
CBI names three Andhra Pradesh men in NMC scandal
The investigation further revealed that Dr Virendra Kumar, another accused, coordinated operations in southern India through Dr Hari Prasad, Dr Krishna Kishore, and Dr Ankam Rambabu of Hyderabad. Posing as a consultant, Virendra Kumar arranged dummy faculty for inspections and facilitated Letters of Renewal and other NMC approvals in return for bribes.
The CBI found that Venkat, Director of Gayatri Medical College, paid Rs 25 lakh to ensure a favourable decision on a pending matter with the NMC. A portion of this bribe was reportedly routed to Dr Virendra Kumar in Delhi through hawala transactions. Sources said Dr Hari Prasad and Dr Ankam Rambabu jointly oversaw regulatory matters for Father Colombo Institute of Medical Sciences in Warangal. Raids held across multiple locations.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
22 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
National Herald Case: Sonia Gandhi Calls ED Charges 'Unprecedented' in PMLA Hearing
Money laundering case sans any property or projection of it: Sonia Gandhi argues in National Herald case The case pertains to money laundering charges over the fraudulent takeover of properties valued over Rs 2,000 crore belonging to the Associated Journals Limited, which published National Herald. PTI Last Updated : 04 July 2025, 12:33 IST ADVERTISEMENT Follow Us :


Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
NIA arrests key accused in Praveen Nettaru murder case on his arrival from Qatar
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Friday arrested a key accused in the murder of Praveen Nettaru, a Karnataka BJP Yuva Morcha leader, upon his arrival at Kerala's Kannur International Airport from Qatar. The arrested, identified as Abdul Rahaman, had been absconding for the past two years after Nettaru was hacked to death with sharp weapons by members of the Popular Front of India (PFI), a proscribed outfit, on July 26, 2022, in the Dakshina Kannada district. Investigations had revealed that Abdul Rahaman had, on the directions of PFI leadership, voluntarily harboured the main assailants and others involved in the case. Rahaman, who carried a reward of Rs 4 lakh, had fled to Qatar after the attackers were arrested. After Rahaman's arrest, NIA said on Friday, 'The killing was part of a larger conspiracy aimed at striking terror among the people and unleashing communal hatred and unrest in the society.' The NIA, in April, chargedheeted four accused, including Rahaman, in the murder case, taking the total number of charge-sheeted people to 28. Six accused in the case had gone into hiding, prompting the Central agency to declare rewards to those providing information on the absconders. In January, NIA announced the arrest of Ateeq Ahmed, a key accused in the case. According to the agency, Ahmed had under the PFI leadership's guidance harboured and assisted Mustafa Paichar, identified as the chief conspirator in the case. Ahmed is the 21st accused to be arrested in the case. Paichar had planned and executed Nettaru's murder at Bellare, which was carried out as part of PFI's agenda to instigate communal unrest among people, said the NIA that took over the case from Karnataka Police in August 2022. Investigations revealed that PFI had formed secret teams called 'PFI Service Teams' or 'Killer Squads' to carry out targeted killings, the agency stated in its initial chargesheet.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Money laundering case: Delhi HC order rejects actor Jacqueline Fernandez 'pick and choose' claim
The Delhi High Court dismissed Jacqueline Fernandez's plea to quash an FIR against her in a Rs 200 crore money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The court rejected her argument of the ED's "pick and choose" policy regarding other actors who received gifts from Chandrasekhar. The court clarified that parity considerations apply to bail proceedings, not to quashing an FIR. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Delhi High Court in its order rejected Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez 's argument that the ED adopted a "pick and choose" policy and did not proceed against other similarly-placed actors in a money laundering case Fernandez was referring to television celebrities Nikki Tamboli , Chahatt Khanna and Sophia Singh Justice Anish Dayal on July 3 dismissed her plea for quashing an FIR against her in a Rs 200 crore money laundering case also involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar The actor argued that the probe agency did not proceed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against other actors who too received gifts and articles from order underlined the consideration of parity during bail proceedings and said the argument couldn't be applied during quashing an FIR as it would completely erase the ECIR against the accused petitioner."Whether the investigating agency chose a pick and choose policy or decided not to proceed against the others, based on the merits of the case, is not an issue under consideration before this court; petitioner is always at liberty to raise this issue at an appropriate stage," the court's 95-page verdict court continued, "The petition and plea of petitioner cannot be entertained for quashing of the ECIR dated August 8, 2021 and 2nd supplementary complaint dated August 17, 2022. The petition is, therefore, dismissed."Besides other grounds, Fernandez claimed the other actors met Chandrasekhar inside Tihar jail where he was lodged and also received gifts from further said a relative of actor Nora Fatehi received a luxury car from Chandrasekhar."Despite this, these individuals have not been arrayed as accused persons by the ED, despite having first-hand knowledge of Sukesh Chandrasekhar being in prison. This disparate treatment has been presented as yet another argument and a ground for quashing the ECIR," Fernandez' plea counsel, opposing the plea argued the actor did not refute the allegations of having received gifts worth Rs 7.12 crore from Chandrasekhar and gifts worth Rs 1.12 crore were delivered to her sister in Sri are allegations of receiving proceeds of crime and retaining them, and these are sufficient to attract money laundering proceedings, he high court referred to verdicts cited by the actor and said they were over the grant of regular bail in PMLA cases and not for quashing the ECIR (FIR)."The issue of parity may be an aspect which the court does consider while granting bail, however, the same cannot by extension or extrapolation, be made applicable to a case of quashing, which would erase the ECIR qua the accused petitioner, completely," it is an accused in the money laundering case lodged against Chandrasekhar and had appeared before the ED for questioning in the Police had booked Chandrasekhar for allegedly duping the spouses of former promoters of Ranbaxy, Shivinder Singh and Malvinder Singh of Rs 200 are other ongoing investigations against him in several cases across the and his wife Leena Paulose, facing proceedings in a money laundering case of the ED, were arrested by Delhi Police along with police invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) in the and Chandrasekhar were alleged to have used hawala routes and created shell companies along with other accused persons to park the money earned as proceeds of crime.