Elon Musk's step away from politics didn't last too long
Elon Musk recently pledged that he would spend more time at Tesla as he steps back from politics.
It appears as if the Tesla CEO can't stay away.
Musk has been posting away on his platform, railing against Trump's spending bill.
When Elon Musk said he'd step back from the White House DOGE office and spend more time on his companies, namely Tesla, investors and fans collectively rejoiced at the thought of getting their chief executive back.
Tesla bull Dan Ives said the move was "music to the ears of Tesla shareholders," while some of the company's biggest fans on X, like Tesla Owners Silicon Valley, said Musk was activating "wartime" mode.
However, with Musk's latest crusade against President Donald Trump's spending bill, the CEO is still getting political.
On Tuesday afternoon, a mere five days after fanfare in the Oval Office to mark his departure from government, Musk posted on X that he "can't stand it anymore."
"This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," he wrote on X.
Since then, Musk has been posting, re-posting, and replying on his social media platform throughout Tuesday and Wednesday against the "Big Beautiful Bill," which, according to the Congressional Budget Office, would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, and — perhaps further motivating his ire — contains cuts to EV tax credits.
Musk was posting early in the morning, Eastern Time, airing his frustrations against the bill (though it's unclear what timezone Musk was posting from): "This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!"
On Wednesday afternoon, Musk urged his more than 220.2 million X followers to call their senators and congressmen and demand that they "KILL the BILL."
Several senators, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who were at the White House Wednesday to discuss the bill, were asked by reporters about Musk's objections. "We're a long ways down the track…," Thune said, according to pool reporters. "We are moving forward."
Musk and spokespeople for Tesla and Speaker Mike Johnson's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
It was just less than two weeks ago when Musk said on X that he'd be winding down his work with the White House DOGE office. The announcement was followed by a media blitz that week, during which he admitted that he probably spent too much time on politics.
Tesla investors and Wall Street liked what they heard.
On May 28, Tesla shares were up 7%, marking a 64% rally since its April slump, when the stock was trading at an all-time low for the year at $227.50. Tesla was trading at $332.05 before Wednesday's closing.
His latest assault on the bill, however, brings into question how long his hiatus in politics will really last — or if it will come at all.
His Wednesday call-to-action to his millions of followers was just one of the warning shots to lawmakers. The day before, Musk said on X: "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people."
During Trump's 2024 reelection campaign, Musk made clear how much he'd put on the line to push for the causes he supports. By the end of 2024, Musk spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars backing the president's campaign.
The CEO said in an interview at the Qatar Economic Forum on May 20 that he was done spending on politics, at least for now.
"If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," he said. "I do not currently see a reason."
Outside of his massive spending, Musk in December leveraged his influence on his own platform to derail a stopgap measure that would have averted a government shutdown that same month.
"Ever seen a bigger piece of pork?" Musk said in an X post at the time.
Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson said in a Wednesday press conference that all remains "friendly" between him and the CEO. The speaker said he hopes to have more conversations with Musk.
"I called Elon last night and he didn't answer," Johnson said. "But I hope to talk to him today."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Musk-Trump alliance craters
Musk-Trump alliance craters | The Excerpt On Friday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer has the latest on the feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Plus, Josh takes a look at how the feud might end. Here's what you need to know about this week's travel ban. The Department of Homeland Security is ending its Quiet Skies surveillance program. The Supreme Court sides with a straight woman in a 'reverse discrimination' case. USA TODAY National Correspondent Elizabeth Weise tells us about invasive Asian needle ants. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@ Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Taylor Wilson: Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Friday, June 6th, 2025. This is The Excerpt. Today, Musk and Trump take their feud to a new level. Plus, details on this week's travel ban. And let's talk about invasive ants. ♦ Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's beef reached a new level of personal jabs yesterday. I caught up with USA TODAY Domestic Security Correspondent Josh Meyer for a look at their ramped-up feud. Hello, sir. Josh Meyer: How's it going, Taylor? Taylor Wilson: Good, good, Josh. Thanks for hopping on, on this. We've been keeping a close eye on this alliance between Trump and Musk for weeks, and now this relationship really seems to be blowing up. What's the latest as Trump threatens to cut billions in federal contracts with Musk's companies? Josh Meyer: Well, it's blowing up in spectacular fashion, Taylor. Trump has threatened to end billions of dollars in federal contracts that Musk's companies have or have had with the government. He's also seeking billions more in contracts through SpaceX, through his AI company, and so forth. Trump, in one of his tweets during this escalating feud, said, "The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." He said, "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it". Of course, Musk replied, and it kept escalating from there. Taylor Wilson: Absolutely. We'll get to some