logo
Philips Hue vs IKEA smart lights: I made my choice, and I don't regret it

Philips Hue vs IKEA smart lights: I made my choice, and I don't regret it

Mitja Rutnik / Android Authority
I recently moved into a brand-new apartment and decided to install smart lights throughout all of the rooms. The first step was deciding which system to use, and Philips Hue immediately came to mind.
I took a look and liked what I saw. The reviews were great as well, but a few issues held me back, ultimately nudging me toward IKEA's system. Now that everything is more or less set up, I can honestly say I don't regret it – here's why.
Which smart lighting system do you prefer?
0 votes
Philips'
NaN %
IKEA's
NaN %
Neither (share more in the comments)
NaN %
Price is king
Mitja Rutnik / Android Authority
My move was expensive. Real estate is far from cheap in my part of the world, not to mention the furniture, which costs a pretty penny. So I had to save money somewhere, and my smart lighting system was it.
All I really wanted was the ability to dim lights, change colors, and set up a schedule so specific lights turn on when I need them. For example, I like it when my night lamp next to my bed turns on when my alarm goes off in the morning. It reduces the chance of me hitting the snooze button and oversleeping.
I planned things out and decided I needed a few LED ceiling lights throughout my apartment, spotlights with LED bulbs, a couple of floor lamps, and an LED strip for use in a few different places. Then there are remotes for specific lights, as well as buttons that I can press to turn on multiple lights simultaneously and create a scene, as it's called.
While I could get everything done with Philips' Hue lighting system, I figured out that the same was true with IKEA's offering. The Swedish furniture giant has everything I needed in its lineup, and for a lot less money.
When I added up the numbers, going with the Philips Hue system would cost me hundreds and hundreds of dollars more. That wasn't something I was willing to pay, considering IKEA's product offering fulfilled most of my wants.
Then there's simplicity
I like simplicity, and IKEA just wins in this department. First off, all the products on offer can be found in one place, which is just about any IKEA store. All their products have a very simple, basic design, which I love since the overall theme of my apartment design is Scandinavian minimalism.
I love the convenience and knowing that I can return anything without explaining myself for 20 minutes.
Then there are returns and warranties. If anything should happen and I need to return or repair an item, IKEA's hassle-free return policy just keeps me coming back and buying more. I love the convenience and knowing that I can return anything without explaining myself for 20 minutes.
The situation with the Philips Hue system is a bit different. Different stores stock different products in my area, and I wasn't able to find everything I needed at just one retailer. And while a lot of their products are simple, there are plenty of extravagantly-designed ones that I just wanted to avoid.
Return policies also differed from retailer to retailer in my area, adding another layer of complexity to my already stressed-out mind that was trying to focus on work, my social life, and my real estate project.
It just works
Mitja Rutnik / Android Authority
I've had nothing but a great experience with my smart home lighting so far. It just works. No issues whatsoever. I was a bit skeptical since the pricing is so much more affordable, so I assumed I might run into an issue. Granted, it's only been a few weeks since the installation, but I'm very happy with my purchase so far, even though I'm not completely done with everything.
Setting everything up is easy as pie thanks to the app. You just connect the remote to the app and then match it with specific lights and bulbs of choice. There's a limit of ten lights per remote, which is good enough for me.
In addition to dimming lights and changing colors, I can also connect multiple ones together and control them at the same time. The app I had to download for this is very simple and easy to use, so you don't need to be a rocket scientist to get this done. I also needed the IKEA Dirigera hub, which is just as easy to set up.
I don't regret it, but…
I definitely don't regret my decision to use IKEA's smart lighting products, but I'm not saying they are better than what Philips offers. I am saying they provide more value for me, though.
I think I would be just as happy with the Philips Hue system if I had installed it, and it's even a better option for a lot of people. Philips offers more products, some of which have various designs that may be better suited for your home interior — not everyone is into minimalism like I am. I also think Philips works just as well and is just as simple to install as IKEA's system, so no differences there — although tell me if you had issues in the comments.
However, for my personal needs and the simplicity of getting everything in one place, it seemed silly to pay so much extra money for more or less the same outcome. So my advice is: go with Philips if you care about those fancy designs and don't mind paying more, but give IKEA a try if its lineup offers everything you need. I know the Swedish giant has a bad reputation for quality at times, but their lighting system is a good one in my experience.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These two apps finally fixed my creative workflow
These two apps finally fixed my creative workflow

