South Africa's 7 dollar billionaires just got a lot RICHER
It's comparatively 'easy' to make money – when you have money. Compound interest really is the eighth wonder of the world!
As they say, the rich get richer, while the poor stay, well, poor.
Money makes money – and these seven South Africans have made a lot of it over the years.
And by a lot, we mean a LOT !
According to Forbes' real-time tracking of billionaires, Johann Rupert and his family are the richest in South Africa, with a net worth of $14.1 billion.
The Ruperts are followed by diamond magnate Nicky Oppenheimer, who boasts a net worth of $10.5 billion.
They are followed by Koos Bekker, Patrice Motsepe, Michiel Le Roux, Jannie Mouton and Christo Wiese.
South Africa's seven dollar billionaires all made their money in different ways – from luxury goods, diamonds, mining, media, banking and retail.
Rupert added a whopping $700 million (R12.8 billion) to his net worth in the last week alone, while Koos Bekker and Michiel Le Roux each added $100 million (R1.83 billion).
In terms of the overall world list, South Africa-born Elon Musk remains the world's richest person with a reported $395.6 billion.
Below, the list of the top seven richest South Africans in the world as of 12 May 2025. Rank Name Last week This week Source 167 Johann Rupert & family $13.4bn $14.1bn Luxury goods 260 Nicky Oppenheimer & family $10.5bn $10.5bn Diamonds 1 071 Koos Bekker $3.4bn $3.5bn Media, investments 1 207 Patrice Motsepe $3.1bn $3.1bn Mining 1 496 Michiel Le Roux $2.4bn $2.5bn Banking 2 048 Jannie Mouton & family $1.7bn $1.7bn Retail 2 160 Christo Wiese $1.6bn $1.6bn Financial services TOTAL $36.1bn $37bn
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
27 minutes ago
- The Herald
Effective strategies urgently needed to stem Nelson Mandela Bay jobs bloodbath
The news that Goodyear is shutting down its manufacturing plant in Gqeberha, with the concomitant loss of more than 900 jobs, is a shocker and has far-reaching implications for the workers affected and the Eastern Cape as a whole. The absolute devastation it has wrought on the lives of the hundreds of families still struggling to comprehend the grim and unexpected announcement is impossible to comprehend. It was a bolt from the blue. Just four months ago, ContiTech similarly announced it was shutting down its conveyor belt operation in Kariega, with 125 job losses. That is more than 1,000 jobs lost in the matter of a few months. And as unemployment in the province creeps up to 40%, the future of the newly jobless is bleak, with the prospects of them finding other work quickly slim. One day they had stable jobs, decent incomes and promising futures, the next, their lives were upended as they stared unemployment and an uncertain future in the face. One employee broke down in tears, saying of the Goodyear announcement: 'Do they have children? Do they have communities? Because they have f***ed up a whole community.' Another employee said he would have to move his daughter out of the school she was in to one where the monthly rate was cheaper. He had also just bought a new car last year which he was now at risk of losing. The Goodyear saga is another indication of a manufacturing sector in crisis in SA. In both cases, low-cost imports have played a big role in the closures. In May, Aspen also revealed that 134 jobs were on the line due to the closure of its eyedrops production facility in Gqeberha. VW Group Africa managing director Martina Biene hit the nail on the head on Friday when she said every business closure in the city spelt disaster. High labour costs and cheap imports are two of the factors affecting the sustainability of businesses in SA. Municipal service delivery issues, including electricity, water and sanitation challenges, and high tariffs are others. But what is the government doing to counter this and to keep the manufacturers in SA? What is being done locally to support the manufacturers here, the lifeblood of Nelson Mandela Bay? This city cannot afford any job losses, let alone such a huge number. It needs to up its game urgently and come up with strategies and effective measures to assist and retain these businesses in the Bay. The Herald
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
Closure of any business spells disaster for Nelson Mandela Bay
With unemployment in the Eastern Cape nearing 40%, the closure of any business is more than just an economic setback — it is a community crisis. On Thursday, Goodyear SA announced plans to shut down its plant in Kariega, with 907 jobs at risk. VW Group Africa MD Martina Biene said every business closure spelt disaster for the manufacturing city. She spoke at the Women Empowerment Network event hosted by the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber at the Boardwalk on Friday. 'It is sad for everyone when a business has to close, even more so in the Bay,' Biene said. 'We still have an unemployment rate of 40%. 'Every business that closes in the Bay is a disaster.' In its report on liquidations in SA, Stats SA revealed that the country had seen 109 business liquidations in April 2025 and 482 business closures since the beginning of the year. Biene said this spoke to the early signs of deindustrialisation in SA. She said VWGA purchased tyres from Goodyear, but the majority were imported to keep manufacturing costs down. 'We are looking at buying tyres from India. 'VW needs to keep manufacturing costs low. 'We all must look at local is lekker , but lekker sometimes comes at a higher price.' Asked what conversations were being held at a national level to ensure the manufacturing business in SA remained sustainable, Biene said a review of the SA Automotive Masterplan 2035 had to happen sooner rather than later. 'On the automotive industry side, we will propose some short-term measures to probably take away the burden. 'Some of the assumptions of the automotive plan in SA and how the sector grows in SA, as well as how much the domestic market plan grows, have not been met.' Out of the seven OEMs operating in SA, Mercedes-Benz SA in East London is the only one now exporting directly to the US However, Biene said that due to the interconnected supply chain, any disruption threatened the broader industry. 