logo
The mortgage buydown backfire

The mortgage buydown backfire

Matt Hutton was living the millennial homeowner dream. He scrimped and saved until he was able to buy his first place in 2019, paying $324,000 for a two-bedroom townhome in a suburb west of Denver. When mortgage rates dropped to record lows during the pandemic, he refinanced to slash his interest costs. Then home values ballooned, enabling him to sell in August 2024 for a gain of roughly $150,000 in just about five years. Hutton and his wife parlayed those earnings into their own slice of the American dream: a bigger, newly built single-family house on a premium lot.
But Hutton's gilded path soon morphed into a cautionary tale. The house itself was nice, with fresh appliances, ample light, and clear views of a lake just beyond the property. The couple started to notice some drawbacks, though. For one, Hutton's new commute sucked. "It took forever to get to the highway," the 34-year-old tells me. Simple trips demanded at least half an hour behind the wheel. The neighborhood was still a jumbled mess of construction, with hundreds of homes yet to be delivered. Even little stuff, like the sound of the wind whipping outside, got annoying. By January, only a few months after they'd closed on the house, Hutton and his wife were already starting to talk about moving.
Their dissatisfaction left them in a bind. Buying and selling so quickly is usually a recipe for financial loss — real estate agents pretty much always recommend staying put for at least a few years to make up for all the transaction costs. Plus, the Denver-area market softened considerably over the past two years, with more homes sitting for sale as buyers started biding their time. But there was one big issue that put Hutton in an especially bad spot. In lieu of cutting the actual list price, the builder of his current home had thrown in $30,000 worth of incentives to lure buyers like Hutton. The bulk of the deal sweetener came in the form of a " mortgage rate buydown," a financing maneuver in which the builder fronts some cash to help buyers get a lower borrowing rate from the builder's in-house lender, often for just a few years. The incentive is supposed to allow buyers to stretch their budgets and soften the blow of higher mortgage rates. Some takers are betting that they'll be able to refinance for better loan terms before their mortgage snaps back to the full rate.
Homeowners who got temporary buydowns in 2022 or 2023 have seen their gamble on rates fail spectacularly. The typical mortgage rate still hovers above 6.5% — roughly around the levels that many buyers back then were hoping to dodge. Given the slowing market, industry analysts, and even some executives, warn that these homeowners could see little in the way of equity gains before the full cost of the mortgage hits. If those buyers try to turn around and sell soon, they may end up having to slash the price just to push a deal through. Hutton's predicament is an example of the pain that could be in store for others who made a similar tradeoff, agreeing to a higher sticker price in exchange for lower interest payments.
Rick Palacios Jr., the director of research at John Burns Research and Consulting, has been sounding the alarm about the growing risks for buydown takers since last summer.
"People are going to start putting those homes back into the market," Palacios tells me, "and I think it's going to be a bit of a shock to them, what they have to reprice at."
The steep rise in mortgage rates in 2022 caused all kinds of havoc for the housing market. Buyers retreated to the sidelines or searched for workarounds that would stave off the pain of higher monthly payments. Sellers had to get real about the fact that they might not get the flood of attention, let alone offers, that listings enjoyed in 2021. And builders found themselves in a tricky spot. After seeing all the demand in the early days of the pandemic, they'd started work on a ton of new houses. With the market grinding to a halt, they'd have to figure out some way to unload them once they were completed.
The answer, in many cases, was a buydown. The deals offered an elegant solution for buyers mourning the fact that they'd missed out on the rock-bottom, sub-3% mortgage rates that everyone scored earlier in the pandemic. "Without something along those lines, the market would've been almost completely frozen in that price range," Lydia Creasey, Hutton's real estate agent, tells me. On their websites, builders touted borrowing rates well below the prevailing levels, keeping sales moving by enticing buyers with cheaper monthly payments. By December 2022, three-quarters of builders surveyed by John Burns Research and Consulting said they were offering buydowns. Regular sellers don't typically offer this maneuver to buyers. But for builders who could afford to eat the cost — while conveniently steering buyers to their in-house lenders — buydowns represented "a silver bullet," John Burns analysts wrote in late 2023.
"It really saved their business," Palacios tells me. In a normal housing downturn, he says, builders would have started cutting prices on their homes. The rate buydowns, though, were "like a mouse trap that allowed them to not have to adjust price."
