Reduce food prices and add food wastage laws, urges anti-hunger movement
This comes as the latest Household Affordability Index report by the Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice and Dignity Group (PMBEJD) showed a 3.1% year-on-year increase in core staples such as brown bread, cooking oil, maize meal, tea, potatoes, frozen chicken pieces, white sugar and sugar beans.
United Against Hunger, which comprises the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund and the Healthy Living Alliance , is demanding through its petition that retailers drop food prices for '10 best buys' including rice, long-life milk, soya, eggs, tinned fish, dried beans, peanut butter, fortified maize meal, maas and lentils.
'These foods are full of protein and energy. That doesn't mean that other foods are not important. These foods could provide high nutritional value at the lowest cost, especially for families living below the poverty line.'
The movement also called on government to implement legislation on food wastage in South Africa, saying companies 'can't just throw away fresh food when people go to bed hungry'.
'We demand more public engagement in the government's draft National Food Security and Nutrition Plan. Over the years, many organisations have built public pressure to increase and top up social grants. But even if we get the significant social grant increases we have been demanding, the cost of living will undermine these victories and keep people in poverty. The R370 [grant] is hardly enough to travel to a job interview or start a small business, let alone buy enough food for the month.'
According to the Household Affordability Index, core foods are bought first to ensure families don't go hungry.
'When the prices of core foods increase, there is less money to secure other important nutritionally-rich foods, which are essential for health, wellbeing and strong immune systems. These include meat, eggs and dairy which are critical for protein, iron and calcium; vegetables and fruit, which are critical for vitamins, minerals and fibre; and maas, peanut butter and pilchards, which contain good fats, protein and calcium essential for children,' said Mervyn Abrahams of PMBEJD.
The data shows that the core foods contribute 54% of the total cost of the household food basket.
'At an average cost of R2,955.34 in May, these foods are relatively very expensive in relation to the total money available in the household purse to secure food. These foods must be bought regardless of price escalations.
'The high cost of core staple foods results in a lot of proper nutritious food being removed off the family plates. The consequences of high costs on the core foods has a negative impact on overall household health and wellbeing, and child development,' said Abrahams.
Overall the latest Household Affordability Index report, which tracks the prices of 44 basic foods from 47 supermarkets and 32 butcheries in Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town,Pietermaritzburg, Mtubatuba in Northern KZN, and Springbok in the Northern Cape, shows that in May the average cost of the household food basket is R5,466.59 — a 2.6% increase from R5,330 a year ago.
Foods that increased by more than 5% include potatoes, onions, tea, carrots, butternut, spinach and peanut butter, while items that increased by 2% or more include samp, frozen chicken portions, fish, wors, cabbage, bananas, apples, margarine and apricot jam.
Abrahams said food is bought after transport and electricity have been paid for or money set aside.
'PMBEJD calculated that workers' families will underspend on food by a minimum of 45%. In this scenario there is no possibility of a worker being able to afford enough nutritious food for her family.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
28 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
We're cleaning up: Correctional services minister opens prison bakery
Correctional services minister Pieter Groenewald says awaiting trial prisoners, unemployed detainees and thousands of foreigners in South African jails are costing taxpayers millions. 'We have about six inmates who have been awaiting trial for more than 10 years. There are ways in terms of legislation where we can request for them to go back to court. But it's not very successful,' said Groenewald. Groenewald was speaking at the opening of a bakery at the Westville correctional facility on Thursday. He was accompanied by national commissioner Samuel Thobakgale. Groenewald said another problem which contributed to overcrowding was that more than 3,000 remand detainees could not afford to pay bail of R3,000 or less. Groenewald said there was a process in place to establish a bail fund to alleviate this. He said there were more than 26,000 foreigners detained at correctional facilities, 13,000 of whom were detainees. 'I hope that by next year this time the department would have legislation in place so we can deport them to their countries of origin,' said Groenewald. He said foreigners were costing the taxpayers more than R11m a month. 'If they want to continue with their criminality they should do it in their own country,' he said. He said with the bakery producing 3,840 loaves daily, more than 50 inmates were benefiting from the much-needed skills training for which inmates received certificates. 'That is very important because it ensues that inmates are part of rehabilitation so when they leave the prison they are self-sufficient and can reintegrate into the society,' said Groenewald. He said the department wanted to set up 20 bakeries in correctional facilities by 2028. 'We serve the people of South Africa to the benefit of taxpayers. With this initiative we are able to save around R3m annually on the bakery,' said Groenewald. He said the department had spent more than R7m to build and establish the bakery, which he deemed to be a investment. 'A loaf of bread costs us R8 compared with the R23 we were paying external suppliers,' he said.
