logo
Europe must choose: reform and resilience − or drift into irrelevance

Europe must choose: reform and resilience − or drift into irrelevance

The Nationala day ago

Donald Trump has been called many things but his newest label – the great unifier of Europe – might just stick. That provocative notion may raise eyebrows in Brussels, Paris, or Berlin, but Mr Trump's return could be the shock that finally compels Europe to do what it has long known it must: to become more self-reliant.
The world has changed. Russia's war in Ukraine shattered the illusion of permanent peace in the region. China 's economic ascendancy is reshaping global competition. And now, with Mr Trump launching a trade offensive against allies and adversaries alike, one truth is impossible to ignore: no one is coming to Europe's rescue.
For too long, Europe has assumed that peace, prosperity and US protection were permanent. That illusion is gone.
Mr Trump's transactional approach to alliances – where strength is rewarded and weakness punished – has exposed a hard truth: Europe can no longer outsource its defence. His worldview owes more to 19th-century protectionism than 20th-century idealism.
But the implications extend beyond defence. Mr Trump's America is not merely retreating from global leadership – it is actively dismantling the postwar order that enabled Europe's rise. Nato, the World Trade Organisation, the International Monetary Fund – these institutions anchored European prosperity and security. That architecture may not include Europe by default next time.
Unless Europe steps up, it risks being left behind. Europe faces a choice: reform and lead or stagnate and drift.
The first path begins with taking responsibility for its own defence. That demands more than budget increases, with Germany poised to channel as much as €1 trillion ($1.15 trillion) into defence and infrastructure under Chancellor Friedrich Merz. It means aligning strategic priorities, co-ordinating procurement, and deepening military integration – ideally through a 'coalition of the willing', rather than waiting for unanimity. This group could include the UK, Norway, Canada and, potentially, Switzerland.
Europe must also fix its chronic economic underperformance. Between 2014 and 2023, nominal US GDP grew 57 per cent; the euro area just 15 per cent. That gap reflects more than demographics – it points to structural inefficiencies. Fragmented capital markets and limited access to risk capital force many European entrepreneurs to look abroad.
A genuine capital markets union would change that, unlocking investment in green tech, artificial intelligence, life sciences and more. It's not just about growth. Innovation is the new battleground.
Energy is the third pillar. The war in Ukraine didn't cause Europe's energy crisis, but it exposed the risks of dependence. Swapping Russian gas for American liquefied natural gas won't delivery energy security. Resilience will come from accelerating renewables, upgrading grids, building storage and revisiting nuclear energy – not just for climate goals, but for sovereignty.
In this optimistic future, Europe is more integrated, more dynamic and more secure. It competes globally and stands on its own terms.
The second path is easier – for now. No hard choices. No integration. Just drift.
In that future, defence stays fragmented. Capital remains trapped. Europe continues to punch below its weight. And, as the world grows more volatile, Europe becomes less relevant.
We've seen this before.
In the mid-1980s, Europe was adrift – weak growth, institutional fatigue, geopolitical anxiety. Then-US president Ronald Reagan's arms race unnerved many after a decade of detente.
Europe responded with the 1986 Single European Act, which laid the groundwork for the single market. It streamlined decision-making and revived the integration agenda. Europe rose to the moment then – and it must again.
This time, the stakes are higher. The next round of reforms must secure not just prosperity, but sovereignty.
Business has a role to play too. Just as industrial leaders helped drive integration in the 1990s, today's chief executives must help shape Europe's renewal − not just because it's good policy, but because a fragmented, inward-looking Europe is bad for business and worse for society.
Leaders like Henrik Andersen, chief executive of Danish wind turbine maker Vestas, offer a useful example. He has urged Brussels to align energy, trade and industrial policy – not out of idealism, but because Europe's competitiveness in clean tech depends on it.
So what must Europe do − urgently and decisively?
First, it must provide for its own defence. With US electoral cycles growing ever more unpredictable, European security can no longer hinge on transatlantic assumptions. A credible defence posture is essential − not to replace Nato, but to rebalance it.
Second, Europe must unlock capital and innovation. Fragmented financial markets continue to stifle scale and ambition. While North America accounts for 60 per cent of global scale-ups, the EU claims just 8 per cent. A capital markets union is now critical to mobilise European savings, fund its own innovation, and reduce reliance on US capital.
Third, the green transition must accelerate − not simply as a climate imperative, but as a strategy for resilience and sovereignty. Renewables, and where appropriate nuclear, should anchor an energy strategy capable of withstanding geopolitical shocks.
And finally, Europe must engage globally with coherence and purpose. It has a foreign minister, but still lacks a foreign policy. That must change. Building stable, values-driven partnerships with powers like India, Saudi Arabia and even China will be essential if Europe is to remain an active shaper − rather than a passive observer − of the global order.
It's one of history's ironies: Mr Trump may be the catalyst for European renewal. By making US commitments less reliable, he's made European responsibility unavoidable. By rejecting global rules, he's made European leadership indispensable.
This is not just another chapter in Europe's integration story. The world has changed − and with it, the stakes. The time for hesitation is over.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

