Australia needs more than hollow words about a fair go – we need brave policy-makers
On Anzac Day I like to post on social media a list of birthdates in the national service lotteries from 1965 t0 1972. I do it because the March 1966 ballot, which was for men born between January and June 1946, includes my dad's birthday. He was picked and he fought in Vietnam, arriving just before the Tet Offensive in 1968.
Not only is my dad's birth date in that March 1966 ballot; so is mine. And that chills me.
It's part of why I revere the Australian War Memorial as a sacred place – it's hard not to when you've stood beside your dad as he pointed to the names of those he knew on the Roll of Honour.
It is why I have no qualms in saying I hate the AWM's lack of commemoration of the frontier wars, and deeply despise the $500m spent turning it into a 'Disneyland of war'.
It's also why I have deep contempt for a party using the days before Anzac Day to announce a jingoistic $21bn in defence spending and which talks about putting us on a 'war footing'. But it is mostly about very expensive, redundant toys.
I also ask the question that is often linked to Anzac Day: what are we defending? What are these values we hear soldiers sacrificed their lives for? And are our politicians brave enough to propose policies that reinforce and deliver those values?
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Is it a society where the unemployed live in poverty while the Reserve Bank believes there needs to be about 4.5% of the labour force without a job to keep inflation stable, and yet jobseeker is about 38% below the poverty line?
If the graph does not display, click here
Is that Australia's'fair go'?
What about our native flora and fauna? Is there anything more deserving of our protection?
This month we were told that the Great Barrier Reef is near a tipping point for survival. Surely a political party proud of Australia would be making the loudest noise possible to get action on climate change. Instead, when asked last week about climate change, Coalition leader Peter Dutton meekly said, 'the question is what we can do about it as a population of 27 million people?'
What about decisions that affect our own shores? Is there any bravery there? No. Instead, the government and the opposition rushed through legislation to ensure salmon farms in Macquarie Harbour can continue even though the industry is almost certainly sentencing the Maugean skate to extinction.
Neither party showed any bravery failing to stand up to foreign companies that employ few workers, and which pay negligible amounts of tax.
If the graph does not display, click here
Dutton at least has been brave enough to be the first leader of the Liberal party to admit we don't have a shortage of gas – something the ALP doesn't admit.
If the graph does not display, click here
But there is no bravery from either party about higher taxes on these mostly foreign-owned gas companies. Over the decade from 2019, beer drinkers will sacrifice more than gas companies – paying $12bn more in excise than gas companies will pay petroleum resources rent tax.
If the graph does not display, click here
Nor do the two main parties show any bravery by arguing we do not need any more new gas fields. Instead, this week the government approved a massive new gas project that will be purely for export and will not be subject to any royalties.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Australia is now a country that defends giving away – for free – our natural resources, and their extraction will contribute to the destruction of the Great Barrier Reef.
On housing, both the ALP and the Coalition capitulated to the wealthy – making it clear they would not touch the 50% capital gains tax deduction or negative gearing.
The Parliamentary Budget Office last week estimated the cost to the government in revenue foregone from both policies in 2025-26 would be $13.4bn. If this was listed as a program it would be the 14th most expensive – just below the cost of jobseeker.
If the graph does not display, click here
But in Tuesday night's debate, Dutton suggested we shouldn't touch it because it 'would be a disaster for people who are saving for a rental property'.
It would seem the Australian dream we now defend is the dream of negatively gearing our property for the second, or third, or 26th time.
Is the Australia we love the one where we have one of the highest levels of old-age poverty among rich nations, and the second lowest age pension?
If the graph does not display, click here
Clearly, sacrifice does not include the taxpayer funded retirees masquerading as 'self-funded' – who reap about $22bn in superannuation tax breaks.
If the graph does not display, click here
I agree that Australia is great. But it could be much greater.
Google 'Australian ballot' and tell me you don't feel some pride that we led the way in ensuring everyone could lodge their vote in private. What about women's suffrage? Does that not suggest a nation that can change the world?
It is not only conservatives who love our country and believe it is worth defending.
But what is it we love, what is it we want to defend? It's all well and good to talk about a fair go, or our great natural resources and lifestyle. But talk is cheap and hollow words are weak.
Bravery in policymaking can ensure we are a free and equitable nation with a unique environment of which we can be rightly proud.
Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tim Wilson says Coalition won't revisit ban on working from home as ‘happy workers' are more productive
Shadow industrial relations minister Tim Wilson says work-from-home arrangements should be negotiated between employees and bosses, as 'happy workers tend to be more productive'. Wilson said Dutton's controversial policy to wind back flexible working for public servants – dumped midway through the election campaign in an embarrassing backdown – was a 'heavy solution' that the Coalition wouldn't resurrect in this term. The shadow minister said such working arrangements should be worked out in individual workplaces, based on productivity. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'If employers can find a pathway … and employees can find a pathway, together in partnership for working from home because it works in their best interest, then that would always be the baseline at which I'd approach workplace arrangements,' Wilson told Sky News on Sunday. 'It's not for me to dictate what those terms are.' Dutton's controversial policy to restrict working from home for public servants has been blamed in post-election analysis as a major factor in turning off professional women and young people from voting Liberal. Nationals leader David Littleproud, during the short-lived split between his party and the Liberals, claimed several times 'the work-from-home fiasco hurt us'. Other Liberal members have indicated since the election they were supportive of flexible working arrangements. Andrew Bragg, the shadow minister for productivity, last week said 'we believe in individual choice and back flexibility at work', citing studies showing such arrangements could boost productivity. Wilson, who bucked the nationwide trend and became the only Liberal to win a new seat by reclaiming the seat of Goldstein he lost in 2022 to Zoe Daniel, echoed similar sentiments. He told Sky News that workers should 'have a sense of ownership and responsibility of their workplace arrangements, in partnership with their employers'. 'When it comes to the politics of [Dutton's policy], I think a lot of people looked at it and ... it was probably interpreted, anyway, as a heavy solution to what should be, for the most part, a productivity managed problem between employers and employees.' Wilson said the WFH policy was raised with him 'from time to time' while campaigning for Goldstein, but that equally he had employers who felt they 'no longer had a balanced relationship with their employees and wanted redress'. 'We do know that happy workers tend to be more productive, and there's certainly circumstances where people working from home can be more productive than they might otherwise be,' Wilson said. 'Because of commute times, because of their capacity to balance out their work and family lives, based on what their needs are, but it can vary circumstance to circumstance.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In a report last week, the Productivity Commission backed flexible working. 'Workers do not need to be in the office full-time to experience the benefits of in-person interactions. As a result, hybrid work (working some days remotely and some days in the office) tends to be beneficial to productivity, or at least is not detrimental to productivity,' the report said. 'Remote work also reduces breaks and sick days, and results in less distractions.' Also on Sunday, shadow finance minister James Paterson said he still believed Australia should boost defence spending to 3% of GDP – a policy outlined by Dutton. Dutton had committed to the figure late in the election campaign, but did not specify how it would be spent. Paterson, speaking on the ABC's Insiders, said the Coalition would provide details 'closer to the next election'. 'There's plenty of good advice out there in open source that suggests areas of investment. One is spending to resolve the recruitment and retention crisis facing the ADF. Another is to make sure that we have the munitions stockpile that we would need to survive a conflict, God forbid, if that should break out,' Paterson said. 'Other things [include] hardening the northern bases, the air and missile defence, drone defence, purchasing our own lethal drones.'
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Sussan Ley says name spelling change was due to ‘punk phase'
The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, has walked back claims that an interest in numerology was the reason she added extra 's' in her name, claiming her comment she made to a journalist in 2015 was a 'flippant remark' and not correct. Ley told Melbourne radio station 3AW on Friday that the name change came during her 'punk phase' as a teenager, shooting down a long-running story that she had added the extra letter because of a belief it would make her life more exciting. The Liberal leader has also conceded women were 'disappointed' with the opposition's policies at last month's election, promising the Coalition would 'modernise' and offer new ideas on housing, especially for young people, as well as childcare and aged care. In a 2015 profile with the Australian newspaper, Ley was quoted as saying: 'I read about this numerology theory that if you add the numbers that match the letters in your name you can change your personality. 'I worked out that if you added an 's' I would have an incredibly exciting, interesting life and nothing would ever be boring. It's that simple … And once I'd added the 's' it was really hard to take it away.' Asked about the quote on 3AW on Friday, Ley claimed it was a 'flippant remark' and numerology was 'actually not the reason'. 