FBI Helping Texas Locate Democrats in Redistricting 'War' Sparks Alarm
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Senator John Cornyn's announcement that the FBI will step in to help locate Texas Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to deny quorum over a mid-decade redistricting bill raised alarms for legal analysts.
The FBI denied to comment when reached by Newsweek on Thursday morning.
Why It Matters
The announcement from Cornyn, a Texas Republican, raised questions about whether this is a proper, or political, use of the FBI.
Texas Republicans are seeking to redraw the state's congressional boundaries to give Republicans an advantage and thwart potential losses in the 2026 midterm elections. Democrats left the state to deny quorum and block a vote on the bill, which they view as blatantly partisan gerrymandering. Several other Republican states are eyeing redraws ahead of the midterms, setting off a redistricting arms race that could see several states with new maps by next November.
FBI Director Kash Patel testifies before the House Appropriations Committee on May 7, 2025, in Washington.
FBI Director Kash Patel testifies before the House Appropriations Committee on May 7, 2025, in Washington.What To Know
Cornyn said in a statement that FBI Director Kash Patel approved his request "for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats."
"I thank President Donald Trump and Director Patel for supporting and swiftly acting on my call for the federal government to hold these supposed lawmakers accountable for fleeing Texas," he wrote. "We cannot allow these rogue legislators to avoid their constitutional responsibilities."
Michael McAuliffe, a former federal prosecutor and former elected state attorney, told Newsweek that the use of the FBI to find the lawmakers is "well beyond alarming."
"The FBI's function is to investigate potential violations of federal law, conduct specified national security functions, and perform background investigations for potential presidential nominees," he said. "Nowhere in the statutory list of powers that I know of is tracking down political officer holders of an opposition party.
"The assignment to pursue state elected officials without clear investigative jurisdiction is a crass abuse of the immense authority of the Bureau. It's an insult to the thousands of special agents who took an oath to protect the nation, not answer the call of politicization."
The FBI being used for this amounts to "pure, naked political purposes" and is a "bull's-eye hit on the rule of law," he said.
"Who in this country really wants armed agents following people because of their political party affiliation or elected official status?" he said.
Texas Democrats have not broken a law that would warrant the use of the FBI, McAuliffe said.
Cornyn, in a letter to Patel, raised concerns about whether the lawmakers "solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts" and "may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offense."
McAuliffe, however, said the letter is a "transparent attempt to hide the political repurposing of the FBI." More than 50 Texas lawmakers are staying in Chicago with support from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat.
"If Patel's justification is to aid state law enforcement in capturing democratic elected officials, then the explicit political nature of the agreement is self-evident. Current Texas and federal leaders should remember that simple interstate travel is a protected right of every American," he said.
This is not the first time lawmakers have fled a state to deny a quorum. Oregon Republicans have used a similar tactic to deny votes on legislation, but the FBI did not get involved.
The difference is that we now have a more "hyperpartisan" political and criminal justice system, former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek.
"We've really sort of opened this Pandora's box, where there is seemingly no line between law and politics anymore," he said. "Historically, you'd never see law enforcement get involved in a purely political dispute, which is what this is."
Generally speaking, the FBI would not get involved in state and local affairs unless there is a "federal hook," Rahmani said. Although Republicans may make the case about federal bribery charges or interstate travel to justify the use of federal law enforcement, the FBI's involvement is "seemingly improper on its face," he said.
"It's an example of lawfare and the weaponization of our criminal justice system in politics," he said.
If any arrests are made, the Texas Democrats have "many good defenses" that the FBI's involvement is a political tactic, including First Amendment defenses, Rahmani said.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, slammed the FBI's involvement on X.
"Shouldn't the FBI be tracking down terrorists, drug traffickers and child predators? The Trump administration continues to weaponize law enforcement to target political adversaries. These extremists don't give a damn about public safety. We will not be intimidated," Jeffries wrote.
Pritzker told MeidasTouch that the FBI does not have "the ability to arrest these Texas Democrats."
"They're all allowed to visit Chicago or Illinois and take in the great view of our lake and our city, and enjoy the great restaurants that we have. But they won't be taking anybody home with them or away from the state," he said.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, has said he could expel Democratic members of the Legislature who left the state.
On Wednesday, Texas lawmakers in Illinois were evacuated from their hotel following a bomb threat, NBC News reported.
What People Are Saying
Anthony Michael Kreis, a constitutional law professor at Georgia State University, on X: "This is a patently unlawful, unconstitutional abuse of federal power."