'We have common suppliers; we share suppliers because the suppliers are not viable if they manufacture for one of us. 'As much as we compete in product in the market, specifically manufacturing, we're all in this together and we need each other and eagerly look forward to more coming in, such as Stellantis, to stabilise the local industry. 'What we're seeing in SA now is that the local automotive industry is on the verge of being replaced and becoming an import market. 'From a VW perspective, I know we're perceived as being expensive, and this is not because we make a lot of money in this country. 'Manufacturing costs a lot in SA. 'The domestic market is small. 'Last year, Suzuki in India produced two-million cars while all seven OEMs here in SA manufactured 600,000. 'Previously, we were competing with products from Europe 15 years ago, under European labour costs and European standards, but now we're competing with Indian and Chinese labour costs. 'The competitive landscape has changed, but we remain the same with our labour costs. Looking at Indian labour costs, then I'm not so sure if I'm competitive. 'If something were to go wrong with us, the Bay would be in deep trouble.' Chamber CEO Denise van Huyssteen said while investors needed to come to SA, the government needed to retain those already here. The Herald
The Herald
4 hours ago
- The Herald
Gqeberha family lawyer wins battle against big law firm
In a classic David-and-Goliath courtroom battle, a sole practitioner from Gqeberha has successfully defeated a prominent law firm that attempted to enforce a restraint of trade clause against her. The court ruling has been widely praised by young attorneys at large legal firms, who see it as a significant victory for professional freedom. Family lawyer Lizette Ferns breathed a sigh of relief last week after the Gqeberha high court dismissed an application by Kaplan Blumberg Attorneys, which sought to prevent her from engaging clients who approached her after she left the firm. However, the legal battle may be far from over, as Kaplan Blumberg partner Chris Unwin said the firm would probably appeal against the court's judgment. If that happens, Ferns may have to put dealing with old clients on ice until the appeal process has been finalised. The matter dates back to 2012 when Ferns was appointed at Kaplan Blumberg and signed her initial employment contract, which contained a restraint of trade clause. The next year she was promoted to head up Kaplan's family law department. In 2017, while still running the department, she was promoted to salaried partner and the firm presented her with a new contract. However, Ferns refused to sign the contract, mainly because she disagreed with the inclusion of a restraint of trade provision. Despite not signing the contract, her duties as a salaried partner within the family law department continued. Further contracts, detailing the terms and responsibilities of employment, followed in 2021 and 2024. However, Ferns still contested the inclusion of a restraint of trade clause. Over time, the relationship between employer and employee soured, and on March 5, Ferns resigned with immediate effect. In a letter to Kaplan Blumberg, Ferns stated her intention to notify clients of her departure from the firm. Anticipating that the firm might attempt to enforce the restraint of trade clause in her original employment contract, Ferns made it clear she would challenge such enforcement and seek relief through the labour court if necessary. In the same letter, she also indicated that she would represent one of the firm's clients the following day to assist him to postpone a court matter, and to inform him that she was leaving the firm. 'It is this conduct coupled with the assertion that the respondent [Ferns] does not regard the restraint of trade provision to be enforceable that prompted the launch of this application,' the judgment reads . After her resignation, some of Kaplan's clients sought to terminate the firm's mandate because they wanted to follow Ferns and her new firm. In the application, Kaplan wanted the court to declare the restraint provisions of Ferns' 2012 contract as binding, interdict her for 12 months from inducing Kaplan employees to terminate their employment, and interdict her from soliciting, canvassing or conducting business with Kaplan clients. Judge Nozuko Mjali said at the heart of the matter was the determination of the existence or otherwise of a restraint of trade provision. 'On the facts of this matter certainty is essential to both applicant and the respondent so that they can carry on with their businesses,' she said. While the judge agreed that the matter was urgent, she said with it being an application for a final interdict, the next hurdle for Kaplan Blumberg was to prove the existence of the real right that it sought to protect. 'This approach is also in line with the one that is followed in restraint of trade cases, namely that the employer who seeks to enforce a restraint against an employee must prove the existence of the restraint obligation against the employee.' Mjali said it was not in dispute that when Ferns was promoted from candidate attorney, up the ranks to salaried partner, she did not sign the new contract. She said the contract Kaplan Blumberg relied on in its application no longer regulated the employment relationship with Ferns. 'Thus, there is no basis for the application. The application falls to be dismissed.' Mjali further ordered Kaplan Blumberg to pay the costs of the court action. Unwin said his firm was still studying the judgment. 'We respectfully disagree with the court's decision.' He said once the appeal was filed, the judgment would be suspended pending the outcome of the process. Ferns, on the other hand, was happy with the outcome. 'The court's decision is a great relief for me, and I am grateful for the conclusion it reached. Now I can focus on the future and continue to build my firm.' She said while the court proceedings were ongoing she had signed new clients and believed some of her old clients would seek her out. Several other Bay attorneys working at top law firms also praised the judgment. 'I did not sign a restraint of trade but this is good news for many attorneys in similar positions,' one said. The Herald
