Researchers zero in on Amelia Earhart's disappearance after 88 years
The Perdue Research Foundation (PRF, based in Indiana) and Archaeological Legacy Institute (ALI, based in Oregon) announced on Wednesday the "Taraia Object Expedition" project.
Researchers will head to the remote island of Nikumaroro, which is halfway between Australia and Hawaii, according to a joint press release from the two agencies.
While on the island, researchers will determine whether the "Taraia Object," a visual anomaly captured by a satellite, is actually the remains of Earhart's plane.
Earhart is widely known as an aviation trailblazer, becoming the first woman to fly solo across the U.S. nonstop on Aug. 24, 1932.
She once worked at Perdue University in Indiana, serving as a career counselor for women and advising the aeronautical engineering department while living in the women's residence hall.
In an announcement of the new expedition, Purdue President Mung Chiang shared that "the Boilermaker spirit of exploration lives on."
"About nine decades ago, Amelia Earhart was recruited to Purdue, and the university president later worked with her to prepare an aircraft for her historic flight around the world," said Chiang.
Richard Pettigrew, ALI executive director, said in the release, "What we have here is maybe the greatest opportunity ever to finally close the case."
"With such a great amount of very strong evidence, we feel we have no choice but to move forward and hopefully return with proof," he added.
Earhart flew "The Electra," which disappeared on July 2, 1937.
"Both Earhart and her husband and manager, George Putnam, expressed their intention to return the Electra to Purdue after her historic flight," said Steven Schultz, senior vice president and general counsel at Purdue.
Researchers hypothesize that Earhart did not crash at sea, but instead landed and was stranded on Nikumaroro Island, later perishing there.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dark Matter Search Could Lead Us to a New Kind of Star
Dark dwarfs could be lurking out in the cosmos, according to a new study. These hypothetical, effectively eternal bodies would be powered by dark matter annihilation, and though dim, there is a way we could spot them. Dark matter is expected to pervade the Universe, but being… well, dark, it's hard to find. It doesn't reflect or emit light – its existence is only inferred through its interactions with regular matter via gravity. No direct evidence of it has been found, despite decades of searching. Now, astrophysicists in the UK and US propose a new place we might find dark matter – hiding in the hearts of brown dwarfs. Bigger than gas giant planets but smaller than stars, these substellar objects never gather enough mass to kickstart the nuclear fusion process that powers stars. Instead, they float around space as large, dim, cold worlds. Related: But in some cases, the new study proposes, brown dwarfs might transform into something more intriguing. In areas with a higher density of dark matter, the strange stuff could accumulate in the brown dwarf's core. And if it's a certain type of dark matter, the particles could interact with each other to produce energy that powers the brown dwarf. The team calls these theoretical bodies "dark dwarfs". "These objects collect the dark matter that helps them become a dark dwarf," says Jeremy Sakstein, astrophysicist at the University of Hawai'i. "The more dark matter you have around, the more you can capture. And, the more dark matter ends up inside the star, the more energy will be produced through its annihilation." A hypothesis is only as strong as its testability, and the researchers include a way astronomers could verify the existence of dark dwarfs: look for lithium-7. This particular isotope burns away quickly inside stars due to their intense heat. But in cooler objects like brown dwarfs, lithium-7 can stick around. Astronomers already use the presence of lithium-7 as a signal to confirm that an object is a brown dwarf. However, if the extra energy from dark matter annihilation is powering a brown dwarf, it could appear larger and brighter than even red dwarfs of the same mass. So if you find something that looks like a red dwarf but has a lithium-7 signature, you might just have a black dwarf – and confirmation of dark matter. Of course there are a lot of ifs. For one, dark matter would need to exist in a specific theorized form, made up of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs). One of the leading candidates, WIMPs would barely interact with regular matter, besides its gravitational influence, but would interact with themselves. WIMPs would be their own antiparticles, meaning if two of them touch, they'd annihilate each other in a burst of energy. When you cram them densely into a confined place – like the core of a brown dwarf – the energy released from all those collisions would power the object. Not to the extent of a star, of course, but more than your garden-variety brown dwarf. Because this process gives them a constant size, temperature, and brightness, dark dwarfs would be effectively eternal, the team says. However, if dark matter happens to take on a different form, like axions or dark photons, there'd be no way to tell from the outside that it's accumulating inside brown dwarfs. That's if dark matter exists at all – there's always the chance that the effects we attribute to it are caused by some other unknown physics. Still, it's important to come up with various ideas about what dark matter could be and how we might detect it. Different observatories and experiments can look out for different potential signatures of dark matter, allowing us to investigate a wide range of possibilities at once. In this case, the researchers say that the best place to look for dark dwarf signatures would be toward the center of our galaxy, where dark matter would gather most densely. The research is available on preprint server arXiv and will be published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 3D Time Could Solve Physics' Biggest Problem, Says Bizarre New Study Physicists Catch Light in 'Imaginary Time' in Scientific First Not All Uranium Can Be Used in Weapons. Here's What 'Enrichment' Means.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Risky' decision to release rare Aussie creatures outside high-security fence