There are a few ways a buydown can work. One option is the permanent buydown: The builder agrees to pay around 5% or 6% of the sale price to lower the mortgage rate for the entire 30-year loan, usually by one or two percentage points. Let's say someone takes out a $400,000 loan at a time when the typical rate is around 6.5% (pretty close to today's prevailing rates). If the builder buys down the rate to 5%, the buyer would be saving almost $400 every month. The initial outlay may be relatively low — in this example, about $24,000 — but over the length of the 30-year loan, the borrower's savings would come out to almost $140,000. Homebuilders and their mortgage companies are cool with this deal because they've often locked up cheap money that they can use for the loans, and because they don't want to get stuck with a bunch of homes on their books. Plus, they really don't want to cut prices, since doing so would tank the values of all the other homes nearby.
People are going to start putting those homes back into the market, and I think it's going to be a bit of a shock to them. Rick Palacios Jr., director of research at John Burns Research and Consulting
The other popular option is a temporary deal, which usually comes in the form of a "2-1 buydown." The builder sets aside cash to lower the buyer's mortgage rate by two percentage points for the first year and one point for the second year, after which it bumps up to the prevailing rate at the time of the home purchase. Again, let's say the prevailing rate is around 6.5%. A buyer with a 2-1 rate buydown would get a rate of 4.5% in the first year, 5.5% in the second, and 6.5% from there on out. If they took out a $400,000 loan, they'd be saving more than $500 every month that first year and more than $250 a month in the second year. That's a total savings of more than $9,000. In theory, this would allow a buyer to stretch their budget a little further to get the place they want, while also giving them some flexibility to refinance down the line if rates drop.
"The thing with residential real estate is that it's not about the investment," Eric Agar, an executive at the California-based brokerage firm Pardee Properties, tells me. "It's about your lifestyle. It's about your family. It's about you being at a home that you love. And if that allows you to do it today, instead of a year from now or two years from now, well, that's a huge pro."
The popularity of these deals soared alongside mortgage rates. In April 2021, just 17% of mortgage borrowers got a permanent buydown of one percentage point or more, data from ICE Mortgage Technology, a real estate software firm, shows. By the same point in 2023, that share had surged to nearly 45%. Temporary buydowns are more niche — they accounted for almost 5% of mortgage originations in late 2023, but have mostly hovered in the low single digits over the past few years. Still, there's no denying the prevalence of buydowns in the world of newly built homes. Last fall, Zillow published the results of a survey showing that 45% of buyers who purchased a home in the past year nabbed a mortgage rate below 5%, despite rates trending significantly higher. More than a third of those buyers said they got a lower rate because the seller or homebuilder offered them a deal on the mortgage.
Both permanent and temporary buydowns come with potential pitfalls, but people who agreed to time-limited incentives are starting to face a particularly harsh reality. To be clear, short-term buydowns aren't the reckless, adjustable-rate mortgages that fueled the housing bubble in the early 2000s — buyers who snag these deals have to prove they'd be able to handle the maximum amount they'll end up paying after the interest rate snaps back. But being technically able to pay that extra money and actually shelling it out each month are two different things.
There are still plenty of ways for buydown takers to end up in hot water. With temporary buydowns, some agents and analysts warn that fresh homeowners may be counting on rates dropping in the near future, allowing them to refinance to a new, cheaper loan before their payments bump up to the normal level. For buyers who got into the market two or three years ago, those dreams are fading fast. There's also the issue of lifestyle creep — if someone is used to saving a few hundred bucks on their loan each month, the jump to the full amount could be a bitter pill to swallow.
Last summer, though, Palacios began warning of a more dire scenario. His concern was aimed at buyers who got a buydown — permanent or temporary — a few years ago and are now looking to sell for one reason or another, like a new job, new kid, marriage, or divorce. These homeowners face a decidedly weaker market. Many areas of the country, particularly construction hotbeds like the Sun Belt, have more homes sitting for sale than at any point since the onset of the pandemic. The typical mortgage rate has yet to slide in a meaningful way. Home prices are up less than 2% nationwide from a year ago, data from the real estate firm Redfin shows, and major metros like Houston, Austin, and Jacksonville recently posted year-over-year price declines. While buyers in 2022 or 2023 might have been willing to accept higher prices in exchange for savings on their monthly payments, they usually can't pass along those benefits to the next owner of the house. If they want to get a deal done, they might have to either cut that once-inflated price or pay tens of thousands of dollars to offer a rate buydown to the next buyer.
