
Man who sued over 10-year delay in diagnosis and treatment of hearing loss settles actions for €800,000
A man whose hearing loss was not fully diagnosed or treated for 10 years as a child has settled a
High Court
action against the
Health Service Executive
for €800,000.
Padraig Byrne, who has Down syndrome, got his first hearing assessment when he was 17 months old, but while a hearing loss was recorded, it was claimed, it was not adequately recognised or followed up until he was five years of age.
His counsel Hugh O'Keeffe SC, instructed by Damien Tansey Solicitors, told the court the treatment of the boy had been 'wholly inadequate'. It wasn't until he was 10 years of age that hearing aids to amplify sound were appropriately fitted and verified.
Counsel said a 10-year delay was conceded in what was a very complicated case. At one stage, he said the little boy had been given hearing aids 'that were clearly going to fail.'
READ MORE
Padraig did not have access to the full spectrum of speech sounds between birth and almost five years of age and even then his hearing aids were not optimised until he was 10 years old, meaning he did not have the access to the speech spectrum during the optimal period for language development.
Counsel said it was their case that had Padraig's hearing loss been diagnosed earlier he would have been given a chance to have a degree of independent living and the delay had had 'a discernible effect on Padraig's future independence'.
The HSE, he said, conceded an earlier diagnosis may have benefited the boy but it did not accept it had had an effect on Padraig's independence.
Padraig Byrne (20), from
Co Carlow
, had through his mother June Byrne sued the HSE.
In the proceedings, it was claimed the delay had resulted in delayed access to optimum speech and language at a time critical for the boy's development of speech and language.
The standard of audiological care that the boy received until September 2014, it was contended, fell significantly below that reasonably expected and the boy had been denied the best possible access to sound.
Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey said he was satisfied that the very best had been achieved for Padraig and the offer was fair and reasonable.
In a separate case a boy who, the court heard, suffered a likely net four-year delay in the diagnosis and treatment of his hearing loss settled his action for €310,000.
Oisín Flanagan, now aged eight years of Portarlington,
Co Offaly
, had through his mother Fiona Flanagan sued the HSE. A breach of duty was admitted in the case.
It was claimed there had been a failure to assess the boy's hearing as requiring amplification and he was allegedly deprived of the amplification required to access the speech spectrum of sound which at that time was critical to his speech and language.
Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Coffey said it was fair and reasonable.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Residents in some nursing homes faced delays in being helped to toilet, inspectors find
Residents in one nursing home faced delays in being assisted to go to the toilet, inspectors from the State's health services watchdog found. In another nursing home there were concerns that residents' dietary needs were not being met. In a third home inspectors found that residents did not have unrestricted access to their funds outside of standard working hours. In the latest batch of inspection reports published by the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa), the regulator said it had found six centres, inspected in recent months to be non-compliant with four or more regulations. READ MORE Hiqa published 47 reports on residential centres for older people, some run by private sector companies and others operated by the HSE . On these inspections, noncompliance was identified in areas including residents' rights, protection, managing behaviour that is challenging, individual assessment and care plans, and procedures around management of complaints. At Beechfield Manor Nursing Home in Shankill, Co Dublin, which is registered to provide accommodation for up to 69 residents, Hiqa inspectors said they had observed incidents where enhanced staff supervision was required. 'Some examples were observed where there were sufficient staff available to attend to residents' who required the toilet; however, there were not timely responses to support residents' needs, as residents' were asked to wait for assistance to go to the toilet,' the inspection report stated. In the morning staff were asked to 'facilitate activities' in one sittingroom but this did not happen and one staff member was 'observed to read a newspaper while the residents sat in silence'. 'Only after being prompted by a resident, staff turned the television on for them,' the report states. [ Concerns over 'care deficits' in two Emeis-run nursing homes are referred to gardaí Opens in new window ] At the Knockeen Nursing Home, Co Wexford – a building with 49 single en suite bedrooms – inspectors said while they had observed kind and compassionate staff treating residents with dignity and respect, 'enhanced governance and oversight were required to improve the quality and safety of service provision'. Arrangements concerning food and nutrition were found to be ineffective, inspectors said. 'After speaking to catering staff and reviewing written documentation to guide catering and care staff in relation to residents' dietary needs, the inspector was not assured that the dietary needs of the residents were safely, effectively and accurately met,' the report states. Inspectors also found that records of mandatory staff training 'demonstrated significant gaps', including on fire safety as well as training regarding safeguarding vulnerable adults from abuse and on managing behaviour that is challenging. At St Camillus Community Nursing Unit in Limerick, which is run by the HSE, Hiqa inspectors found while residents were complimentary of the quality of care they received, their civil rights 'were not consistently upheld'. 'Residents who were dependent on the registered provider for support and assistance to manage their finances lacked unrestricted access to their funds outside of standard working hours of staff and information about their accounts,' the report states. Inspectors found some residents were worried about whether they had sufficient funds to cover day-to-day expenses.


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
What happens when your therapist or GP asks: ‘Have you ever wondered if you might be neurodivergent?'
Imagine this. You're sitting with your healthcare provider, maybe your therapist or GP, maybe even your physio, talking about your mental or physical wellbeing . Then, they gently ask a question you didn't expect: 'Have you ever wondered if you might be neurodivergent?' You might feel confused, relieved, annoyed, or feel like you're being told there's something wrong with you. You may not have heard the word before. Or maybe you've wondered about it privately, but never said it out loud. If this is you, and you're struggling under an avalanche of thoughts and emotions, that's okay. It makes sense that it feels like a lot. READ MORE Why might a healthcare professional suggest neurodivergence? Neurodivergence refers to natural variations in how people think, learn, and experience the world. This includes differences such as autism , ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), and sensory processing disorders, among others. When a clinician brings this up, it's rarely a shot in the dark. They've likely noticed patterns in your behaviour, your history, or how you respond to the world that align with neurodivergent profiles. Some of the issues that may have sparked their curiosity include: Sensory differences. You might be overwhelmed by overlapping noise, bright lights, or scratchy clothes. You may need music to focus or feel panicked when a room is just a little too warm. Maybe you ferociously rub your feet together to soothe yourself to sleep. Maybe you seek stimulation, or avoid it. If you can't adjust the sensory environment, it's not just disappointing, it's unbearable. Harsh self-talk. You might describe yourself as lazy, disorganised, or too sensitive. Many neurodivergent people blame themselves for struggling in systems not designed for them. If the people around you don't seem to share your challenges, it's easy to internalise the idea that you're the problem. Lifelong struggles. Maybe anxiety, social challenges, or problems managing time and tasks have been with you for as long as you can remember. Perhaps things got harder in adolescence or when you left home, but really, the difficulties have always been there. Formal identification isn't always necessary to start understanding and accommodating your needs. Especially within the autistic community, self-identification is broadly accepted as valid and can allow you to begin to explore neurodiversity-affirming supports Dependence on structure. You might rely on routines, lists, or rituals to function. When plans change suddenly, it can knock you sideways. It's not about being inflexible. These systems are how you cope. Minimal progress despite best efforts. You're working hard in therapy or self-help, but nothing sticks the way it should. Often, therapeutic approaches are designed with neurotypical brains in mind. That mismatch can leave you feeling like nothing works, no matter how hard you try. A long trail of diagnoses. Folks who experience emotional dysregulation, and especially women, can be offered a string of labels that don't quite explain what's going on. Like a mental health Goldilocks, you may have found none of these diagnoses fits just right. The emotional impact of the neurodiversity chat Psychotherapist Lisa Healy: 'Exploring neurodivergence isn't about fixing something broken. It's about getting to know yourself more truthfully' Some people feel seen. You've had a suspicion for a while and now have a reason to explore it further. Part of you may feel relieved. Others feel hurt, confused or defensive. Is your clinician suggesting something is off about you or blaming you for your challenges? You might think your therapist is writing you off, suggesting things won't get better. You might imagine they think poorly of you and feel judged or diminished. These reactions are understandable. Especially since neurodiversity is heavily stigmatised and often misunderstood. We might have caricaturised ideas of what autistic or ADHD people are like based on bias and stereotypes. We may struggle to see ourselves within our limited view of the label we're being offered. Your healthcare provider's intentions This isn't about giving you a label and sending you off. It's not about undermining the reasons you sought help in the first place. It's about offering a new way of looking at things that may help life make more sense. As a psychotherapist who's had many of these conversations, and as someone who came to understand my own neurodivergence in adulthood, I can offer some insight into what your provider likely hopes for you: Understand yourself more clearly Understanding how your brain works helps you to meet your needs and make sense of your experiences and history. The challenges have never been based on a personality flaw. You're just running on a different operating system. [ One-quarter of over-18s say they are neurodivergent or have family member who is, survey finds Opens in new window ] Less self-blame, more compassion Many neurodivergent people have spent years blaming themselves for things that were never about effort or attitude. Recognising that your struggles have a reason can help you respond to yourself more gently. Manage your energy Masking, the process of constantly presenting a curated version of yourself to fit in, can take a huge toll. You might have suppressed behaviours or avoided preferences to 'pass' for neurotypical. Dropping that mask, even a little, can create space for more joy and less burnout. [ Niamh Garvey on being diagnosed with autism at 34: 'You