of those escalations. He also responded to this threat over government contracts by saying SpaceX will pull back from some of its work, and we know SpaceX does a lot of work for the government. What can you tell us here? Josh Meyer: Musk said he's already going to be decommissioning their Dragon spacecraft, which does payload deliveries to the International Space Station. Musk has already taken steps, he says, to pull back some of the deliveries from his contracts, including to NASA and the Defense Department. I'm not sure he can do that. I assume there's going to be some lawsuits flying from both of these guys in terms of this, but this is really like two junior high school kids that break up, and they're just getting very personal and very nasty, and they're just threatening all sorts of things and won't talk to each other. Who knows where this is going to end? Taylor Wilson: Speaking of nasty, I know Musk has even alleged that Trump's name is listed in classified files related to Jeffrey Epstein. What did he say here? What happened here? Josh Meyer: Basically, Musk said, "Time to drop the really big bomb. Real Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day DJT." I mean, it's really getting quite nasty here. Taylor Wilson: Yeah. Well, Musk's various companies have benefited from billions in government contracts over the past two decades. We've touched on some of this. What would this Trump threat to pull billions mean for Elon's businesses if came to fruition? Josh Meyer: A lot of the billions in subsidies came in the early years. I mean, Tesla got hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars of subsidies early on. We're at the point now where, I think, it's 18 different companies or entities from within the Musk empire are getting some federal money, and it's not that easy to just pull them back. I mean, Trump is threatening to do this, but SpaceX delivers a lot of payloads to the International Space Station. It helps get satellites up into space. It's interwoven within the fabric of the US government in ways that would be hard to disentangle. I'm not sure how much of this is actually going to happen, but I can say that there's people that are watching X, as it's now called very, very carefully to see how much more they escalate. I know that there's people acting as intermediaries to try to get both of them to calm down, but we don't really know where this is going to end. Taylor Wilson: As you write, Josh, the political battlefield is littered with the scorched remains of some of Trump's previous allies who picked a fight with him or were on the receiving end of one. I'll ask you, could Musk be next? Josh Meyer: Well, I think he already is next. The question is how much. I talked to John Bolton, who is Trump's national security adviser, and that was fired by Trump/faced Trump's vindictiveness, too. I mean, he wrote a book called In The Room Where It Happened. Trump tried to get it shut down before it could be published, claiming that he was using classified materials. Tried to get him prosecuted. What Bolton said about the current spat, "It's going to end up like most mud fights do, with both of them worse off. The question is how much worse the country is going to be off as a result." Taylor Wilson: All right. I'm sure this is not the last of this. Josh Meyer covers domestic security for USA TODAY. Thanks, Josh. Josh Meyer: Thanks, Taylor. ♦ Taylor Wilson: We're learning more about President Trump's travel ban this week. On Wednesday, he signed the sweeping proclamation that will bar or partially restrict entry to the US from nearly 20 countries, citing national security concerns. The ban prohibits travel into the US for foreign nationals from Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Haiti, Iran, and many other countries, and he issued travel suspensions for a number of other nations. The White House emphasized that the ban targets countries with high visa overstay rates and that are deficient with regards to screening and vetting. There are similarities to Trump's controversial 2017 ban, which targeted several majority-Muslim nations and faced widespread protests and legal challenges. Former president Joe Biden repealed that ban in 2021, calling it a stain on our national conscience. This latest ban includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, current visa holders, and certain visa categories, and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. Though, those qualifications were not specified. ♦ The Department of Homeland Security is ending its controversial Quiet Skies surveillance program for airline travelers, saying yesterday that since its existence, it has failed to stop a single terrorist attack while costing US taxpayers $200 million a year. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that the program had been improperly politicized and that under the guise of national security, the Quiet Skies watch list was used to target political opponents and benefit political allies. Noem said the Transportation Security Administration will maintain its critical aviation and security vetting functions, and the Trump administration will return TSA "to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety and security of the traveling public". Quiet Skies was revealed in 2018 by the Boston Globe, which said the program deployed air marshals who fly armed and undercover to thwart terrorists, to track dozens of suspicious travelers daily. Lawmakers and civil rights groups have long criticized the program for potentially masking racial or religious discrimination in deciding who to focus on. Part of identifying suspicious travelers had relied on noticing behaviors like fidgeting or having a penetrating stare, which government watchdogs and some lawmakers have criticized in the past as an unreliable basis for probable cause. ♦ The Supreme Court agreed yesterday that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay. The unanimous decision could trigger a wave of reverse discrimination lawsuits, and it came amid a national backlash from some against DEI programs. The justices rejected a lower court's ruling that