logo
Grant Cardone Lost ‘Half' of His $65 Million Mansion in Cali Wildfire, Says ‘Revolt and Protest' New Plan to Turn Land Into Low-Income Housing

Grant Cardone Lost ‘Half' of His $65 Million Mansion in Cali Wildfire, Says ‘Revolt and Protest' New Plan to Turn Land Into Low-Income Housing

Yahoo25-07-2025
Prominent real estate investor and media personality Grant Cardone is at the center of a heated political and housing controversy after his Malibu mansion was severely damaged in the catastrophic Palisades fires of January 2025. Cardone has since emerged as a leading critic of California's disaster response, blasting state officials for what he calls years of 'mismanagement, incompetence, and missed priorities' both in the handling of the wildfires and the state's subsequent recovery plans.
Cardone's $65M Malibu Mansion in Ruins
Cardone's renowned Carbon Beach property, which was listed for sale as high as $65 million before the fire, stood as a symbol of Malibu affluence. Firefighters fought valiantly to save what they could, but videos and photos posted by Cardone show extensive devastation: blackened ruins of a palatial lounge, a scorched oceanfront deck, and large portions of the 9,500-square-foot home reduced to rubble. Cardone publicly stated he lost 'half' of his mansion to the flames.
More News from Barchart
This Self-Driving Car Stock Is Surging on a Major Nvidia Boost
UnitedHealth Stock Spirals Lower Again. Don't Buy the Dip.
UNH Stock Falls as UnitedHealth Confirms DOJ Probe. How Should You Play Shares Here?
Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines.
The estate, which Cardone personally renovated with over $1 million in upgrades, was 'the last one standing among the row of scorched mansions' on Carbon Beach, according to images shared in the aftermath. The Cardone family, known for their ties to the Malibu and Santa Monica communities, is now among thousands forced to rebuild or relocate.
Cardone's Fierce Public Critique
Cardone quickly pivoted from personal tragedy to public advocacy, taking to social media to rail against California's leadership. He dismissed the prevailing narrative that climate change was the primary culprit behind the wildfires, arguing instead that the true causes were 'government incompetence, neglected infrastructure, overregulation, and spending billions on pet projects instead of fire prevention.' In a viral tweet, Cardone charged:
'California Fires will be blamed on Climate Change but do NOT believe it. These fires will produce $100's of billion in losses due to incompetence, corrupted budgets, an oppressive coastal commission, over regulation, bizarre environmental initiatives, homeless camps, and freak liberal agendas all combined with NO COMMON SENSE,' he wrote, directly blaming Governor Gavin Newsom for failing to invest in long-term solutions such as burying electrical lines, managing forest floors, and expanding water access.
In television appearances and subsequent interviews, Cardone escalated his attacks, calling on Governor Newsom to resign and urging affected residents to join a class action lawsuit against state and local authorities. He alleged the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power shared blame due to suspected electrical failures that may have sparked the fires.
Cardone's rallying cry — 'Revolt and protest' — has resonated with a segment of fire-ravaged Californians, drawing both support and speculation about his future political aspirations.
Battling California's Response: Accusations of a 'Land Grab'
The controversy intensified with the introduction of California's Senate Bill 549, which enables the state to acquire burned properties for affordable redevelopment and establishes a 'Resilient Rebuilding Authority.' Cardone's response was unequivocal:
'You guys think California 'land grab' was just a conspiracy?... California passes bill to buy Palisades fire-ravaged homes.'
He maintains that the measure, compelling the sale and redevelopment of luxury lots into low-income and multi-family units, erases property rights and exploits disaster for governmental expansion. It's an accusation state officials deny, citing the urgent need for safe, affordable housing and climate resilience.
A Divided Community
While Cardone garners support for his outspoken activism, critics note his position as a multimillionaire homeowner contrasts with families desperate for affordable housing and those who lost far more in the fires. Nonetheless, his willingness to pursue legal action — he's reportedly fielding over 1,000 responses from other potential plaintiffs — could shape the coming legal and political battle over California's wildfire recovery.
As rebuilding begins, Cardone's mansion, now little more than charred frames and ash, stands as a dramatic backdrop to a wider debate: whether California's bold new policies represent hope and recovery, or, as Cardone insists, a failure of government stewardship and respect for property rights.
On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China cites ‘backdoor safety risk' in Nvidia's H20 AI chip; company denies allegation
China cites ‘backdoor safety risk' in Nvidia's H20 AI chip; company denies allegation

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China cites ‘backdoor safety risk' in Nvidia's H20 AI chip; company denies allegation

