Everything you do is wrong
As you may or may not have seen, a Guardian investigation published recently revealed that most British supermarkets sell seabass and seabream, which are linked to 'devastating overfishing in Senegal'. Though the actual fish is cultivated in farms in Turkey, seafood giants are purchasing fishmeal from factories in the African country, and destroying the livelihood of local communities as a result.
The last straw isn't meant to be the biggest or most important one – that's the whole point. Still, despite knowing this, I couldn't help but feel quite gently hysterical as I lost my mind reading about fish.
It isn't a terrific state of affairs, but I should have been able to read about it, frown solemnly, then go on with my day. Instead, the story made me lose my mind. You see, I eat quite a lot of seabream and seabass, and have done so for a number of years. A while back, I decided I ought to live a more ethical life, and stopped buying meat to cook at home.
I still eat it when out of the house, but I felt it was a decent compromise. We all have to do our bit, and all that. It was a healthier lifestyle, sure, but mostly it made me feel good about myself. I really love eating both beef and chicken, meaning that making the switch was quite tough, but at least I was able to feel good and virtuous about my choice. The Guardian piece put an end to that smugness.
More than that, though, it made me wonder: what's the point of it all? Somehow, life in the 21st century, as someone trying to be vaguely progressive, involves making endless tweaks to your life – even if you'd rather not make them – and still ending up feeling like you're not doing enough.
Food is one part of it – try to buy organic, spend more to make sure you're not helping anyone commit any atrocities, and so on – but the internet is arguably worse. At the end of last year, I left Twitter for good, and moved permanently to Bluesky. It was a decision that, I'm sure, cost me quite a few commissions, as many editors still refuse to budge from Elon Musk's platform.
Visibility often is the main weapon in a freelance journalist's arsenal, and I willingly let go of it, as I just didn't feel comfortable being there anymore. Well, and yeah: it made me feel pretty righteous too, though righteousness rarely tends to pay the bills. More broadly, I only get items delivered to my house when I've explored every other option and found them all to be wanting.
It does mean that errands sometimes remain unrun for days or weeks, as I just don't have the time to schlep to the DIY store or wherever else, but it's all for a good cause, isn't it? Similarly, I shun takeaway apps as I worry they're both killing a lot of local restaurants and threatening to kill their underpaid, overworked delivery drivers.
I could go on but you hopefully get the gist. The world of 2025 is, technically, one of glorious, grotesque abundance, but the only way to feel decent about how you choose to live your life is to lead an increasingly monk-like life. I try not to be too bitter about it but sometimes it's hard: I look at people abusing fast fashion, overusing Uber and eating whatever they damn well like and I think: man, it sure looks like they're having a swell time. Why can't I do the same? Or else – why can't I convince them to join me, over her on the dour side of existence?
It's a problem for me, of course, but I also worry that it's a problem for left-wing parties everywhere. At risk of being a tad too vague, as I wouldn't wish to spoil the people who haven't got round to watching it yet, the conclusion of The Good Place, a brilliant TV show, is that all modern consumption is inherently evil.
The sitcom isn't in any way promoting teenage communism, but instead pointing to a simple fact: the more complicated our world becomes, the harder it is for us to know if we're doing the right thing or not, and the easier it is to cause harm without meaning to. Progressive parties should be the one arguing that people can have it all – live lives that are both fulfilling and virtuous – but where to even begin?
No-one will ever win any votes by telling the electorate to stop doing things they enjoy, and make their lives easier. Similarly, fixing a lot of these issues feels impossible at a national level, as, say, Musk can't be reasoned with, and both food and tech giants often act like they're too big to fail.
I wish I had more answers to offer but, in truth, I don't. I've no idea what the way forward is. All I know is that I'll still eat bass and bream, because we all have our limits, and I guess I've just found mine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: An AP photographer captures the moment an Israeli airstrike slammed into Gaza City
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
The Little Ships of Dunkirk: All you need to know about Operation Dynamo
In May 1940, 85 years ago, a military operation began to evacuate British and French soldiers from northern France following the German advance. The mission became known as Operation Dynamo. Around 70 small vessels, including fishing boats, yachts, and pleasure steamers, braved treacherous conditions to rescue over 336,000 troops from the beaches of Dunkirk. Background: In 1940 Germany invaded France and the Low Countries, cutting through British, French and Belgium troops in the process. The Allies were pushed back to the French port of Dunkirk where they were vulnerable to attack with their backs to the sea. Prime Minister Winston Churchill ordered the men to be rescued in what became the largest military evacuation in history. Codenamed Operation Dynamo it was co-ordinated from the tunnels deep beneath Dover Castle. Dynamo was a type of electrical generator that had been used there. John Evans was a boy living in Southampton and talks about his memories of seeing troops returning from Dunkirk. The evacuation lasted from 26 May – 4 June 1940, and under intensive firing and bombing 338,000 troops were brought back over the English Channel to ports such as Dover, Margate and Ramsgate . Hundreds of civilian ships were commandeered to help shuttle the stranded troops from the beaches to the deeper waters where larger Royal Navy ships were waiting. These have become known as 'The Dunkirk Little Ships'. Many were privately owned and included fishing