Android Authority

time2 hours ago

  • Android Authority

These two apps finally fixed my creative workflow

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority For years, Notion has been my go-to for organizing everything from invoices to movie watchlists. Its flexibility as a database is unmatched, but when it came to creative workflows like jotting down spontaneous ideas, threading together thoughts, and collecting visual inspiration, that's where Notion starts to feel a bit rigid. I needed something that didn't ask me to file every passing idea into a system the moment it showed up. That's just not how a creative flow works. At least not for me. I needed a tool that didn't ask every idea to fit into a system the moment it showed up. I know, I know. Obsidian is the usual answer here with its unending customisation and the famed graph view. But I wanted something cloud-first. So I began looking for a tool that could complement, if not replace, what Notion already does so well. That's how I found myself bouncing between Notion and Capacities for the better part of a year. Like most people trying to organize their digital life, I started with one, flirted with the other, then went back and forth until I realized something simple: these two tools aren't competing. They're completing each other. Here's why building a system that uses both apps works so well for me. Capacities is where I think, Notion is where I act Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority The trick, as always, wasn't picking a side at the get-go. It was figuring out what each tool is actually good at — and then staying out of their way. That realization changed how I approached both tools. For example, I stopped using Notion as a space for unstructured notes. Not because it can't do that, but because it never felt natural. You can create endless pages and subpages, sure. You can embed anything you want. But that multi-page hierarchy quickly spirals out of control. I was using Notion to catalog interesting places in cities I want to visit, and over time, that structure became a maze — multiple layers deep, hard to navigate, and harder to maintain. Notion thrives when there's structure and purpose. It's where I build systems that are borderline automatic in execution. Capacities works best when there's none. It's where I think. The moment I stopped trying to force one app to do it all, things clicked, and I could move between them without friction, letting each tool handle what it's built for instead of bending it into something it's not. Capacities doesn't ask you to polish your thoughts before capturing them. It's not just a user interface issue. It's a mindset issue. Notion forces you establish tables, databases and more the moment you decide to enter in some data. This makes me feel like every idea needs a home before it even exists. That pressure to organize too early kills my creative flow and inhibits how much I use Notion. I might have the ideas, but the environment doesn't feel right. You wouldn't want to work in Google Sheets for capturing ideas. Notion's rigidity has the same effect. Capacities flips that dynamic. You don't start with a table or a template — you start with an object. Notes, images, bookmarks, and files are all loosely organized by type and stitched together with backlinks. It's closer to how Obsidian works and feels more like a living network than a rigid notebook. That one shift changes everything. I don't worry about where a thought belongs. I just capture it, drop in a few tags, and move on. I'll clean it up later. Or not. A place to gather ideas without having to polish them first Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority When I'm in creative mode doing anything from writing to outlining something vague, my go-to app is Capacities. If I'm collecting screenshots, reference visuals, creating to-do notes or compiling quotes across multiple articles, it all goes there, easily cross-referenced by Capacities' take on a graph view. I can write half a thought, leave it for a week, and come back to find it already connected to three other ideas I forgot I had. That's not just good design. That's momentum. And it is critical in allowing me to jump back into work and be in a creative space almost immediately. Trying to think in Notion can feel like brainstorming in a spreadsheet. At the risk of sounding loquacious, Capacities offers an