logo
What is anorexia? What eating disorder experts need you to know

What is anorexia? What eating disorder experts need you to know

USA Today24-02-2025

Tens of millions of adults and teens in the U.S. are affected by a wide range of mental health disorders. The U.S. National Institute of Mental Health notes that some of the most common ones include anxiety disorders, depression, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD.
The agency also includes eating disorders as being among the most prevalent mental health disorders, but notes that they are more common among teens than they are among adults. While there are many forms of disordered eating, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders specifies eight distinct eating disorders. These include anorexia nervosa as the most common one, followed by bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica, rumination, and two categories that include a wider range of less common or less studied disordered eating behaviors.
Here's what anorexia nervosa is, why it's so concerning and how people who struggle with the disorder can get help.
What is anorexia nervosa?
Anorexia nervosa, usually called anorexia, is a serious mental disorder that impacts all systems of the body. Claire Aarnio-Peterson, a clinical psychologist and associate professor at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, explains that the most common symptoms and signs of the disorder include:
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Restriction of food intake that leads to a significantly low weight for one's age, sex, developmental trajectory or physical health.
Intense fear of gaining weight or persistent behaviors that get in the way of weight gain, even if the person is already at a dangerously low weight.
Negative body image and obsession over body weight, shape or image.
A lack of recognition of the seriousness of one's current low body weight or degree of malnourishment.
There are a host of adverse outcomes associated with the disorder as "people with anorexia can suffer from multiple physical and mental health concerns that may impact every organ in the body," says Kim Anderson, clinical director of the Eating Recovery Center in Colorado. Some of the negative physical and mental health outcomes that can occur as a result of the disorder include gastrointestinal issues, infertility, suicidal ideation, pubertal delay, anxiety, depression, anemia, skin issues, osteoporosis and heart conditions such as bradycardia.
'We're all overcompensating':Why so many LGBTQ community members struggle with body dysmorphia
What percent of people in the U.S. suffer from anorexia?
Research shows that some 9% of the U.S. population, nearly 30 million Americans, have an eating disorder at some point in their lifetime. This percentage may be higher in certain age groups, however, "as we know that approximately 12% of adolescent girls have some form of an eating disorder," says Melissa Freizinger, associate director of the eating disorder program at Harvard Medical School.
Specifically for anorexia nervosa, studies show that around 4% of women and 0.3% of men suffer from the disorder, "but if you look at individuals who may not meet the full criteria of anorexia nervosa but may be engaging in some of the behaviors, the prevalence rate may be higher," says Freizinger.
And the rates are almost certainly underreported or underestimated for males, Aarnio-Peterson adds, "due to the stigma among men of both having a psychiatric condition and a primarily 'female-specific' diagnosis."
'I wish I could live a normal life':What your friend with an anxiety disorder wishes you knew
Can you recover from anorexia?
Despite the seriousness of any mental health disorder, people with anorexia and their families have reason to be hopeful. "We know that early detection is a good predictor of positive outcomes for individuals with anorexia nervosa," says Aarnio-Peterson.
This early detection starts with friends or family members lovingly helping the individual get the help they need. This is most often accomplished in a non-judgmental and supportive way while emphasizing "that this is a disease and not their fault," says Aarnio-Peterson. Even with the best approach, however, many people with anorexia are not aware of the seriousness of their condition and may resist assistance. "Enlisting loved ones and professional support in this process can be very helpful," says Anderson.
Once the individual agrees to get help, adequate care should always include "medical monitoring, nutritional counseling, and some type of therapy," says Freizinger. Such care is best provided in person or at a treatment center, but if you live in an area where such care is not available, "there are also many great online options that people can access from all over the country and most of them take some type of insurance," Freizinger says. She names Equip Health and Within Health as two such options.
Treatment for anorexia always begins with a comprehensive and personalized assessment. Then, based on the results of the evaluation, "a treatment plan will be developed," says Anderson.
Regardless of which treatment path is recommended, "know that there is always hope for a full recovery from anorexia nervosa as most of the individuals who get help achieve long-term recovery," says Freizinger. At the same time, she says, it's important to keep in mind that recovery can be difficult and requires patience and understanding from all involved. "Celebrate all positive steps forward," she advises, "and do not be discouraged if there are setbacks and relapses along the way."
If you or someone you know is struggling with body image or eating concerns, you can call The National Alliance for Eating Disorders' clinician-run helpline from 9 a.m. until 7 p.m. EST at (866) 662-1235. If you are in crisis or need immediate help, please text 'ALLIANCE' to 741741 for free, 24/7 support.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House proposes axing 988 suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth
White House proposes axing 988 suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

White House proposes axing 988 suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth

The Department of Health and Human Services' proposed budget for 2026 eliminates specialized suicide hotline services for LGBTQ youth and young adults. The budget proposal, which the department published Friday, designates $520 million for 988, the suicide prevention line, and behavioral health crisis services, which is the same amount the Biden administration provided for 988. However, the 2026 budget proposal would end government funding for LGBTQ-specific counseling to 988 callers upon request. When asked for comment, a spokesperson for HHS directed NBC News to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Rachel Cauley, a spokesperson for OMB, noted that the proposed budget would provide the same amount for 988 services as was provided in previous years. 'It does not, however, grant taxpayer money to a chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counselors' without consent or knowledge of their parents,' Cauley said. 'Radical gender ideology' is a political term adopted by conservatives and President Donald Trump's administration to describe the existence of transgender people and the trans rights movement, which it considers harmful to children. The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline has existed since 2005, and, in 2020, during his first term, Trump signed legislation designating 988 as the new lifeline number by 2022. That legislation required 988 to provide LGBTQ youth and young adults who call the line with access to 'specially trained staff and partner organizations,' noting that queer and trans youth 'are more than 4 times more likely to contemplate suicide than their peers, with 1 in 5 LGBTQ youth and more than 1 in 3 transgender youth reporting attempting suicide.' A senior administration official said the money for services for LGBTQ young people has not been cut, but rather reallocated to the general 988 services so that it doesn't go to 'radical grooming contractors,' using another term adopted by conservatives decades ago to falsely equate being LGBTQ or promoting LGBTQ inclusivity with sexually abusing children. The contractors who provide LGBTQ-specific services through 988 are mental health organizations based across the U.S. Most of them provide mental health care to the general population in addition to LGBTQ people. The official said only the contract with 'radical gender' counselors is being terminated, and not the resources. However, under the proposed budget, when LGBTQ youth and young adults under age 25 call 988, there will not be an option for them to be connected to a counselor who is trained to provide support to LGBTQ youth. Currently, LGBTQ young people can also text 'PRIDE' to 988 to reach a counselor with such training. The official did not respond to additional questions regarding what organization(s) 'radical grooming contractors' was referring to specifically. The Trevor Project, a national suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ youths, is among the contractors that make up a subnetwork of specialists who provide 988 services to LGBTQ young people. 'Attempts to discredit these life-saving services will not change the reality of what this administration is proposing: the elimination of a national suicide prevention program, run by seven leading crisis contact centers, that has supported over 1.3 million LGBTQ+ youth across the U.S. with best-practice crisis care,' Jaymes Black, the project's CEO, said in a statement to NBC News, referring to the number of contacts who have reached out to 988 for LGBTQ-specific support since the program's start in 2022. 'Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle — and our President — came together during the first Trump administration to create this specialized resource,' Black added. 'It's a shared acknowledgement that every young life is worth saving, and that risk, not identity, drives evidence-based and effective crisis intervention. We strongly urge the administration and Congress to rethink this proposal, and do what is best for ending the public health crisis of suicide among our nation's youth." The other six contractors who provide 988 services to LGBTQ young people are Centerstone, Volunteers of America Western Washington State, Solari Crisis & Human Services, CommUnity Crisis Services, HopeLink Behavioral Health and La Frontera EMPACT. Centerstone did not answer NBC News' question about the proposed elimination to 988's LGBTQ-specific service, and the other organizations did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In April, The Washington Post reported a leaked HHS budget draft that proposed cutting funding for 988 services for LGBTQ youth. At the time, the White House wouldn't confirm the veracity of that draft or the information about the funding. The budget proposal is the latest effort from the Trump administration to rollback services and protections for LGBTQ people, specifically transgender people. In the first few weeks of his second administration, Trump issued several executive orders targeting trans people, including declaring that there are only two unchangeable sexes; prohibiting trans people from enlisting and serving in the military; barring trans girls and women from competing on female sports teams in federally-funded K-12 schools and colleges; and barring federal funding from going to hospitals that provide transition-related care to minors. Federal officials have also scrubbed agency websites of any mention of transgender or intersex people, including from the website for the Stonewall National Monument commemorating the site of the 1969 Stonewall Uprising, in which historians say trans people were crucial and became a turning point in the modern gay rights movement. At the start of June, which is LGBTQ Pride month, the Navy confirmed to NBC News that it would rename the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler named for the LGBTQ rights activist, Navy veteran and first openly gay man elected to public office in California. This article was originally published on

RFK Jr. fires entire CDC vaccine advisory panel
RFK Jr. fires entire CDC vaccine advisory panel

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. fires entire CDC vaccine advisory panel