Former Representative Colin Allred, a Texas Democrat running for Senate, on X: "This isn't about "locating" anyone — they're not hiding. It's about silencing dissent and weaponizing law enforcement. Cornyn is deputizing the FBI and [Texas Attorney General Ken] Paxton is trying to expel lawmakers because they're both too weak and corrupt to stand up to Washington. Enough is enough — Texans deserve better."
Representative Daniel Goldman, a New York Democrat, on X: "What federal criminal interest could the @FBI and @FBIDirectorKash possibly have in this matter? Answer: none. This is yet another disgusting partisan abuse of power by the FBI, and any agent asked to assist should refuse to do so."
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, on X: "Texas DPS and the FBI are tracking down the derelict Democrats. They will be taken directly to the Texas Capitol. Those who received benefits for skipping a vote face removal from office and potential bribery charges. In Texas, there are consequences for your actions."
What Happens Next
Any arrest of Texas lawmakers could lead to further legal challenges over the FBI's authority to intervene in the case.
Meanwhile, the redistricting arms race continues with states Ohio, Florida, Missouri and Indiana potentially working on more pro-Republican maps. Democratic states like California, New York and Maryland have considered redrawing their maps to neutralize the threat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas House finally passes congressional redistricting map after weeks of walkouts, lock-ins and arrest warrants
The new map could secure the GOP five additional seats in Congress in next year's midterms. Democrats say they now plan to challenge the map in court. The Texas House of Representatives approved a new map for the state's congressional districts on Wednesday, cementing a legislative win for Republicans that had been put on hold for weeks when Democratic legislators fled the state to block its passage. The new map would give the GOP a chance to secure up to five additional seats in Congress in next year's midterm elections. A final vote in the state Senate, which is expected to approve the plan, is needed before the it can be signed into law. Democrats say they intend to challenge the map in court. Republicans first announced their intention to pursue redistricting outside of the usual 10-year cycle in June. But the fight over the plan didn't become a national story until earlier this month, when dozens of Democrats left the state in order to prevent the House from having enough members present to formally meet. Each absent Democrat was fined $500 a day during the roughly two weeks they were out of state. Texas's Republican governor Greg Abbott also threatened to have them removed from their seats and civil warrants were issued for their arrests. In the end, though, the Democrats opted to return home in order to 'build a strong public legislative record for the upcoming legal battle' over the maps. They argue that the new district violates both the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. Their walkout, which was never likely to prevent the maps from passing entirely, inspired Democrats in blue states across the country to rally behind their cause, pleading to pursue their own redistricting plans to offset the GOP's gains in Texas. So far, only California has formally moved forward with that process. Democratic governor Gavin Newsom has called for a special election in November to ask voters to approve new district lines in the state. Texas Democrats returned to the House for the first time on Monday, which allowed the chamber to meet briefly before adjourning with a plan to meet again on Wednesday to consider the maps. At the end of Monday's session, the House's GOP leadership instituted a rule requiring all Democrats who had previously left the state to submit to police escort in order to be allowed to exit the Capitol. All but one, Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth, consented. Collier chose instead to remain in the House chamber. She spent Tuesday night sleeping at her desk with her feet propped up on a rolling chair. Two of her colleagues, including House Minority Leader Gene Wu, joined her overnight protest Tuesday night. More Democrats did the same on Wednesday night. The House reconvened on Wednesday morning for a lengthy — and at times heated — debate over the redistricting plan. Democrats proposed a variety of amendments to the proposal, including one that would have only allowed the maps to go into effect if the federal government agreed to release all files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'What we are doing today is unjust, it is un-Texan and it is un-American,' Democratic representative Cassandra Garcia Hernandez said before the bill's final passage. The bill was eventually passed in an 88—52 party-line vote. The issue now moves to the courts. The standards for what makes congressional maps legal or not can be complicated. The Supreme Court has ruled that gerrymandered maps drawn to give one party a political advantage are generally constitutional. However, district lines that deliberately weaken the voting power of a specific racial group are not. The fate of Texas's new map will hinge on whether the courts view it as a racial gerrymander, as Democrats claim, rather than a purely partisan one. Republicans are also looking at a number of other red states where they believe there may be opportunities to gain extra seats through redistricting, including Ohio, Missouri and Indiana. Democrats are doing the same in blue states outside of California, though their ability to put more favorable district lines in states like Illinois, Maryland and New York may be limited. Read more: Texas redistricting fight goes national as GOP, Dems prepare for more battles over future House maps The ultimate outcome of the redistricting battle, in Texas and nationwide, could play a major role in deciding which party has control of Congress after the 2026 midterms. Democrats only need to gain a small number of seats to get the majority in the House. If they do, they would effectively have veto power over any legislation Trump and the GOP want to pass. They would also have new oversight authority and the ability to launch investigations into the president's most controversial moves since he returned to office.
