Iran's Supreme leader Khamenei was Israel's top target during recent conflict
Israel had plans to assassinate Iran's top leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during the recent 12-day war, but the right moment never came, according to the country's defense minister. Defense Minister Israel Katz, who had openly threatened to kill Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he confirmed those efforts in a televised interview.(AP)
The Israeli military had been actively searching for Khamenei during the conflict, which ended earlier this week after a cease-fire was brokered with help from US President Donald Trump. Defense Minister Israel Katz, who had openly threatened to kill Khamenei, confirmed those efforts in a televised interview.
'I estimate that if Khamenei had been in our sights, we would have taken him out,' he said. 'But Khamenei understood this, went underground to very great depths and broke off contacts with the commanders who replaced those commanders who were eliminated, so it wasn't realistic in the end,' he added. Donald Trump threatened Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
President Donald Trump also threatened Khamenei's life during the war, he wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter) on June 17: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (Kill!), at least not for now.'
Also Read: Inside 'Operation Narnia,' the Daring Attack Israel Feared It Couldn't Pull Off
Khamenei became Israel's top target last week after an Iranian missile hit a hospital in Beersheba, injuring around 80 people and destroying several parts of the facility.
After that strike, Katz warned that 'Khamenei will pay for his crimes,' and said future operations would 'shake' the foundations of Iran's regime, as cited by New York Post report. Ayatollah disappeared on June 13
The ayatollah disappeared from the public eye once Israeli airstrikes began on June 13. He remained out of sight for days, reappearing Thursday with bold claims that Iran had come out on top against both Israel and the United States.
'The Islamic Republic was victorious and, in retaliation, delivered a hand slap to America's face,' Khamenei said, despite the serious damage inflicted on Iran's military and infrastructure.
He also dismissed reports from the US and UN about the effectiveness of American airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Washington confirmed it had used deep-penetrating bombs to target nuclear sites, but Khamenei downplayed the outcome. 'US couldn't achieve much…': Khamenei
'US hit nuclear sites but couldn't achieve much,' Khamenei said during a televised speech. He also took aim at former President Trump, saying, 'US President Trump needed to do showmanship,' marking his first public comments since the cease-fire started on Tuesday, as cited by Daily Mail report.
So far, the cease-fire has held. Meanwhile, American and Qatari officials are trying to pull Iran back into negotiations over its nuclear program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vietnam braces for end of US tariff pause
AP Image Businesses in Vietnam's capital are suffering from declining sales after the United States introduced trade tariffs on the country earlier this year. Hanoi's Old Quarter is replete with stores selling designer goods, brand clothing and electronics from rustic French colonial buildings that still form the fabric of the area. Signs proclaiming that goods are "Made in Vietnam" are everywhere — a concept locals insist on emphasizing to passers-by, hoping for sales from foot traffic made up largely of tourists and backpackers. Vietnam PM expects trade deal before July tariff deadline Vietnam is an attractive prospect for US investors because of its young workforce and low labour costs. However, that has been dampened by Washington's 46 percent tariff rate, which is due to come into effect in July. Hanoi is in negotiations with Washington for a reduction. On Wednesday, Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh said he expected a trade deal with the US ahead of the scheduled 46 percent tariffs. "I hope that you will see that the result will come earlier than two weeks," Chinh said. "Vietnam and the US share a deep understanding on tariffs. I hope that all the positive things will come for us." In the meantime, a baseline tariff of 10 percent has been in place since April. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Livguard Lithium-X: The Future of Power Backup Livguard Learn More Undo Fast-growing economy Apple, Samsung and Nike have chosen Vietnam as key manufacturing locations. The country exported goods worth $142 million to the US last year, accounting for about 30 percent of its total economic output. Vietnam has one of the fastest-growing economies in Southeast Asia, with a projected GDP growth of 6.8 percent by the end of 2025, according to a report by the World Bank in March. The report attributed the estimated growth to Vietnam rebounding in industries such as manufacturing exports, tourism and foreign direct investment. But those projections may not meet expectations in the absence of a trade deal or tariff relief. "Without tariff relief, Vietnam will fail to hit their ambitious growth targets; the US market is simply too important for them," Zachary Abuza, a professor at the National War College in Washington, told DW. "Even if they can reduce that 46 percent tariff, the Trump administration has imposed a baseline 10 percent tariff on all countries." Why are Trump's tariffs so high? US President Donald Trump has hit Hanoi with high tariffs partly due to concerns that China is using Vietnam as a transshipment point to work around its own high tariffs imposed by Washington. Hanoi has intensified efforts to curb illegal transshipment, predominantly involving goods from China. Eric Nguyen, CEO of Grando Premium Aluminium Vietnam, which produces and exports to international markets worldwide, told DW that the US government suspects that Vietnam is using products from China. "But the fact is that Grando, we do not use Chinese material, [everything is] 100 percent made in Vietnam," Nguyen said, adding that the tariffs have forced their operations to rely on other markets worldwide. " We seek to expand our export market to other markets, such as Europe, Japan, and Korea, so that we do