Anno 117 Pax Romana Preview: A Beautiful Simulation of a Prosperous Time
The next game in the series, Anno 117: Pax Romana, has the earliest historical setting for the Anno series to date, and it's an incredibly ambitious shift (nearly as much as the brief stint in futuristic settings with Anno 2070 and Anno 2205). As the dates suggest, Anno 117 takes place during a time of immense economic and cultural prosperity in antiquity -- and I got an early peek at how that looks during a three-hour hands-on virtual preview session moderated by an Ubisoft employee.
While Anno 117: Pax Romana is a game where you'll still be focusing on your economy and fostering positive relations first and foremost, you'll also need to consider building fortifications and training units for land and sea combat.
As the game is centered on growing your own Roman empire, you'll have to choose which end to colonize first, either beginning in Latium (in modern-day western Italy, around Rome) as a Roman governor or expanding Celtic influence by starting in Albion (in modern-day England). My hands-on preview was limited to Roman gameplay, but I was able to see how much depth the Celts add to the game. Starting in Albion doesn't just change the map geography and resource nodes you can build around, it changes the research trees, religions and construction projects you're able to access as well.
Many contemporary 4X strategy games (it stands for explore, expand, exploit and exterminate) such as Sid Meier's Civilization 7 and Age of Mythology: Retold focus heavily on outmaneuvering and destroying your opponents. In Anno 117, there isn't really the same type of "win condition" -- and there's far less extermination to revel in overall.
The interwoven construction systems of Anno 117 are easy to pick up but difficult to master, especially if you want your empire to span multiple islands across the map. Here's what I picked up about the game during my three-hour preview.
Majestic mountains and flowing fields of wheat surround the first stone residences of my budding province.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
When building a civilization, the devil is in the details
If you're choosing to set a game in the golden age of Roman civilization, it definitely makes sense to focus on graphical fidelity -- I'm sitting down here to engage with the beauty and culture of Pax Romana.
Anno 117 doesn't disappoint in this regard. Toward the tail end of my hands-on preview, I frequently found myself straying away from my self-imposed objectives to simply watch my citizens barter in the marketplace or work away on the wheat or hemp farms that stretched across the countryside.
Each dwelling you build adds three new citizens to your island, and these nonplayable characters are fully simulated as they go about their day-to-day business.
My citizens are enriching their interior lives in the grammaticus, a cultural center for reading and learning.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
I watched the plebeians master their crafts, making silks and baking bread before they retired to cultural centers to find an education. The lower class libertini mined ore, chopped wood and delivered goods on handcarts, creating a constant stream of foot traffic that was mesmerizing to keep an eye on.
The complexity of these real-time interactions is a real treat. If too many workers gather at a warehouse with goods and raw materials, the roadways jam up and productivity drastically drops. It felt incredibly natural to manage these blockages and make necessary adjustments because I was already so involved with the little lives carrying on in the game.
Once you build something you feel truly proud of, Anno 117 has features that let you toggle the heads-up display off -- I used this photo mode to capture some of my favorite pictures for this section of my preview. The images can't capture the simple joy of watching fields of golden wheat swaying in the wind, but I think they convey the splendor of a budding city-state in Latium.
You can snap new structures diagonally onto roads and other buildings. But this feature is no substitute for poor city planning.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
You might need an urban planning degree to run a well-oiled machine
If I could go back in time and restart my Anno 117 preview play session, I'd choose to take a beat before beginning construction on my starting island.
That's no joke -- every resource node, production center and citizen dwelling will affect how future supply chains are built, and that's before factoring in the increasingly complex web of roads you'll have to build to connect everything to the docks.
I shrugged and placed my first houses and farms randomly in the middle of the map, and it started causing problems for me hours later when I needed to build out unhygienic pigsties and hazardous kilns to broaden my civilization's economic prospects.
There's almost an overwhelming number of variables to juggle. Resources can only be extracted from certain nodes (and some fisheries and farms can only be built where the soil or water is suitably fertile for them), warehouses need to be located close enough for storage and production facilities will need speedy access to requisite materials.
I tried to separate my clay tile-producing kilns from the homes in my province's city, but as my civilization expanded it became a greater fire hazard.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
More complex goods require multiple resources to make, which means your supply chains will become even more complicated as ore, grain and animal products move further and further around your budding city.
