Senator Penny Wong spruiks WA's geographic position as a key benefit in AUKUS pact during Quad trip
The Foreign Affairs Minister said the Quad meeting — a diplomatic dialogue between Australia, the US, Japan and India — had focused on the strategic importance of the deal, which WA would play a central role in.
'The focus yesterday was much more on what we can do together and also on AUKUS — that's a win, win or a win, win, win,' she told Sky on Thursday.
Senator Wong said 'geography and capability' of Australia's defence posture benefited America in the pact.
'That's one of the benefits of AUKUS — the geographic location of Fleet Base West and the additional capability that that will provide,' she said.
'That is more maintenance for American submarines, that translates to more days in the water for US submarines.'
A new defence precinct at Henderson, south of Perth, will be the maintenance home of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine fleet.
The precinct will be home to a production line churning out army landing craft — first medium then heavy — and general-purpose frigates at new shipbuilding facilities.
It is in the vicinity of The Royal Australian Navy's largest naval base, HMAS Stirling at Garden Island — housing much of Australia's fleet submarines and frigates as a key defence hub.
'One of the great things about the AUKUS arrangements is it increases the capability of all three countries,' Senator Wong said.
'Certainly, in the near and medium term it's a benefit to the US because it increases both the build rates but also maintenance rates. That equals submarine capability in the water.'
In 2023, Australia's defence strategic review stated that WA's north was the first line of defence alongside the Northern Territory.
The high-level talks on Indo-Pacific security in Washington comes amid growing pressure from the Trump administration for Australia to hike its defence spending.
Senator Wong said US Secretary of State Marco Rubio hadn't raised defence spending during the Quad meeting or sideline bilateral discussions.
She also said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was 'very flexible' about arrangements to meet with US President Donald Trump and that Secretary Rubio made clear 'they're keen for a meeting'.
'We're obviously very flexible about those arrangements,' Senator Wong said.
'The president is a very, very busy man, but I was pleased that Secretary Rubio made clear that obviously they're keen for a meeting, they want to reschedule it, it was disappointing, as he said, that they had to reschedule because the President had to return as a consequence of what was occurring in the Middle East.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
29 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passes after tumultuous journey through Congress and fierce Democratic resistance
President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB) has narrowly passed the US Congress after a fierce battle and will now be signed into law by the commander-in-chief. A short time after midnight, House Speaker Mike Johnson declared: 'We have the votes', following the test ballot with the megabill clearing its final hurdle. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant domestic victory for the Republican President that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 election campaign. Nearly all members voted along party lines, with all 212 Democrats voting in unison against the bill and were joined by two Republicans, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. Republican leaders in the House of Representatives and the President himself spent all night convincing holdouts to get in line behind the controversial legislation to meet the strict deadline of July 4. Trump kept up the pressure throughout, persuading and threatening lawmakers as he pressed them to finish the job. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform. "Largest Tax Cuts in History and a Booming Economy vs. Biggest Tax Increase in History, and a Failed Economy. What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???" House Speaker Mike Johnson said: 'This is jet fuel for the economy, and all boats are going to rise.' "Today we are laying a key cornerstone of America's new golden age." The 869-page bill, worth $3.4 trillion, would raise the US debt ceiling by $5 trillion and combines significant tax cuts with increases in border and military spending as well as sweeping cuts to healthcare and food assistance programs. The bill represents a dramatic realignment of the federal government's role in American life, shifting resources from the social safety net and investments in clean energy and reorienting them to finance trillions of dollars in spending on tax cuts. Despite concerns within Trump's party over the bill's hefty price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voting against it, following an intense overnight standoff. The bill has already cleared the Republican-controlled Senate by the narrowest possible margin. The White House confirmed Trump will sign it into law at 5pm American time on Friday, the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Congressional Democrats blasted the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured, coining the mammoth legislation the "big, ugly bill". "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans, is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that was the longest in the chamber's history. During the speech, Jeffries read letters from people insured through Medicaid, including many who said they live in congressional districts represented by Republicans. Jeffries called the bill "an immoral document". "Everybody should vote no against it because of how it attacks children and seniors and everyday Americans. And people with disabilities," Jeffries said. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the bill would lower tax revenues by $4.5 trillion over 10 years and cut spending by $1.1 trillion. The spending cuts largely come from Medicaid, the health program that covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would tighten enrollment standards, institute a work requirement and clamp down on a funding mechanism used by states to boost federal payments - changes that would leave nearly 12 million people uninsured, according to the CBO. Republicans added $50 billion for rural health providers to address concerns that those cutbacks would force them out of business. Nonpartisan analysts have found that the wealthiest Americans would see the biggest benefits from the bill, while lower-income people would effectively see their incomes drop. On the other side of the ledger, the bill staves off tax increases that were due to hit most Americans at the end of this year when Trump's 2017 individual and business tax cuts were due to expire.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
'We're here': Australia joins the race for US academics
Australia hopes to bring America's brightest minds Down Under as Donald Trump's research cuts spark a US brain drain. The US president has taken a chainsaw to science funding, slashing thousands of government grants and transforming the global state of research. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, now vice-chancellor of the University of Canberra, said efforts by the Australian Academy of Science to attract American talent was good national co-ordination. "I'm very pro-American, but if their current government doesn't want some of their best to brightest minds, why should we let them go to Europe or Asia?" he told AAP. "We haven't invented this challenging environment for American higher education ... but that doesn't mean that we should sit back and watch the French, the Germans, the Asian nations, recruit these clever people without at least Australia saying 'we're here too'." The academy has designed a relocation package which includes research funding, access to facilities, family relocation support and visa acceleration in a bid to recruit leading US scientists and Australians returning home. About 70 people have already indicated interest. Some were directly impacted by the Trump administration's budget cuts and lost either their positions or support for their areas of research. Though there have been cuts across a range of disciplines, some of the more significant slashes have been applied to areas such as virology and immunology, alongside cuts to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which enables researchers to forecast weather and model climate change. Other interested researchers have seen the havoc wreaked on American academia and become "disillusioned or despairing" of their ability to pursue their interests in the US, Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia said. By comparison, Australia's research landscape is more stable and less politically driven. "Whilst it's a volatile situation and quite an unfortunate one that we are experiencing, there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia," she told AAP. By bringing more to Australia, they can contribute to research and development which can eventually open up new economic sectors, new trade potential and a plethora of other benefits, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering chief executive Kylie Walker said. "You're looking at a decade or more to show benefits from that investment, but when they come - my goodness - they come," she told AAP. Australia isn't the only nation hoping to capitalise on Mr Trump's attack on academia. His cuts have ignited a "global race" for science and technology talent, and Australia's universities, research organisations and agencies such as the CSIRO are all trying to attract them. Almost half of the academy's fellows, which are Australia's most distinguished scientists, were born overseas and many had a multiplier effect when they arrived in Australia as they trained the next generation and helped seed industries. "This is the Australian story, this is what science is in Australia," Ms Arabia said. "It's multicultural, it's of the highest standard, it's undertaken in a supportive environment and in a democratic environment where we nurture science and our scientists." Australia hopes to bring America's brightest minds Down Under as Donald Trump's research cuts spark a US brain drain. The US president has taken a chainsaw to science funding, slashing thousands of government grants and transforming the global state of research. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, now vice-chancellor of the University of Canberra, said efforts by the Australian Academy of Science to attract American talent was good national co-ordination. "I'm very pro-American, but if their current government doesn't want some of their best to brightest minds, why should we let them go to Europe or Asia?" he told AAP. "We haven't invented this challenging environment for American higher education ... but that doesn't mean that we should sit back and watch the French, the Germans, the Asian nations, recruit these clever people without at least Australia saying 'we're here too'." The academy has designed a relocation package which includes research funding, access to facilities, family relocation support and visa acceleration in a bid to recruit leading US scientists and Australians returning home. About 70 people have already indicated interest. Some were directly impacted by the Trump administration's budget cuts and lost either their positions or support for their areas of research. Though there have been cuts across a range of disciplines, some of the more significant slashes have been applied to areas such as virology and immunology, alongside cuts to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which enables researchers to forecast weather and model climate change. Other interested researchers have seen the havoc wreaked on American academia and become "disillusioned or despairing" of their ability to pursue their interests in the US, Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia said. By comparison, Australia's research landscape is more stable and less politically driven. "Whilst it's a volatile situation and quite an unfortunate one that we are experiencing, there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia," she told AAP. By bringing more to Australia, they can contribute to research and development which can eventually open up new economic sectors, new trade potential and a plethora of other benefits, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering chief executive Kylie Walker said. "You're looking at a decade or more to show benefits from that investment, but when they come - my goodness - they come," she told AAP. Australia isn't the only nation hoping to capitalise on Mr Trump's attack on academia. His cuts have ignited a "global race" for science and technology talent, and Australia's universities, research organisations and agencies such as the CSIRO are all trying to attract them. Almost half of the academy's fellows, which are Australia's most distinguished scientists, were born overseas and many had a multiplier effect when they arrived in Australia as they trained the next generation and helped seed industries. "This is the Australian story, this is what science is in Australia," Ms Arabia said. "It's multicultural, it's of the highest standard, it's undertaken in a supportive environment and in a democratic environment where we nurture science and our scientists." Australia hopes to bring America's brightest minds Down Under as Donald Trump's research cuts spark a US brain drain. The US president has taken a chainsaw to science funding, slashing thousands of government grants and transforming the global state of research. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, now vice-chancellor of the University of Canberra, said efforts by the Australian Academy of Science to attract American talent was good national co-ordination. "I'm very pro-American, but if their current government doesn't want some of their best to brightest minds, why should we let them go to Europe or Asia?" he told AAP. "We haven't invented this challenging environment for American higher education ... but that doesn't mean that we should sit back and watch the French, the Germans, the Asian nations, recruit these clever people without at least Australia saying 'we're here too'." The academy has designed a relocation package which includes research funding, access to facilities, family relocation support and visa acceleration in a bid to recruit leading US scientists and Australians returning home. About 70 people have already indicated interest. Some were directly impacted by the Trump administration's budget cuts and lost either their positions or support for their areas of research. Though there have been cuts across a range of disciplines, some of the more significant slashes have been applied to areas such as virology and immunology, alongside cuts to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which enables researchers to forecast weather and model climate change. Other interested researchers have seen the havoc wreaked on American academia and become "disillusioned or despairing" of their ability to pursue their interests in the US, Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia said. By comparison, Australia's research landscape is more