An executive at KB Home, one of the nation's largest builders, recently said in an earnings call that many customers are "overpaying" for homes that offer these incentives, suggesting they could have a harder time clearing a profit in the future. "They're tied into this higher price that they're going to be stuck with forever until they sell that home."
If you so much as dipped your toe into the housing market sometime in the past few years, there's a good chance you encountered the phrase, " Marry the house, date the rate." The mantra got plenty of airtime when mortgage rates spiked in 2022 — the prevailing sentiment among agents, lenders, and real estate execs was that the jump in rates would soon blow over. Don't stress too much, the logic went, because you can always refinance when rates drop back down. Better to just find a good place while you can. That mindset has so far turned out to be wishful thinking. And while there haven't yet been signs of widespread strain in the market, homeowners who got a buydown just a few years ago may be facing a significant jump in their monthly payments or the prospect of selling for far less than they'd hoped.
"I'm hearing more and more stories of buyer's remorse," says Jess Uphoff, a mortgage lender who previously worked for a homebuilder. Not long ago, a temporary buydown seemed like a win-win: Builders could keep list prices higher while still passing along savings to buyers in the form of lower monthly payments. But if one of those buyers is trying to sell now, they'll likely be competing against the same builder who sold them their home — "only the builder has been steadily lowering prices or layering on new incentives." Uphoff says. "That means homeowners often can't resell for what they originally paid." At the end of May, for example, the homebuilding giant Lennar said its average incentive per home had stretched to nearly $60,000, up from $44,000 a year prior.
I'm hearing more and more stories of buyer's remorse. Jess Uphoff, mortgage lender
Rate buydowns aren't always a trap for buyers. People who got a permanent buydown a few years ago may feel pretty good about that decision, given that rates haven't yet dropped significantly. But Lauryn Dempsey, a real estate agent in the Denver area, says she counsels buyers to make sure they'll be staying in the home for at least five to seven years if they get one of these deals.
"Where I'm running into challenges right now is with the people who bought a couple of years ago that want to sell," Dempsey tells me. "I'm bringing estimated net proceeds that have negative numbers attached to them, so the seller has to bring cash to the closing. And I know I'm not alone in that right now."
Hutton, the homeowner in the Denver area, fell into this camp. He and his wife paid nearly $800,000 for their new house in 2024, while the builder bought down the mortgage rate by about one percentage point. That may not sound like a lot, but that meant they were paying hundreds of dollars less in interest every month. The Huttons won't be sticking around to enjoy those benefits, though. When I talked to Hutton in mid-August, he and his wife had just closed on the sale of their home, his second in roughly a year. They managed to sell the house for $800,000 — almost exactly what they paid for it, but down from their original asking price of $850,000, which factored in some of the additional upgrades they'd made to the place. The buyer also requested that the Huttons pay $40,000 for a rate buydown to match the terms the builder was offering for other new homes nearby. They agreed to the deal. Hutton says he worried that if they wavered on a sale much longer, they'd only have more new homes in the neighborhood to compete with, each of them offering a bevy of incentives.
"The interest rates were killing us, because no one was buying with that," Hutton tells me. "So the only way for me to get my house sold was to offer an incentive, pretty much."
Hutton walked away from his first sale with six figures in his pocket. Roughly a year later, after the latest transaction, all that money is gone. His agent, Lydia Creasey, even dipped into her commission to cut the buyer a check for $350 at the closing table — a rare scenario, she says, owing to the unusual circumstances of the deal. "It was the right thing to do in this situation," Creasey tells me. Hutton and his wife are now living in an apartment, biding their time until they're ready to take another stab at finding their dream home.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Work Visa Update as Marco Rubio Announces New Pause
US Work Visa Update as Marco Rubio Announces New Pause

