Mali Arrests Dozens Of Soldiers Over Alleged Bid To Topple Junta
Since seizing the reins in Mali through back-to-back coups in 2020 and 2021, the west African country's junta has ramped up repression of its critics in the face of widespread jihadist unrest.
"Since three days ago, there have been arrests linked to an attempt to destabilise the institutions. There have been at least around 20 arrests," a Malian security source told AFP.
A separate source within the army confirmed an "attempt at destabilisation", adding: "We have gone ahead with the necessary arrests".
Among those arrested was General Abass Dembele, a former governor of the central Mopti region and a respected military officer.
"Soldiers came early this morning (Sunday) to arrest General Abass Dembele in Kati," on the outskirts of the capital Bamako, a figure close to the officer said.
"They have not told him why he was arrested."
A member of the National Transition Council, the junta-backed parliament, spoke of "around 50 arrests".
"All are soldiers. Their objective was to overthrow the junta," the lawmaker said.
Since 2012 Mali has been wracked with crises on various fronts, with militants linked to the Al-Qaeda or Islamic State groups carrying out violent attacks across the Sahel nation.
Criminal and sectarian violence are likewise rife, while the economy is in dire straits.
After the coups, the junta turned its back on France, arguing that the country should be free of its former colonial ruler, as have its fellow military-run allies in Niger and Burkina Faso.
It has forged ties with new allies, notably Russia, whose mercenaries from the paramilitary Wagner group and its successor Africa Corps have helped the military fight jihadists and other internal adversaries.
Yet, like Niger and Burkina Faso, Mali has continued to struggle to contain the jihadist threat, while the regular army and its Russian allies are frequently accused of committing atrocities against civilians.
For Malian sociologist Oumar Maiga, this latest purge was "proof that the officers are struggling to control the situation. There are grumblings within the army's ranks".
"Some soldiers are not happy with the treatment given to the Russian mercenaries at the expense of Malian soldiers," Maiga added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
28 minutes ago
- DW
What are secondary sanctions and do they work? – DW – 08/14/2025
Will Donald Trump's threat to use secondary sanctions slow Russian aggression or dampen its economy? Some see them as a powerful deterrent, while others think they are impossible to effectively enforce. After Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the aggressor was hit with economic sanctions from the US, UK, European Union and others. These sanctions restricted domestic companies or individuals in how they trade and do business with Russia. The sanctions were an effort to make Russia change its course without resorting to direct military force. Since then, the sanctions have piled up. Russia's foreign assets have been frozen, and a majority of Russian banks have been cut off from the global banking system. To keep its economy going, Russia redirected trade to other countries like China, India, Turkey and the UAE. To move its oil around the world, the country turned to a fleet of "shadow tankers." To end this game of economic cat and mouse, and bring Russia to ceasefire talks, the US Senate is working to pass a bipartisan bill that threatens "secondary sanctions" on countries that still do business with Russia. Primary sanctions are placed on foreign countries or entities, but they restrict the behavior of the sanctioning country's own citizens and businesses by limiting or prohibiting them from engaging with the sanctioned parties. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Secondary sanctions go a step further and extend to third-party countries, companies or individuals that do business with sanctioned parties. Even though these third-party entities aren't directly bound by the sanctioning country's laws, they are pressured to comply or face consequences should they do business in the sanctioning country. "Secondary sanctions do not attempt to force foreign subsidiaries to follow a sanctioning country's policies," according to John F. Forrer in a paper published by the Atlantic Council, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. "The sanctioning country restricts its own firms and/or citizens from having commercial dealings with designated firms or individuals." The proposed US legislation would enable 500% tariffs on goods from any country that buys or sells Russian oil, uranium, natural gas and petroleum or petrochemical products. The United States is the biggest proponent of secondary sanctions. Their power stems from the importance of the US dollar on a global level and from the fear of losing access to the US market or its financial system. Since a significant amount of cross-border trade is in dollars or passes through the US banking system, this gives the country great