IEJ welcomes government's decision to reverse 'regressive' VAT hike
The Institute for Economic Justice (IEJ) has welcomed the decision to reverse the VAT hike, which it says is a regressive tax that would have disproportionately harmed the poor, low-income workers and the struggling middle class.
'We caution that this reversal should not open the door for budget cuts as appears to be the National Treasury's preference.'
It said while begrudgingly conceding on the issue of the VAT hike, the National Treasury and finance minister Enoch Godongwana appeared to double down on their ideological rejection of progressive revenue alternatives.
'This flies in the face of evidence presented in parliament by the IEJ and other civil society organisations, as well as by political parties, which show that many alternatives are readily available.'
The IEJ said the 0.5 percentage point VAT increase, at best, would have secured R13.5bn in revenue, which was a tiny 0.5% of the national budget.
'It has recently emerged that the revenue overrun collected by Sars (of about R9bn) alone, without further revenue or budget cuts, largely fills this hole.
'It also highlights the failure by the National Treasury to find innovative ways to raise revenue that can immediately unlock resources to further finance essential services and expand public investment,' the IEJ said.
The organisation said there were a number of immediate sources of revenue. These included:
● Tapping into the Gold and Foreign Exchange Reserve Account (GFECRA), which still has over R300bn available to the government;
● Removing tax breaks for high-income earners (those earning above R1m per year), such as those linked to pensions or medical aid contributions. The government spent about R51bn on these in 2022/23; and
● Raising the corporate income tax rate back to 28%, as the previous reduction to 27% failed to attract investment. This would have raised an extra R12bn in 2024/25.
The IEJ said that over the medium term, other measures, including a wealth tax, social security tax, and financial transactions tax, are available that could generate significant revenue and reduce inequality.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
DSD briefs parliament on basic income support policy
The Department of Social Development aims to provide basic income support for citizens between the ages of 18-59. During a briefing with the Portfolio Committee on Social Development, DSD updated parliament on the progress of the development of the Basic Income Support Policy. 'Work on the policy has been ongoing, with the first draft of the policy having been presented to the Social Protection, Community and Human Development Cluster Cabinet Committee on 26 November 2024', said DSD spokesperson, Bathembu Futshane. The committee raised that more consultations were needed in order to discus the policy. It was further suggested that meetings should be held with internal stakeholders. The meeting would focus on the affordability of the policy and linkages of its proposed beneficiaries with economic opportunities. An interdepartmental workshop was held in order to communicate the directive of collaboration. According to Futshane, the workshop affirmed the need to link the policy's beneficiaries to other employment and sustainable livelihood opportunities. 'A follow up workshop will be held in June 2025. Followed by bilateral engagements with the Presidency, the Department of Labour and National Treasury', said Futshane. He said once the consultations are concluded, DSD will approach the SPCHD Cabinet Committee in the second Quarter of the 2025/26 financial year. They will request cabinet to consider the revised policy. Once the policy is approved, it will be published for public comments. Futshane said that in order to ensure stability during the consultation period, the department will consult National Treasury for the R370 Social Relief of Distress grant be extended. The grant will remain in place until the legislative process is complete. Beneficiaries will be protected from extreme poverty and vulnerability while they wait for the policy to come into effect. 'The Department, has for the interim, been granted an extension by the National Treasury to continue with this provision for the 2025/26 financial year', concluded Futshane. DO YOU THINK SOCIAL GRANTS ARE HELPING SOUTH AFRICANS OR ENCOURAGING A CULTURE OF LAZINESS? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.


Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Parliament's Standing Committee on Finance chair Maswanganyi says debate on fuel levy hike not over
CAPE TOWN - Chairperson of Parliament's Standing Committee on Finance, Joe Maswanganyi, said the debate on increasing the fuel levy was far from over. The fuel levy had been left untouched for three years until Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana hiked it on Wednesday in efforts to meet the budget shortfall. On Wednesday, the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party and the Economic Freedom Fighters both rejected it as a revenue proposal in the 2025 budget when the finance committee met to adopt its report on the fiscal framework, in preparation for next week's vote in the National Assembly. ALSO READ: • EFF hellbent on having fuel levy hike scrapped, despite losing legal bid • Godongwana weighed his options before deciding to hike fuel levy: Mashatile • Treasury defends fuel levy increase Maswanganyi has committed to further discussions on the matter. "We had a very lengthy debate about this in 2022. We will look at that in the next quarter when we have Treasury. We will also bring the Department of Energy on board to discuss this matter and see what can be done moving forward. So, we are not dismissing what you are raising Honourable Moatwe, and Honourable Molefe." Meanwhile, ActionSA's Alan Beesley said that given the widespread financial mismanagement at the Road Accident Fund, which is largely funded by the fuel levy, it should be scrapped on that basis alone. "The RAF collects R50 billion of taxpayers' hard-pressed money. It's a cesspool of corruption and incompetence. It has an adverse audit report. The CEO should be fired. The board should be fired, and it's just sad that we are taking money from hard-pressed taxpayers, giving it to the RAF and that money is literally going down the drain."


Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Main opposition parties reject Treasury's assertion of pro-poor budget
CAPE TOWN - The main opposition parties in Parliament have rejected the National Treasury's assertion that the national budget is pro-poor and not one of austerity. The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party also slammed the National Treasury's economic growth projections, saying it consistently gets it wrong. The party told a joint meeting of the finance committees that it believes the hike in the fuel levy will also have a severe impact on growth. The meeting on Wednesday finalised its report on the fiscal framework, which underpins the budget's money bills. The MK Party's Des van Rooyen said the National Treasury is being overly optimistic on its GDP growth projection of 1.4% for this year. READ: Experts say economic momentum remains elusive after weak GDP growth Van Rooyen said the budget is being premised on the wrong variables. 'We are not speaking of a once-off prediction. We are speaking about something that is well recorded. National Treasury has been missing its targets for the past 10 years.' The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)'s Omphile Maotwe, meanwhile, insisted government's economic reform programme Operation Vulindlela won't lead to the desired economic growth. 'Just go look at what the public-private partnerships are doing in the State-owned entities. We are not saying we are closing them out. But there's nothing they are bringing to the table. I can assure you.' Former Transnet chief executive, Brian Molefe, now an MK Member of Parliament (MP), backed Maotwe, who also previously worked at the freight company, saying during his tenure, the company was profitable.