Cabinet approves National Labour Migration Policy to regulate foreign employment
The paper will mark a significant step in regulating the movement and employment of foreign nationals in South Africa.
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said that the policy seeks to provide a framework to enforce proper and orderly movement and employment of foreign nationals in the country. 'It aims to achieve a balance across several areas, including addressing South Africans' expectations for job prospects, in light of rising unemployment and the perception that foreign nationals restrict labour market access.'
Cabinet said that the NLMP introduces quotas on the total number of documented foreign nationals with work visas that can be employed in major economic sectors such as agriculture, hospitality and tourism, as well as construction, among others. 'The policy complements other interventions such as enforcement of a list of sectors where foreign nationals cannot be allocated business visas and amendments to the National Small Enterprise Act, 1996 (Act 102 of 1996), as amended, to limit foreign nationals establishing small, medium and micro enterprises, and trading in some sectors of the economy.'
Cabinet added that the NLMP is the first comprehensive National Labour Migration Policy aimed at managing labour migration both into and out of the country. 'The policy is designed to promote a 'brain gain' by attracting skilled workers to South Africa, while also addressing the 'brain drain' caused by the emigration of skilled professionals. The Employment Services Amendment Bill goes hand-in-hand with the NLMP and has been created to make it legal for the government to regulate the employment of immigrants in South African businesses.'
One of the bill's more contentious features is the potential introduction of employment quotas, which would limit the number of immigrants that businesses can hire and require employers to prioritise the hiring of South African citizens, the Cabinet said.
Matthew Parks, Parliamentary Coordinator for Cosatu, said that he welcomes Cabinet's approval of the National Labour Migration Policy and the Employment Services Amendment Bill. 'Cosatu extensively engaged on both the Policy and the Bill at Nedlac and looks forward to the Bill's processing and adoption by Parliament and their implementation. The Bill and the Policy provide a long overdue response to the flood of undocumented migrant labour into the economy over the past decade.'
Parks said this will enable the Minister for Employment and Labour to set limits on the number of documented migrant workers that can be employed in a workplace and an economic sector.
'These limits are critical for an economy battling dangerously high and rising unemployment levels of 43.1% overall and 72% among youth. We have seen countless unscrupulous employers in certain sectors, in particular agriculture, petrol stations, restaurants, and construction, among others; preferring to employ undocumented migrant labour as their vulnerability opens them to wildly abusive exploitation."
Parks said they hope that the Department of Employment and Labour's recruitment drive for an additional 20 000 labour inspectors will provide a decisive boost to efforts to crack down on such violations of workers' hard-won labour rights.
It is crucial that the Critical Skills List be continuously assessed by government with business and labour at Nedlac to ensure that it is positioned to attract scarce skills to South Africa, to upskill local workers and to ensure unemployed South Africans with such needed skills are prioritised, he said.