environment that invites exploration. This includes the way Capacities treats images which can be inline, full-bleed, or tied to objects allowing you to effectively turn it into a gallery, not just a document. That might seem like a small thing, but when you're spending hours sketching outlines or piecing together visual references, it adds up. You're not just writing. You're effectively building an interconnected web of ideas — something I've struggled with in Notion. Apple's wildly different FreeForm tool offers the closest, but not quite the same, experience. On the other hand, Notion doesn't work like that. It's structured. Precise. Sometimes a little too precise. But that's exactly why it works so well for everything else. Notion is still where my life lives Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Capacities may be better for thinking, but Notion still runs the day-to-day. This is where I track invoices, update my reading list, monitor freelance projects, and check off recurring tasks. When I know what I'm tracking — things like client deliverables, brand campaigns, editorial calendars — Notion is unbeatable. I can build databases with views and filters, connect them with automation, and set up reminders that actually help. It's purpose-built for that kind of work. Tools like Notion Forms make it a killer home for long-term data, and on-the-fly additions. Unlike Capacities, Notion offers a kind of safety in knowing that everything has a place. If I log something today, I'll know exactly where to find it three weeks later. It also makes it incredibly easy to add data on the go. When I want to add something quickly like, say, a new restaurant I've spotted on Instagram, I use a Notion Form I set up to log key details straight into my food database. Name, location, cuisine, tags, and that's it. The form is saved as a bookmark on my phone's homepage and lets me accomplish the task in seconds. That's the kind of frictionless utility Notion excels at. I've tried doing that inside Capacities, and while there is a table view, it still feels like an afterthought. It's not really built for structured data entry, nor is it very good at making sense of large volumes of data. They solve different problems — so stop comparing them Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority The biggest mistake is thinking these two tools are solving the same problem. They're not. They both let you write, collect, embed, and organize. But what they do with those abilities is totally different. Capacities is designed for creativity and knowledge exploration. Similar to Obsidian, everything in its interface is nudging you to connect ideas through backlinks, nested objects, graph views. It's less of a productivity tool and more of a creative studio. When I'm not quite sure what I'm working on, but I know I want to chase an idea, Capacities gives me the room to do that. Notion, on the other hand, is more like a traditional work tool. It doesn't ask you to explore. It asks you to decide, define, and commit. And that matters because how we feel when using these tools often dictates whether we use them at all. While it is certainly possible to use either of these tools exclusively, Notion's structured approach to data types makes it feel like a chore. In fact, I've tried to commit to Notion several times, but every single time it felt I was underusing it because my notes were messy or incomplete. But that wasn't a Notion problem. That was a mismatch. Once I gave that role to Capacities instead, Notion stopped feeling like a burden and started being useful again. The takeaway There's no straight-up winner here. Capacities helped me get comfortable with a messy workflow again. It gave me back the ability to think in fragments and collect ideas without committing. It's a tool for planning and for users still getting used to the idea of knowledge management. In fact, I'd say it's the perfect PKM tool for the first-time user. On the other hand, Notion helps me make order out of chaos. It's the tool I trust to hold the pieces together once I know what they are. Be it large databases of pitches, invoices, things to do, restaurants to check out, Notion is great for that kind of workflow. That said, at the end of the day, both tools taught me to stop looking for the perfect app and start building a better workflow instead. For me, it was a combination of Capacities and Notion.

Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned
Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned

Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned Disputes inside the GOP about parts of Trump's major tax bill threaten approval in the Senate and past compromises reached by the Republican-led House. Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk 'disappointed' with Trump's tax bill Elon Musk told CBS he is 'disappointed' with President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill. Republicans begin debate in the narrowly divided Senate with factions seeking to increase spending cuts or curbing tax breaks, which threaten the compromise needed for approval back in the House. Trump's billionaire adviser Elon Musk complicated the debate by urging lawmakers to kill the bill. Congressional leaders insist approval is still possible despite the fissures in the narrow Republican majorities in each chamber and the unified opposition of Democrats. WASHINGTON – Will President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' go bust? The second-term president's highest-priority legislation is under attack from some Senate Republicans – and from his former billionaire adviser Elon Musk – for costing too much. Complaints are also mounting from Republicans who are opposed to cutting Medicaid health insurance and other popular programs used by many Americans, especially as a way to help pay for tax breaks that would benefit some of the country's highest-income earners. With Republicans holding the slimmest of majorities in both chambers of Congress and with Democrats showing no sign of wanting to help Trump notch a major win to begin his new administration, lawmakers from Trump's own party are sounding apprehensive about threading the needle before their self-imposed July 4 deadline to get something to the president's desk for signature into law. More: Trump and Musk's bromance ends after personal attacks over criticism of tax bill 'We're anxious to get to work on it," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, told reporters earlier in the week as Republicans and Musk started publicly airing their complaints about the effort. Adding to the challenge: Some of the very House GOP members who last month voted in favor of their 1,100-page version of Trump's tax and policy plan started finding faults of their own that they say meant they'd probably have been a 'no' if they had the chance to do it again. Presidents often aim high to start terms Presidents often try in their first year to build on the momentum of their elections to get major legislation approved. For Joe Biden, it was an infrastructure bill. For Barack Obama, it was overhauling healthcare insurance. For George W. Bush, it was overhauling public education. Trump leapt into action in 2025 with an unprecedented pace of executive orders: 157 through May 23. When he turned to legislation, he persuaded Republican congressional leaders to package all his priorities into one bill, rather than splitting taxes and border security into two different bills, to complete the debate in one fell swoop. More: Everything's an 'emergency': How Trump's executive order record pace is testing the courts Lawmakers often shy away from piling too much into one bill because each contentious provision spurs its own opposition. But faced with the prospect of unanimous Democratic opposition, Trump opted for a strategy that focuses on GOP priorities such as tax relief and border security while personally lobbying reluctant Republicans to stay in line. 'Americans have given us a mandate for bold and profound change,' Trump told Congress in a speech March 4. 'I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY,' he added in a social media post about three months later, on June 2. Musk opposition makes waves Trump's efforts worked in the Republican-led House, which after several days of negotiations and an all-night floor debate voted 215-214 in favor of a plan that had the full backing of the White House. Getting the measure through the Senate - even with the GOP in charge needing just a simple majority of 51 votes - is proving to be its own elusive challenge. Musk, the former head of Trump's bureaucracy-slashing Department of Government Efficiency, spent this past week unloading on the House-passed bill for spending too much money. He called the legislation "pork-filled" and a "disgusting abomination," and urged lawmakers to "KILL the BILL." More: The post-fight fallout from Trump-Musk battle could get even uglier While Musk's barrage ignited a war with Trump and left many Republicans cringing, deficit hawks in the GOP said they appreciated the world's richest man also pushing for deeper spending cuts from the U.S. government. "I welcome people like Elon Musk that try to hold our feet to the fire," said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Missouri. "We often disappoint our voters when we don't do the cuts that we campaign on, when we're not fiscally responsible." But Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, who served in the Air Force for 30 years, said the division between Trump and Musk wasn't a good look for his party, especially when it's trying to advance the primary piece of legislation on the president's agenda. "It's just not helpful," Bacon said. "When you have division, divided teams don't perform as well." 'The opposite of conservative': Sen. Paul on bill Several pockets of Republican senators have voiced concerns about the House-passed legislation. Each group has their issue that they want addressed, and each one presents a hurdle for Trump and GOP leaders like Thune as they try to cobble together a winning 51-vote coalition that can also make it back through the House for another final vote. The Senate factions include one group seeking to cut more spending because the Congressional Budget Office said the House-passed plan would add $2.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years. Others are worried about cutting Medicaid, the federal health insurance program for low-income families. And another handful of senators say they are worried about the House-passed bill rolling back renewable energy tax credits for solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear energy. "There are many of us who recognize that what came out of the House was pretty aggressive in how it seeks to wind down or phase out many of the energy tax credit provisions," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska. "I happen to think that we've got tax policies that are working to help advance our energy initiatives around the country, as diverse and as varied as they are. Wouldn't we want to continue those investments? 