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired all 17 members of a committee that advises the federal government on vaccine safety and will replace them with new members, a move that the Trump administration's critics warned would create public distrust around the government's role in promoting public health. At issue is the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, which makes recommendations on the safety, efficacy and clinical need of vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It comprises medical and public health experts who develop recommendations on the use of vaccines in the civilian population of the United States. 'Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' Kennedy, who has a history of controversial views on vaccines, said on June 9 in announcing the overhaul. 'The public must know that unbiased science – evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest – guides the recommendations of our health agencies.' More: Many said RFK Jr. would launch a war on vaccines, medicine. Is it here? Kennedy's decision marks a reversal from what a key Republican senator said the Trump Cabinet member had promised during his confirmation hearings earlier this year. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, said Kennedy had promised to maintain the advisory committee's current composition. "If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes," Cassidy said. The Biden administration appointed all 17 sitting committee members, with 13 of them taking their seats in 2024. According to Trump's HHS, those appointments would have prevented the current administration from choosing a majority of the committee until 2028. "A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science,' said Kennedy, adding that the new members "will prioritize public health and evidence-based medicine" and "no longer function as a rubber stamp for industry profit-taking agendas." The Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice is scheduled to hold its next meeting June 25-27 at CDC headquarters in Atlanta. An HHS source familiar with the details told USA TODAY that the new members of the panel will attend the session. More: Emotions fly high behind the scenes at RFK Jr.'s Congressional hearings Critics of the Trump administration warned that Kennedy's move was not necessary, undermines the government's role in vaccine safety and could lead to more deadly disease transmissions. Dr. Paul A. Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the Food and Drug Administration Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, told USA TODAY that Kennedy was "fixing a problem that doesn't exist." Picking members for the committee generally involves a three- to four-month vetting process by the CDC. "Now he's just going to pick people he likes," Offit added. "Presumably people who are like-minded, and I think that will shake confidence in this committee." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Kennedy and the Trump administration are "taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy." The New York Democrat added that wiping out an entire panel of vaccine experts doesn't build trust – it shatters it. "Worse, it sends a chilling message: that ideology matters more than evidence, and politics more than public health," he said. Dr. Bruce Scott, president of the American Medical Association, warned that Kennedy's work has undermined trust and "upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives." "With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses," he said. A measles outbreak recently killed two unvaccinated children in Texas. The CDC said the deaths were the first from measles in the United States since 2015. Kennedy has backed vaccination as a preventive tool during a measles outbreak but also said that vaccines should be left to parents' discretion. As of June 5, a total of 1,168 confirmed measles cases were reported by 34 jurisdictions. The CDC also reported three deaths due to the outbreak. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: RFK Jr. fires all 17 members of CDC vaccine advisory panel

How Culture Shapes Our View of Wellbutrin for Anxiety
How Culture Shapes Our View of Wellbutrin for Anxiety