leverage. For many countries, keeping this access is more important than doing business with sanctioned regimes. "While secondary sanctions can 'work' as part of the larger package, the intent, timing and credibility of the threat are important," said Lena Surzhko Harned, associate director of the Public Policy Initiative at Penn State Behrend. They are an important tool with symbolic power. "However, like all threats, it loses its power if it is not perceived as credible or other loopholes are found," Harned told DW. The Obama administration used secondary sanctions to target banks and other companies doing business in Iran in a successful effort to get the country to negotiate about limiting its nuclear program. More recently, the US has used secondary sanctions on Chinese firms trading with or handling financial transactions with North Korea. The US also introduced secondary sanctions against entities doing business with Venezuela, especially in the oil and financial sectors, in an effort to isolate the Nicolas Maduro regime. This past April, President Donald Trump imposed secondary tariffs on countries that import Venezuelan oil. This month, Trump issued an executive order, levying an additional 25% tariff on India over its purchases of Russian oil. Sidestepping Congress the president has threatened further secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian energy. Not every country is a pushover when it comes to secondary sanctions, and some find creative loopholes to avoid much of their economic impact. They rely on alternative currencies, such as the Chinese yuan or cryptocurrencies. Businesses or countries subject to sanctions can barter or use intermediaries or shell companies to conclude deals. Secondary sanctions are difficult to enforce and risk retaliation. They can also push like-minded countries closer together — and therefore further from US influence. There is a rift between academics and practitioners on secondary sanctions. Many experts think they are not an effective foreign policy tool, according to Forrer, an associate professor and director of the Institute for Corporate Responsibility at the George Washington University's School of Business. "Many researchers view secondary sanctions as having all the worst attributes of economic sanctions, plus the added onerousness of potentially instigating new conflicts with allies and adversaries who object to the imposition of restrictions and economic hardship on their own industries and citizens," argued Forrer. In the end, it is difficult to say what exactly makes a country change course with so many parallel variables to take into account. "Secondary sanctions should be considered an option when designing economic sanctions, but only under a very particular set of circumstances," concluded Forrer. "As with any economic sanction, if deployed incorrectly, they can do more harm than good." "Not to use secondary sanctions against third parties is a waste of a potentially useful tool," agreed Harned, but warned, "to expect them to be a silver bullet is a misguided mistake."
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Alaska: A Source Of Russian Imperial Nostalgia
Alaska, the US state that will host the meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump on Friday, is a source of imperial nostalgia and often less-than-serious territorial claims in Russia. The territory that Russia sold to the United States in 1867 is now a symbol of the entwined history of the countries, whose relations have been severely damaged since Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine in 2022. To some experts, the summit in Alaska evoked memories of the thaw between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War. "It's a classically orchestrated summit, like in the era of detente," Russian political scientist Fyodor Lukyanov said on Telegram. "Its symbolic significance is the absence of intermediaries: the powers, so to speak, decide for themselves," he added, saying that China is "not close" to Alaska and that Europe is "as far away as possible". But beyond being a unique meeting place, Alaska also fuels Russian memories of the Tsarist empire, the historic predecessor of the Soviet Union. "For Russia, Alaska symbolises the peak of an expansion," Alexander Baunov, senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, said on the centre's website. It was "when the Russian continental empire had, for the only time, succeeded in crossing an ocean like the European empires", Baunov said. A Russian colony since the 18th century, Alaska was eventually sold to the United States for $7.2 million in 1867 by Tsar Alexander II. The remote territory was economically very difficult for the Russians to exploit and at the time its sale was welcomed by the Imperial Court as the country was struggling economically. But the transaction later came to be seen as a regrettable bargain after what formerly was a fur trading hub turned out to house crucial natural resources: gold and oil. In recent years, the