Marlean Ames could not sue the Ohio Department of Youth Services because she had failed to provide background circumstances showing the department was that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority. US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said back in 1981 that, while white people are covered by the Civil Rights Act, it defied common sense to suggest that the promotion of a Black employee justifies an inference of prejudice against white coworkers in our present society, but the law itself, which bans discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, does not set different thresholds for members of minority and majority groups. You can read more with the link in today's show notes. ♦ Asian needle ants are spreading across the country. I spoke with USA TODAY National Correspondent Elizabeth Weise, to learn more about this invasive species. Thanks for joining me, Beth. Elizabeth Weise: Once more into the scary creatures beat. Taylor Wilson: Well, I love the scary creatures beat, Beth. Let's start with the basics, though. What are these ants? Elizabeth Weise: They're called Asian needle ants, and the problem with them is they look like a lot of other ants, so there's no way that they're Asian needle ants until they sting you. Then, you know. Taylor Wilson: Well, all right. What does happen when they sting you? Elizabeth Weise: They are carnivorous. They hunt prey, especially termites. They love termites. They're used to attacking. If they sting you... They're not very aggressive, but if you reach into where they live, they will sting you. First, you feel this intense sharp pain like somebody poked you with a needle. That lasts for a couple of minutes, and then it fades and you're like, "Cool, I'm fine." Then, five minutes later, you feel the same thing again as if you'd just been stung but you hadn't. The pain continues to reoccur in the same place. It disappears. It comes back. It disappears. It comes back. One of the researchers I spoke with said, for him, that pattern lasts for about two hours, but he has talked to people for whom the reoccurring pain can go up to two days. That's not the only thing. These ants also... They can cause severe allergic reactions in some people and in about 1% of the people that get stung, they can cause anaphylactic shock, which can kill you. Taylor Wilson: Well, in terms of how they got here and how they've spread in the US, tell us about this mystery behind this. Elizabeth Weise: It's a bit of a mystery. They were first recorded in the US in Georgia in 1932, but they must have been here before that because two years later in '34, they were being seen in three different states, mostly in the southeast. They live in mulch and loamy soil. It's thought they probably came over in the root ball of trees that were being imported. They're originally from Asia. They occur natively in China, Japan, and Korea. There's thought that they might've come over perhaps in the flowering cherry trees, the ones that we just had the blooms of and that are popular in Washington, that were very popular at the turn of the 20th century. A lot of them were imported from Japan. At that time, trees were transported with soil around their roots. We don't do that anymore, partly because it's dangerous because they can carry things with them. Taylor Wilson: I guess you don't want heaps of these in your back or front yard. What can folks listening at home do about these ants? Elizabeth Weise: Yeah. There's not a lot you can do to prevent their arrival. They're now in more than 20 states, mostly in the southeast, but they've been seeing as far north as Connecticut/as far south as Florida. If you leave them alone, they will be fine. They will not bother you. They're not like fire ants that will go on the rampage. But they do like to live in mulch and loam, so if you're out gardening... Or they also like to live in rotting logs, so if you've got a wood pile and you pick that up/up a log, you might disturb a nest. They're a little hard to deal with because they don't lay pheromone trails. Most ants lay a pheromone trail, and so, one, you can see where the nest is. You follow it back. And two, you can disrupt the pheromone trail and stop them. These don't. You have to look to see where their nest is. Then, you can put out bait. Protein bait works really well. That will kill off the nest. But all the entomologists I spoke with said, "Don't try and do just widespread spraying because it's not going to work because they're underground, and you'll kill a lot of things that you want in your garden and you probably won't kill the ants." Taylor Wilson: And they are invasive, right? These ants, Beth? What have they done ecologically? Elizabeth Weise: I mean, that's the other problem, is that like a lot of invasive species, when they show up someplace where they did not evolve, they out-compete other native ants. It turns out they will push out other ants. They'll eat a lot of insects that would've been there otherwise. Those are important... I mean, even termites. You don't want termites in your house, but you sure need termites out in the forest because they're what break down fallen logs. If you don't have termites, those logs don't necessarily break down as fast. Another thing is, this was interesting, a researcher who's now in Hong Kong did some work. There are ants that disperse seeds. They eat them, and they carry them away, and then the seeds get dispersed and plants and trees grow. The Asian needle ants out-compete those seed-dispersing ants. The Asian needle ants don't disperse the seeds. They just stay where they fall and they die. Then, they're seeing places where plants that should be spreading naturally are not. Taylor Wilson: All right. Elizabeth Weise is the national correspondent with USA TODAY. Thanks, Beth. Elizabeth Weise: You're so welcome. Thanks a lot. ♦ Taylor Wilson: Thanks for listening to The Excerpt. We're produced by Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan, and our executive producer is Laura Beatty. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio, and if you're on a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Taylor Wilson, and I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Auburn's Bruce Pearl speaks out against antisemitism on college campuses: 'Not acceptable'
