
Public urged to back ban on destructive fishing in protected areas
A consultation is being run by the Marine Management Organisation until September 1, which includes bans on bottom trawling in 41 offshore marine protected areas (MPAs) that have been designated thanks to the importance of their seabeds, in moves to better protect 30,000 square kilometres of sea.
The call from The Wildlife Trusts to support the bans comes as polling for the charities reveals that eight out of 10 people agree that marine wildlife should be treated with the same care as species on land.
The survey of more than 2,000 people by Savanta also revealed that many people did not realise bottom trawling could still take place in many protected areas – with more than a third (36%) believing an MPA designation meant all wildlife and seabeds are protected from damaging activities.
Daniele Clifford, marine conservation officer for The Wildlife Trusts, said the UK's seas were full of 'incredible marine life', with habitats from cold-water corals to sandbanks, muds and chalk reefs supporting species from fish to whales, and storing huge amounts of carbon.
But much of that marine life is threatened, facing pressures such as destructive fishing practices.
Putting in marine protected areas was a 'tried and tested' method to help nature's recovery, but while many had been designated in British waters, they were not doing well because they were still being affected by pressures such as bottom trawling, she said.
The fishing method can destroy the habitat on the seabed, and the nets 'literally sweep up everything in their path', Ms Clifford said, creating a huge amount of bycatch, besides the one or two species targeted, which is then thrown back.
'If land-based nature reserves were being bulldozed, there would be an outcry.
'And yet bottom trawling has been going on for many years in these MPAs. It's about time proper management was implemented,' she said.
'We know that when you reduce pressures on marine life, it helps support their recovery. It's possible to recover our seas, we just need to remove those pressures.'
Unlike on land where active management may be required to help habitats and species recover, seas are more able to bounce back on their own if those pressures are removed, Ms Clifford said.
'You allow nature to do its thing and recover naturally.
'The benefit of this measure is our seas will recover – and we know people want healthy seas,' she said, adding restoring wildlife in MPAs had benefits for wider ocean health and fish stocks.
Where bans have already been implemented in inshore MPAs, Ms Clifford said there were 'astonishingly' signs of recovery quite quickly, pointing to cold-water corals starting to recover within two to three years of restrictions in Lyme Bay, on the south coast, along with increases in scallops and lobsters.
And off the coast of Sussex, largely vanished kelp beds are being helped to recover in a major marine rewilding project thanks to restrictions on bottom trawling introduced in 2021.
The kelp was hit by stormy conditions in the 1980s and bottom trawling, leaving only 4% of the habitat remaining, affecting both an array of wildlife using it for shelter and food, and society which benefits from its role in reducing storm impacts and supporting fish stocks.
The habitat's restoration is 'a long process,' according to George Short, kelp recovery co-ordinator for Sussex Wildlife Trust, one of the partners in the Sussex Kelp Recovery Project.
'One of the key things about our work is letting nature lead in its own recovery.
'It's been impacted for decades, it's not an overnight recovery,' she said.
But nearly five years into the project, monitoring shows mussel beds – which form the hard bed on the seabed that kelp grows on – are starting to recover, as are the black sea bream once targeted by the trawling, she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Knowledge of tartans' origins vital to grasp our history
Not so much today, but not too many years ago, I was a re-enactor of historical periods. Initially, when I lived in England, reenacting the English civil wars between 1646 to 1651. A few years before I migrated to Scotland, I met up with the Scottish contingent of that period which eventually led me to jump a hundred years into 1745 to 1746. The last Jacobite period if you will. In each period, anyone and everyone had to be perfectly correct in what clothing we wore, what armaments we used, and if we partook in living history camping, then what domestic utensils, bedding and container chests were used. Men, women and children of all ages. In order to succeed in this important aspect, England had a living history market twice a year where ready-made equipment could be purchased from experts in their field or, the correct material could also be purchased to create your own wardrobe etc. READ MORE: Scottish Labour councillor suspended for 'bullying' member of the public The point of all this is that historical knowledge was the backbone necessary to, not only wear the correct garb, but to have learned about its origins. Such as with the material for the great kilt of the 18th century. Reading was obviously the necessary source for information and from various sources of authoritative writers. For myself, I learnt that with clans, regardless of which glen they dwelt, most had a local wool spinner and weaver. The colour used in dying the wool came from natural source as in vegetation or crushed stone. This was more or less the origin of how different clans, no matter how related to each other, had their variations of so-called colour and weave of wool into the criss-cross pattern we associate as tartan. Homemade dyes would been quiet pale in some cases. I tried it myself using onion and carrot. The weave would also have been varied according to the choice of the weaver. I expect there might be contradiction to my resourced information, but there was a general consensus amongst us re-enactors, wherever we came from, during discussions about our hobby around the evening campfires. Ideas were shared and information appreciated. Alan Magnus-Bennett Fife THE letter by Gordon Ian MacLeod in the Sunday National (July 27) referencing John McGrath's great play, brought to mind a recent article in the Daily Mail regarding an ongoing case at the Court of Session where the parties in dispute are a wealthy (non-Scottish) landowner and a large energy company (also non-Scottish). The dispute concerned constraint payments – credits given to energy companies to turn off wind turbines when either the demand for electricity is low or the grid cannot get the electricity to where it can be used. Remarkably it turns out that these credits can be traded between energy companies and the landowner obviously wanted his cut of what was produced on his land – despite it being non-existent! Is there a playwright out there who can give us 'The cheviot, the stag and the imaginary electricity' for 2025? The lessons from the original play have obviously not yet cut through. R Millar Darvel NOW that I am no longer a member of the SNP and my once treasured badge of honour, my plastic membership card, has been cut up and awaits