stable and less politically driven. "Whilst it's a volatile situation and quite an unfortunate one that we are experiencing, there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia," she told AAP. By bringing more to Australia, they can contribute to research and development which can eventually open up new economic sectors, new trade potential and a plethora of other benefits, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering chief executive Kylie Walker said. "You're looking at a decade or more to show benefits from that investment, but when they come - my goodness - they come," she told AAP. Australia isn't the only nation hoping to capitalise on Mr Trump's attack on academia. His cuts have ignited a "global race" for science and technology talent, and Australia's universities, research organisations and agencies such as the CSIRO are all trying to attract them. Almost half of the academy's fellows, which are Australia's most distinguished scientists, were born overseas and many had a multiplier effect when they arrived in Australia as they trained the next generation and helped seed industries. "This is the Australian story, this is what science is in Australia," Ms Arabia said. "It's multicultural, it's of the highest standard, it's undertaken in a supportive environment and in a democratic environment where we nurture science and our scientists." Australia hopes to bring America's brightest minds Down Under as Donald Trump's research cuts spark a US brain drain. The US president has taken a chainsaw to science funding, slashing thousands of government grants and transforming the global state of research. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten, now vice-chancellor of the University of Canberra, said efforts by the Australian Academy of Science to attract American talent was good national co-ordination. "I'm very pro-American, but if their current government doesn't want some of their best to brightest minds, why should we let them go to Europe or Asia?" he told AAP. "We haven't invented this challenging environment for American higher education ... but that doesn't mean that we should sit back and watch the French, the Germans, the Asian nations, recruit these clever people without at least Australia saying 'we're here too'." The academy has designed a relocation package which includes research funding, access to facilities, family relocation support and visa acceleration in a bid to recruit leading US scientists and Australians returning home. About 70 people have already indicated interest. Some were directly impacted by the Trump administration's budget cuts and lost either their positions or support for their areas of research. Though there have been cuts across a range of disciplines, some of the more significant slashes have been applied to areas such as virology and immunology, alongside cuts to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration which enables researchers to forecast weather and model climate change. Other interested researchers have seen the havoc wreaked on American academia and become "disillusioned or despairing" of their ability to pursue their interests in the US, Australian Academy of Science chief executive Anna-Maria Arabia said. By comparison, Australia's research landscape is more stable and less politically driven. "Whilst it's a volatile situation and quite an unfortunate one that we are experiencing, there is a tremendous opportunity for Australia," she told AAP. By bringing more to Australia, they can contribute to research and development which can eventually open up new economic sectors, new trade potential and a plethora of other benefits, Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering chief executive Kylie Walker said. "You're looking at a decade or more to show benefits from that investment, but when they come - my goodness - they come," she told AAP. Australia isn't the only nation hoping to capitalise on Mr Trump's attack on academia. His cuts have ignited a "global race" for science and technology talent, and Australia's universities, research organisations and agencies such as the CSIRO are all trying to attract them. Almost half of the academy's fellows, which are Australia's most distinguished scientists, were born overseas and many had a multiplier effect when they arrived in Australia as they trained the next generation and helped seed industries. "This is the Australian story, this is what science is in Australia," Ms Arabia said. "It's multicultural, it's of the highest standard, it's undertaken in a supportive environment and in a democratic environment where we nurture science and our scientists."
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
New management revives SRT performance division that developed Hellcat V8 engine