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

US Work Visa Update as Marco Rubio Announces New Pause

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday announced that commercial truck driving work visas are being paused, "effective immediately." Why It Matters The move comes as federal and Transportation Department investigators probed a deadly Florida highway crash involving a truck driver from India whom prosecutors charged in the deaths of three people. The announcement echoes earlier administration actions to tighten English-language enforcement for commercial drivers and followed recent orders from Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to increase oversight. What To Know Taking to X, Rubio posted, "Effective immediately we are pausing all issuance of worker visas for commercial truck drivers." "The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers," Rubio added. President Donald Trump signed an executive order in April directing the enforcement of English-proficiency rules for commercial drivers. "President Trump believes that English is a non-negotiable safety requirement for professional drivers, as they should be able to read and understand traffic signs; communicate with traffic safety officers, border patrol, agricultural checkpoints, and cargo weight-limit station personnel; and provide and receive feedback and directions in English," the order said in part. A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek via email that the pause is for applicants who wish to operate commercial trucks with H-2B, E-2 and EB-3 visa classifications. "The Department will take all necessary steps to protect public safety, including on America's roads. This pause will remain in place while the Department of State, in coordination with the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security, makes any necessary updates to its screening and vetting protocols," the spokesperson added. This month in St. Lucie County, Florida, Harjinder Singh was charged with three counts of vehicular homicide, accused of attempting an illegal U-turn while driving a commercial semitruck, Florida Highway Patrol (FHP) investigators said. Three people in a minivan died in the crash. FHP said Singh entered the country illegally via the Mexico border in 2018 and obtained a commercial driver's license in California. Press release relating to the truck driver charged for vehicular homicide: — FLHSMV (@FLHSMV) August 17, 2025 What People Are Saying Florida Governor Ron DeSantis posted to X on Monday: "Illegal alien issued CDL by California. Doesn't even speak English. Sanctuary policies are deadly. Must hold the illegal alien accountable but also the other actors involved including the company." Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy posted to X on Thursday: "Non-enforcement and radical immigration policies have turned the trucking industry into a lawless frontier. @USDOT is committed to cleaning it up. Thanks to @POTUS, all truck drivers MUST be able to speak and read English or they WILL be put out of service. If you don't understand the language, you can't understand the laws. End of discussion." Immigration lawyer Nicolette Glazer posted to X on Thursday: "This is such BS! There are very few 'work visas' issued to commercial truck drivers, probably in the few hundreds, if that, a year. The reason? They don't really fit in the H2B because the shortage is not seasonal or temporary and other than for carriers from MX or Canada w transborder MCs, not likely to fit them in the transfer categories." What Happens Next It is immediately unknown how long the pause will last or if the Trump administration will add more restrictions to it.