G7 leaders head to Canada as Iran-Israel clash fuels global alarm
G7 leaders head to Canada as Iran-Israel clash fuels global alarm

Al Etihad

time2 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

G7 leaders head to Canada as Iran-Israel clash fuels global alarm

15 June 2025 12:13 ALBERTA (dpa)Leaders of the Group of Seven arrive in Canada on Sunday for a three-day summit overshadowed by a dangerous military escalation between Iran and Israel that has raised fears of a broader conflict in the Middle have soared after Israel launched a major strike on military and nuclear sites in Iran on Friday, prompting a deadly exchange of retaliatory attacks over the past three crisis is set to top the G7 agenda as the heads of the world's leading industrialised democracies gather at a remote mountain lodge in Kananaskis, summit officially begins on Monday with the first working session. Bilateral talks are expected on the Middle East tensions, leaders are expected to focus on the war in Ukraine, global trade disputes, migration, and securing access to critical raw include US President Donald Trump, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting the a break from tradition, the group is not expected to issue a joint final communiqué. Instead, according to German government sources, Canada plans to release only "selected statements on specific topics."As in previous years, leaders from outside the G7 have been invited to take part. Those expected to attend include heads of state and government from Mexico, India, South Korea, South Africa, Australia and Indonesia.

Donald Trump's military parade takes over Washington
Donald Trump's military parade takes over Washington

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Donald Trump's military parade takes over Washington

US President Donald Trump on Saturday presided over a military parade in Washington to mark the 250th anniversary of the US Army and Flag Day – both of which happened to fall on his 79th birthday. Tanks and troops made the journey down Constitution Avenue in the US capital, while jets soared in the skies above. Cannon were fired, military marching bands played and patriotic songs were sung. Mr Trump watched from the stands, flanked by his wife, first lady Melania Trump, and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. 'Thanks to their [the army's] extraordinary service and devotion, 250 years later, America stands tall, America stands proud and America stands free,' Mr Trump said, recounting famed military exploits throughout US history. 'We're the hottest country in the world, right now.' The streets were packed, with many wearing shirts and hats showing their support for Mr Trump. Some also wore attire disparaging Democrats. Right outside the fenced-off parade venue, Trump merchandise sellers were plentiful. 'We've got a beautiful pink hat, too,' shouted one of the merchants trying to sell hats embroidered with the President's name to parade attendees queuing before the event began. Streets along the parade route were shut down, and security checkpoints were set up for those attending the ceremony. 'If you have anything that's in a bottle or can you're not getting through that security gate,' shouted one of the security workers, talking to visitors queuing outside the security gates. 'These things [full can] could be used as weapons, that's why we're taking them, but please enjoy yourself.' Bottles of water and cans of an energy drink called 'Phorm Energy' were passed out to visitors on entering. The flavour of the energy drink was 'Screamin' Freedom'. In the US capital, large-scale military parades are rare. The last time a similar parade took place was in 1991 shortly after the US liberated Kuwait from Saddam Hussein. Yet Mr Trump, going back to his first term in office, has always wanted to hold one. This parade has not been without controversy. Critics have called it ostentatious, drawing comparisons to dictatorships like North Korea. 'Military parades are about honouring those who have served, not praising a president who only thinks about himself,' Arizona Democratic Senator Mark Kelly posted on X. Even some Republicans have expressed reservations. Senator Rand Paul said that he did not think the parade was appropriate. 'Never been a big fan of goose-stepping soldiers and big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' he told reporters. 'So, if you ask me, I wouldn't have done it.' The timing of the US military parade amid the deadly air strikes exchanged between Israel and Iran and coupled with the deteriorating situation in Gaza, also proved to be problematic juxtaposition. In addition, the Trump administration has made slashing government spending one of its central policy goals. Most estimates indicated that the planning and logistics for the parade cost US taxpayers as much as $45 million About six in 10 Americans have said the parade is 'not a good use' of government spending, according to a Thursday poll conducted by the Associated Press-Norc Centre for Public Affairs Research. There were concerns from local elected officials in Washington that the large, heavy would damage to the streets in the US capital. But for those in attendance, many of whom queued for hours before it started to get a prime spot, the critics, concerns and worries about the parade seemed to melt on contact. 'Well, other countries celebrate and have military parades, in France, everybody celebrates it, why can't we?' said Jeanette, who told The National that she had travelled from Indiana to see the event. 'I'm here to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Army, and also it's Trump's birthday today.' There were protests outside the parade as well, though Mr Trump had said in recent days that any demonstration would be met with 'very big force'. About 400 people, organised by a group called marched through Washington and gathered for a rally in a park opposite the White House. Large protests against the Trump administration, called 'No Kings' demonstrations, drew thousands of participants in various other cities throughout the country. 'I did see a few protesters on my way here, near the metro station,' said Joseph Casaretto, who travelled from Texas to watch the event. 'But the protests were small, absolutely nothing like you're seeing in Los Angeles.' Another Washington parade visitor, US Army veteran Zachary Lambidakis urged critics of the parade and Mr Trump's decision to hold the parade, to focus their energies elsewhere. 'Enjoy the whole process,' he said. 'Yes, there's going to be some issues or some conflicts but that's perfectly normal and not everybody is going to agree, but we can agree to disagree.' Mr Lambidakis said he could not remember a similar event taking place in Washington for his entire adult life, and that it was long overdue. 'We're being blessed with the opportunity to appreciate our veterans and the active-duty people,' he said.

