The CFO's Role Has Never Been More Vital: By Laurent Descout
In a year defined by economic shocks and geopolitical instability, from proposed tariffs to inflationary pressures, one executive stands increasingly at the centre of strategic decision-making: the Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
No longer just a financial gatekeeper, today's CFO is a central architect of business resilience, growth, and operational agility. They are expected to navigate macroeconomic uncertainty, lead real-time treasury operations, manage currency volatility and trade disruption, all while ensuring the business stays on course and compliant.
This expanded remit is why the CFO has become one of the most essential and future-facing roles in the organisation and why more are stepping into the top job. New data shows that 34% of outgoing CFOs became president or CEO in 2024, up from 20% the prior year.
Their elevation reflects a shift in expectations, it's no longer just about managing the books, but leading the business through structural volatility.
CFOs now contribute across the enterprise, helping to address shareholder activism, geopolitical turbulence, cybersecurity threats, and environmental instability. They are expected to chart a steady course in a world defined by disruption from AI acceleration and shifting workforce dynamics to climate change and capital market transformation.
To do this effectively, CFOs need more than just financial acumen. They need foresight, speed, and the right tech stack.
A Role Transformed by Data and Speed
In the past, CFOs focused on what had already happened from auditing, reporting and ensuring compliance. But today, the CFO must look forward to leveraging data-driven insights to chart future courses.
This transformation has brought with it a broader portfolio. CFOs now oversee procurement, investor relations, M&A activity, post-merger integration, enterprise transformation, IT, and even cybersecurity.
A recent McKinsey survey highlights how CFOs are increasingly tasked with enterprise-wide performance management and collaborating across the C-suite. Another survey found that 95% of finance leaders are working well beyond traditional finance functions, including AI (60%), customer acquisition (46%) and marketing (41%). More than half (55%) say they have significant control over their company's investment priorities.
What's enabling this shift? Data. CFOs have more information at their fingertips than ever before, but also more responsibility to turn that data into actionable insight.
However, this is both a blessing and a curse. With a plethora of tools on the market, the modern CFO's tech stack can often be fragmented and inefficient.
The Simplicity Imperative
Many CFOs are still reliant on a patchwork of tools and platforms, each solving a narrow problem, whether it be spend management or FX hedging, but none built for the interconnected reality of modern finance.
This fragmented tech stack leads to siloed data, manual processes, and time-consuming reconciliation, the very things that slow down decision-making when speed is paramount.
Almost all (91%) finance leaders say they are expected to make decisions faster than ever before, according to research by Confluent. With the number and urgency of decisions rising, there's no room for brittle, inefficient systems.
Therefore, CFOs need integrated, simplified solutions to empower smarter, faster decisions. The rise of fintech has introduced solutions that can help CFOs by automating financial processes, integrating disparate functions and providing real-time insights.
Treasurers benefit from centralised platforms that unify services like cross-border payments, FX operations and treasury management. This holistic approach does more than reduce errors and equips CFOs with the clarity and agility to make impactful decisions.
Today's CFO must be risk-ready and future-focused
As businesses face accelerating change, from AI advancements to geopolitical headwinds, the CFO remains at the intersection of every critical decision. Their ability to embrace technology, simplify complexity, and lead with a risk-balanced perspective will determine the organisation's resilience and growth.
The exponential CFO is not only equipped to measure enterprise value but also to drive it. Their role will only grow in importance as they continue to bridge the gap between strategy and execution, purpose and profit, and present and future.