'Whilst migration is ingrained with history and South Africa is no exception, the current levels into South Africa are unsustainable, more so given the high levels of unemployment. The Bill and Policy seek to find the correct balance and to ensure the state is better capacitated to set limits and protect the needs of workers. These are badly needed, and their implementation must be expedited,' Parks said.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
How much money Dricus du Plessis won ‘by laying on the ground for 25 minutes'
The South African lost his title to Russian Khamzat Chimaev on Sunday in Chicago. He may have surrendered his Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) middleweight title this past weekend, but South Africa's Dricus du Plessis will receive a small silver lining in the way of a bloated bank account. Du Plessis had no answers for undefeated Russian Khamzat Chimaev's wrestling as he succumbed to a unanimous decision defeat at UFC 319 in Chicago on Sunday. Various reports online have estimated the South African will receive approximately $3 million (nearly R59 million) for essentially laying on the ground for almost 25 minutes. According to this amount includes a $1 million base purse reflecting his championship status, as well as between $1-1,5 million in Pay Per View and promotional bonuses — boosted by his star power and PPV points. Had he won the fight, this amount would have increased by a further $500,000. New champion Chimaev New champion Chimaev will earn an estimated $1.8 million — $750,000 for his base purse, $500,000 win bonus, roughly $750,000 to $1 million, driven by the event's hype and an extra $50,000 for his performance of the night bonus. Notably, Du Plessis previously banked $3.34 million at UFC 312 against Sean Strickland, per industry estimates, and $1.9 million at UFC 305 against Israel Adesanya. The combined earnings of Du Plessis and Chimaev, estimated at over $5 million, highlight the financial stakes of UFC title fights. Chimaev's amount reflects his rising star power, while Du Plessis' $3 million highlights the champion's PPV advantage. As the UFC prepares for a $7.7 billion Paramount deal in 2026, these figures spark curiosity about future fighter pay structures.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Why some South Africans are celebrating Dricus du Plessis' UFC title defeat
While sports minister Gayton McKenzie sent his commiserations to Du Plessis for the loss, other South Africans weren't so sympathetic. Several South Africans on social media have celebrated Dricus du Plessis' loss of his Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) middleweight title to Russian-Emirati fighter Khamzat Chimaev. 'Dricus' loss actually made me more pro-South African. He stood for the white genocide (which has been debunked), and he's also pro-Trump (who should be debunked). 'This is a loss for the good of the country,' wrote comedian Yaaseen Barnes on X (formerly Twitter) after the fight. Dricus' loss actually made me more Pro-South African He stood for the white genocide (which has beeeen debunked), he's also pro-trump (who should be bunked) This is a loss for the good of the country. — Yaaseen Barnes (@Ya_a_seen_Him) August 17, 2025 More reactions Due to UFC's popularity, some of the biggest fights penetrate through pop culture, grabbing the attention of people who don't usually follow the sport. 'Dricus du Plessis, you made us proud as one of the great champions, and we know you will be back. You faced a tough wrestler today, but you will come back stronger,' said Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie However, while McKenzie sent his commiserations to Du Plessis for the loss, other South Africans weren't so sympathetic. 'There is no patriotism with peddlers of fake genocide in SA and racists. Thank you, Khamzat. Free Palestine,' wrote EFF Member of Parliament, Sinawo Thambo. South Africa rallied behind Du Plessis when he first won the title from Strickland, but during his reign as champion, the South African's endorsement of US President Donald Trump left a bad taste in the mouths of his fellow citizens. Where the disdain stems from In a lead-up to defending his title earlier this year, during a press conference, a journalist asked Du Plessis about a t-shirt he wore, which read 'Trump prefers champions' with an X (formerly Twitter) logo. 'Obviously, being a champion, he said he wants champions in his team, and he said it on X in a big shout-out to fellow South African Elon Musk for also doing the right thing,' said Du Plessis. Du Plessis's comments came a few days after Trump's baseless claims about land confiscations in South Africa. Nice @dricusduplessis wearing a Trump shirt, acknowledging President @realDonaldTrump for calling out the South African government. Dricus' first fight in the UFC on ESPN, he spoke out about farmer murders on 11 October 2020. He also gave a shoutout to @elonmusk. Dricus has the… February 5, 2025 Trump accused the South African government of 'confiscating land' and treating 'certain classes of people' badly. Since then, support from some South Africans has waned. So much so that South Africans supported whoever took on Du Plessis. ALSO READ: 'Please moer this Dricus du Plessis': Support for Strickland grows after Du Plessis' endorsement of Trump's comments Du Plessis dominated Chimaev dominated Du Plessis across five consecutive rounds at UFC 319's main event held in Chicago, Illinois, in the US. The South African has held the middleweight title since January 2024, when he beat American fighter Sean Strickland. 'The man has incredible control on the top,' Du Plessis said about Chimaev. 'He was just like a blanket. It wasn't a matter of strength; it wasn't that physical; it was just almost as if he knew what your next move was going to be. He got it without using too much power, and I had to decide whether to be on my back or have him on my back. At the end, I went for it, had the back, I could almost taste that victory.' 'He deserves this 100%, he beat me fair and square tonight.' WATCH: Du Plessis interview after the fight NOW READ: Beaten Dricus says, 'Big ups to Khamzat, he deserves this 100%'
