WH press secretary brushes off reports Musk ‘body-checked' Treasury chief: ‘Robust disagreement'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Sunday downplayed reports Elon Musk 'body-checked'' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a heated meeting, calling their dispute simply a 'robust disagreement.''
Leavitt acknowledged to Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that she wasn't in the room when the April dust-up took place but contended she wouldn't call it a 'fistfight' based on what she heard second-hand about the scrum — which supposedly included Musk ramming into Bessent's rib cage 'like a rugby player.'
'I certainly wouldn't describe it as a fistfight, Maria,' Leavitt told host Maria Baritomo after the journalist characterized it as such. 'It was definitely a disagreement, although I was not there. I didn't witness it with my own eyes.
Advertisement
'When this story originally broke, I said from the podium that there have definitely been healthy disagreements amongst the cabinet and Elon Musk,' Leavitt said.
3 White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Sunday downplayed reports of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk coming to blows.
Getty Images
'There were times in which they got frustrated with one another, but I think that really speaks to the heart of this Cabinet and the president's team, that they can have these robust disagreements and then still come together to do what's right for the people they are serving.
Advertisement
'We have moved on from that,' Leavitt said. 'The president has moved on from it.
'And the entire administration is focusing on passing this bill,' she added of the proposed sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'Cutting waste, fraud and abuse from our government remains a critical component of this administration's agenda.'
After Musk publicly went nuclear over the bill — and onetime ally President Trump — last week, presidential buddy Steve Bannon claimed the world's richest man had scrapped with the Treasury secretary two months ago.
3 Musk exploded at President Trump publicly last week amid a series of frustrations, including over the deficit.
AP
Advertisement
'Scott said [to Musk], 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,' ' Bannon told the Washington Post, recalling how Musk then rammed into Bessent's rib cage 'like a rugby player.'
Eventually, multiple bystanders in the room supposedly intervened and pulled them apart.
'President Trump heard about it and said, 'This is too much,' ' Bannon added.
Bannon, a former top strategist for Trump who hosts the 'War Room' podcast, has publicly called for Musk, a South African native, to be deported and for the president to invoke the Defense Production Act to seize control of his SpaceX company in retaliation for his public broadsides against the president.
Advertisement
Musk has not publicly commented on the alleged altercation, nor has Bessent.
There had been a prior report from the New York Times alleging that the two men got into a shouting match at the same April meeting.
3 Bessent reportedly scolded Musk for overstating the spending cuts he could find with DOGE.
Getty Images
During the meeting, both men had pitched different candidates to lead the Internal Revenue Service. The president ultimately backed Bessent's choice.
Musk had previously publicly backed then-Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick to helm the Treasury Department over Bessent. Trump ended up making Lutnick the secretary of the Department of Commerce.
The day of the April meeting, Bessent also allegedly needled Musk for falling far short of his goal of cutting government spending by $1 trillion with the Department of Government Efficiency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
32 minutes ago
- CNET
This 23andMe Data Breach Settlement Could Pay You Up to $10,000: Here's How
Hackers used a credential stuffing attack to gain access to 23andMe accounts in October 2023. Getty Images/Viva Tung/CNET If you have ever used 23andMe, there's a good chance you may be able to get paid as part of its massive data breach settlement, potentially as much as $10,000. Genetic testing company 23andMe was struck by a prolonged data breach that allowed hackers to gain personal data for about half of the company's 14 million customers. Since then, the company struggled, filing for bankruptcy in March 2025, and it was eventually acquired by Regeron. Now that the ownership situation has been settled, 23andMe has started to allow customers to file claims for their shares of the legal settlement related to the data breach. The San Francisco-based company, which allows people to submit genetic materials and get a snapshot of their ancestry, announced in October 2023 that hackers had accessed customer information in a data breach. As a result, a January 2024 lawsuit accused the company of not doing enough to protect its customers and not notifying certain customers with Chinese or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry that their data had been targeted specifically. It later settled the lawsuit for $30 million. "We have executed a settlement agreement for an aggregate cash payment of $30 million to settle all US claims regarding the 2023 credential stuffing security incident," a 23andMe spokesman told CNET. "We continue to believe this settlement is in the best interest of 23andMe customers, and we look forward to finalizing the agreement." A few months after that decision, there's now an official method available to make a claim and potentially get paid by 23andMe, in some cases as much as $10,000. Keep reading to get all the details you need, and for more, find out why T-Mobile settlement checks have been delayed and discover whether you can claim a piece of Apple's Siri privacy settlement. How many people did the 23andMe data breach hit? The settlement could cover roughly 6.9 million 23andMe customers whose data was targeted. To qualify, 23andMe customers must also have been US residents as of Aug. 11, 2023. That 6.9 million number includes around 5.5 million customers of 23andMe's DNA Relatives profiles, which lets people find and connect with genetic relatives. The other 1.4 million people affected by the breach used another service known as Family Tree, which predicts a family tree based on the DNA users share with relatives, 23andMe said. How much money could I get from the settlement? At the top end, 23andMe has said it would pay out up to $10,000 with an "Extraordinary Claim" to each customer who can verify that they suffered hardships as a direct result of their information being stolen in the data breach that resulted in unreimbursed costs. This includes costs from "identity fraud or falsified tax returns," acquiring physical security systems, or receiving mental health treatment. Residents of Alaska, California, Illinois and Oregon who were affected by the data breach can also apply for a payment as part of the proposed settlement, since those states have genetic privacy laws with damages provisions. The payments for these individuals are expected to be around $100, depending on how many people file for them, a settlement document said. Also, a smaller subset of affected users whose personal health information was impacted by the breach will be able to apply for a payment of $100. Infographic: Gianmarco Chumbe/CNET. Photo:Will the 23andMe settlement include anything else? Beyond those payments, 23andMe will also offer impacted users three years of a security monitoring service called Privacy Shield, which filings described as providing "substantial web and dark web monitoring." How can I file a claim for the 23andMe settlement? In order to file a claim electronically, you can do so using this official online portal from the Kroll Restructuring Administration. An additional online form is available if you would like proof of your claim sent to you. Potential claimants can also download and print out hard copies of the claim form and proof of claim form if they wish to submit them by mail. If you plan to use this method, send your forms to one of the addresses listed on the claims website. The deadline to make a claim is July 14, 2025. For more, you can read about how class-action lawsuits work.