There's a new CEO in charge at Stellantis, and he's bringing back the racing department that developed the supercharged Hellcat V8. Antonio Filosa, who took charge of the French-Italian-American automotive conglomerate in late June, has been slowly announcing his executive and senior management team. He has promoted Tim Kuniskis, currently head of Ram, to oversee all of its North American brands, which also include Dodge, Jeep and Chrysler. Mr Kuniskis will also head up the revived Street and Racing Technology (SRT) division that was shuttered in 2021 not long after Fiat Chrysler merged with the PSA Group — parent of Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel and Vauxhall — to form Stellantis. SRT will once again be put in charge of engineering performance models for all four North American marques. It will also take over Stellantis North America's racing operations, which include drag racing and, starting next year, the NASCAR Truck Series. In its past life SRT made vehicles like the Dodge Neon SRT-4, as well as the V10-powered Dodge Viper. Its most recent efforts were concentrated around the 6.2-litre supercharged Hellcat V8 engine, which was installed in the Dodge Charger sedan and Challenger coupe, Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, and Ram 1500 TRX. The division also worked its magic on less fire-breathing V8 models, including those used in the Chrysler 300. Although the SRT division was disbanded in 2021, the company continued to develop the Hellcat engine up until the demise of the third-generation Dodge Challenger and seventh-generation Dodge Charger. The Hellcat soldiers on to this day under the bonnet of the Dodge Durango Hellcat. No plans for SRT have been announced so far, but it's widely hoped it will try to find a way to insert V8 Hellcat engine into the new Charger coupe and sedan, which are currently only available with electric drivetrains and turbocharged 3.0-litre straight-six Hurricane petrol engine. Hopes have been raised since Mr Kuniskis returned to run Ram in late 2024. In June he announced the 5.7-litre Hemi V8 would return the 1500 ute range after year-or-so away. "Everyone makes mistakes, but how you handle them defines you. Ram screwed up when we dropped the Hemi — we own it and we fixed it," he said at announcement. This week announcement of SRT's revival and the elevation of Mr Kuniskis to oversee Dodge, Ram, Jeep and Chrysler is a real back-to-the-future moment. Mr Kuniskis held a similar role in 2014 when these brands were part of Fiat Chrysler, and is widely credited with championing the Hellcat V8 project. MORE: Everything Jeep Content originally sourced from: There's a new CEO in charge at Stellantis, and he's bringing back the racing department that developed the supercharged Hellcat V8. Antonio Filosa, who took charge of the French-Italian-American automotive conglomerate in late June, has been slowly announcing his executive and senior management team. He has promoted Tim Kuniskis, currently head of Ram, to oversee all of its North American brands, which also include Dodge, Jeep and Chrysler. Mr Kuniskis will also head up the revived Street and Racing Technology (SRT) division that was shuttered in 2021 not long after Fiat Chrysler merged with the PSA Group — parent of Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel and Vauxhall — to form Stellantis. SRT will once again be put in charge of engineering performance models for all four North American marques. It will also take over Stellantis North America's racing operations, which include drag racing and, starting next year, the NASCAR Truck Series. In its past life SRT made vehicles like the Dodge Neon SRT-4, as well as the V10-powered Dodge Viper. Its most recent efforts were concentrated around the 6.2-litre supercharged Hellcat V8 engine, which was installed in the Dodge Charger sedan and Challenger coupe, Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, and Ram 1500 TRX. The division also worked its magic on less fire-breathing V8 models, including those used in the Chrysler 300. Although the SRT division was disbanded in 2021, the company continued to develop the Hellcat engine up until the demise of the third-generation Dodge Challenger and seventh-generation Dodge Charger. The Hellcat soldiers on to this day under the bonnet of the Dodge Durango Hellcat. No plans for SRT have been announced so far, but it's widely hoped it will try to find a way to insert V8 Hellcat engine into the new Charger coupe and sedan, which are currently only available with electric drivetrains and turbocharged 3.0-litre straight-six Hurricane petrol engine. Hopes have been raised since Mr Kuniskis returned to run Ram in late 2024. In June he announced the 5.7-litre Hemi V8 would return the 1500 ute range after year-or-so away. "Everyone makes mistakes, but how you handle them defines you. Ram screwed up when we dropped the Hemi — we own it and we fixed it," he said at announcement. This week announcement of SRT's revival and the elevation of Mr Kuniskis to oversee Dodge, Ram, Jeep and Chrysler is a real back-to-the-future moment. Mr Kuniskis held a similar role in 2014 when these brands were part of Fiat Chrysler, and is widely credited with championing the Hellcat V8 project. MORE: Everything Jeep Content originally sourced from: There's a new CEO in charge at Stellantis, and he's bringing back the racing department that developed the supercharged Hellcat V8. Antonio Filosa, who took charge of the