Chinese authorities have summoned U.S. chip giant Nvidia Corp. over alleged security vulnerabilities in its H20 processor, a move that could complicate the company's efforts to re-enter the Chinese market just as Washington and Beijing struggle to make progress on a renewed trade truce. The Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) called Nvidia representatives to a meeting to discuss 'serious security risks' tied to its H20 AI chip, Bloomberg reported, citing a statement from the internet watchdog. The agency pointed to comments from U.S. lawmakers advocating for tracking capabilities in advanced chips sold overseas, and asked Nvidia staff to explain potential vulnerabilities and provide supporting documentation. The probe casts a shadow over Nvidia's China business weeks after co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang visited Beijing and met with local AI firms and officials. While the company has denied any wrongdoing, saying its chips do not contain so-called 'backdoors', the timing of the investigation has raised eyebrows in the tech and policy communities. Security doubts cloud comeback 'The CAC's scrutiny over H20 security risks could further erode Nvidia's Chinese market share amid rising domestic competition, and immediate H20 sales resumption may face delays due to regulatory uncertainty,' Forrester analyst Charlie Dai told Bloomberg. 'It also aligns with China's broader push to accelerate domestic semiconductor alternatives for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls.' The H20 chip was designed specifically to comply with U.S. export restrictions on advanced semiconductors. Washington recently lifted some of those curbs, reportedly in return for increased access to Chinese rare earth minerals, just as trade talks in Stockholm aimed to extend a temporary tariff truce. While those negotiations were described as 'constructive,' no concrete resolution emerged. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had framed the resumption of H20 sales as a breakthrough following earlier discussions in London, a claim that now appears increasingly uncertain. Domestic rivals gain ground The CAC's move also boosts local competitors. Huawei's Ascend 910C chip is now seen as a viable domestic alternative to the H20, particularly for inference workloads. According to Bloomberg, Huawei Technologies Co. now spearheads a nationwide effort to develop homegrown technologies to reduce China's reliance on American hardware and circuitry, and catch the U.S. in potentially game-changing technologies. Nvidia, meanwhile, reiterated in a statement that 'cybersecurity is critically important to us' and denied any claims of remote access or tracking features. 'Nvidia does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them,' the company said. As both countries tiptoe through fragile trade negotiations and navigate semiconductor nationalism, Nvidia's experience could signal deeper fault lines in tech diplomacy. While the H20 was initially hailed as a compromise chip to satisfy both regulators and customers, its future now hinges on a political equation that continues to shift. Solve the daily Crossword

UNITEDHEALTH CLASS ACTION ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm
UNITEDHEALTH CLASS ACTION ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm

Business Upturn

time2 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

UNITEDHEALTH CLASS ACTION ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Encourages Investors to Contact the Firm

NEW YORK, Aug. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized stockholder rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against UnitedHealth Group Incorporated ('UnitedHealth' or the 'Company') (NYSE: UNH) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired UnitedHealth securities between December 3, 2024 and April 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Investors have until July 7, 2025 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. Click here to participate in the action. According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) UnitedHealth had, for years, engaged in a corporate strategy of denying health coverage in order to boost its profits, and ultimately, its share price; (2) this anti-consumer (and at times unlawful) strategy resulted in regulatory scrutiny (as well as public angst) against UnitedHealth, which ultimately resulted in the murder of Brian Thompson ('Thompson'); (3) animus towards UnitedHealth was such that, subsequent to the murder of Thompson, many Americans openly celebrated his demise, expressed admiration for his accused killer, and/or otherwise demanded that UnitedHealth change its strategy even if they condemned Thompson's killing; (4) the foregoing regulatory and public outrage caused UnitedHealth to change its corporate practices; (5) notwithstanding the foregoing, UnitedHealth recklessly stuck with the guidance it issued the day before Thompson's murder, which was unrealistic considering UnitedHealth's changing corporate strategies; and (6) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. If you purchased or otherwise acquired UnitedHealth shares and suffered a loss, are a long-term stockholder, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore by email at [email protected], telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no cost or obligation to you. About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook, and keep up with other news by following Brandon Walker, Esq. on LinkedIn and X. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]

‘Don't Jump the Gun,' Says Investor About Nvidia Stock
‘Don't Jump the Gun,' Says Investor About Nvidia Stock

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

‘Don't Jump the Gun,' Says Investor About Nvidia Stock

Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) stock has attracted plenty of positive coverage over the past few years – and for good reason. Behind the headlines is a company that consistently exceeds revenue expectations while maintaining strong profit margins, reinforcing investor confidence quarter after quarter. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Even regulatory roadblocks proved short-lived, as the Trump administration recently greenlit the company's ability to market its H20 chips to China, reversing a previous ban and effectively clearing a key overhang for investors. Meanwhile, broader concerns about a slowdown in AI infrastructure spending have also faded. The hyperscalers – those driving the AI boom – have now locked in their 2025 capex plans. Notably, Alphabet took things a step further, bumping its projection by a hefty $10 billion to a whopping $85 billion. That kind of spending speaks volumes about the demand tailwinds Nvidia still enjoys. With these tailwinds in place, it's tempting to see this as a no-brainer investment case. But not everyone is on board. One voice of caution is 5-star investor A.J. Button, who isn't quite ready to join the parade. 'Without being forced, I choose not to get involved in Nvidia stock,' Button says. The investor is not dismissing Nvidia's progress. In fact, he acknowledges the company could continue its explosive 50% CAGR pace, making its 2027 Forward P/E of 25x look downright reasonable. And yes, the macro setup – with rising capex and relaxed export rules – certainly supports continued growth. But Button is more focused on what lies ahead, zeroing in on a key concern: rising competition. AMD is gaining traction, Alphabet is building out in-house chips, and Huawei's offerings have been potent enough to force Nvidia to slash prices in China. Still, Button isn't outright bearish. He credits Nvidia's massive patent portfolio, entrenched software ecosystem, and the steep switching costs that act as barriers for would-be rivals. Yet, despite those competitive moats, Button remains cautious. 'The bottom line on Nvidia is that it has run up a lot, and is expensive by some metrics, but it's still not a short,' Button sums up, assigning NVDA a Hold (i.e. Neutral) rating. (To watch Button's track record, click here) Turning to Wall Street, however, the broader sentiment remains bullish. Of the 38 analysts tracked, 34 rate NVDA a Buy, translating to a Strong Buy consensus. The average price target stands at $185.79, suggesting ~7% from current levels. Not exactly something to write home about – yet history suggests that when it comes to NVDA, analyst targets often trend higher as momentum builds. (See NVDA stock forecast) To find good ideas for AI stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store