As settlements become cities, problems emerge. Certain structures can spread disease and others are fire hazards, and you'll need to invest in Pax Romana's version of hospitals and firemen to mitigate these risks. I didn't have to worry about invading forces in the demo -- my Pax Romana was a true time of peace -- but you'll have to secure your borders in the full release, ensuring that there is enough military manpower spread around that your citizens are safe. It's been some time since land combat was featured in an Anno game, but you can train warriors and scouts that patrol your land for different quest objectives.
The speed of your city's growth and expansion is largely dependent on the caliber of citizens you're drawing to your island: In order to upgrade your citizens, you must cater to their basic needs and their luxury wants by building them into the city-state's supply chain.
While certain buildings provide debuffs to nearby citizens, other buildings will raise their happiness or fulfill certain needs.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
This can be confusing to a new player -- I was left momentarily scratching my head about being limited to construction of logging camps, wheat farms and basic food and clothing production -- but the real construction possibilities open up once you begin diversifying your population with more worker types. I unlocked the plebeians in the latter half of my first hour with Anno 117, and that's when the game truly picked up and more construction options became available.
Even so, I'd caution against rushing the citizen class upgrades. Expanding too quickly is a huge strain on your purse, and I found that I needed to spend a lot of denarii in order to establish a decent income.
This is one of the cases where slow and steady improvements to your supply lines are extremely important. I quickly learned the lesson that private equity seemingly hasn't: Don't sacrifice long-term growth on the altar of short-term profits. That's a good way to get hosed down with a net negative denarii drain, which will slow your expansion indefinitely.
If you're willing to take the time to do some very basic planning before clearing out trees and establishing your first builds, I expect players will find Anno 117 to be a very rewarding (if occasionally confusing) city builder spanning a rich territorial tapestry of different island factions.
I didn't personally get a chance to sail the seas, but I built my first boatyard -- this will be an extremely important part of Anno 117's core gameplay loop.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
Hidden at the periphery: Trade routes, disputes and random events
During my three-hour play session, I was largely relegated to a single island, building out the basic necessities and cultural landmarks that serve to kickstart a burgeoning Roman province. Even still, I was able to get a glimpse at some of the game's deeper systems -- and there's a lot going on in the wider world while the player is getting themselves situated.
There are many other nonplayable characters governing their own states on neighboring islands, and I would occasionally get notifications informing me of their achievements in research, development and trade.
These pop-ups created a sense of urgency -- my civilization was not being built within a vacuum, and I couldn't be sure if these other peoples had a tendency to build mutually beneficial relationships or if they stood only to conquer their nearby foes. I mostly enjoy building trade routes and forging alliances with others, but I would be lying if I said that these infrequent updates didn't have me contemplating an investment in a bigger military presence.
I imagine that starting with the Romans in Latium or the Celts in Albion won't just affect the nodes you can unlock in your research tree, but will change the way different neighbors interact with you as you make contact with them throughout the wider world.
Not every interaction with outsiders is a promise to paint the streets or oceans red -- and outside of trade, there are other ways that NPC factions help you build a better future.
I chose Ceres as my patron goddess, since I was primarily building into agriculture.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
Provinces that adopt the same faith as you cement the belief in your gods, and both societies will reap greater buffs as the religion spreads among a larger population. These boons can increase research speed, military might or economic production. A rising tide raises all ships, and spreading religious fervor benefits all governors who worship the same gods.
Players will exert influence on the wider world, but it will also exert an influence on their own city-state: The society they'll build is only one piece of a much grander, ever-shifting puzzle.
On a more granular level, a player's civilization will undergo random events and disputes that keep it in a state of perpetual motion. Their people are never at a standstill (unless one uses their omnipotent powers to literally pause time) and as such, they'll have trade disagreements, spread rumors and even riot.
Some of these events are simple decisions: In a moment of economic turmoil, I took a bribe from a wealthy businessman, but ended up enraging workers throughout the city; another time, I chose a personal advisor who increased my passive income instead of one who would optimize the storage of my warehouses.
The buffs (or debuffs) that are attached to these choices are not insubstantial, and so it feels like your decisions really matter. They drive the future direction of your province.
Ubisoft/Screenshot by CNET
Other events start up more involved questlines -- when citizens live in fear of a nearby shipwreck that is said to be haunted, I'd have to train up a scouting party and send them into the depths to report on what was truly happening. These secondary objectives make your territories feel alive and engage the player outside of the usual city-building activities.
There's a complex world hidden behind the curtain of Anno 117, but the game is approachable for new real-time strategy players, continuing the series' usual throughline of placing an emphasis on solving conflict through economic and diplomatic means.
Combat is certainly present, but I was able to completely avoid it during my preview session, leading me to wonder how much fighting there will truly be for the more military-minded players. Either way, Anno 117: Pax Romana sold me on its premise -- and I wanted to continue building my empire during this historically unprecedented time of peace.
Anno 117: Pax Romana is set to be released in 2025, but we don't have an exact date as of yet. The game will be available on PC, PS5 and Xbox Series X and S.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
I Played Battlefield 6: Hands-On With the Return To Big Battle Warfare
After a few hours playing the upcoming Battlefield 6, it's clear the game is designed to be a mea culpa to fans: Trust us, we're bringing back the Battlefield you remember. At a massive preview event in Los Angeles, I sat down to play a slice of the game's multiplayer mode -- and came off it suitably whelmed with a mix of raucous moments and tedious deaths. Ultimately, it feels like it will deliver the kind of big team battles players have been craving, with technical flourishes that amplify the gleeful chaos of a warzone. Developer DICE has a lot to prove with Battlefield 6. Its predecessors, 2018's World War II-themed Battlefield V and 2021's near-future Battlefield 2042, made unpopular changes to the game's formula, but subsequent updates salvaged some goodwill. So there's a reason the developers emphasized that DICE's newest game drew from the wells of Battlefield 3 and 4, returning to a successful era of big, destructive battles and retreating from some of the more drastic deviations. "We approached [this project] with this idea that not only do we want to draw inspiration from Battlefield 3 and 4, and sort of the best of the best in our series, we wanted to do it with our players," said Christian Grass, vice president and executive producer at DICE's Ripple Effect studios. "That was a big thing early on, get Battlefield Labs stood up, get [the game] out there, get players to play, and then start that conversation with them, listen to the feedback they're giving us and sort of build this game together." With the Battlefield Labs feedback program DICE set up, it's clear the studio wants to head off any potentially unpopular changes to the core gameplay people have come to expect from Battlefield. "With [Battlefield] Labs, everything that we're doing and communicating with our community early on, we want to make sure that we are landing it when [Battlefield 6] comes out," said Thomas "Tompen" Andersson, creative director at Ripple Effect. He noted that the team wants to "make sure that we don't have to counter some decisions that the community doesn't agree with." Labs has already provided Battlefield 6's developers with a wealth of data, from weapon pick rates to map movement patterns, that's led developers to tune the guns and different game modes. Their attention zooms down to the level of destructibility in objects, gathering feedback on whether walls are too sturdy or fragile and how that affects the player experience. "OK, maybe no one is using this lane, why aren't they using that? Oh, they feel like it's a kill zone, or there's not enough coverage," Andersson said. "We're taking that internally and testing and seeing if we can make that better." Read more: How to Join the Battlefield 6 Open Beta: Early Access Sign Up and Weekend Dates Balancing old and new Battlefield Battlefield 6 isn't a full rejection of modernity to embrace tradition. For instance, the game offers "closed weapon" modes that only let classes field select weapon categories to reinforce roles, while "open weapon" modes give everyone access to the game's full arsenal. But for the most part, it's a return to the arcade-y modern military shooter days that the community remembers more fondly than DICE's more recent experiments. The result, at least from the few hours of Battlefield 6 multiplayer I played, is a polished shooter with a lot of focus on making skirmishes exciting at any scale. Long-range sniper duels and tank battles felt as intense as close-quarters gunfights, all of which could be happening mere feet from each other on the same map. There are enough modes, guns, tools and play styles to give players whatever experience they crave in a military shooter. Whether that's tight-knit squad fights in alleyways or large-scale clashes between platoons of dozens of players each, you can pick weapons and a kit to customize to your liking -- running and gunning, fixing up armored vehicles, sniping from afar or reviving teammates -- all strategies felt viable. I felt that I contributed to the victory even if I wasn't leading my team in kills, and had the freedom to play out my little medic or tank commander fantasies. The preview didn't include any single-player content, leaving us in the dark about what's in store for the game's globe-trotting story campaign, which pitches a beleaguered NATO against the mysterious private military corporation, Pax Armata. But to be frank, single-player content is a nice extra -- it's far more important to evaluate the game's bones, which feel solid, if teetering on the edge of flooding players with complexity. Maps, classes, kits and guns: Grappling with too many options My Battlefield 6 preview rotated me between four modes, showing off different battle scales, goals and objectives. Conquest is the classic Battlefield experience, big maps split into multiple objective zones to capture, which fragments the fight into small areas with their own quirks and features. Breakthrough is still a big map, but you only play in thin sections of it at a time -- if the attacking team wins control of objective zones, the defenders retreat to the next slice of the map. Domination ditches vehicles for small-scale squad battles that rack up points with captured zones, king-of-the-hill style. Squad Deathmatch is a simple four-squad competition for who reaches the kill limit first. Unsurprisingly, the maps are split according to size. The larger maps in the preview included Liberation Peak, which felt like the platonic ideal of a Battlefield map -- a mountainous desert with small bases