not depend 100 percent to the US market and to be less vulnerable to any change from the US government," he said. Nguyen Tuong Phan, general manager of Aviation Solution Services, a cargo freight company in Hanoi, told DW that since the tariffs were introduced, cargo freight companies in China have been trying to send their cargo to the US via Vietnam in order to evade the higher rates. "Now a lot of charter flight from freight forwarders are coming from China, are now coming to Vietnam. The capacity to fly to the US increase from Vietnam has increased by, let's say, 80 percent,' he said. Balancing US demands with China ties Vietnam and China hold close relations both economically and politically. Beijing is Hanoi's largest trading partner and both countries share similar political ideologies and are governed by their respective Communist parties. Hanh Nguyen, a research fellow at the Yokosuka Council on Asia Pacific Studies (YCAPS), said if Vietnam does decide to reduce its dealings with China, it will hurt the Vietnamese economy either way. "Reducing or even cutting off input materials and components from China will cause significant damage to Vietnam's economy," she told DW. She noted that Vietnam's manufacturing sector — particularly electronics and textiles — is "dependent on imported raw materials from regional supply chains based in China." "If Vietnam complies with US demands, it will also hurt Vietnam's ties with China, which will perceive Vietnam's compliance as joining the US-led anti-China coalition," Hanh added. Vietnam is a huge manufacturing hub for international clothing brands, but Washington has highlighted how counterfeit products have also contributed to their concerns over trade. In January, a report from the US Trade Representative flagged Saigon Square shopping mall as a hotspot for the sale of forged fashion items from major brands. Hanh said Vietnam has taken several measures to cater to Washington's concerns, that will hopefully reduce the high tariffs imposed on them. "[Vietnam has been] stepping up the crackdown on transshipment issues and has recently launched a new campaign to crack down on counterfeit products and digital piracy," he said, adding that the question now is: what will Vietnam's do next? "There is not a country in the world that has been more proactive than Vietnam in negotiating tariff relief with the Trump administration. One of the predicaments for the Vietnamese right now, is how much to negotiate and give away."
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's lost engineers built America's technology empire: Will US visa hurdles spark a tech ascent back home?
Picture a nation where dreams are narrowly defined, where engineering and medicine are not just career paths but cultural commandments. A country where students endure gruelling exams of staggering difficulty, claw their way into elite institutions, only to chart their futures not within its borders, but thousands of miles away. This is India, home to millions of dreamers who weigh success by effort, excellence, and global opportunity. For decades, its most brilliant minds have earned degrees and their dreams, boarded flights westward, and seeded innovations in the boardrooms of Silicon Valley. India's deep-seated and celebrated focus on engineering and medicine has produced a workforce that the world relies on, especially the United States, whose technological sector has established and flourished with the contributions of Indian talent. But now, as the land of opportunities is shrinking the welcome mat under the weight of visa restrictions and policy uncertainty, a historic crossroads has emerged: Can India transform its long-standing brain drain into a transformative brain gain? The answer may well define the next chapter of its technological destiny. When brilliance took flight The making of this diaspora dates back to a time when Indian households recited career mantras with a singular rhythm: Engineer or doctor, or you are left behind. The 1990s, with their liberalisation boom, brought an alluring promise: Engineering not just entailed prestige, it presented a silver platter of opportunities. It was a ticket to mobility, prosperity, and often, America. What started as an individual ambition propelled into a national aspiration. Coaching centres mushroomed in small towns. Families drained their savings. Aspirants competed not just for limited college seats, but for a future that seemed to be secure and lucrative. The IITs and other engineering institutions became launching pads, alas, not for Indian industry, but for outbound talent. Fueling the American tech juggernaut Meanwhile, on the other side of the globe, the US was undergoing its own transformation. A tech revolution was underway, but domestic talent pipelines were woefully short. Here, entered the H1B visa programme, a legislative bridge that connected American corporate needs with Indian intellectual capital. Indian engineers flocked to America's tech firms, first as quiet contributors, then as leaders. Companies like Infosys, TCS, and Wipro deployed thousands of workers to the US on client-facing projects. Simultaneously, American tech titans like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon opened their gates to Indian talent. It was not long before the corner offices too carried Indian names—Pichai, Nadella, Narayen. This shift wasn't accidental. It was systemic. Today, Indian nationals receive more than 70% of all H-1B visas issued annually, according to USCIS. In some years, the number has crossed 75%. The pipeline from Indian campuses to US cubicles was not a leak, it was a designed outlet. The obsession that fed two economies, but starved one India's unprecedented push for engineering education created a surplus, hundreds of thousands of engineers each year, many with no robust domestic job market to absorb them. The local ecosystem, for all its startup buzz, lagged far behind in opportunities, infrastructure, and innovation capital. The result was almost predictable: a global migration where talent sowed growth abroad and left India grappling with underutilisation and oversaturation Here claps the irony, while India exported minds, it imported software, platforms, and services, often built by its own citizens working on foreign shores. A crack in the pipeline