French-Italian-American automotive conglomerate in late June, has been slowly announcing his executive and senior management team. He has promoted Tim Kuniskis, currently head of Ram, to oversee all of its North American brands, which also include Dodge, Jeep and Chrysler. Mr Kuniskis will also head up the revived Street and Racing Technology (SRT) division that was shuttered in 2021 not long after Fiat Chrysler merged with the PSA Group — parent of Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel and Vauxhall — to form Stellantis. SRT will once again be put in charge of engineering performance models for all four North American marques. It will also take over Stellantis North America's racing operations, which include drag racing and, starting next year, the NASCAR Truck Series. In its past life SRT made vehicles like the Dodge Neon SRT-4, as well as the V10-powered Dodge Viper. Its most recent efforts were concentrated around the 6.2-litre supercharged Hellcat V8 engine, which was installed in the Dodge Charger sedan and Challenger coupe, Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, and Ram 1500 TRX. The division also worked its magic on less fire-breathing V8 models, including those used in the Chrysler 300. Although the SRT division was disbanded in 2021, the company continued to develop the Hellcat engine up until the demise of the third-generation Dodge Challenger and seventh-generation Dodge Charger. The Hellcat soldiers on to this day under the bonnet of the Dodge Durango Hellcat. No plans for SRT have been announced so far, but it's widely hoped it will try to find a way to insert V8 Hellcat engine into the new Charger coupe and sedan, which are currently only available with electric drivetrains and turbocharged 3.0-litre straight-six Hurricane petrol engine. Hopes have been raised since Mr Kuniskis returned to run Ram in late 2024. In June he announced the 5.7-litre Hemi V8 would return the 1500 ute range after year-or-so away. "Everyone makes mistakes, but how you handle them defines you. Ram screwed up when we dropped the Hemi — we own it and we fixed it," he said at announcement. This week announcement of SRT's revival and the elevation of Mr Kuniskis to oversee Dodge, Ram, Jeep and Chrysler is a real back-to-the-future moment. Mr Kuniskis held a similar role in 2014 when these brands were part of Fiat Chrysler, and is widely credited with championing the Hellcat V8 project. MORE: Everything Jeep Content originally sourced from: There's a new CEO in charge at Stellantis, and he's bringing back the racing department that developed the supercharged Hellcat V8. Antonio Filosa, who took charge of the French-Italian-American automotive conglomerate in late June, has been slowly announcing his executive and senior management team. He has promoted Tim Kuniskis, currently head of Ram, to oversee all of its North American brands, which also include Dodge, Jeep and Chrysler. Mr Kuniskis will also head up the revived Street and Racing Technology (SRT) division that was shuttered in 2021 not long after Fiat Chrysler merged with the PSA Group — parent of Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel and Vauxhall — to form Stellantis. SRT will once again be put in charge of engineering performance models for all four North American marques. It will also take over Stellantis North America's racing operations, which include drag racing and, starting next year, the NASCAR Truck Series. In its past life SRT made vehicles like the Dodge Neon SRT-4, as well as the V10-powered Dodge Viper. Its most recent efforts were concentrated around the 6.2-litre supercharged Hellcat V8 engine, which was installed in the Dodge Charger sedan and Challenger coupe, Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, and Ram 1500 TRX. The division also worked its magic on less fire-breathing V8 models, including those used in the Chrysler 300. Although the SRT division was disbanded in 2021, the company continued to develop the Hellcat engine up until the demise of the third-generation Dodge Challenger and seventh-generation Dodge Charger. The Hellcat soldiers on to this day under the bonnet of the Dodge Durango Hellcat. No plans for SRT have been announced so far, but it's widely hoped it will try to find a way to insert V8 Hellcat engine into the new Charger coupe and sedan, which are currently only available with electric drivetrains and turbocharged 3.0-litre straight-six Hurricane petrol engine. Hopes have been raised since Mr Kuniskis returned to run Ram in late 2024. In June he announced the 5.7-litre Hemi V8 would return the 1500 ute range after year-or-so away. "Everyone makes mistakes, but how you handle them defines you. Ram screwed up when we dropped the Hemi — we own it and we fixed it," he said at announcement. This week announcement of SRT's revival and the elevation of Mr Kuniskis to oversee Dodge, Ram, Jeep and Chrysler is a real back-to-the-future moment. Mr Kuniskis held a similar role in 2014 when these brands were part of Fiat Chrysler, and is widely credited with championing the Hellcat V8 project. MORE: Everything Jeep Content originally sourced from:
