Amapiano stars TxC makes BET history as the DJ duo claims major US award
The award shared with Brazil's Ajuliacosta continues SA's strong presence at the long-standing awards ceremony following Makhadzi's 2024 win.
Industry leaders highlight African music's growing global influence and commercial potential.
South African amapiano duo TxC made history at the 2025 BET Awards, becoming the first DJ duo ever to be recognised in the Best New International Act category, jointly winning with Brazilian newcomer Ajuliacosta.
Tarryn Reid and Clairise Hefke – collectively known as TxC – accepted their award at the Peacock Theatre in Los Angeles, marking another milestone for South African music on the global stage.
The win cements amapiano's growing international influence and follows South African singer Makhadzi's victory in the 2024 ceremony in the Viewer's Choice: Best New International Act category.
The Best New International Act category featured impressive South African representation, with Dlala Thukzin and Maglera Doe Boy also receiving nominations alongside artists from Nigeria, the UK, Tanzania, France, and Brazil.
Prior to departing for Los Angeles, TxC was honoured with a send-off celebration at which industry leaders praised their groundbreaking achievement.
READ | SA's Tyla, Maglera Doe Boy and Dlala Thukzin strike a chord with 2025 BET nods
Monde Twala, senior vice president and general manager at Paramount Africa and BET Lead, sees TxC's success as part of a larger movement of African musical excellence gaining global recognition.
'For me, it's about culture and storytelling. If you look at the continent, Africa has great talent. Music and the drumbeat are our anchor, rhythm, and vibe,' said Twala.
We are the new frontier – it's Africa's time to shine on the global stage. Our music is from an Afrobeats perspective and an amapiano perspective. Hip hop did it, too – the AKAs have won international awards, and the Casspers have been nominated in the past.
Twala highlighted a growing list of African artists making international waves, including Diamond Platnumz, Tiwa Savage, and many others, creating unprecedented opportunities for emerging talent.
When asked about African music's global significance, Twala drew focus to the continent's cultural richness as its unique selling point.
'What African culture brings is gold right now. We are magic, but I think it comes from our diversity. If you look at how broad this continent is, all the countries and their vastness, and the dynamics in terms of tribes and languages, we are so dynamic, colourful, and exciting. That's the edge we bring to the world,' he explained.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by BET Africa (@bet_africa)
Reflecting on South Africa's growing BET Awards presence, he noted past successes from artists like Black Coffee, Babes Wodumo, AKA Nasty C, and Tyla's recent triumph.
'It's beautiful to see amazing talent male, female, young, old – being able to represent the continent,' he said.
Young people today must focus on how they can build their brands beyond borders, collaborate with artists across the continent, create business in music outside South Africa, and earn in dollars.
He highlighted strategic brand development for artists seeking international success as a key goal up-and-comers should strive for.
'It's about being well-packaged. Always think about how you can package your brand as an artist. Have the right people around you,' he advised.