'It was something I did during my rebel teenage years and, you know, I went through a punk phase in those years and added the extra 's'. People have been fascinated by the numerology angle, but it's actually not correct,' Ley said. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email It is not the first time Ley has walked back the 2015 claim, seeking to explain her earlier quote in several media interviews when asked in recent years. In mid-May, shortly after being elected Liberal leader, Ley told Kyle and Jackie O's Kiis FM program that the original quote was 'an offhand remark to a journalist, which sort of took off'. 'The real reason is I was rather rebellious in my youth. That's been covered in my punk rock past, and so I just added the extra 's' and annoyed my family members. At that time, by the way, I certainly didn't think I would end up being leader of the opposition or even a politician,' she said. In the 3AW interview, Ley also said the Liberals 'we must listen, we must change, we must develop a fresh approach'. 'That listening is very important in what we do next. We will modernise. We will rebuild,' she said. The Coalition will be left with just 43 seats in the House of Representatives, and the Labor government holding a large majority with 94 seats. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We've got to have a party that respects modern Australia, reflects modern Australia, and represents modern Australia. And we've got to meet modern Australia communities, the people who listen to your program, where they are,' Ley said. 'I stood on the pre-poll in the last fortnight [of the election] all around the country, including Melbourne, and I talked to women and I saw the look of disappointment on many of their faces, and I asked them what they were thinking, and they didn't feel that we had a policy offering that was relevant to them.' Ley was this week critical of former Liberal president Alan Stockdale, who reportedly claimed women had become 'so assertive' that the party might need to consider extra support for men. The Liberal leader admitted that housing was a key issue the opposition had to work on, especially to win the votes of younger Australians. She also nominated childcare, aged care and policies on students as priority issues. 'They [young people] are worried about work. Of course, they're worried about studying, but they're worried about housing too, and if we can't find a pathway, or articulate a pathway into housing for young people, then they're not going to support our political party,' she said. 'We had some policies at the last election. We'll review those. I'm always very frustrated by what state governments are not doing when it comes to supporting young people in housing. But I'm not saying that it's only in their court. There are things the federal government can do as well.'
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Thursday briefing: How Geert Wilders' exit from Dutch coalition might set up his own comeback
Good morning. The Dutch government dramatically collapsed on Tuesday after far-right politician Geert Wilders pulled out of the coalition, citing his frustration over immigration and asylum policy. Shortly afterwards the prime minister, Dick Schoof, handed in his resignation to King Willem-Alexander. Fresh elections are expected in October. Until then ministers will remain in place in a caretaker capacity. There are a lot of players in this coalition and plenty of initials to keep track of (bear with me). In a political earthquake, Wilders' anti-Islam Freedom party (PVV) emerged as the largest party in parliament in the last election. The other coalition members were the conservative-liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), which came third, the centrist New Social Contract (NSC), which came fourth, and the populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), sixth. It took six months of negotiations to piece this coalition government together, and 10 months for it all to come crashing down. Schoof called Wilders' decision 'irresponsible and unnecessary'. The VVD leader, Dilan Yeşilgöz, said she was 'shocked' by the 'super-irresponsible' move. Wilders, for his part, said he would 'fight the coming elections to make the PVV even stronger' with the goal of emerging on the other side as prime minister. In today's newsletter I spoke to Cas Mudde, a Dutch political scientist and leading expert on populism and the radical right who is based at the University of Georgia. That's after the headlines. US news | Donald Trump has signed a sweeping order banning travel from 12 countries and restricting travel from seven others, reviving and expanding the travel bans from his first term. Security concerns and visa overstays, the US president said, justified the move. Fuel poverty | Bereaved families of tens of thousands of dead pensioners could be pursued by tax officials to recoup winter fuel payments under a new system being explored by the Treasury, the Guardian has learned. Israel-Gaza war | The Palestinian Red Crescent Society has detailed the harrowing account of one of its paramedics, Asaad al-Nasasra, 47, who told the organisation he heard Israeli troops shoot first responders. The attack on a convoy of emergency vehicles killed 15 others. UK economy | Keir Starmer has said he hopes a trade deal struck last month with the US can come into effect 'in just a couple of weeks', as the White House has signalled that the UK will be spared the 50% steel and aluminium tariffs that came into force on Wednesday. Global health | A cure for HIV may be closer