Whether it's responding to policy shocks like Trump's tariffs or meeting the baseline expectations of instant payments and real-time reconciliation, today's CFO must combine clarity with speed. They need the tools and the mandate to act fast, lead boldly and drive the business forward through complexity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump ally bids for £170m Crystal Palace stake
John Textor is considering three sale offers to rescue Crystal Palace 's Europa League place – including one from Donald Trump ally Woody Johnson. Telegraph Sport understands the New York Jets owner tabled a 43 per cent purchase proposal, marginally less in overall value than two others being discussed. Raine Group, the New York broker which secured sales for Chelsea and Manchester United, had been in discussion with parties on behalf of Textor since last year. However, the American is conscious of the club's need to now secure a quick transaction to guarantee European competition next season. A quick sale for as little as £170 million has been mooted for Eagle Football Holdings' 43 per cent stake as Textor's ownership of Lyon leaves Palace facing the threat of expulsion from Europe's second tier. Industry insiders believe a purchase of Textor's shares by the current co-owners, Josh Harris and David Blitzer, is the most likely outcome this summer. However, options include at least two other proposals from the US, one of which has been established for months. A deal with Johnson, 78, is viewed as an outside shot. He is a controversial figure in US sport, with the New York Jets facing scrutiny last year following reports of 'controversial and dysfunctional practices' under his watch. Johnson bought the New York Jets in 2000, with the NFL franchise now estimated to be worth around $6.9 billion. The Jets' $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium will hold next year's World Cup final. Johnson is also well-known in UK politics. The long-time Republican Party donor was appointed as US ambassador to the UK during Trump's first term. His brother, Christopher, took over Jets operations during his post. The American businessman has long been interested in buying a Premier League club, having approached Raine about Chelsea in 2022. Other suitors for Palace, meanwhile, are believed to include NBA star Jimmy Butler, part of a consortium of sport and entertainment executives that is expected to make an offer. That separate proposal was first reported by The Athletic on Wednesday night. Another international consortium advised by the veteran football financier Keith Harris also previously expressed interest. Mr Harris's group would probably execute its deal through the recently incorporated Sportbank vehicle. The Sportsbank consortium – worth upwards of £200 million – is said to be made up of a collection of investors from North America, Canada, Europe and the Gulf. Textor, who previously expressed interest in buying Everton, is willing to find another club as soon as possible. Textor acquired his holding in Palace in 2021 for about £90 million. His multi-club network Eagle Football also includes French club Olympique Lyonnais, Rio-based Botafogo and RWD Molenbeek in Belgium. His priority is to pursue a club which can accept players across the group. Crystal Palace's overall value is said to be around £500 million – around the same price that Everton was valued at, minus debt, during Farhad Moshiri's protracted sale. Stanley Tang, of the US-based food delivery company DoorDash, denied suggestions that he was also in discussions to buy Textor's stake. Chairman Steve Parish, Textor and his fellow US businessmen Harris and Blitzer oversee the running of the Selhurst Park club as general partners. However, Textor has repeatedly hinted at frustrations that he does not exert as much club control as he would like. Uefa is set to inform Palace whether they are in breach of its multi-club ownership rules by June 30 – although the matter may then be taken to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) which would delay a final verdict. The FA Cup winners met Uefa officials last week in a two-hour meeting in an attempt to avoid being barred. Palace insist there is no sharing of information or staff or facilities with the French side. The club argue that despite Textor's shareholding, he has no say in the day-to-day running and has just 25 per cent of voting rights. Indeed, Textor has previously spoken about his annoyance at the lack of say he has at Palace and has been trying to sell his shares. Textor reiterated this after last week's meeting in Nyon. However, Nottingham Forest have written a letter to Uefa expressing their position and asking for clarification over whether Palace will be involved.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump to review Aukus nuclear submarine pact with Australia and UK
The US is reviewing the Aukus nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to assess whether it aligns with Donald Trump 's 'America First' agenda, casting doubt on the trilateral agreement aimed at countering China. A Pentagon official said the 2021 deal was being reviewed to ensure it 'aligned with the president's America First agenda' ahead of his talks with Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese at the upcoming G7 summit in Canada. The £176bn Aukus agreement involving Australia, the US and the UK is a strategic security partnership aimed primarily at helping Australia acquire nuclear submarines using American and British technology, marking a major advancement in the country's military capabilities. Australian defence minister Richard Marles said on Thursday Canberra was confident the pact would proceed and that their government would closely work with the Trump administration. 'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he told ABC News, adding that Aukus was in the strategic interests of all three countries. He claimed that a review of the deal signed under former US president Joe Biden was not a surprise. 