For a decade, a group of rare kangaroo-like marsupials have been protected behind a high-security fence. Protecting these brush-tailed bettongs at Australian Wildlife Conservancy's (AWC) 7,830-hectare Mount Gibson Wildlife Sanctuary was necessary because invasive cats and foxes have hunted them to near extinction in the wild. A small population of the critically endangered marsupials, which are also known as woylie, were taken to the sanctuary in 2015. Without the threat of predators, they bred from 162 individuals to over 1,000 over 10 years. This year, a decision was taken to release around 10 per cent beyond the fence. And this month a chosen few were set free across 70,000 hectares of land nearby where AWC has been reducing invasive predator numbers. The species once occupied 60 per cent of the mainland, but today their range has plummeted to less than 1 per cent. In Western Australia's Wheatbelt, where the sanctuary is located, they haven't been seen in the wild for over a century. Amazing photographs highlight gleeful moments woylie are released. Source: Brad Leue ⚡️ Scientists tackle mystery of wind farm 'risk' as major Australian projects begin ⛏️ Reason tradies faced 'absolute challenge' fixing deceptively simple old hut 📸 Rare colour footage of extinct Australian animal seen again after 90 years AWC's CEO Tim Allard said the plan is to re-establish locally extinct species across larger landscapes. 'While it is risky to release a predator-prone species such as the woylie into an area where cats are present, we sometimes have to take well-considered risks to advance conservation,' he said. 'We have evidence from previous releases of other species, and from monitoring the outcomes of predator control on the release site, to suggest that Woylies have a good chance of establishing outside the fence at Mt Gibson.' 🎣 Fisherman's sad admission highlights growing Aussie problem 🐸 Tiny creature that almost vanished in the 1990s secretly released 🕸️ Ominous sign for Australia's cities after deadly discovery in New Zealand Over the next few months, ecologists will monitor the animals. Several have been fitted with tracking collars so their progress can be compared to those within the fence. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Big question remains over wind farm 'risk' as major projects begin in Australia
As Australia prepares to massively expand offshore wind farms across six priority zones, a group of researchers is racing to unlock the mystery of how much of a risk their blades pose to migratory seabirds. During high winds, 100 to 200-metre-long wind farm blades can rotate at 290km/h, theoretically making mincemeat out of anything that collides with them. While this sounds alarming, it's not known whether seabirds are actually flying at the height they operate at. Monash University's Dr Mark Miller and his team studied how high, fast and at what time of day iconic migratory species like albatrosses, petrels, shearwaters and storm-petrels tend to fly. And while there's still more work to be done, their newly published study indicates the risk could be low. 'These offshore wind turbines are huge, and the distance between the bottom of the blade and the sea surface is around 35 metres. So if you could say all the birds fly under 35 metres, then that's mitigating a lot of the collision risk,' he told Yahoo News. 'What the evidence is telling us is that seabirds fly quite low to the water, but the point is that the evidence is very limited.' If it's confirmed that all birds in their path fly low to the water, then raising the height of turbines could provide a simple solution that reduces collision risk. But more research would be required to better understand the flight paths of other birds, like the critically endangered orange-bellied parrot and swift parrot, which migrate from Tasmania to the mainland. The impact of turbines is likely to be lower than other threats like plastic ingestion, commercial fishing, habitat destruction and climate change, which are thought to be contributing to the deaths of over a million seabirds a year. But migratory seabirds cannot afford to face any new dangers. Around a third are threatened with extinction, and populations have reduced by 70 per cent in just 50 years. Not only is seabird flight data limited, but so is information about how many birds offshore wind farms kill. 'Onshore, if something gets hit, you have people doing surveys. But at the moment, if a bird collides with an offshore turbine, it falls in the sea, and you have no evidence of that mortality,' Miller said. While there are plans to install cameras on offshore turbines, once the farms are installed it will be too late to modify them. And they'll sit in place for 20 to 40 years. 🏡 Ominous sign for Australia's cities after deadly discovery in New Zealand ⛏️ Reason tradies faced 'absolute challenge' fixing deceptively simple old hut 📸 Rare colour footage of extinct Australian animal seen again after 90 years The Monash team is hoping their study, which was published in the Journal of Applied Ecology will help guide policymakers and the wind farm industry before construction begins. Study co-author Associate Professor Rohan Clarke said it's possible to ensure that new renewable energy projects are good for both humans and wildlife. 'One of the key challenges we face is what's known as the 'green-green dilemma', where initiatives designed to reduce environmental impact, such as renewable energy development, can unintentionally harm other ecological values,' he said. 'But we must identify evidence-based solutions to these competing priorities, because climate change remains the single greatest threat to biodiversity. The energy transition isn't optional, it's essential, and finding solutions that support both climate goals and nature is critical.' Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