after researchers discovered a new way to force the virus out of hiding in human cells. This 'overwhelming' breakthrough could help overcome one of the biggest obstacles to a cure: the virus's ability to lie dormant in certain white blood cells. Unstable coalition governments aren't new on the Dutch political scene. The threshold for a party to enter parliament is quite low compared to other European countries. In 2002, a coalition government collapsed in less than 100 days. Still, this latest debacle stands out. Things were rocky for the coalition from the beginning. The two biggest parties, the PVV and NSC, were not especially eager to join the government, as Mudde explains, and neither was the VVD. They eventually reached an agreement that allowed the PVV to be part of the government, but barred Geert Wilders from becoming prime minister or taking a cabinet post. 'From the start this was a very unlikely coalition and they have been fighting about almost everything. That has a lot to do with the fact that Wilders isn't in the government. He's the leader of the biggest party who is very isolated,' Mudde said. It's important to remember that Wilders is the PVV. 'You have all these people in the government from Wilders' party who have no power because the only one who decides is Wilders. He's mostly communicating through Twitter,' Mudde added. The BBB and NSC are both new and inexperienced political parties that were slipping in the polls. The former dominant party, the VVD, was internally divided about joining the coalition and likely to have been searching for an exit strategy. 'Despite this and despite a number of crises, the government survived 2024,' Mudde said. Then came the so-called issues around immigration and asylum. From all accounts, none of the other coalition parties saw it as a crisis – except Wilders. What were Wilders' immigration policies? Wilders had wanted to adopt a 10-point plan to radically reduce immigration and asylum. This included enlisting the army to secure and patrol the borders, turning all asylum seekers back when they reached the Netherlands, closing refugee accommodation facilities, deporting all Syrian refugees, suspending EU asylum quotas, and banning family members joining refugees already in the country. Unsurprisingly, legal experts said several of these proposed policies breached European human rights laws or the UN refugee convention, to which the Netherlands is a signatory. Still, Mudde said the government had tried to bring immigration down through drastic measures. For one, the government wanted to declare a national immigration crisis, which would have granted special powers, but a court struck it down as unconstitutional. 'They have passed many other legislations, but of course it has to be implemented. And that often takes a long time. This is much more about impatience than about not having policies passed,' Mudde said. One of the parties in the coalition was against declaring an immigration crisis. 'But they mostly didn't want to do that because it was clear that it would be struck down by the court. So the difference between the parties has not so much been about what we should do. It is much more about how to do it. It is not as if these other parties have said, no, you are too extreme. They've pretty much given Wilders everything on immigration,' Mudde added. What the government did push for, he said, was bringing immigration down within the legal framework of Dutch liberal democracy. Why did he pull out? Wilders' decision to pull out of the coalition is widely seen as bizarre. Recent polls show the PVV has lost significant voter support since its shock election victory in November 2023. The party is now polling at about 20%, roughly level with the Labour/Green alliance, currently the second-largest bloc in parliament (more on them soon). 'There is no strategic decision here. It is being framed by the other parties as him being unreliable, and this plays into the broader narrative of populists being irrational, like he is some kind of Trump. He is not reckless usually, so this is a very odd decision,' Mudde said. Unlike some other far-right politicians, Mudde added, Wilders is a true believer. 'Wilders has been living for more than 15 years under 24/7 police protection because of the threat of jihadists. And while he denies that this has affected the way he looks at the world, there's no way that this hasn't impacted him.' For Wilders, the fight against immigration, or more bluntly, against Islam and Muslims, is existential. 'It is the only issue for him, it is fundamental. He's not concerned about surviving as leader because he is the party. He believes that the government didn't do what he wanted, so he got out of the government. It's an ideological decision, which strategically doesn't make much sense. That is very rare in politics: to put ideologies over strategy.' What happens next? It is hard to predict who will come out on top in the October election – and much of what is happening now may be forgotten by then. After the collapse, Wilders came out swinging with one clear message to voters: I wasn't allowed to implement the radical changes the country needs. Vote for us because we're too big to ignore. The VVD, under Dilan Yeşilgöz, has responded in a way reminiscent of former prime minister Mark Rutte, Mudde explains: acknowledging that immigration is a major issue but insisting that far-right populists like Wilders are all talk and no delivery. Yeşilgöz hasn't ruled out governing with Wilders again. That risks a repeat of the 2023 election, which was framed around immigration and whether Wilders should be allowed into government, which is a narrative that ultimately benefits him. There is still a chance the VVD could pivot back to traditional issues, such as lowering taxes, he added. If that happens, the Netherlands could end up with a centrist government made up of the VVD, GroenLinks–PvdA, D66, and the Christian Democrats, 'bringing the Netherlands back to where it has been for a long time'. According to Mudde, two key players in setting the political tone are the Dutch media, which has been 'obsessed' with the far right and immigration since the 2002 assassination of Pim Fortuyn, and the VVD itself. 