'It's about exploring new markets. If you're popular in Jozi, think about how to be popular in Lagos and then build your brand in Kenya, New York, and London. Today, we have social media and the internet, making African content and artists accessible worldwide. You have to take advantage of new media. '
News24 reached out to the BET award winners, who were unavailable for comment owing to the time difference and booked public engagements in Los Angeles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
38 minutes ago
- WIRED
I Went to an AI Film Festival Screening and Left With More Questions Than Answers
Aug 20, 2025 6:30 AM Runway AI paired up with Imax to screen 10 AI-generated winning selections. The festival has been derided by some cinephiles, while others insist it's part of a natural technological evolution. The AI Film Festival. Photograph: Mark Sommerfeld Last year, filmmaker Paul Schrader—the director of Blue Collar, American Gigolo , and First Reformed , and writer of Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver —issued what seemed like the last word on artificial intelligence in Hollywood filmmaking. A few days after the release of Denis Villeneuve's sci-fi blockbuster Dune: Part Two , Schrader asked his Facebook followers: 'Will Dune 3 be made by AI? And, if it is, how will we know?' Schrader is well regarded not only as a director, but one of cinema's top-shelf curmudgeons, quick with a wry burn or baiting shit-post. But his Dune tweet seemed like more than another provocation. It spoke to a mounting feeling among many filmgoers, myself included: that Hollywood had stooped to producing sleek, antiseptic images so devoid of personality that they might as well have been made not by a living, breathing, thinking, feeling artist, but by a computer. Most generative AIs 'train' on existing troves of man-made images. With Dune , the opposite seemed true. It appeared as if Villeneuve was training on AI conjurations, screensavers, and glossy desktop wallpapers. (In fact, the film used 'machine learning' models to relatively modest ends.) Still, it got me thinking: Is there an actual AI aesthetic? Do video generators powered by AI share a set of artistic ideas, or values, common among their output? Or, even more basically, can AI video generators have ideas, or values, at all? My initial hunches here were … a) no; b) no; and c); no, of course an AI could not have 'ideas' or 'values,' which are the exclusive province of human artists, and human beings more generally. A toaster does not get a notion to warm up your bread or bagel, and then follow through with it. Nor does it care about how it does so. It merely executes a set of routinized, mechanized functions related to the warming (and eventual jettisoning) of breads, bagels, and other toastables. Why should generative AI be any different? To test these premises (and my own rather dismissive conclusions) I trekked to a theater in New York to take in a program of 10 short films from the 2025 AI Film Festival. The AI Film Festival is backed by Runway, a New York–based AI company offering 'tools for human imagination.' Among those tools are image and video generators allowing users to create characters, sets, lighting schemes, and whole immersive scenes. With its Gen-4 software, users can theoretically create a whole movie—or something vaguely approximating one, anyway. 'We were all frustrated filmmakers,' says Runway's cofounder, Alejandro Matamala Ortiz, of he and his partners, who met as grad students enrolled in the Interactive Telecommunications Program (ITP) at NYU's Tisch School for the Arts. 'We wanted to build the tools that we wanted to use.' The film festival was born of a further desire to help legitimize those same AI tools. A gala screening held earlier this summer at New York's prestigious Alice Tully Hall at the Lincoln Center (home to the New York Film Festival and year-round programming) saw filmmakers and technologists gather to watch the crème de la crème of a technology typically written off for producing mere 'slop.' The festival format, Ortiz says, serves to 'bring people together.' Now, that same gala program is touring Imax cinemas around the country, for a limited engagement. As with any billing of 10 shorts made by 10 different filmmakers, the quality is a bit scattershot. The program begins promisingly enough with Maddie Hong's Emergence, an immersive nature documentary 'shot' (and narrated) from the POV of a butterfly larvae hatching from a chrysalis. With its bold pastel color palette, the rotoscope animated More Tears Than Harm , by Herinarivo Rakotomanana, superficially evoked the work of American primitivist painter Horace Pippin (who is one of my favorite artists). Simon Reith's 6000 Lies is a rapid collage of gestating human fetuses, followed by a photo of a fetus burial site. In an abridged form, it might make an effective advertisement for a pro-life group. Indeed, if there was anything like an aesthetic sensibility shared by the films it was a sense of commercialized gloss: rapid-fire edits, satiny, photorealistic images. A few, like Riccardo Fusetti's Editorial and Vallée Duhamel's Fragments of Nowhere , played like perfume ads for a fragrance an android might wear. The lousiest of the bunch was an anime short called RŌHKI - A Million Trillion Pathways , credited to a filmmaker named Hachi and IO. Beyond being wholly derivative, it highlighted the rather obvious shortcomings of the technology, like characters' earlobes and shirt collars seemingly mutating in shape between scenes. One filmmaker in the audience, Robert Pietri, came away mostly impressed by what he saw. 