vessels, yachts, tugs, motorboats and paddle steamers including the Medway Queen. The operation was a success because of the heroism of the rescuers and the dogged rearguard action that was fought. But the Germans also paused the advance on Dunkirk which allowed many more men to escape. Britain's soldiers, the British Expeditionary Force were trained professionals and their loss would have meant almost certain defeat and surrender early in World War Two. Morale was boosted as tragedy was turned into triumph and the rescue was dubbed by Churchill as ''The Miracle of Dunkirk.'' But the country was at its lowest point following this disaster as its main Allies had been defeated and it had lost much of its military equipment. The invasion it feared that summer never came though. The RAF went on to defeat the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain a few months later and Hitler instead embarked on a mass bombing campaign known as the Blitz. Britain did not return to France until D-Day four years later. How Operation Dynamo unfolded- 20/05/1940 - Winston Churchill orders preparation of vessels to evacuate the British Expeditionary Forces from Northern France. 24/05/1940 - Hitler orders his forces not to cross the Lens-Bethune-St Omer-Gravelines line, allowing the Allied forces more time to reach the French coast. 24/05/1940 - Allied defensive positions are hit by by German Luftwaffe bombers around Dunkirk. 25/05/1940 - More and more retreating Allied units arrive at Dunkirk. 26/05/1940 - Hitler orders his forces towards Dunkirk. 26/05/1940 - The evacuation of Allied forces from the French port officially begins. It's called Operation Dynamo and is based in Dover Castle. 26/05/1940 - Over 850 British civilian vessels assist military forces to awaiting transports. It would become the largest military evacuation in history. 29/05/1940 - More than 72,000 British soldiers had been evacuated from France to ports such as Dover, Margate, Ramsgate and Sheerness. 01/06/1940 - Defense of the outlying region near Dunkirk now passes to French XVI Corps 04/06/1940 - Some 40,000 French soldiers are taken prisoner by Germany at the fall of Dunkirk. 04/06/1940 - The evacuation of Allied forces at Dunkirk officially ends. Over 338,000 soldiers are saved. Little Ships Abdy Beauclerk Abdy Beauclerk was towed across the English Channel by a drifter they arrived at a beach just East of Dunkirk harbour on 31st May. Aberdonia Aberdonia went to Dunkirk where she is thought to have made four trips to the beaches even before they had time to repaint her in battleship grey. Advance Advance was one of the first Little Ships to arrive at Dunkirk - but was one of a group of little ships which were machine-gunned by two aircraft. Alusia Alusia was built as a pleasure boat, but soon after the outbreak of war she was called up for more serious duties as a patrol boat, and assisted in the evacuation of Dunkirk. Angele Aline Angele Aline is almost 100 years old, but there is no record of the number of trips she made ferrying troops from the harbour to the warships anchored in deep water off the coast. Anne Anne was the only 'little ship' to return to Dunkirk in 2010 on her original engines. She is now berthed in Chichester. Aquabelle Aquabelle was delivered to the Royal Navy to go to Dunkirk and as she was fitted with a gun, she went on to defend lighthouses from air attack. Beatrice Maud Beatrice Maud crossed the channel on 31st May and around 260 soldiers, reported to be French, boarded her on 4 June and a British Naval ship towed her in to Dover the following day. Bessie In 1940, Bessie was taken from Wells-next-the-Sea to Ramsgate as part of Operation Dynamo to help evacuate the British Expeditionary Forces from Dunkirk. Bluebird Bluebird made two false starts in getting to Dunkirk. The first time she developed engine trouble. Then, when she got as far as Sheerness, there were too many volunteers and she was left behind. Braymar Braymar suffered major damage, not from air attack, mines or shells at Dunkirk but she was laid up ashore for ten years after the war and completely dried out so that her planks and topsides started to deteriorate.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Simple looking elementary school math problem leaves people stumped - can you get the answer in 30 seconds?
A seemingly straightforward math problem has sparked debate online after leaving social media users confused over the correct answer. The brain teaser, which appears simple at first glance, has divided the internet with people coming up with different solutions to what appears like a basic math problem. Twitter user @BholanathDutta shared the math riddle with followers, asking 'Can you solve this #math' alongside an image decorated with colorful flowers. The post shows a calculation that looks simple: 500 + 450 ÷ 5. The post has now been viewed more than 3,000 times, with dozens of commenters sharing their answers. But not everyone agrees on the solution. The overwhelming majority of respondents believe the answer is 590, with many users showing their working to prove their point. One user methodically explained their approach. They wrote: '500 + 450 ÷ 5 = ? 450 ÷ 5 = 90, 500 + 90 = 590.' Another person reached the same conclusion, posting: '450/5=90, 500+90=590.' However, not everyone reached the popular answer, as several users offered completely different solutions. A handful of commenters suggested alternative answers, with one stating the result should be 190. Another claimed the correct answer was 945. A couple of users argued the answer should be 19. The confusion appears to stem from different interpretations of the order of operations. That is the principle that determines which calculations should be performed first in complex equations. According to standard math rules, division should be completed before addition, which would support the majority answer of 590. Problem solvers should use the conventional order of operations - which goes by the acronym PEMDAS: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division (from left to right), and Addition and Subtraction (from left to right). Using that, the calculation would indeed be: 450 ÷ 5 = 90, then 500 + 90 = 590. The viral math puzzle joins a long list of seemingly simple problems that have recently gone viral online.