New York Post
32 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sen. Joni Ernst pushes to ban taxpayer-funded union time in One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Sen. Joni Ernst wants to tweak the House-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act to eliminate the longstanding practice of taxpayer-funded union time. Approximately $160 million of your money went toward fed workers' union time as of 2019, the last time such data was available, and Ernst (R-Iowa) has been on a quest for more recent information. Her legislation, dubbed the 'Protecting Taxpayers' Wallet Act,' would compel government unions to reimburse taxpayers for all of their taxpayer-backed activities. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) has championed the measure in the House. 'Bureaucrats should be serving the American people, not themselves,' Ernst said in a statement. 'Taxpayer-funded union time is a completely backwards and bonkers policy that gives handouts to union bosses and puts taxpayers last. 3 Sen. Joni Ernst has long been a critic of taxpayer funded union time. AP 3 Federal labor unions have been critical of the Trump administration's efforts to slash government bloat. Zach D Roberts/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 'I worked with the Trump administration to get federal employees back to work and now is the time to force the deep-pocketed unions to foot their own bill.' Taxpayer-funded union time refers to activities including union-sponsored training events, preparations for collective bargaining, labor meetings, and work on behalf of those facing disciplinary action. By law, federal unions can't negotiate with the government over benefits or pay. 'They're left negotiating for tedious things that are of zero or negative benefit to taxpayers,' Rachel Greszler, a senior research fellow on workforce and public finance at the Heritage Foundation, previously explained to The Post. 'This includes things like the height of cubicle panels, securing designated smoking areas on otherwise smoke-free campuses, and the right to wear Spandex at work.' The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which cleared the House last month, is now working its way through the Senate, where Republicans in that chamber are hoping to make modifications. After it clears the Senate, the megabill will head to the House for another vote and then to President Trump's desk for his signature. GOP leaders are hoping to get it over the finish line by the Fourth of July. 3 There was an estimated $160 million spent on taxpayer funded union time in 2019, the last time comprehensive data was collected. Zach D Roberts/NurPhoto/Shutterstock With the GOP holding narrow majorities in both houses, senators have significant leverage and are hoping to use it to make adjustments to the megabill. Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) have signaled they may push for changes to the megabill's Medicaid reform provisions. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) has noted that she wants to look closely at the bill's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) reforms. Fiscal hawks, including Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), have demanded steeper cuts to federal spending. Paul has specifically demanded that Republicans remove the increase to the debt ceiling. The House version would hike the debt limit by $4 trillion, which the Senate's blueprint calls for a $5 trillion increase. The US is projected to hit its credit limit by August or September, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated. Ernst, who helms the Senate DOGE Caucus, has pushed for other reforms to find additional savings. Those include the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, which had $320 million allocated to it last year; disqualifying millionaires from receiving unemployment benefits, which cost about $271 million during the first two years of the Biden administration; and selling six federal buildings to recoup a projected $400 million. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is intended to be President Trump's signature legislative achievement of his second term, featuring tax cuts, enhanced border security, boosted energy supply, bolstered defense spending, and more. The CBO estimates that the megabill will increase the federal deficit by about $3 trillion over the next decade.
Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democrats Whine About ICE As California Burns
Ben unpacks how the Democrats' poor politics and leadership led to the chaos that's unfolding in California. He's later joined by FOX News National Correspondent Matt Finn to share his reporting on the riots in Los Angeles. Then, Founder of Pirate Wires Mike Solana joins to discuss the tensions between the tech industry and the populist right when it comes to labor and emerging technologies. Later, Ben and Dylan react to Greta Thunberg's deportation from Israel and Justin Baldoni's dismissed lawsuit against Blake Lively. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