Time Business News

time6 hours ago

  • Time Business News

How Culture Shapes Our View of Wellbutrin for Anxiety

In today's globalized world, the way we understand and interpret mental health treatments is deeply influenced by cultural beliefs, values, and norms. One such medication that has garnered attention in recent years is wellbutrin anxiety. Originally approved as an antidepressant and smoking cessation aid, it has also been used off-label for treating anxiety in specific cases. However, public and medical perceptions of using Wellbutrin for anxiety vary widely depending on cultural background. Understanding how culture shapes our view of this drug provides insight not just into Wellbutrin's reception, but into broader societal attitudes about mental health and pharmacological treatment. When it comes to treating ADHD, stimulant medications play a crucial role in improving focus and reducing impulsivity. Two Vyvanse vs adderall prescribed options are Vyvanse and Adderall, each with distinct characteristics. Vyvanse is a prodrug, meaning it's inactive until metabolized in the body, leading to a smoother and longer-lasting effect. In contrast, Adderall contains a mix of amphetamine salts that act more quickly but can have a shorter duration. Both medications target similar brain chemicals but differ in onset time and side effects. Choosing between Vyvanse vs Adderall often depends on individual response and lifestyle needs. Culture plays a critical role in shaping how individuals perceive mental health, diagnose emotional distress, and seek treatment. In Western societies, particularly in the United States, there is a growing acceptance of using medication for managing mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. The biomedical model dominates—mental health is largely seen as a result of neurochemical imbalances, treatable through pharmaceutical intervention. This belief system naturally influences the openness toward medications like Wellbutrin, even for off-label uses such as anxiety. In contrast, in many non-Western cultures, mental health is more likely to be seen through spiritual, communal, or holistic lenses. Psychological distress might be attributed to personal failure, spiritual imbalance, or societal disharmony. These cultural frameworks often result in stigmatization of psychiatric drugs or skepticism about their necessity. As a result, someone in a collectivist culture might be more hesitant to use Wellbutrin for anxiety, fearing social judgment or believing that non-pharmacological methods like meditation, herbal remedies, or community support are more acceptable. One of the major cultural factors that influences the use of Wellbutrin is stigma—both internal and societal. In many cultures, there is significant stigma attached to taking psychiatric medication, often rooted in a belief that mental illness indicates personal weakness or failure. Even in countries like the U.S., where psychiatric drug use is widespread, people often express reluctance or shame in discussing their medication openly. Wellbutrin's branding as a 'non-typical' antidepressant and its use in smoking cessation has somewhat reduced this stigma for some users. It doesn't carry the same weight as more commonly used SSRIs like Prozac or Zoloft. However, when used for anxiety—a condition often seen as less severe or 'less legitimate' than depression in some circles—users may face added pressure or disbelief. Cultural norms that promote stoicism, self-reliance, or silence around emotional distress can further discourage individuals from accepting Wellbutrin as a viable treatment for anxiety. How a medication is marketed also plays a substantial role in shaping cultural perceptions. In the United States, direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising is legal and widespread. Television ads often portray medications like Wellbutrin as life-changing tools, providing visual narratives of transformation—from despair to joy, from isolation to connection. This imagery feeds into a cultural narrative that medical solutions are the most efficient and desirable route to wellness. However, this is not the case globally. In countries where pharmaceutical advertising is restricted or banned, public knowledge of medications like Wellbutrin often comes from doctors or health professionals, not TV commercials or social media. As a result, cultural narratives about these drugs are more medically grounded and less emotionally driven. In such societies, Wellbutrin may be seen more clinically and less symbolically—as a neutral tool rather than a symbol of modern self-care or empowerment. Cultural differences in healthcare systems also affect the way Wellbutrin is prescribed and understood. In the United States, the healthcare model allows for a greater degree of patient choice and provider flexibility. Off-label use, such as prescribing Wellbutrin for anxiety, is relatively common. Physicians may be more willing to explore alternative applications of existing drugs, especially if patients advocate for them. In other countries, stricter regulations, standardized treatment protocols, and less patient involvement in treatment decisions can result in a more conservative approach. Doctors may hesitate to prescribe Wellbutrin for anxiety if it's not officially approved for that use, regardless of emerging evidence or individual cases. This cautious stance is not necessarily due to mistrust of the drug, but due to systemic differences in risk tolerance and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. How cultures define and handle emotions also deeply influences the acceptability of using medications like Wellbutrin for anxiety. In some Western cultures, expressing emotions openly and prioritizing emotional well-being is encouraged. Anxiety is increasingly seen as a legitimate health issue requiring treatment, and patients are encouraged to seek out solutions, whether therapeutic or pharmacological. In more reserved cultures, where emotional restraint and control are highly valued, anxiety might be normalized or downplayed. Instead of seeking treatment, individuals might be encouraged to 'tough it out' or turn to traditional healing practices. In these environments, suggesting a pharmaceutical solution like Wellbutrin may be met with resistance or disbelief—not necessarily because the drug is distrusted, but because the condition it treats isn't universally acknowledged in the same way. The rise of online health communities and social media platforms has begun to blur traditional cultural boundaries. People from different countries and backgrounds can now share their experiences with medications like Wellbutrin, creating a global dialogue. On platforms like Reddit, YouTube, and TikTok, individuals openly discuss the pros and cons of using Wellbutrin for anxiety. These discussions can demystify the drug for some, validate others' experiences, and challenge deeply ingrained cultural beliefs. Younger generations, especially digital natives, are more likely to seek health information online and adopt perspectives that differ from those of their parents or cultural predecessors. In some cases, this has led to increased openness about mental health and reduced stigma around medication use, even in cultures that historically resisted psychiatric intervention. As a result, cultural perceptions of Wellbutrin are gradually shifting, becoming more nuanced and inclusive. Wellbutrin's use for anxiety, while still considered off-label, offers a fascinating case study in how cultural beliefs shape medical treatment. From the stigma surrounding psychiatric medication to healthcare system practices and emotional expression norms, countless factors influence how this drug is perceived and utilized. While Western cultures may embrace Wellbutrin more readily as a modern solution to mental health struggles, non-Western societies often approach it with caution, shaped by different traditions, values, and healthcare infrastructures. As global conversations about mental health continue to evolve, it's essential to recognize that there is no single, universal view of medications like Wellbutrin. Each perspective is valid in its own cultural context. By understanding these cultural nuances, we can foster more inclusive, respectful, and informed approaches to mental health treatment across the world. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store