Trump's 2024 Disclosure Reveals $600 Million Income Surge
Trump's 2024 Disclosure Reveals $600 Million Income Surge

Arabian Post

time3 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

Trump's 2024 Disclosure Reveals $600 Million Income Surge

Donald Trump's financial disclosure for the 2024 calendar year reveals more than $600 million in gross income and at least $1.6 billion in assets, offering a detailed window into the former president's expansive business empire and the diversification of his revenue streams. The filing, submitted on 13 June 2025, highlights a sharp rise in earnings derived from cryptocurrency ventures, numerous golf and hospitality properties, global licensing agreements, and an array of branded merchandise deals. Income from crypto alone was staggering: $320 million in fees from the $TRUMP meme coin and $57.35 million from token sales tied to World Liberty Financial, a DeFi enterprise in which Trump holds 15.75 billion governance tokens. Golf-related revenues accounted for a significant portion of the total, with Trump's Florida-based resorts—including Jupiter, Doral, West Palm Beach—and the Mar‑a‑Lago club bringing in at least $217.7 million. Trump National Doral generated $110.4 million alone. International properties in Ireland and Scotland added approximately €19 million and £28.7 million respectively. ADVERTISEMENT Royalties and licensing across Trump's branded merchandise further bulged into the tax disclosure. Revenues included $1.3 million from the Greenwood Bible, $2.8 million from Trump Watches, $2.5 million from Trump Sneakers and Fragrances, and $1.16 million from NFT trading cards. Foreign branding deals yielded over $36 million, emanating from projects in Vietnam, India, and Dubai. Passive income from investments—comprising interest, dividends and bond yields—totalled at least $12 million, sourced from holdings of about $211 million. The most notable fund positions were in Blue Owl Capital, Charles Schwab and Invesco government bond strategies. The disclosure confirms the minimal asset estimate of $1.6 billion, calculated using the lowest bounds in declared valuations. However, asset values may be considerably higher, given ranges presented in the filing. Despite assertions that Trump placed his businesses in a blind trust managed by his children, the disclosure underlines that the associated earnings continue to funnel to him directly. Critics argue this arrangement poses ethical concerns and potential conflicts of interest, especially where government policy intersects with crypto or development sectors potentially benefiting his enterprises. First Lady Melania Trump was listed as earning $216,700 from licensing her NFT collection. The disclosure notes Trump Media & Technology—including Truth Social—remains a key asset, though its precise contribution to the total remains unspecified. The financial filing, examined by Reuters and the Washington Post, runs through 2024 and follows extensive public and media scrutiny regarding Trump's financial transparency. He faces ongoing legal challenges—including potential liabilities amounting to nearly $440 million stemming from defamation and state litigation—but those were recorded as pending appeal. Trump's earnings from crypto and golf underscore an evolving business strategy where new digital ventures coexist alongside traditional real estate and leisure interests. The disclosure offers a snapshot of an economic footprint that spans DeFi, luxury goods, hospitality, passive investments and global licensing—reflecting a sophisticated, multi-channel revenue model.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store