Now, the well-oiled machinery that kept this talent drain going is grinding against new realities. The H-1B visa system, already stretched by demand, is under intense scrutiny. In FY 2024, over 780,000 applications were filed for just 85,000 slots. Multiple applications by single beneficiaries have raised red flags. Proposed reforms suggest a shift to a beneficiary-based lottery model, potentially ending the era of mass filings and gaming the odds. Add to that surging wage thresholds, stricter compliance measures, and growing political resistance to foreign labour, especially in election years, and suddenly, the American dream feels overweighted. From drain to dynamo: A new possibility for India What was once perceived as brain drain can take a U-turn to brain gain and benefit the home country, India. As global immigration hurdles rise, Indian professionals are reviewing their long-term plans. The country stands at the threshold of a potential talent renaissance. This is not merely limited to reversing the flow, but creating a conducive ground to make it a preferred destination for its own brightest minds. India today is better positioned than ever to convert returning or deterred engineers into national assets. With its expanding startup ecosystem, growing digital infrastructure, AI and semiconductor missions, and government-led initiatives like "Make in India" and " Startup India ," the soil is fertile. What it needs now is deep reform in research funding, public-private partnerships in innovation, better university-industry integration, and a cultural shift that values invention as much as instruction. Rather than being a training ground for foreign economies, India must become a destination for its own talent. That shift will require bold policymaking, targeted investment, and a conscious dismantling of the prestige economy that equates foreign relocation with success The road ahead India's engineering graduates did not just build apps; they built an empire abroad. But empire-building should no longer be an outsourced exercise. The same minds that helped power global tech can now rewire India's future—if given reason to stay, and room to rise. The question, then, is no longer just about visa quotas. It's about national vision. If the US closes its gates, India must open its own doors wider, not just for returnees, but for innovation itself. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
India.com
30 minutes ago
- India.com
China in panic after witnessing destruction caused by US' B-2 bombers; experts say Beijing, Xi Jinping must...
The B-2 stealth bomber is the world's most expensive warplane. (File) B-2 stealth bomber: Earlier this month, the United States decimated Iranian nuclear sites as they used the B-2 stealth bombers to drop the massive 30,000lbs (13.6 tonne) GBU-57 Massive Ordinance Penetrator (MOP), aka the bunker buster bombs, on Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow nuclear facilities, which purportedly 'completely obliterated' these locations, according to US President Donald Trump. The US' use of the B-2 stealth bomber in Iran has become a hot topic of discussion among global strategic circles, and has sparked panic among Washington's rivals, including China, who have been stunned at the destructive effectiveness of the sixth-generation bomber jet, especially its ability to fly long distances. Chinese experts in awe of B-2 stealth bomber The B-2's performance has impressed Chinese experts, who are now calling upon Beijing to develop a similar bomber jet to maintain strategic parity with the United States. According to Song Zhongping, a military analyst and former instructor in China's People's Liberation Army (PLA), nothing, not even a latest 6th-generation fighter jet, can replace strategic bomber, even in an era where long-range attack missiles exist, South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported. Zhongping notes that strategic bombers have the capability to carry both nuclear and conventional attack, which makes it strategic weapon that could turn the tide in favor of any army. How B-2 stealth bomber destroyed Iranian nuclear sites On June 22, the US military launched Operation Midnight Hammer, under which seven B-2 stealth bombers breached Iranian airspace and dropped its heavy GBU-57 bunker busting bombs on the country's top nuclear facilities, including Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. The bomber took off from the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, and flew for nearly 37 hours, taking the trans-Atlantic route via the Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea, and entered Iran's airspace from the west or southwest. This was the the longest mission for the B-2 bomber since 2001. After bombing Iranian nuclear facilities with impunity, the B-2 stealth bomber fleet left the Iranian airspace and returned without any resistance, a feat that has stunned Chinese experts, who now believe that strategic bombers are very important for the Chinese army due to their utility in attacking anywhere in the world and establishing nuclear deterrence. What makes the B-2 stealth bomber special? The Northrop B-2 Spirit, commonly known as the B-2 stealth bomber, is a heavy strategic bomber with low-observable stealth technology designed to evade dense anti-aircraft defenses. The B-2 bomber has a special radar-absorbent coating on its body, which absorbs radar signals and prevent them bouncing off the aircraft, significantly reducing detection chances by enemy radars. This unique technology also increases the B-2's speed, and its sleek body is designed in manner that drastically reduces the plane's radar cross-section. The B-2 stealth bomber is especially designed to carry heavy bombs, including the GBU-57 bunker buster, which it reportedly dropped on Iran's underground Fordow nuclear site during Sunday's attack. The heavy bomber can also carry nuclear bombs. Additionally, the B-2 has a range of more than 10,000 kilometers, making it capable of carrying out intercontinental strikes. China is currently flight-testing two different sixth-generation aircraft, the J-36 and J-50, however, even the most advanced 6th-gen stealth fighters are no match for a strategic bomber, due its long-flight capability, and the sheer volume of explosives it can carry, as per analysts.