'This is a multi-decade plan,' he said. 'There will be governments that come and go, and I think whenever we see a new government a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken.' The statement came after media reports said the US was reviewing its commitment to the pact. It was first reported by the Financial Times, citing six people familiar with the matter. 'The department is reviewing Aukus as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president's 'America first' agenda,' a Pentagon official was quoted as saying. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs.' The Pentagon's top policy adviser, Elbridge Colby, who has previously raised concerns that the US could lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Mr Marles confirmed. Australia and the UK have both faced pressure from the White House to increase their military spending. While the UK has heeded the demand, Australia has resisted it. Mr Albanese is expected to meet Mr Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting. They are likely to discuss Washington's demand that Australia increase its defence spending from 2 to 3.5 per cent of its GDP. Mr Albanese has said Australia's defence spending will rise to 2.3 per cent but has declined to commit to America's target. The possibility of the deal collapsing has caused anxiety in London and Canberra but has been met with cheers in Beijing, experts said. John Lee, an Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was 'primarily an audit of American capability' and whether it could afford to sell up to five nuclear submarines when it wasn't meeting its own production targets. 'Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor,' Mr Lee said. John Hamre, president of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and a former senior Pentagon official, told a Lowy Institute seminar in Sydney on Thursday there was a perception in Washington that 'the Albanese government has been supportive of Aukus but not really leaning in on Aukus ', with defence spending being part of this.
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
America's biggest automaker dodges tariffs with stunning $4B shift from Mexico to US plants
America's best-selling carmaker is putting US factories back in the spotlight. General Motors announced plans to invest $4 billion in American manufacturing capacity that will help shift vehicle production from Mexico to the United States. The company said late Tuesday that the investment will be made over the next two years and is for its gas and electric vehicles. CEO Mary Barra said in a statement on Tuesday that GM is committed to making two million vehicles annually in the US and supporting American jobs. Last year, GM built 889,072 cars in Mexican factories, including the gas and electric Chevy Equinox and Blazer. Soon, freshly-built gas-powered Chevrolet Blazer and Chevrolet Equinox models will roll out of American plants. Both are expected to come state-side starting in 2027. The Blazer will be produced at GM's Spring Hill, Tennessee plant, while the Equinox will be made at its Kansas City, Kansas facility. GM will also begin making gas-powered full-size SUVs and light duty pickup trucks at its Orion Township, Michigan plant. The move is a bit of an about-face: the company was exclusively producing high-rolling EVs from the plant, including the GMC Hummer, Cadillac Lyriq, and the Chevy Silverado EV. It's the second recent rejigging for GM's EV plants in a month. The company recently announced plans to invest over $800 million to build new V-8 engines in a Buffalo, New York plant that was building batteries. Electric vehicles will remain a major focus for GM, which just reported a record sales month for its Chevy EVs. But GM's manufacturing shift is the automaker's latest move to navigate President Donald Trump's automotive tariffs. In April, the President signed an exacutive order that partially relaxed his previously-set 25 percent import levies on all cars and their parts. But, despite the relaxed rules, the tariffs loomed heavily over automakers that chose not to bring manufacturing back to the US. Barra recently warned that the company expected a $4 to $5 billion line item to pay for the tariffs this year alone. She didn't say if the automaker would pass those costs on to consumers. However, independent analysts say the tariffs will raise prices, reduce sales and make US production less competitive worldwide. Moving production back to the US still might not shield American consumers from higher prices, experts warned. 'The challenge for GM will be the higher labor costs,' David Whiston, an automotive analyst at Morningstar, told 'The higher costs might need to be passed down to dealers and consumers.' Still Whiston said the company will likely remain profitable this year, despite the major investments and tariff costs. The company agrees. But it recently slashed its earnings forecast because of President Trump's policies. It could also force other major carmakers — namely Stellantis — to bring more manufacturing capacity back to the US. The bigger intrigue, Whiston said, will be the impact on Korean and Japanese automakers like Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, and Kia. 'If their governments can't get a carveout for autos, then they have to decide between two difficult options,' he said. 'Do they eat tariffs for a few years and hope they go away once Trump leaves office, or do they take the expensive and more permanent route of adding plants?'