price at which Alaska was sold, considered by some to be ridiculously low, and the legal validity of the transaction have become regularly recurring debates in Russia. In July 2022, in the midst of patriotic fervour in Russia and as tensions soared between Moscow and Washington following the offensive against Ukraine, the Alaska issue resurfaced. The speaker of the Duma, the lower house of the Russian Parliament, Vyacheslav Volodin, spoke of "lands to be returned", describing Alaska as a "disputed territory". Russia's authorities are apparently not interested in reclaiming it. In 2014, Vladimir Putin, asked by a pensioner about the possibility, replied: "My dear, why do you need Alaska?" adding the territory was "too cold". Still, the idea of reclaiming Alaska is an endless source of memes widely circulating on Russian social media. One of the most famous claims that "our soul" suffered from the loss of Alaska because "it's where our bears live". The recapture of Alaska is even mentioned in a 1990s hit by a rock band Putin likes, Lyube, with the lyrics: "Stop messing around, America... And give back our Alaskan lands." US President Donald Trump meets his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday AFP Some Russians mourn the loss of Alaska because 'it's where our bears live' AFP
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
French Dictionary Gets Bad Rap Over Congolese Banana Leaf Dish
Diners flock to the terrace of Mother Antho Aembe's restaurant in downtown Kinshasa to enjoy "liboke", blissfully unaware of the linguistic brouhaha surrounding the Democratic Republic of Congo's national dish. Made by grilling fish from the mighty River Congo wrapped in a banana-leaf parcel with spices, tomatoes, peppers, onions, garlic and chillies, liboke enjoys cult status across the central African country. But liboke's inclusion in one of France's top dictionaries has upset Congolese intellectuals, who say its compilers have failed to capture the full meaning of a word derived from the local Lingala language and closely associated with national identity. The Petit Larousse dictionary -- an encyclopaedic tome considered a foremost reference on the French language -- announced in May it was including liboke in its 2026 edition. Its definition: "a dish made from fish or meat, wrapped in banana leaves and cooked over charcoal." Tucking into a plate on the terrace in the city centre, civil servant Patrick Bewa said it was a "source of pride" that liboke had made it into the leading French dictionary. "We love it, it's really a typically African and Congolese meal," he said. "With the smoky flavour which takes on the aroma of the leaf, it's an inimitable taste. You have to taste it to believe it." But some scholars argue that the definition was compiled in Paris by the Academie francaise (French Academy), the chief arbiter on matters pertaining to the French language, without doing justice to liboke's original meanings. Referring only to liboke as food is "very reductive", argued Moise Edimo Lumbidi, a cultural promoter and teacher of Lingala, one of scores of languages spoken in the DRC where French remains the official language. Under dictator Mobutu Sese Seko, whose rise to power was helped by former colonial master Belgium and whose kleptocratic rule was backed by the United States as a bulwark against Cold War communism, liboke was even part of the national slogan. "Tolingi Zaire liboke moko, lisanga moko," was a rallying cry, meaning: "We want a united and undivided Zaire", the former name for the DRC during Mobutu's 32 years in power. "I'm not happy about restricting this precious word, so essential to our culture... liboke moko, it's above all that communion, that national unity," writer and former international cooperation minister Pepin Guillaume Manjolo told AFP. "Limiting it to its culinary aspects may be all very well for the French, but for us it will not do." The Petit Larousse should have drawn up the definition by consulting the literary academies of the DRC and its neighbour the Republic of Congo, as the region where the word originated, he said. AFP contacted the publishers of the Petit Larousse dictionary for comment but did not receive an immediate response. Edimo, the language teacher, explained that in Lingala, liboke means "a little group". While liboke's inclusion in the dictionary is a good thing, Edimo said, Larousse's compilers should "deepen their research so as to give us the true etymology of the word". That would be "a way for them to express their respect for our culture", he added. At her restaurant in Kinshasa's upscale Gombe district, 41-year-old Mother Aembe was unaware of liboke's newfound literary status, but said she just hoped it would bring in more customers. The fish or meat is wrapped up with spices, tomatoes, peppers, onions, garlic and chillies before grilling AFP Liboke vendors can be found all over Kinshasa AFP Congolese intellectuals are angry that a French dictionary has failed to capture the full meaning of liboke AFP