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas House passes GOP redistricting plan after weeks-long standoff
The Texas House of Representatives gave final passage on Wednesday to House Bill 4, a controversial Republican-backed proposal to redraw the state's congressional maps and potentially add up to five new GOP-leaning districts. Entering Wednesday, the bill needed to pass two votes in the House to advance to the Senate. Each vote passed 88-52. Before the final vote, lawmakers debated a series of amendments offered by Democrats, all of which were rejected by the Republican majority. The bill was the sole item on the agenda for the day's floor session, which began at 10 a.m. The Texas Senate, which approved a similar version of the redistricting legislation earlier this week, is scheduled to take up the House-passed bill when it convenes this Thursday at 7 p.m. If the Senate approves the House version without changes, the legislation could be sent to Gov. Greg Abbott by the end of the week. If not, the two chambers will need to reconcile differences in a conference committee. The vote came after a dramatic standoff earlier this month, when Democratic lawmakers fled the state to break quorum and block action on the redistricting bill. Their absence stalled the Legislature and effectively ended the first special session, delaying the measure for two weeks. Gov. Greg Abbott called a second special session hours after the first adjourned, and Democrats returned to the House chamber on Monday, allowing the legislation to move forward. That evening, HB 4 passed out of the House redistricting committee on a 12-8 party-line vote. To prevent another walkout, House Speaker Dustin Burrows imposed a rule requiring Democratic members to be escorted by Department of Public Safety officers if they wished to leave the Capitol. While most Democrats complied, Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth refused. She was temporarily locked in the House chamber and was later allowed to go to her Capitol office. On Monday, Collier filed a petition in state court alleging she was under "illegal restraint by the government." The court has not yet ruled on the matter. On Tuesday, several other Democrats joined Collier in protest, tearing up their signed escort agreements and spending the night in the Capitol. With the passage of HB 4, Republican leaders dropped the escort requirement. The redistricting plan is expected to give Republicans a significant advantage in the 2026 midterm elections, potentially flipping up to five congressional seats.
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani doubles down on pro-prostitution policies as he praises ex-NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio's decriminalization focus
Mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani has doubled down on his pro-prostitution policies. After being hounded by rival campaigns about his stance on decriminalizing sex work as a Queens assemblymember, Mamdani said Wednesday that he wants to mirror the policies of his favorite ex-mayor: Bill de Blasio. 'What I want to do is look at the ways in which the previous administration addressed this issue,' Mamdani, the Democratic nominee, said when pressed on the issue during an unrelated public event on the Upper East Side. 5 NYC Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has doubled down on his position on pro-prostitution policies. Matthew McDermott 'I found that it created far more safety than what the current administration has done,' he told reporters, in a ding at Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for re-election as an independent in November. De Blasio, at the tail end of his administration in 2020, proposed a series of reforms to decriminalize prostitution in an attempt to shift focus on the arrests of traffickers, rather than sex workers. Opponents of decriminalizing sex work, such as the National Organization of Women, however, argue it could actually lead to spikes in sex trafficking, as well as a decrease in quality of life for New Yorkers due to open-air brothels. De Blasio's admin pushed the use of 'community-centered services' for sex workers, rather than arrests, and services supporting victims of trafficking. 5 Mamdani told reporters he wants his policies to reflect those of ex-mayor Bill de Blasio. Paul Martinka 5 At a public event taking place in the Upper East Side, the mayoral frontrunner said he wants to 'look at the ways in which the previous administration addressed this issue.' Matthew McDermott But it's not clear how much of these policies ended up being implemented. Current City Hall representatives didn't respond to a request for comment about the Adams admin's implementation or rollback of the de-Blasio era proposals. But Mamdani, a proud Democratic Socialists of America member, took the opportunity to swipe at Adams' record on the issue. 5 During the de Blasio era, his administration sought to use 'community-centered services' for sex workers, rather than arresting individuals. William Farrington 5 Mamdani took a shot at Mayor Eric Adams at the public event, saying his administration has led 'New Yorkers facing the same problems that they did a year prior.' Matthew McDermott 'So I have said time and again, my focus is on the outcomes of public safety,' he claimed. 'And what we have seen from this current administration is a theater, one that repeats itself every so often and leaves New Yorkers facing the same problems that they did a year prior.' A representative for Adams' campaign did not respond to a request for comment. The Manhattan District attorney's Office announced that it would no longer prosecute prostitution cases in April 2021.
