $175,000, including $20,000 from the City of Nelson Civic Trust, went towards the council's anniversary commemorations, with most of the funds contributing to the book.
Welcome to Whakatū Nelson City Council 1974–2024 is available for issue at Nelson's public libraries or to purchase from local independent bookstore Page & Blackmore, and will be made available as an ebook.
'It inspires the next generation to make good decisions, to further build the city's unique character, and make sure that Nelson is the best little city, in the best little country, in the world,' Smith said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
04-08-2025
- Newsroom
When the Feds come to town
Was it a big deal or not? The director of the FBI, Kash Patel, was sprung by a Herald journalist lurking in the basement of the Beehive. His appearance came after another reporter twigged that the FBI's plane was sitting on the tarmac at Wellington airport. The avalanche of mumbling 'no comment' from MPs was quickly followed by a release from the US Embassy about exactly why such an exciting guest was here – the FBI hanging its shingle out in the Capital. 'Kash Patel being spotted in the Beehive basement felt like the start of a good spy movie,' says RNZ political reporter Anneke Smith. But the FBI has long had a presence in New Zealand, and a former spy spoken to by The Detail says it's no big deal. So why did we get so excited about it? Maybe because everyone loves it when a secret gets out. Today on The Detail, Smith tells us how the story unravelled, and a Senior Lecturer in Security Studies at Massey University, Dr Rhys Ball, questions the significance of the event. Patel himself said – through a carefully curated media package and video that was rigged to look like a press conference, though it wasn't – that it was all about transnational crime including countering the narcotics trade, cybercrime, and 'countering the CCP', the Chinese Communist Party. The FBI was 'opening up our law enforcement attaché office here in Wellington,' he said, to show 'the world that the FBI is actually prioritising a permanent presence across all Five Eyes countries, and here in New Zealand we had not had that until this historic moment'. The China comment was a very different line to what the New Zealand Government took, says Smith. Ministers later that day were reiterating that it was all about cracking down on crime in the Indo-Pacific. Foreign Minister Winston Peters said the issue of China hadn't come up in their meeting. 'Two very different tacks I think taken from New Zealand and the US,' says Smith, 'the US being quite bolshie in terms of framing this up with the wider context in terms of the geopolitical contest in the Indo-Pacific region.' China called the FBI director's statements 'groundless assertions' and described his comments as part of a 'Cold War mentality'. And that's why our politicians played that aspect of this visit down. 'New Zealand(ers) will be well aware we have an important trade relationship with China, they're our biggest trading partner, they're about a third of our exports, a lot of meat and dairy go to China so a really significant trading relationship there,' says Smith. 'We walk very much through the centre line of a lot of hefty controversial subjects on that because of our trading relationship. 'The US, on the other hand, doesn't hold back.' Kash Patel is a controversial figure and a Trump loyalist, who's a conspiracy theorist, supporter of the rioters on the Capitol, an anti-vaxxer and has been accused of perjury. 'I don't think any of that came up during his visit to New Zealand last week,' says Smith. 'That was all about opening the office and signalling it's here in the Indo-Pacific.' Dr Rhys Ball says the move isn't really a big deal. 'It's part of the usual relationship or engagement that intelligence and security agencies have,' he says. 'Particularly in the Five Eyes community. The legal attaché role within the FBI is a simple liason office role, and there's been engagement with Bureau legal attachés for a long time.' He says there are New Zealand police liaison agents in other countries around the world, and that's usually a quid-pro-quo situation. The difference now is that where the legal attaché in Canberra used to be responsible for New Zealand, that person is now in Wellington. 'One perhaps can speculate that particular role for the Canberra Legat office has got quite big now and the business that needs to be discussed has expanded to the point where the Bureau, and Wellington, feel the need for a permanent presence in Wellington,' says Ball. He says cooperation between various international law enforcement agencies has increased in the past five to 10 years, particularly between the United States, Australia and New Zealand. 'Things are picking up to the point where there's benefit in a permanent presence in Wellington.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Scoop
24-07-2025
- Scoop
U.S. Court Agrees Trump Administration's ICC Sanctions Likely Violate First Amendment Rights Of Fortify Rights CEO