'A couple of them were really pushing, and going where I think you should be going with this,' he says, 'which is creating a cinema that you can't create otherwise. I was excited by it.' He sees the weaker films as not being limited as much by the emerging AI toolkit but by the 'limitations of the creators.' An AI it seems, cannot render away bad ideas inputted by the human beings plugging in the prompts. Well, not yet, anyway. As something of a generative-AI skeptic, watching the program raised all kinds of questions. Some of these were pretty pedantic and boring. Like: Does standard movie theater etiquette (re: looking at one's cell phone) apply during an AI film fest? You could imagine a computer filmmaker might actually like to see another little computer, lighting up in the dark theater, as if approvingly. Other questions were a bit more existential—or, perhaps, ontological—relating to the very nature of so-called 'AI art.' Even when these films were entertaining or nice to look at, I couldn't help but feel a little tricked. Aren't those qualities mere impersonations of real films, painstakingly made by real people? And so, aren't even the 'good films' still fundamentally bad? There are other, less chin-stroking, considerations. Generative AI has drawn criticism for its massive draw on natural resources, with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitting that the proliferation of data centers is pretty much unsustainable without considerable developments in nuclear fusion. And AI's encroachment on certain creative fields has led to concerns about mass layoffs in the film and video game industries. Runway's Ortiz says he thinks of AI as similar to previous technological innovations rollicking creative fields. 'Technology has brought some disruption in the job market,' he says. 'But it also opens up new, new stuff.' The technologists and 'creatives' using and promoting these tools tend to frame the arrival of all this 'new, new stuff' as something of an inevitability. Phoenix-based filmmaker Jacob Adler, whose Total Pixel Space took top honors at the AI Film Festival, seems to follow a similar philosophical track. 'I am fascinated by the long arc of technological evolution that requires the flow of time, beginning with biological technologies such as self-replicating molecules, cell membranes, photosynthesis, nervous systems, eyes, brains, etc.,' Adler wrote in an email to WIRED. 'AI is not a departure from nature, but a continuation of the fundamental evolutionary trend of biology learning to build more complex information-processing systems, now outside its own flesh.' But flesh still has its defenders. The AI battle lines increasingly seem drawn in terms that are unreconcilable. So it comes as little surprise that skeptics, critics, and champions of the old ways have been decrying the AI Film Festival from day one. When Imax announced its partnership with Runway AI, responses among cinephiles were spiky. One X user replied,'Not watching anything made by clankers,' referencing the slur used to disparage robots in the Star Wars films. Actor Jared Gillman reposted Imax's announcement on X with an image of Ethan Hawke in a suicide vest from First Reformed with the caption, 'One ticket for the ai imax film festival please' (doubly appropriate, perhaps, considering Schrader's stated views on the technology). The commingling of Imax and AI seemed a particularly egregious offence. Imax, after all, is a corporation ostensibly dedicated to showcasing the theatrical cinematic experience at the grandest and most imposing scale. And AI is regarded as, well, something else entirely. As one especially withering Redditor put it, 'Imax and Runway AI Sign a Film Festival Deal to Show Dogshit.' AI's defenders (many of whom have a vested financial interest in the technology's success) love claiming that many great leaps forward in human artistry have been met with similar resistance. And they have a point—to a point. Digital filmmaking challenged analog, celluloid filmmaking. The introduction of sound and color technology in cinema was regarded, at first, as a mere gimmick. Even very early critics and academics fretted that photographic media like cinema could never be art, precisely because they merely represented reality, instead of interpreting it. With time, and plenty of counterargument, pretty much all these takes have been proven wrong. Adler's own prize-winning short (which earned him a $15,000 cash prize and 1 million Runway AI 'credits') is a thesis film on this very idea. Total Pixel