Daily Maverick
28 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
ICJ climate opinion shows the power of youth and Global South solidarity
The unanimous decision clarifies governments' obligations and provides a precedent for human rights-based cases in Africa. In 2019, law students in the Pacific Island state of Vanuatu were frustrated by the injustice of who pollutes the Earth versus who suffers the consequences. Their decision to explore legal recourse resulted in a rare act of Global South solidarity and the first-ever International Court of Justice (ICJ) opinion on climate change. Africa has much to gain from the opinion. There are also lessons about focused collective action and pursuing legal pathways to compel climate action. On 23 July, the ICJ judges found that climate change posed an 'urgent and existential threat' and that governments were legally required to protect the climate system as a precondition for upholding human rights, and to address damages already created. The opinion stated that 'failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system from [greenhouse gas] GHG emissions — including through fossil fuel production, fossil fuel consumption, the granting of fossil fuel exploration licences or the provision of fossil fuel subsidies — may constitute an internationally wrongful act… attributable to that [state]'. The ICJ opinion is not legally binding but clarifies state responsibilities. It also demands that governments regulate and hold the private sector accountable through mechanisms that include compliance, emissions accounting and risk mitigation. It requires states to uphold international climate change agreements, namely the Paris Agreement. The opinion opens the door for low-emissions groups and countries — many in Africa — to push high-emissions nations to stronger action or seek compensation. It could significantly change conversations around climate change in Africa, and is a triumph of collective action among low-income and climate-vulnerable countries. The 2019 campaign was spearheaded by the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, who urged national leaders to take human rights and climate change to the ICJ. In 2021 Vanuatu announced it would seek an ICJ opinion on climate change. For 18 months, the country lobbied other United Nations (UN) members to support its request. In 2023, after the matter was put before the UN General Assembly with 132 co-sponsors, all 193 member states agreed to approach the court. Youth advocacy As a result, climate inaction now constitutes a matter of international law. Vanuatu's successful campaign also shows that collective youth advocacy can set a global agenda and enable change. For years, youth have lobbied at UN conferences, organised campaigns, pressured corporations and engaged policymakers. The ICJ opinion reaffirms litigation as an effective tool for youth to demand action and rights protection. Two examples show how African youth have already taken steps in this direction. In 2024, South African youth led the #CancelCoal campaign, which included, among others, the African Climate Alliance. The campaign won a landmark high court case, overturning government plans for a new 1,500 MW coal-fired power project. The judge found that the government had not fully considered the impact on children's rights, particularly to a healthy environment. In 2012, a group of minor children in Uganda filed Mbabazi and Others vs The Attorney-General and National Environment Management Authority for failing to address climate change. After 13 years, the case has yet to be concluded. The ICJ opinion offers global legitimacy that could bolster African youth's demands from their governments and courts, providing a powerful rallying point to frame climate litigation regarding human rights. Young people in Africa should strategically advocate and build transnational coalitions as part of a global effort. Vanuatu comprises a collection of islands with a population of just 300,000. It continuously loses territory and arable land due to rising sea levels. Despite its size, the country has been at the forefront of climate justice for decades. At the first UN Framework Convention on Climate Change meeting in 1991, Vanuatu led the call for a justice mechanism for countries bearing the brunt of climate change despite contributing the least. Small Island Developing States in Africa, the Pacific and Caribbean have worked collectively to maximise their influence. The ICJ opinion is significant for Africa. Despite contributing only about 3%-4% of historical emissions, the continent suffers the worst impacts. These include biodiversity loss, water scarcity, reduced food production, loss of life and reduced economic growth. At the end of 2024, 9.8 million people were displaced internally by climate-related events, mainly in Africa. The ICJ opinion should embolden African actors to amplify this asymmetry as a climate justice matter that compels global accountability and reparations, and in negotiations for more equitable climate finance. By framing climate change as a human rights issue, the ICJ provides a precedent for other rights-based cases and a mandate for countries to strengthen climate laws. Most African legal systems have a limited appetite for climate change due to there being few precedents, procedural backlogs and insufficient capacity. In May 2025, a coalition of African lawyers and civil society groups requested an advisory opinion from the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights on the obligations of states in the face of the climate emergency. The ICJ case is the largest to date, with 91 written and 107 oral statements. Countries including Cameroon, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Namibia and Kenya argued that climate change adversely affected human rights. Historic greenhouse gas emitters and petrostates argued against linking human rights to climate impacts, and for treaties like the Paris Agreement to govern climate change. South Africa — Africa's largest emitter (7% of global emissions) — also argued against a rights-based approach, saying its own climate vulnerabilities and complex socioeconomic circumstances caused an unjust burden. China and India have made similar claims to avoid paying into climate funds, which in turn have been used by countries such as the US to withdraw from climate agreements. How the ICJ opinion will be applied, who uses it, and how states respond remain to be seen. Options for African countries to seek reparations or debt cancellation are open for exploration. DM Aimée-Noël Mbiyozo is a Senior Research Consultant, Migration and Kgaugelo Mkumbeni is a Research Officer, Climate Risk and Human Security, Institute for Security Studies (ISS).