Alpina Holdings' (Catalist:ZXY) Earnings May Just Be The Starting Point
Alpina Holdings' (Catalist:ZXY) Earnings May Just Be The Starting Point

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Alpina Holdings' (Catalist:ZXY) Earnings May Just Be The Starting Point

Even though Alpina Holdings Limited's (Catalist:ZXY) recent earnings release was robust, the market didn't seem to notice. We think that investors have missed some encouraging factors underlying the profit figures. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A Closer Look At Alpina Holdings' Earnings One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'. As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth. Alpina Holdings has an accrual ratio of -0.14 for the year to June 2025. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of S$11m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of S$4.29m. Given that Alpina Holdings had negative free cash flow in the prior corresponding period, the trailing twelve month resul of S$11m would seem to be a step in the right direction. Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Alpina Holdings. Our Take On Alpina Holdings' Profit Performance As we discussed above, Alpina Holdings has perfectly satisfactory free cash flow relative to profit. Because of this, we think Alpina Holdings' earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! Furthermore, it has done a great job growing EPS over the last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. If you want to do dive deeper into Alpina Holdings, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for Alpina Holdings (1 is significant!) that we believe deserve your full attention. Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Alpina Holdings' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data

Steak ‘n Shake slams Cracker Barrel CEO for eliminating ‘old-timer' from logo: ‘We take pride in our history'
Steak ‘n Shake slams Cracker Barrel CEO for eliminating ‘old-timer' from logo: ‘We take pride in our history'

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Steak ‘n Shake slams Cracker Barrel CEO for eliminating ‘old-timer' from logo: ‘We take pride in our history'

Steak 'n Shake has taken aim at Cracker Barrel, accusing the Southern country-themed chain of erasing its heritage and identity with its controversial new logo. The Indianapolis-based burger chain took to X on Thursday to slam Cracker Barrel for allegedly abandoning its roots, implying that CEO Julie Felss Masino is stripping away the identity of the restaurant and gift store chain in pursuit of short-term trends. Advertisement 'Sometimes, people want to change things just to put their own personality on things,' Steak 'n Shake posted on X on Thursday, along with an image of part of the old Cracker Barrel logo. 'At [Cracker Barrel], their goal is to just delete the personality altogether. Hence, the elimination of the 'old-timer' from the signage.' Steak 'n Shake continued, 'Heritage is what got Cracker Barrel this far, and now the CEO wants to just scrape it all away. At Steak 'n Shake, we take pride in our history, our families, and American values. All are welcome. We will never market ourselves away from our past in a cheap effort to gain the approval of trend seekers.' 3 Steak 'n Shake has fired back at Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino, accusing the company of eliminating its heritage with its new, controversial logo. FOX News Advertisement The fiery post followed just one day after Steak 'n Shake called out Cracker Barrel on Wednesday for the logo change. Replying to a post from Trump advisor Alex Bruesewitz in which he criticized the chain's leadership for the new logo, Steak 'n Shake accused Cracker Barrel's board of directors of not respecting its 'historical customers' or 'brand.' 'At Steak 'n Shake, we have gone back to basics,' Steak 'n Shake posted to X on Wednesday. 3 The Indianapolis-based burger chain posted on X that Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino is stripping away the restaurant's identity. AP Advertisement 'Our tallow fries are waiting for you. Oh yeah, you can also now pay with Bitcoin!' Cracker Barrel unveiled its new logo on Tuesday as part of its new branding campaign — eliminating the iconic image of a man resting on a barrel in favor of a text-only logo for the first time since 1977. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Conservative critics said the logo was the company's 'Bud Light' moment after receiving intense online backlash, while CEO Masino contended the response was 'overwhelmingly positive.' Advertisement According to a company press release, this new logo is still 'anchored in Cracker Barrel's signature gold and brown tones' and 'now rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and word mark that started it all.' 3 The company posted an image of the old Cracker Barrel logo with the caption, 'Sometimes, people want to change things just to put their own personality on things.' Getty Images On Thursday, shares of Cracker Barrel (CBRL) dropped more than 12%, the steepest drop since April. Steak 'n Shake and Cracker Barrel have been serving customers for more than 50 years. Steak 'n Shake was founded in 1934 in Normal, Illinois, while Cracker Barrel opened its first store in 1969 in Lebanon, Tennessee, according to their websites. Steak 'n Shake and Cracker Barrel did not immediately respond to FOX Business' request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store