suddenly get the language that explains your life' Opens in new window ] Process the emotional impact Realising you're neurodivergent can bring up grief. It can be hard to shed a negative self-concept, even when it was based on faulty assumptions. You might look back and feel angry or sad that it took this long to be understood. You might wonder how things would have been different with the right support earlier on. That process is valid, and for many, it's the beginning of healing. Should you get assessed? Assessment isn't always accessible. Waiting lists can be long and private options expensive. However, formal identification isn't always necessary to start understanding and accommodating your needs. Especially within the autistic community, self-identification is broadly accepted as valid and can allow you to begin to explore neurodiversity-affirming supports. You can begin by asking yourself questions like: Would assessment help me understand myself and my life better? Would it change how I speak to myself in difficult moments? Would it allow me to make meaningful changes in how I live? Would it help me advocate for myself more effectively – in work, healthcare, or in relationships? Could I access support that I hadn't previously considered? Would formal identification offer something that self-guided exploration and learning can't? How would I feel if I went for an assessment only to be told I'm not neurodivergent? There's no deadline on learning about yourself, so take your time making this choice. Explore your options. Talk it over with people you trust. Try out this new lens on your life and see if it changes your perspective in valuable ways. Final thoughts Exploring neurodivergence isn't about fixing something broken. It's about getting to know yourself more truthfully. It's about understanding your history and experiences, accessing support that fits, and finding ways of living that work for you. Your healthcare provider likely brought this up not to pathologise you but because they see something important. They see what you've been carrying, and they want things to feel less heavy. The neurodiversity chat isn't a diagnosis. It's a gentle nudge in the direction of greater self-acceptance and compassion. A hopeful suggestion that maybe life could feel less like swimming upstream if you were allowed to do things in the way that suits you best. Lisa Healy is an accredited integrative psychotherapist at Evidence-Based Therapy Centre. She supports adults navigating trauma, emotional distress, and neurodivergence.


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Legal row over millions being made at firm sourcing staff for HSE
Dr Judith Kundodyiwa, who owns a stake in Ireland-based Minana International, which trades as GoodPeople, has made 'very serious allegations' in Ireland of breach of duty against Minana's co-owner and managing director, Gerard Chimbganda, the UK's High Court has been told. The former friends set up Minana International in 2017 alongside Mr Chimbganda's wife, who also acts as the firm's finance director. She is also Dr Kundodyiwa's cousin. All three hail from Zimbabwe. Mr Chimbganda moved to Ireland in 2001. The allegations made in Ireland include that Mr Chimbganda has purported to take over 95pc of the shares in Minana International. Dr Kundodyiwa claims to own 50pc of the Irish firm. Company filings in Ireland claim that a company owned by Mr Chimbganda and his wife owns 95pc of Minana and that Dr Kundodyiwa owns 5pc. Dr Kundodyiwa has also claimed in Ireland that Mr Chimbganda at one stage paid himself €500,000, characterised as a dividend. When challenged about this, the UK's High Court has also heard, it is alleged that Mr Chimbganda promised that an equal dividend would be provided for Dr Kundodyiwa the following year. She says this was not forthcoming. Proceedings were issued in Ireland against Minana International in January this year. The latest set of publicly-available accounts for Minana International show that it made a near €1.3m profit in 2023 and had retained earnings of almost €2.9m at the time. In December last year, Mr Chimbganda launched an action in the UK against Dr Kundodyiwa and UK-based firm GoodPeople Healthcare Limited. Mr Chimbganda and Dr Kundodyiwa are equal and joint owners of the British firm, which provides domiciliary care services to local authorities, particularly through the use of migrant care workers. ADVERTISEMENT Mr Chimbganda claims that Dr Kundodyiwa – a consultant gynaecologist with the NHS in the UK – has been in breach of her duties to GoodPeople Healthcare. Both are directors of the firm. He alleges in the UK action that she has mismanaged the firm's finances and incurred expenditure for the benefit of herself, her family and others. He also claims that she has diverted business opportunities to a company owned by her sister. Dr Kundodyiwa has denied the allegations. Specifically, the allegations by Mr Chimbganda include that of more than £1m (€1.17m) paid into the accounts of GoodPeople Healthcare Limited, Dr Kundodyiwa failed to account for about £500,000 of this. He also alleges that there have been inconsistent explanations given in relation to tens of thousands of pounds of other expenditure and that payments have not been properly accounted for. Dr Kundodyiwa has rejected claims including those about inconsistencies and vagueness, noting that she has done her best in relation to the records currently available. She also claims that the action in the UK against her is in retaliation for the allegations made in Ireland against Mr Chimbganda. However, the action in Ireland was launched after the legal action in the UK.