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Top House Democrat speaks as Trump-Musk feud shakes political world
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: In Chaotic Economy, Hiring Remained Steady in May
Matt Minich, who was fired from his job with the Food and Drug Administration in February, was one of thousands swept up in the mass layoffs of probationary workers at the beginning of President Trump's second administration. After Matt Minich was fired from his job with the Food and Drug Administration in February, he did what many scientists have done for years after leaving public service. He looked for a position with a university. Mr. Minich, 38, was one of thousands swept up in the mass layoffs of probationary workers at the beginning of President Trump's second administration. The shock of those early moves heralded more upheaval to come as the Department of Government Efficiency, led by the tech billionaire Elon Musk, raced through agency after agency, slashing staff, freezing spending and ripping up government contracts. In March, about 45 minutes after Mr. Minich accepted a job as a scientist in the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, the program lost its federal grant funding. Mr. Minich, who had worked on reducing the negative health impacts of tobacco use, observed that he had the special honor of 'being DOGE-ed twice.' 'I'm doubly not needed by the federal government,' he said in an interview. He is still hunting for work. And like hundreds of thousands of other former civil servants forced into an increasingly crowded job market, he is finding that drastic cuts to grants and contracts in academia, consulting and direct services mean even fewer opportunities are available. Some states that were hiring, another avenue for former federal government employees, have pulled back. So, too, have the private contractors typically seen as a landing place. The situation is expected to worsen as more layoffs are announced, voluntary departures mount and workers who were placed on administrative leave see the clock run out. Image More than 700 people attended a recent resource fair in Arlington, Va., to receive free consultation, professional headshots and workshops. Credit... Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times With Mr. Musk's time in Washington now done, a fuller picture of just how completely he and Mr. Trump have upended the role of government is coming into view. Federal tax dollars underpin entire professions, directly and indirectly, and the cuts led by Mr. Musk's operation have left some workers with nowhere to go. In Washington, D.C., and the surrounding area, the disruption has the hallmarks of the collapse of an industrial cluster, not unlike the disappearance of manufacturing jobs in the upper Midwest during the 2000s. Except this time, it is moving at lightning speed. In January, just as Mr. Trump was taking office, the civilian federal work force across the country had reached a post-World War II peak of 2.3 million, not including the Postal Service. Few agencies have publicly stated how many people have been fired or voluntarily resigned, but a rough count shows that federal agencies have lost some 135,000 to firings and voluntary resignation, with another 150,000 in planned reductions. Contracted and grant-funded workers — which the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimated to be as many as 4.6 million people — are harder to track in official data. The first contractor layoffs began in February with organizations that received funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development, like Chemonics and FHI360. As more grants and contracts that were under review across government are terminated, job cuts have gained steam. Booz Allen Hamilton, the sprawling consulting firm based in Northern Virginia that gets 98 percent of its revenue from the federal government, announced that it was cutting 7 percent of its 36,000-person staff. Even providers of Head Start, the low-income preschool program, have issued layoff notices because funding has been in doubt. While the national labor market remains stable, job loss is starting to become notable in the capital region. Unemployment rates in the District of Columbia and most of its surrounding counties have been on the rise since December. The number of people receiving unemployment insurance has been elevated in Virginia and D.C. over the past several months. Job postings in Washington have dropped across the board, according to the hiring platform Indeed, including in opportunities for administrative assistance, human resources and accounting. Local government agencies around Washington are hosting dozens of hiring events, and most of them are packed. Elaine Chalmers of Woodbridge, Va., was among 750 people who attended a recent resource fair in Arlington, Va., just outside Washington. The event offered free consultation for updating résumés, as well as professional headshots and workshops, including one on managing personal finances during a transition in employment. Image Elaine Chalmers of Woodbridge, Va., resigned from her role at the Agriculture Department to escape the stress and uncertainty created by new mandates. Credit... Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times It was the fourth one she attended in the month since she left the Agriculture Department, where she had worked for 20 years, most recently in the division that ensured equal access to grants for rural communities. She resigned to escape the stress and uncertainty created by new mandates, such as erasing words like 'equity' and 'diversity' from department communications. 'It just became almost a character question for myself,' said Ms. Chalmers, 53. 