to hold, rocky outcrops to perch behind while sniping, buildings to swarm and wide roads to race down with tanks and light armored vehicles, all while helicopters and jets race overhead. The other big map, Siege of Cairo, is an urban battlefield with plenty of wide shooting lanes for vehicles and tight buildings for alleyway combat. The big maps captured my attention, but the smaller ones still held a lot of charm, particularly Iberian Offensive, where I held strong on several rounds of Domination, leaping between and on top of buildings to hold zones. Empire State was also in our rotation, a close-quarters slugfest with too many corners, I found myself getting smoked from behind frequently. While we didn't play them, our guide noted five other maps coming to the game at launch, including Operation Firestorm which is returning from Battlefield 3. Through all this, players deploy with one of four classes: Assault, Engineer, Support and Recon. Each has its unique perks: Assault heals faster and has explosive gadgets like grenade launchers, Engineer has a vehicle-fixing blowtorch and auto-repairs vehicles they ride in, Support has a healing resupply pack they can throw to the ground and uses defibrillators to quickly revive teammates and Recon can call UAVs and use motion sensor gadgets. Each class has an active skill that I honestly forgot about in the heat of battle -- including Assault's ability to see outlines of enemies through walls if they're making enough noise. EA DICE You can sit with the pre-made weapon-and-gear loadouts and dive into the game or customize them. I found it satisfying to get just the right attachments on my guns, but that's as far as I took it. Gadgets, explosives, grenades and sidearms stack up so many options that I didn't bother with much beyond my main weapon. Perhaps I could've gotten a better edge with all those extras, and Andersson described some truly novel gadgets coming in the main game like a sniper decoy that distracts enemies from far away and up close and personal laser devices that act as sniping rangefinders. But the quick time-to-kill made it feel like any moment I wasn't ready to snap my assault rifle to someone popping out of a corner would be a duel I'd lose. I did okay -- heck, in a couple matches I was even near the top of the scoreboards -- but I never dominated. At the best moments, I was in tune with my squad, often using the new anyone-can-revive feature to put my teammates back on their feet (Support class does this faster). In the worst moments, I got shot in the back over and over as enemies seemingly came out of nowhere, with no time to shoot back. High highs and low lows abound. It wasn't that the game felt unfair or that there was a skill cap I wasn't close to reaching (though obviously there were plenty of players even in my preview who had no trouble taking me down). It felt like it walked a tightrope balancing lethality, movement and slight tactical choices. That refinement feels like the result of all the aforementioned player feedback DICE is getting with Battlefield Labs -- including how to blow buildings up just right. EA DICE Nailing the right flavor of Battlefield-style map destruction A staple of Battlefield games is environmental destruction -- how much of the map crumbles and explodes as it's peppered with tank shells and grenades over the course of a match. As I played these maps over and over again, I saw how certain high-traffic zones would get obliterated by the time the match ended, with buildings reduced to rubble and areas around objectives flattened. It's technically impressive, and if I believe what the developers say, potentially useful. This is Battlefield's so-called Tactical Destruction, it's the idea that you can blow holes in walls or take out sniper nests to change the terrain. Through testing, the game's developers honed the destruction to reliably operate the same way every time -- something players can depend on to give them options in firefights. "We know that people love when things blow up, but there needs to be substance to all of these things that you're doing, right? So that's why it's so central to me that it's deterministic -- that you can rely on 'if I nail this rocket right here in this house, then exactly this is going to happen'," Andersson said. While DICE included visual language to communicate conditions to the players -- like cracks in the walls that are ready to shatter on the next explosion -- they don't expect folks to take advantage of Tactical Destruction at first. That comes from map knowledge gained over time, and players could eventually start seeing the logic in paving the way toward objectives with explosives. Then they can combine this with other items like the assault ladder gadget, which Andersson notes could give squads second-floor access to surprise enemies. In my preview, I didn't even get close to destroying the environment to my advantage. But the explosions were impressively immersive. While hunkered down in a building in the Siege of Cairo map, tank shells and rockets turned our shelter into rubble as the roof caved in around us, flooding the room in dust and blinding us as we rushed out. Occasionally overwhelming and often distracting me from firefights, the game's destruction tech put me more firmly in my soldier's boots, escalating the chaos and locking me into skirmishes that ratcheted up in tension, with each boom echoing in my headphones. In this, I felt DICE looking to recapture the controlled chaos that makes Battlefield games unique among the military shooters of today -- namely Call of Duty. But returning to the successful Battlefield titles from a decade ago means, hopefully, giving players a chance to recreate moments they loved. In that, it's looking like Battlefield 6 could be what those nostalgic gamers are waiting for. "If you start with Battlefield 3 and 4 that we know is loved and [say] let's execute on those staples and pillars, I feel like this is almost like a cheat code -- this is what Battlefield should be," Andersson said. Battlefield 6 launches on Oct. 10 for PC, PS5 and Xbox Series X/S. Free open beta weekends will run on Aug. 9-10 and Aug. 14-16.