'This bill is the opposite of conservative, and we should not pass it,' added Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, in a June 4 social media post that raised concerns about the nation's debt limit. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley is one of the outspoken Republicans taking issue with the House-passed bill's provisions that would cut nearly $800 billion during the next decade from Medicaid and, according to the Congressional Budget Office, cost 7.8 million people their health insurance. "I don't want to see rural hospitals close and I don't want to see any benefits cut in my state," Hawley said. Trump and his allies contend spending cuts of $1.6 trillion are the most ever approved in a House bill and that the tax cuts will spur economic growth to offset the costs. Trump got personal this week in calling Paul's ideas 'crazy' in a social media post and said the people of Kentucky 'can't stand him.' More: Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch Trump ally, told reporters June 4 that few people are going to like everything in an 1,100-page bill. But the Louisiana Republican said the measure he helped craft in the House was carefully calibrated to gain wide support. "I hope everybody will evaluate that – in both parties, and everybody – and recognize, 'Wow, the benefits of this far outweigh anything that I don't like out it,'" Johnson said. Senate dropping local tax deductions would be 'radioactive': Rep. Lalota Any changes made by the Senate will force another vote in the House before the bill can become law - and that's where the math can get tricky. Republican senators are talking about tinkering with a key compromise that Trump and Johnson signed off on in the House that raised the federal deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) from $10,000 to $40,000 for people earning less than $500,000 per year. That provision is important to GOP lawmakers from high-tax states such as California, New York and New Jersey who supported the House bill that passed through the 435-seat chamber by only a one-vote margin. More: Senate Republicans plan to amend SALT tax deduction in Trump's sweeping bill The Senate aims to cut back that provision. But Rep. Nick Lalota, R-New York, told reporters on June 4 that revisiting the tax issue "would be like digging up safely-buried radioactive waste." House members scouring through the bill they voted on weeks ago are also finding unfamiliar provisions in the version that they say they would have opposed. For example, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, said in a social media post June 3 that the Senate needs to strip out language she hadn't noticed earlier that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Nebraska, said he opposed a section that aims to hinder federal judges from enforcing their court orders. Trump sought the provision to prevent judges from blocking policies largely spelled out via his executive orders. Senate could drop contentious provisions House members risked supporting Even though Republicans control both chambers of Congress, the Senate could drop or fail to approve contentious parts that GOP House colleagues in competitive districts already went out on a limb to support. It's happened many times before - with sizable political consequences. The concept even has a name: Getting BTU'd. That refers to a 1993 House vote on a controversial energy tax during the first year of Bill Clinton's presidency based on British thermal units. House Democrats lost 54 seats in the 1994 election – and control of the chamber for the first time in 40 years – in part because of supporting the BTU tax that the Senate never debated. John Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College, has said a book about such votes could be called 'Profiles in Futility.' Another example was the 2009 American Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill which Obama supported as president that aimed to limit the emissions of heat-trapping gases from power plants, vehicles and other industrial sources. The Democrat-controlled House narrowly approved the measure 219-212 but the Senate never took it up. Critics said it would raise the cost of energy. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a non-profit libertarian think tank that opposed the measure, counted 28 House Democrats from coal states who lost their seats in the 2010 mid-term election after voting for the bill. Fast forward to 2025 and Republicans are the ones facing a similar dynamic. Musk, who contributed about $290 million of his personal fortune to help Republicans including Trump win last November, slammed House lawmakers who voted for the president's legislative package.'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong,' Musk wrote June 3 on social media. But House Republicans who voted for the legislation, including some who also demanded deeper spending cuts when it was in their hands, said they're not worried about the package falling apart and coming back to haunt them. They say that's because they did fight for more budget cuts. "This wasn't a hard vote. It was hard going through the process to get more, and you can always do better," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-South Carolina. "But look at what Donald Trump's done, the great things that are contributing to cutting the deficit." Rep. David Schweikert, R-Arizona, who represents a competitive toss-up district, noted that he's introduced multiple bills to trim federal spending. "If Mr. Musk wants to be helpful, what he should do is start to understand that those of us in a 50-50 district who have shown up with actual policy solutions that offset every penny of this bill," he said. Leaving Washington for the weekend, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force Once on June 6 that he wasn't worried about Musk and that he remained confident he'd get "tremendous support" in the Senate to pass the bill. 'I don't know of anybody who's going to vote against it," the president said, before adding: "Maybe Rand Paul." For his part, Johnson told reporters June 4 that he wasn't concerned about House Republicans losing seats in 2026. Predicting that the Senate would find the necessary votes on the president's tax bill, the speaker said he expects Americans will see the benefits of Trump's efforts before the next election. 'Am I concerned about the effect of this on the midterms? I'm not," Johnson said. "I have no concern whatsoever. I am absolutely convinced that we are going to win the midterms and grow the House majority because we are delivering for the American majority and fulfilling our campaign promises." Contributing: Reuters