'I couldn't honorably stay.' Like many of the federal workers who chose to take a deferred resignation or early retirement, one of the tools the administration has used to shrink the work force, she is on leave and will be paid through September. It is a relief, she said, because she is the sole caregiver for her mother and 15-year-old son. But the prospects do not look good. Ms. Chalmers said she expected to have to take a pay cut. She said she applied for more than 100 jobs in the week before the job fair and received several automated emails informing her that she did not get the position. For many government workers, career transitions can be especially daunting because their jobs are often extremely specific, performing functions that do not exist in the private sector. 'For a lot of them, it's almost like starting from scratch,' said Laura Moreno-Davis, a spokeswoman for WorkSource Montgomery, the work force agency for Montgomery County, Md., just outside D.C. 'If they really have a wealth of experience and knowledge, how can we best use that?' A new group formed by two former federal employees is trying to help people do that. 'How do you translate these skills that you've learned in the federal government that are so complex and seem to be so unique into something that can be communicated easily outside of the federal government?' said Julie Cerqueira, co-founder of the group, FedsForward. Ms. Cerqueira's partner, Karen Lee, said that people who worked in federal disaster recovery and resilience jobs, for example, had expertise that could easily transfer to private-sector work in contingency planning and supply chains. But it is not so simple for everyone. Chelsea Van Thof, 33, is a public health veterinarian who focused on diseases that spread from animals to humans, and humans to animals — a niche job even in government. A few weeks after the inauguration, the contract she worked under at the State Department was placed on hold for a 90-day review and ultimately terminated. Dr. Van Thof immediately lost her health insurance and took on a housemate to cover her rent. Image Chelsea Van Thof, a public health veterinarian, saw the contract she worked under at the State Department be placed on hold for a 90-day review and ultimately terminated a few weeks after President Trump's inauguration. Credit... Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times Plans for the future changed, too, as she had been counting on public-sector loan forgiveness to pay off her $250,000 in veterinary school debt, a prospect that now seems increasingly remote. She sometimes feels as though she is sending résumés into a void. 'I was just thankful when I got a rejection because it meant they saw my application,' she said. Like others in the science field, including Mr. Minich, she is looking for jobs outside the country. And in the meantime, she helped form a support group of about 80 wildlife protection conservationists who are in similar predicaments. People working on government contracts are hit especially hard because they are not eligible for the deferred resignation plans available to federal employees, and cannot look forward to their pensions. Todd Frank, of Westminster, Md., was given just a few minutes' notice before he was laid off as a technical writer on a contract with the Department of Homeland Security's science and technology directorate, helping get the appropriate gear out to military personnel in the field. Mr. Frank, 54, is now wrestling with whether to uproot his family to find a new job, which would come with steep trade-offs. His wife runs her own business — a licensed day care out of their home. His teenage sons do not want to leave their high school, he said. Lately, he is looking at the family's budget for where to make cuts. 'Not being able to buy a suit for prom sounds like rich people problems, but you don't want to turn around and tell your kid, 'You can't do this' or 'You can't do that,'' Mr. Frank said. Several states had advertised their eagerness to hire people laid off by the federal government in the early days of federal cuts. In March, Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania said the state would give hiring preference to former federal workers. Since then, the state government has received more than 7,300 applications from people who said they had federal experience, his office said, and so far, state agencies have hired 120 of them. But state jobs have gotten a lot more popular in recent months. Since March, former and current federal employees have sent in nearly 700 applications, California's human resources office said. Some states are having their own budget problems, in part brought on by uncertainty around the continuation of federal funding. Alaska, Massachusetts, Indiana, Louisiana and New Hampshire have implemented hiring freezes. Public health agencies in Ohio and Alaska have laid people off as grants were canceled. And a broad swath of universities have also paused new hires, including the University of California system, the University of Pennsylvania, and Emory University in Georgia. With the Trump administration's firings of scientists and grant cancellations from agencies including the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, science and consulting have been hit especially hard, according to Indeed. Companies and nonprofits that helped evaluate whether federal programs were working, like American Institutes for Research, have let go up to a quarter of their payroll. Paro Sen, a research scientist in Cincinnati, was laid off in May along with most of the people in her office at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. She worked on industrial hygiene, studying worker exposures that cause chronic health problems, and visited Washington in May with her union to talk to members of Congress about the need to restore these jobs to the federal government. 'This was my dream job that I have been ripped from,' she said in an interview. Ms. Sen and her colleagues work in such a specialized field that they are competing for very few available jobs, especially if they want to stay where they are. 'The job market right now is not amazing,' said Ms. Sen, 29. 'Cincinnati is not a very big city, and you've got, suddenly, some of the smartest people in this field all applying and competing for the exact same jobs at the same time.'