'Politicians create their own realities,' Mudde says. 'And so just as Starmer thinks that if he is going to be Reform-lite, then he's going to win back the white working-class vote, which he never lost actually, the VVD has a similar story: they think that if we campaign as the trustworthy anti-immigrant party, then we will win back the voters who we lost to Wilders.' But if they choose to focus on immigration, the media will follow, and the far right will benefit, he added. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion And what of the centre left? The Social Democrats and the Greens are running on a joint list and are very close to merging, Mudde explains. That's made them more interesting to the media and helped them poll neck-and-neck with the far-right PVV. 'They've got Frans Timmermans, who's a heavyweight. But they haven't been able to truly shift the discourse. He'll likely campaign against the far right — 'Vote for us, or you'll get Wilders' — but that still keeps the focus on Wilders,' Mudde said. 'Whereas if you campaign on housing, education, healthcare, which are major issues in the Netherlands, then you force the VVD to have a position on that. You even force Wilders to have a position on that.' A gorgeous edition of our Long Wave newsletter (sign up here!) this week from Nesrine Malik. She explains how 'African fashion' (for want of a less generalising phrase) went global, from gallabiyas to kaftans. Charlie Lindlar, acting deputy editor, newsletters Children in Slovenia are less likely to experience deprivation than anywhere else in Europe. Guardian writer Zoe Williams explores whether that's due to current policies, or whether the answer lies in the country's socialist past. Aamna Keir Starmer may be in Downing Street, Kemi Badenoch may run the Tories and Nigel Farage may be the figurehead of conservatism – but Rafael Behr reckons one figure looms spookily over our politics and explains its decay: Liz Truss. Charlie The return of Billie Piper to Doctor Who made me smile, as did this roundup by Guardian readers on the series finale. While many welcomed the nostalgia, it's clear the BBC still has work to do to stay relevant. Aamna Here's a rare but fun appearance in the Guardian opinion pages from our own readers' office – on what many see as the egregious overuse of the word 'gotten'. Creeping Americanism, or acceptable if slightly clumsy neologism? You decide. Charlie Tennis | The wildcard French player Lois Boisson, who was ranked 361 in the world at the start of the French Open, stunned sixth seed Mirra Andreeva in a 7-6 6-3 victory to reach the semi-finals on her debut. In the men's draw, Novak Djokovic defeated Alexander Zverev in four sets and will next face world No 1 Jannik Sinner in a semi-final. Football | The England vice-captain Millie Bright has withdrawn from next month's Euros in Switzerland, saying it 'is the right thing for my health and my future'. The decision is a setback for Sarina Wiegman before the defence of the title the Lionesses won three years ago. Football | Chelsea have strengthened their attack by completing the £30m signing of Liam Delap from Ipswich. The club were determined to bring in a new striker this summer and have moved swiftly to secure one of their top targets. 'Chaos fears over return of winter fuel payments' says the Guardian, while the Times has 'Pensioners face tax hit for winter fuel U-turn' and the Express renders it as 'Farage backs call for full U-turn to help OAPs'. The i paper plays this one with a straight bat: 'Pensioners on disability and housing benefit in line for winter fuel payments'. 'Glee school meals' – the Mirror claims 'campaign victories' on that issue and the winter fuel money. 'Reeves forced to drop net zero cuts' – that's the Telegraph while the chancellor gets a better run in the Metro with 'Reeves unveils major transport plan … £15bn to get Britain moving'. Top story in the Financial Times is 'Trump's 'big beautiful bill' will swell US debt by $2.4tn, warns watchdog'. 'Battle lines drawn over immigration' says the Daily Mail, summarising the platforms of 'Keir' and 'Kemi' side by side below. Is AI about to steal your job? Should we believe the warning that AI is about to upend the jobs market? Chris Stokel-Walker reports A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad From its plot to its performances and picturesque Oregon setting, The Goonies remains a timeless piece of cinema. But as it turns 40, it turns out the film still has its secrets, as Ann Lee finds out in this behind the scenes oral history, in which the cast and crew spill on their on-set antics. 'We were a family. We loved each other and we bickered and drove each other mad,' says Kerri Green, who plays cheerleader Andy. 'It's about friendship. It's an underdog story; that idea that if you do this together, you're going to succeed. It was such a magical thing. I have learned to just look back and appreciate how lucky I was to have been part of that.' Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