5 AI tools I rely on more than ChatGPT
5 AI tools I rely on more than ChatGPT

Android Authority

time3 hours ago

  • Android Authority

5 AI tools I rely on more than ChatGPT

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority ChatGPT is usually the first tool that comes to everyone's mind when you start talking about AI. It sure is versatile and capable of doing a lot — often better than others in many ways. Its memory feature helps it learn about you and fine-tune responses, making it more personalized than many other (even paid) alternatives. It's also the one to open the floodgates for a wave of AI tools designed for very specific tasks — the kind that even ChatGPT can't handle well. And that's exactly where the broader world of AI tools comes in. I've tried quite a few of these AI tools, and here are the ones that have truly embedded themselves into my daily workflow. I can't imagine getting through the day without them anymore. What's your go-to AI tool (besides ChatGPT)? 0 votes Gemini NaN % Perplexity NaN % Claude NaN % Something else (comment below!) NaN % Gemini Ryan Haines / Android Authority Gemini is similar to ChatGPT in many ways — and no, I don't use it to unload my life problems. But I do end up using it quite a lot, and the simple reason is its presence. Since I rely on Google products both personally and professionally, Gemini is always just there — sometimes in the sidebar, sometimes just a wake word away. On my Workspace for Business account, I often use it to check grammar, tighten language, or tweak the tone of emails. But I've also had it read contracts in Docs and point out anything working against me or take notes during Meet calls and summarize the meeting within minutes of it ending. It even handles different accents in a single meeting quite well. Perplexity Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority If I've developed muscle memory for using ChatGPT, Perplexity has quietly replaced Google Search for most of my web lookups — especially on desktop. I use it heavily for research. Instead of browsing ten websites, scrubbing YouTube videos, or combing through forums for one specific detail — like what the most popular desktop OS in Europe was in the early 2010s — I just ask Perplexity. And much like appending 'Reddit' to a search to get real user opinions instead of content written for SEO, Perplexity does that for you. It gives you a concise gist, which is handy when I'm looking for general sentiment, say, around viral news. While it saves me the search legwork, I still verify what it gives me just to make sure I'm delivering accurate information with the necessary human oversight. NotebookLM Andy Walker / Android Authority For the longest time, I avoided NotebookLM. It felt like a niche product good for only a few tasks — but that's exactly where its strength lies. And honestly, what a tool Google has made! You can create multiple notebooks and upload source documents, even on the free plan. It analyzes long documents and can surface different perspectives, themes, and patterns — like a real brainstorming partner. That's not what I personally use it for, though. NotebookLM is a true example of AI's potential — I just hope it doesn't land in the Google graveyard anytime soon. What I love is its ability to switch tone easily between 'Guide' and 'Analyst' modes, especially when I need a more conversational or direct approach. But my favorite feature is its podcast-style audio summaries. Those have helped me digest jargon-heavy, never-ending documents while driving or cooking — and suddenly, it doesn't feel like work! NotebookLM is a true example of AI's potential — I just hope it doesn't land in the Google graveyard anytime soon. Notion AI Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Some AI tools become part of your routine without you even realizing it — and Notion AI is one of those for me. I initially dismissed it as something Notion was forcing on its users, but I've ended up using it more than I expected. I use Notion for almost all my long-form personal writing — blog posts, short stories, you name it. One thing that's always frustrated me is the lack of autocorrect. When I'm in vomit-draft mode, I don't care about typos or grammar and cleaning them up later was always a pain. With Notion AI, I can fix all that with just a couple of clicks. I can also throw in unformatted lists (groceries, travel packing, etc.) and just ask AI to clean them up. I even use it to brainstorm multiple angles for blog ideas, helping me avoid getting stuck on one track. It's like the second set of eyes I have always wanted for my blogs. The free plan gives me limited prompts, but since I only use Notion once or twice a day, I get by just fine. Ideogram An image generation tool has been eerily missing from this list — that's because I saved the best for the last! Ideogram has been my preferred tool for that because of one big reason. It is one of the only free tools that lets you customize and control a lot of aspects of your generated images, including their size and ratio. Most AI tools generate square images that are terrible for online use as feature images or on social media. Ideogram gets you a few free credits per week and creates some fantastic AI images using its latest-generation model with whatever customization you want. And it also has something called magic prompt that uses AI to create an elaborate prompt on your behalf. We all tend to underexplain AI the exact scene we want, but Ideogram covers you for that. Specialized AI tools are far more useful companions than a chatbot that behaves like an over-eager intern who always needs direction. AI beyond ChatGPT We've had AI around us for years — from Gboard's smart suggestions to Google Assistant — but it wasn't until ChatGPT became a buzzword that we really started noticing generative AI in our everyday lives. It's honestly hard to believe it's just been a couple of years since its arrival. A lot of AI tools have emerged in such a short span, and many of them have surely become an indispensable part of my life. But most importantly, I get to use them to be more productive without fearing about AI dimming my creative spark. They are far more useful companions than a chatbot that behaves like an over-eager intern who always needs direction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store