Why Reddit Stock Got Hammered on Wednesday
An analyst tracking the stock made a double-digit cut to his price target.
He also left his rather lukewarm "neutral" recommendation unchanged.
10 stocks we like better than Reddit ›
One of the more up-and-coming social media stocks in recent times, Reddit (NYSE: RDDT), went down quite a bit on Wednesday. Investors traded assertively out of the stock following an analyst's price-target cut, to the point where it closed the day more than 9% in the red. That was a far steeper fall than the S&P 500 index's 1.6% decline.
That pundit was Baird's Colin Sebastian, and before market open he changed his Reddit fair-value assessment to $120 per share, well down from his previous $140. Despite the double-digit adjustment, he left his "neutral" recommendation on the shares unchanged.
The analyst's move, according to reports, was largely due to concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities being harnessed by tech titans such as Alphabet. Not long ago, that company's core Google unit rolled out AI responses to standard search queries, and it plans to continue beefing up its AI enhancements.
To Sebastian, this is a threat to Reddit's user growth, as it can obviate the need for discussion with other users -- the bread and butter of Reddit's business -- in order to obtain an answer. Mitigating this to a degree, the pundit wrote, is a data-licensing agreement in place between Reddit and Google.
While that's a legitimate source of concern for Reddit investors, I don't feel it's quite a deal-breaker. We still have quite a distance to go before AI functionalities can even come close to mimicking genuine and organic human reactions, so Reddit's forum-style presentation should continue to be popular.
It should also keep attracting new users, adding to Reddit's base -- and providing a foundation for more double-digit percentage growth in fundamentals like revenue and profitability.
Before you buy stock in Reddit, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Reddit wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $642,582!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $829,879!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 975% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Why Reddit Stock Got Hammered on Wednesday was originally published by The Motley Fool

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
The biggest risk to valuations is what happens to 10-year rates, says Barclays' Venu Krishna
Venu Krishna, Barclays head of U.S. Equity Strategy, joins 'The Exchange' to discuss Barclays lifting it S&P target to 6,050.


CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
Health care stocks are due for a turnaround after a historically bad month, according to the charts
The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) was down over 5% in May, as the S & P 500 gained over 6%, which means that XLV underperformed the index by 11%. That's a huge performance discrepancy. In fact, it was the worst relative monthly percent move vs. the SPX in XLV's history, dating back to late 1998. As is clear from this long-term chart, the odds of this horribly bad relative weakness continuing at this same pace is low – at least for June. XLV itself now has approached two major long-term support levels after the recent downturn. The first is the rising trendline that begins at the 2009 financial crisis low and extends through the Covid bottom. XLV tested this line in mid-May, bounced and finished the month modestly off its lows. The second key support zone comes from the cluster of lows in 2021, 2022 and 2023, noted by the horizontal line that's in the low 120s. The converging lines present a confluence of support that clearly could help XLV's bouncing prospects in June. XLV: The 3 biggest holdings Believe it or not, 34 of XLV's 61 components actually logged gains in May. That's encouraging, but we'll need to see its biggest holdings respond soon. If they can't rally, XLV will continue to struggle. The three largest stocks within the ETF are Eli Lilly , Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie , which make up nearly 27% of XLV combined. So, what are the odds that all three stocks actually can mount strong up-moves in June? Let's take a closer look. We'll start with LLY since it's XLV's biggest component, with a 12% weighting. LLY last made an all-time high in August 2024. From that peak to its April low, the stock lost 30%. But as the following weekly chart (in log scale) shows, it wasn't straight down from there. LLY logged various rallies and drawdowns since then, all of which have taken place within the pictured downward sloping trading channel. The best time to buy LLY, thus, has been after a big, long decline. The stock just fell another 20% from April 30 through May 25. As we can see, the past ensuing bounces yielded big percentage moves, even if they ultimately failed to break through the channel's upper threshold. Additionally, LLY's weekly Williams %R indicator (on the lower panel) is emerging from an oversold condition, which has supported three of the last four big up-moves. In fact, LLY quietly has logged gains in six of the last seven trading days. That's a good start. JNJ (7.7% weight) has been trending lower since topping in 2022, while ABBV (6.8%) has been in a clear uptrend the last few years. However, both have experienced various swings within their respective long-term trading channels — like LLY. And with both JNJ and ABBV having sold off from their 2025 highs, now would be an opportune time for the next bounce to commence. From a big picture market perspective, rotation is an important component of true, long-lasting uptrends. Thus, if/when the air comes out of the more extended sectors and groups soon, capital could find its way to the underperforming areas, which of course, includes health care. DISCLOSURES: None. All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI-driven search ad spending set to surge to $26 billion by 2029, data shows
By Jaspreet Singh (Reuters) -Spending on AI-powered search advertising is poised to surge to nearly $26 billion by 2029 from just over $1 billion this year in the U.S., driven by rapid adoption of the technology and more sophisticated user targeting, data from Emarketer showed on Wednesday. Companies that rely on traditional keyword-based search ads could experience revenue declines due to the growing popularity of AI search ads, which offer greater convenience and engagement for users, according to the research firm. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Search giants such as Alphabet-owned Google and Microsoft's Bing have added AI capabilities to better compete with chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Perplexity AI, which provide users with direct information without requiring to click through multiple results. Apple is exploring the integration of AI-driven search capabilities into its Safari browser, potentially moving away from its longstanding partnership with Google. The report has come as concerns grew about users increasingly turning to the chatbots for conversational search and AI-powered search results could upend business models of some companies. Online education firm Chegg said in May that it would lay off about 248 employees as it looks to cut costs and streamline operations because students are using AI-powered tools including ChatGPT over traditional edtech platforms. QUOTE "Publishers and other sites are feeling the pain from AI search. As they lose out on traffic, we're seeing publishers lean into subscriptions and paid AI licensing deals to bolster revenue," Emarketer analyst Minda Smiley said. GRAPHIC CONTEXT AI search ad spending is expected to constitute nearly 1% of total search ad spending this year and 13.6% by 2029 in the U.S., according to Emarketer. Sectors such as financial services, technology, telecom, and healthcare are embracing AI as they are seeing clear advantages in using the technology to enhance their ad strategies, while the retail industry's adoption is slow, the report said. Google recently announced the expansion of its AI-powered search capabilities into the consumer packaged goods sector through enhancements in Google Shopping. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data