Space explores the notion of a hypothetical universe of colored pixels, exploring what its narrator calls 'a process of discovery in which all of reality is already mapped.' OK. But is all of reality 'already mapped'? Is this technology merely being 'discovered,' as one might discover, say, a river or a cool restaurant? Or is it being invented, and managed, by actual people making actual decisions, which have actual consequences? Perhaps AI is just the latest disruptive innovation riling up the haters and fuddy-duddies. Or perhaps machine-generated art constitutes not just another step in cinematic-technologic evolution, but a fundamental break from the basic, taken-for-granted idea of what it is to make art: that it involves skill, tremendous patience, considerable talent and, at very least, a human being positioned as its prime mover. AI is a difference (or 'disruption') not of degree, but kind—not the next step in a process, but a totally different thing. Apples and computer-generated oranges. For Troy Petermann, a 15-year-old attending the New York screening of the Imax AI Film Festival with his family, AI is not a tool. It's a threat. 'AI is definitely an innovation,' says the aspiring filmmaker. 'But innovation is the drug of humanity. We never know how to stop when it goes too far.' Petermann's reflections are refreshing, in large part because generative AI technologies are so typically pushed to people in his exact demographic: wannabe filmmakers with big ideas but little in the way of tools, money, or institutional support. He admits that AI technology may have tremendous upside in terms of its 'analytical' capacities, like processing and synthesizing information. 'When it comes to creative aspects,' he says, 'we should just draw the line.' Increasingly, those lines are getting blurrier. The AI Film Festival earned such pointed cinephile scorn in part because it was easy to single out as a conscious enemy of the seventh art. Runway's Ortiz speculates that, for the festival's next installment, the company may change the branding altogether. 'I don't think it will remain the 'AI Film Festival,'' he says. 'We do think AI is just going to be part of any process. Similar to other companies. Everyone is an AI company, and will be using AI in some way. AI will become just another tool within filmmaking.'
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tamar Braxton Reveals She 'Almost Died' 2 Days Ago, Was Found in a 'Pool of Blood' by Friend
"I don't even know what happened to me," Braxton says of an accident she suffered over the weekend NEED TO KNOW Tamar Braxton revealed she suffered a serious accident on Sunday, Aug. 17 The "Let Me Know" singer took to her Instagram Stories to share that she was found in a pool of blood by a friend and "almost died" She wrote that she "fractured my nose, lost some teeth and mobility" and "can't even really talk anymore" Tamar Braxton is recovering from a near-death experience. The singer, 48, revealed on her Instagram Stories on Tuesday, Aug. 19 that she suffered a terrifying accident over the weekend. In the post, Braxton detailed her injuries and said she was found in a pool of blood. 'I struggled to write this but everyone keeps calling me and honestly, I can't even really talk anymore I'm so weak,' she began. 'I almost died Sunday. I was found in a pool of blood from my friend with a face injury.' 'As the days go by the worse it is,' she continued. 'I fractured my nose, lost some teeth and mobility. 💔💔the way I look at life now is totally different. As my health is on the mend my mental journey begins… pray for me for real 💔💔💔💔I don't even know what happened to me 💔💔.' The singer added the song, "Spirit Lead Me" by Clavier in the background of her Instagram post. After she shared the news of the incident, she reposted a page of the Bible on her Instagram Stories showing Proverbs 31, which is a passage about strong women. Hours before she opened up about the incident, Braxton posted a quote to her Instagram Stories where she expressed gratitude for waking up. 'Thank you God for waking me up today,' it read. Earlier this year, Tamar shared her plans to focus on her health before her tour, which is still ongoing. 'It is OFFICIALLY tour time!!!!' she wrote on Instagram on March 23 alongside a video in which she was singing her 2013 song 'Stay and Fight.' 'Ima tell yall to get yall tickets!! A whole new set list… and the new music STARTS HERE!!!' In a second slide, Tamar included a photo of herself standing on a scale, which read 153.3 lbs. She vowed to get healthier as she prepared to go on the road. 'Bday is over so no more drinks…. No more carbs… all body and VOICE!!!' she said. 'Me and my brother @octoberlondon and I are going to give you a night you won't forget❤️😍🍀✨ see ya soon🏆.' Tamar recently graced TV screens when she teamed up with her sisters on the WEtv reality series, The Braxtons, which aired last year. Tamar was joined by sister Toni, Trina, Towanda and matriarch of the family, Dr. Evelyn 'Miss E' Braxton on the show as a way to honor their sister Traci, who died in 2022 from esophageal cancer. 