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Former ANC MP Vincent Smith denied R2m for legal defence in fraud case
Former ANC MP Vincent Smith, pictured here appearing in court, has been unsuccessful in his bid to access just over R2 million to fund his defence in his upcoming criminal trial. Image: Supplied Fraud and corruption-accused former ANC MP Vincent Smith has suffered a major blow after he was refused access to over R2 million to fund his defence in the looming criminal trial. The former chairperson of the National Assembly's Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services is facing charges that he received payments totalling R600,000 from former Bosasa (now African Global Operations) chief operations officer Angelo Agrizzi, who is his co-accused in the matter alongside Smith's company, Euroblitz 48. The 65-year-old Smith and Euroblitz 48 together face seven counts of corruption and 18 of fraud, as well as money laundering and offences relating to the Tax Administration Act. Smith maintains that the funds were a loan and had electric fencing and a security system installed in one of his properties in Johannesburg by Bosasa. In addition, Agrizzi also facilitated payments totalling R277,000, and some of the funds were used to pay for Smith's daughter's studies abroad in tranches between R10,000 and R220,000. Smith failed to declare the benefits he received from Bosasa as required of all members of Parliament by the Code of Ethical Conduct and Disclosure of Members' Interests. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) also accuses Smith of trying to return the favour to Bosasa by rubbishing a high-level probe into tender fraud at the Department of Correctional Services conducted by the Special Investigating Unit when the matter came before the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services, which he chaired in Parliament at the time. Earlier this year, the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, Acting Deputy Judge President Thifhelimbilu Mudau dismissed with costs Smith's application for the release of funds in terms of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (Poca) for legal expenses in his criminal trial limited to R2m. Smith's two properties registered at the Johannesburg and Pretoria deeds registries were placed under a preservation order granted in April 2021, in accordance with Poca. The application was brought by National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi and dealt with the properties and was meant to safeguard them to satisfy a possible confiscation order to the value of nearly R47m. Smith disclosed a monthly pension from his annuity of R88,459 after tax deductions and R7,500 from property rental. He explained that his actual expenses amounted to R77,545 a month, which left him with a surplus of approximately R18,415 monthly. Smith complained that the amount was inadequate to fund his trial for the anticipated entire term and insisted that he had made a full disclosure of all assets relating to the determination of the value of realisable property. However, Batohi told the court that Smith has never filed any application for living and legal expenses since the restraint order was granted, and admitted he could meet his expenses from unrestrained assets. She said Smith saved over R18,000 a month for the last four-and-a-half years since he was arrested and could have had nearly R1m available towards his legal expenses, but instead continued with his exorbitant monthly expenses. The exorbitant monthly expenses include R11,550 on credit cards and overdrafts, R16,500 on groceries, R7,200 on rent, despite owning properties, R8,100 on a domestic helper and garden services, R2,098 on a cellphone, R2,000 for clothing, R1,480 for satellite television, R899 for Wi-Fi, R5,500 on petrol while he is unemployed, R9,000 for medical fees, R1,000 on his tithe, and R3,200 on printing. Additionally, the court heard that Smith's disclosed income and expenses increased exponentially between the period May 2023 to March 2025, and he failed to provide a declaration of the increase in his income and/or expenses or supporting documents in support of the increase. Smith failed to challenge the allegation that his income and/or expenses had increased, and his legal representative argued that the failure to file a replying affidavit was merely a mistake. Judge Mudau also dismissed with costs his application for leave to appeal, for which he provided reasons on Tuesday this week. Smith indicated that the court erred in reading into the clear provisions of Poca that he must make a full declaration of his assets and liabilities. 'The application for leave to appeal is wholly unmerited,' ruled Judge Mudau. On Thursday, Smith said he is yet to discuss the way forward with his legal team and has nothing to say at this point. Henry Mamothame, spokesperson for the NPA's Investigative Directorate Against Corruption, said Smith's criminal trial is set down for October at the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg.