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Nintendo raises the Switch 1 price from $299 to $339
The original Nintendo Switch, which has cost $299.99 in the US since its release in 2017, is now priced at $339.99 on Nintendo's online store. Other first-gen Switch models are now more expensive, too, with the Switch OLED going from $349.99 to $399.99, and the Switch Lite increasing from $199.99 to $229.99. Nintendo said on Friday that its decision to raise the price was 'based on market conditions,' just after implementing a similar new set of prices in Canada on August 1st. The US announcement came just one day after President Donald Trump signed an executive order that will impose new 'reciprocal' tariffs on a range of countries. Trump's growing list of tariffs now includes a 20 percent levy on products imported from Vietnam, where Nintendo has transferred most of its production. Nintendo also issued $10 price increases for the Alarmo and Switch 1 Joy-Cons, which now cost $109.99 and $89.99, respectively. Prices aren't changing for the Switch 2 console, as well as Switch and Switch 2 games, whether physical or digital. With the price increase, the Switch OLED is now only slightly less expensive than the $449.99 Switch 2 (which doesn't have an OLED display). The Switch 2 has been a massive hit so far, selling over 6 million units since launch despite Nintendo struggling to keep up with demand. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Emma Roth Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Entertainment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gaming Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Nintendo
CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
Act Fast to Save Up to $1,300 on Samsung and LG TVs at Best Buy
Today's televisions have more than just access to local channels and Wi-Fi. They also often include fantastic audio, accurate resolution and outstanding refresh rates that are perfect for gamers. However, these cool features can also increase your costs. That's why we're glad to let you know we've spotted Samsung and LG TVs at Best Buy for up to $1,300 off for a limited time. Keep in mind that some of the deals we're listing end today at 9:59 pm PT, while others are likely to end soon as well. We suggest acting fast so you can grab your chosen new TV. Best Buy's deals include Samsung and LG TVs of multiple sizes and features. Though we're emphasizing new TVs with discounts, you might be able to save even more if you find an open-box version of your desired TV. Open-box TV offers vary by location and might not come in their original packaging. Right now, you can find this Samsung 55-inch TV for just $280 right now, which saves you $100. This is a smart-capable TV that's compatible with Amazon Alexa and Bixby. It also has 4K resolution for accurate color and contrast. For a slightly larger option, this 65-inch Samsung Q7F series with SamsungVision AI and 4K resolution. It's compatible with Amazon Alexa and Samsung Bixby. With Best Buy's current discount, it's just $550 and saves you $100. Best Buy is also offering discounts on high-end Samsung TVs, including this 85-inch QN80F series television with Samsung AI for $500 off, which scores you this television for $3,000. Finally, this 77-inch Samsung class S95D series TV is now a massive $1,300 off, which brings the price down to $2,500. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. There are also fantastic discounts to be had on LG TVs of various sizes. This 65-inch LG Class 80 series with WebOS is now just $500, down from its regular price of $700. For anyone who might want a bigger TV, this 86-inch LG 85A series TV is now $600 off, which brings it down to $1,900. Make sure to take a look at the entirety of Best Buy's offers so you can find the Samsung or LG TV that fits your needs and budget. Looking for a new TV and not sure if this deal is for you? Check out our list of the best smart TVs so you can explore all of your options. Why this deal matters Samsung and LG TVs are some of the best you can find, and Best Buy is now offering significant discounts on devices from either one of these brands. With an average refresh rate of 120Hz, these TVs are great for gamers and people who enjoy streaming or watching their local TV channels. Savings can go as high as $1,300 for a limited time, which makes now an excellent time to shop. Plus, shopping now might help you allay any tariff concerns.