'The main reason for wanting to do The Braxtons again is because of Traci,' Toni shared in a trailer for season 1. 'She asked us to do this — this was her last wish,' Miss E added. The family previously starred together on Braxton Family Values. Season 2 of The Braxtons has been renewed by WEtv. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In April, the family celebrated what would have been Traci's 54th birthday with several sweet tributes. Tamar shared a clip on Instagram of a crowd holding up their flashlights to Traci's hit single, "Last Call," playing at a concert. "Happy Heavenly Birthday beautiful @therealtracibraxton," Tamar wrote in the caption. "We miss you down here sis!! But I know God didn't want to see you sick like that so, he brought you home to himself to heal you ❤️." "Thank you for being an amazing sister and covering all of us down here🙏🏼✨," she concluded. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
News24
an hour ago
- News24
She digs deeper: Nomalanga Shozi explores the role of a ‘female zama zama' in BET's Black Gold
Black Gold is the new BET show that dives into the world of illegal mining. Nomalanga Shozi believes the series is unique in its portrayal of a woman zama zama. She stars alongside Dawn Thandeka King and Sello Maake kaNcube and calls it an 'incredible experience'. Nomalanga Shozi is back to shake up South Africa's screens with a new lead role. The actress, presenter and media personality has snagged the lead role of Amandla Zungu in the new BET daily drama Black Gold, diving into the high-stakes world of illegal mining. Set in the heart of KwaZulu-Natal's rich terrain, Nomalanga's character Amandla is a principled and headstrong woman forced into the world of illegal mining after a tragedy changes the trajectory of her life forever. Catching her in between shooting explosive scenes on the Black Gold set, Nomalanga takes a few minutes to chat with TRUELOVE on her new role. Exploring the world of a woman zama zama Nomalanga tells us what resonates the most with her about playing Amandla Zungu on Black Gold. 'I think a story of unbecoming to become is really what resonated with me. And I think it just came at the perfect time in my life as well, where I had gone through just enough life experience to understand how to portray all of those feelings and all of those emotions because I think also life experience is our greatest teacher. 'So yeah, I think the story of somebody going through a phase of having to shed an identity that they had attached themselves to for so long and then become something completely new, that's what resonated the most with me and excited me about it,' she shares. What portraying Amandla on Black Gold has taught Nomalanga is that the only constant in life is change, and that 'The quicker we embrace change is the quicker we learn and grow,' she remarks. Black Gold explores themes of feuding family, betrayal and lust, themes that audiences are all too familiar with from popular telenovelas. But Nomalanga believes that what sets the series apart from other local shows is its focus on a woman navigating the world of zama zamas or illegal mining. She explains, 'I think it sets itself apart in the fact that it's the first story we've ever seen or been told, or watched of the first female zama zama basically. 'How a woman could navigate that world, who she would have to be, how she would morph her way into becoming this very dangerous, scary, determined, courageous, brave person. So, I think that definitely is the one thing that sets it apart from most.' Sharing the stage with industry greats Nomalanga acts alongside industry veterans like Dawn Thandeka King, who plays her fearsome matriarch Florence Zungu, and Sello Maake kaNcube as Tom Motspe, a mining magnate caught in forbidden love and haunted by his deadly past. This powerhouse cast reflecting the theme of feuding families that Mzansi has come to love is also what distinguishes itself from other telenovelas on air. View this post on Instagram A post shared by BET Africa (@bet_africa) On sharing the stage with these acting greats, Nomalanga says, 'It has been the most incredible experience of my life, I can't even begin to describe to you. I mean, yes, the role is super challenging and obviously having such a big story is also really, really challenging just as a creative, but just having such a supportive web and network of seasoned cast and actors and actresses just to draw inspiration from or to go to for when I needed inspiration, when I need a different way to tackle a scene or handle emotion. 'All of those things to me are just such a blessing and it's not lost on me how unique this opportunity is. And the fact that it's also just a once in a lifetime, yeah, it really, really is. 'I mean, I grew up watching ubab' Sello and now I get to act alongside him and it's just so beautiful, it really, really is. It feels like I'm just learning from the best, and I'm just so grateful, man. It's such an amazing opportunity ... Can you imagine? You walk on the set and it's Archie Moroka,' she laughs.