Mail & Guardian
3 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Pace of gender equality at tertiary education institutions painfully slow
A 2024 study at a South African university found female staff are concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. Photo: File This year, 2025, marks the 30th anniversary of International Women's Day, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, an agenda for women's empowerment. On 8 March, International Women's Day was observed under the theme 'For All Women and Girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment'. Sorry to burst the celebration bubble but, with the deadline to achieve the UN sustainable development goals just under five years away, true emancipation of women seems a distant goal. An Concerning women leaders at institutions of higher learning, the Without taking anything away from both women's achievements, it is perplexing that it took the institutions 167 and 148 years to have a woman at the helm. Several scholars have published articles about problems facing academic and support personnel in both traditional universities and universities of technology. The battle to attain gender equality at institutions of higher learning, even beyond 30 years of democracy in South Africa, is there for everyone to see. Delving into some of the scientific evidence, in their 2024 study Reforming Higher Education in South Africa by Addressing Gender Inequalities, researchers Anri Wheeler and Laurika Wiese identified the absence of ' Their research article, published in the Journal of Adult and Continuing Education , shows that the policy vacuum perpetuates the marginalisation of female students and personnel. The study was conducted with female employees from varied staff components at a university of technology and they applied the Gender and Development Theory, which asserts that 'genuine economic and social progress is hindered as long as gender inequalities endure'. Some of the study's key findings highlight the preference of some males for working only with colleagues of the same gender. Meanwhile, female staff remained concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. The results also highlight that the selection of female staff into higher positions often serves only to comply with filling of quotas — a tick-box exercise. Even more disturbing, some participants confirmed the existence of a 'band of brothers' mentality in institutions — a group of male colleagues indifferent to working with females and, in many instances, treating them with disrespect based on gender. Furthermore, one of the themes emanating from the study is female stereotyping, where female colleagues are undermined by labels such as 'emotional' because of their gender. The study indicates that universities can help to reduce inequities and create a more inclusive and diverse learning and working environment by addressing gender discrepancies in academic and professional contexts. Wheeler and Wiese affirm that by espousing sustainable development goal 5, higher learning institutions can simultaneously contribute to attainment of other goals such as poverty eradication; quality education; decent work and economic growth reduced inequalities. A 2022 study, Workplace Bullying and Its Implications for Gender Transformation in the South African Higher Education Sector: An Intersectional Perspective by Brightness Mangolothi and Professor Peliwe Mnguni is relevant in helping us find ways to fasttrack gender transformation. They employed qualitative semi-structured interviews wherein they targeted a sample of 25 women academics from three universities. Their research article, published in the International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies , makes a link between Mangolothi and Mnguni listed bullying behaviours directed at women such as excessive workload allocation, removal of key areas of responsibility and being given trivial tasks to replace their core duties. The researchers summarise women's academic journey through a model anchored in the elements of access, retention, development, performance, progression and exit through resignation. The authors' research findings are aligned to identified themes and point to bullying mostly affecting African, coloured and Indian women academics. Key findings include access being denied and resources withheld; not being seen or heard; shifting goalposts; recognition withheld and authorisation denied for women at institutions of higher learning. Mangolothi and Mnguni's study shows that there is a 'boys club' culture, where men support each other in bullying women, undermining and excluding them from decision-making structures. South Africa continues to grapple with the triple developmental challenges of poverty, inequality and unemployment, with women seemingly the most negatively affected. Amid the research concluding there is gender inequality, the question is whether there is a will to address the patriarchy's negative impact across society and the workplace — or will women emancipation remain an elusive dream? Shalate Davhana & Malesela Maubane are Tshwane University of Technology alumni, with the former a staff member at the university. They write in their personal capacities.