(Bangkok, July 23, 2025)—A U.S. federal court last week granted a preliminary injunction in Smith v. Trump, a lawsuit brought by Fortify Rights CEO Matthew Smith and human rights advocate Akila Radhakrishnan challenging the Trump administration's executive order imposing sanctions on officials of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and banning advocates from communicating with the ICC under threat of criminal prosecution. The court issued the order on July 17 and concluded that the advocates were likely to succeed on their claim that the speech restrictions imposed on them by the executive order violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to freedom of speech. The preliminary injunction prohibits the administration from punishing the two advocates for their work related to the ICC while the litigation is pending. 'I'm grateful the court recognized the serious threat this executive order against the ICC poses to fundamental freedoms and to our ability to pursue accountability for mass atrocity crimes,' said Matthew Smith. 'This case is not only about our rights — it's about safeguarding the space for all human rights defenders to advocate for justice, speak truth to power, and demand international accountability without fear of reprisal.' Both Smith and Radhakrishnan are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)—a leading American organization that defends and promotes individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. As the lawsuit explains, the sanctions violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by prohibiting Smith, Radhakrishnan, and other Americans like them from speaking with the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor, including by providing legal advice, expert analysis, and evidence. 'Preventing our clients and others like them from doing critical human rights work with the ICC is unconstitutional, and we're heartened that the court saw that as well,' said Charlie Hogle, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project. 'The First Amendment does not allow the government to impose sweeping limits on what Americans can say and who they can say it to.' Under the executive order, people in the U.S. who have devoted their lives to seeking justice for the victims of atrocities — like the genocide of Myanmar's Rohingya people, or gender-based violence committed against Afghan women under the Taliban — could face stiff penalties simply for exercising their constitutional right to engage and advocate with ICC investigators and prosecutors. The international community, including the United States, established the ICC in 1998 to help maintain international peace and security. The ICC investigates and prosecutes crimes of the severest magnitude — including genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes — when domestic courts are unwilling or unable to do so. Today, 125 countries have joined the ICC's founding treaty, known as the Rome Statute. As the lawsuit explains, although the United States has not ratified the Rome Statute, it has supported the ICC's critical work on a wide range of matters. 'Fighting this order isn't only a defense of the work I do, or the court itself,' wrote Matthew Smith in an op-ed published June 6 in the New York Times. 'It's also a statement about what kind of country we want to be.' On Friday last week, the New York Times referred to the court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction 'a striking, if tentative, blow to the president's efforts to penalize and isolate the world's highest criminal court.' For more information about the lawsuit, please see the ACLU's webpage devoted to Smith v. Trump.
NZ Herald
17-07-2025
- NZ Herald
NZ sharemarket closes up more than 1% as heavyweight stocks rally
'Even though Trump sent a letter to Mexico, it won't affect goods that are compliant with the USMCA [United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement]. So there's still a feeling that Fisher & Paykel will be compliant and exempt,' Smith said. 'I suppose after the initial concern around those letters that were sent on the weekend, the market has gained some poise and become a bit more relaxed about the situation overall.' Fisher & Paykel Healthcare rose 76c to $36.75 after 333,220 shares changed hands to the value of $12,182,093.91. Infratil also had a positive day, with its share price rising to $11.38, with $11,103,102.81 worth of shares changing hands. Elsewhere, Auckland Airport said the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) had provided an update to those who made submissions on its recent request for viewpoints on the effectiveness of the economic regulation of airport services. In its findings, MBIE advised that at this time, it is not considering legislative change. 'A bit of relief around the fact that regulatory oversight is now a non-issue, and it was now off the table,' Smith said. Auckland Airport shares subsequently rallied 4.36% to $7.78, with 1,363,985 shares changing hands to the value of $10,580,401.99. Meanwhile, a2 Milk's share price also climbed, rising 4.81% to $8.28 after $4,056,430.72 worth of shares were traded. 'The Chinese infant milk market is shrinking, but the reality is a2 has been taking market share, and I suppose there's some optimism that the result in mid-August will be a good one,' Smith said. Wall Street stocks finished higher on Wednesday local time, shrugging off a mid-session swoon after US President Donald Trump denied he was planning to fire Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell. Major indices had moved suddenly negative after reports that a dismissal could be imminent. They recovered quickly when Trump ruled out firing Powell, for now. Trump, who has bitterly attacked the Fed chairman for months, said such a move was 'highly unlikely' and that 'I'm not talking about that' when asked if he would fire Powell. The tech-rich Nasdaq Composite index advanced 0.3% to 20,730.49, a third straight closing record. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.5% to 44,254.78, while the broad-based S&P 500 advanced 0.3% to 6,263.70. 'It's very clear that the market wants to go higher,' said Adam Sarhan of 50 Park Investments, who described investor reaction to Trump's mixed messaging on Powell as typical of a bullish tilt. 'Every time we get bad news thrown at it, the market shrugs it off and continues to rally, including today,' Sarhan said. – Additional reporting AFP Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.