recycling, I can't help but think that it is perhaps ironic that it took Mhairi Black to spur me into doing something I should have done a long time earlier. It will not matter to the SNP that another member has left because they don't listen to us anyway! That is a sad indication of the state of play for all us independence supporters. At least I got a good laugh when two plonkers had a chat on Monday. As the president of the free world ranted that he didn't like all sorts of people and other stuff, including windmills and the Labour mayor of London, perhaps the Prime Minister should have told the president that windmills were very, very important because they sent power to England from Scotland down south so that the poor Scots could be charged exorbitant prices to buy it back! He could also have told the president, who said that he wanted Scotland to thrive, that he, the UK Prime Minister, would never ever allow that to happen as England would be screwed if Scotland were to become independent. It is nauseating to say the least watching people letting themselves be humiliated by a convicted felon posing as some sort of messiah. I might not be a member of the SNP anymore but I am still a proud Scot. As such I have to say that I think we are better than all this. Old John Ayrshire


BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
New collection tells story of love at Doncaster stately home
As the clouds of war gathered over Europe, a "below stairs" love story was beginning at a country servants at Brodsworth Hall, near Doncaster, bonded over an interest in photography and married in maid Caroline Palmer was warned that her love for valet Alf Edwards was likely to end in early widowhood, but the pair had two sons during a union that lasted three the house's owners, English Heritage, have been gifted a treasure trove of photographs, letters and documents about their life together after they were donated by the couple's grandson. Caroline went into service at Brodsworth, the seat of the Thellusson family, in 1906, leaving her home in Northamptonshire. Seven years later Alf moved from London to take up a post as estate owner Charles Thellusson's personal met when Alf began to use the hall's kitchens as a makeshift studio in which to develop photographs he had taken. Many were scenes of life on the estate and the large number of staff who worked there at the poor health meant he was unable to join the forces when war broke out in 1914, and Caroline was cautioned that their marriage could be a short one. They had their wedding in 1916, by which time Caroline had become cook at the house, although she had to leave her position as a married other male servants left for the war, Alf took on other duties, including taking charge of the estate's shoots and gunroom and acting as sons John and Harold were born before Alf died from tuberculosis in 1919. Despite being servants, the couple were liked and respected by the Thellussons - Charles, who died in the same year, was John's godfather and his wife Constance wrote a letter consoling Caroline when both were widowed. After Alf's death, Caroline returned to Northamptonshire with some financial help from the Thellussons towards her sons' struck again when John died aged 15 from an infected insect bite. Caroline became a cook in one of the boarding houses at Oundle School, and in later life moved in with her younger son Harold and his wife. They recorded many of her memories in note form before her death in 1968. Her grandson, Gordon Edwards, contacted English Heritage to offer them the collection of items telling the story of Alf and Caroline's lives at Brodsworth said: "We're so pleased to be able to donate these objects so they can continue to be cared for, shared with the public, and help to tell the important stories of those people below stairs who lived and worked at Brodsworth Hall."Eleanor Matthews, English Heritage's curator of collections and interiors, said it was extremely rare to have a collection relating to the lives of servants survive."Alf's photographs are incredibly important to the history of the site and have provided us with the earliest image of staff at the estate - hopefully in time we will be able identify them all. "These beautiful, poignant items tell a story largely unknown to us until now and, thanks to this donation, we are able to add another layer of understanding to the rich fabric of Brodsworth's history."While the bulk of the collection is being catalogued, a number of items have gone on public display at the hall, including Alf's camera, pipes, wartime registration cards, postcards, and Caroline's watch. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North


Fashion United
7 hours ago
- Fashion United
EFSA recommends cage-free fur farming for improved animal welfare
Paris - The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) issued a scientific opinion on Wednesday recommending abandoning the cage system to improve the welfare of fur animals on farms. The EFSA suggests opting for a system of "enclosures that offer more space and stimulation" to mink or red foxes. This opinion was requested by the European Commission as part of its response to a petition requesting the end of the fur industry. The petition was submitted in 2023 after gathering one and a half million signatures. At the time, Mark Oaten, chief executive officer of the International Fur Federation, said he was open to "a scientific review of fur farms". He specified that an outright ban would cost thousands of jobs for an industry that represents 18 billion dollars worldwide. The EFSA gathered studies on five species (mink, red fox and arctic fox, raccoon dog, chinchilla). This also included site visits, hearings and calls for contributions to identify the points that harm the welfare of these animals and the means to remedy them. "For all five species, the most relevant points concern the size and layout of the cages. These restrict movement and prevent the animals from foraging. They can also lead to sensory under-stimulation or over-stimulation (for example, if there is no shelter allowing the animal to isolate itself if necessary)", the health authority said in the preamble. Mink raised in groups can, for example, inflict injuries on each other. The EFSA recommends isolating them after a certain age and separating males and females beforehand. Red foxes and raccoon dogs would benefit from a change in cage flooring and more space to reduce paw problems. Chinchillas suffer from the impossibility of hiding when a human, a source of stress, is nearby. The authority recommends adding a shelter. It adds that most of the points identified cannot be improved under the "current production system because the limited size of the cages prevents the addition" of equipment. Improvements related to food are possible, however, for example by giving chew bones to foxes or hay to chinchillas. The authority highlights the lack of information on possible alternatives to cages since this system is widespread in fur animal production. Around 20 European countries have already banned fur farming, including about 15 EU members. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@