China's workers face unpaid leave and lower wages amid economic squeeze
Mike Chai intends to reduce wage costs at his kitchen cabinet factory by about 30% to remain competitive against other Chinese companies, many of which have ceased selling to the U.S. due to steep tariffs and are now targeting his long-time customers in Australia.
Chai had already halved his workforce to 100 people since the COVID-19 pandemic and says he has no more room to trim. Instead, he is shortening shifts and asking workers to take unpaid leave – an increasingly common practice that has become a hidden deflationary force in the world's second-largest economy.
'We're in survival mode,' said the 53-year-old, adding that his company, Cartia Global Manufacturing, in the southern city of Foshan, 'barely breaks even.' 'I told them, you don't want our factory to go broke. You've worked here for 10-15 years, let's do it together.'
China's headline unemployment rate has held around 5% as U.S. President Donald Trump raised tariffs on imports from China by 30 percentage points this year. Washington and Beijing extended on Monday a tariff truce for another 90 days, during which tariffs will remain at the levels reached in April.However, economists argue that underemployment – which, like other economies, is not tracked in data – is worsening due to higher levies and industrial overcapacity, thereby squeezing workers' incomes, undermining their confidence in the future, and prompting them to spend less.
Consumer confidence lingers near record lows, retail sales have weakened and inflation in July was zero.
Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief Asia-Pacific economist at Natixis, says it is China's manufacturing workers who suffer while exports – and the economy – keep growing despite the U.S. tariffs.
'It's the people who are hammered by this model of huge competition, lower prices, thus you need to lower costs, thus you need to lower wages. It's a spiral,' she said.
'The model is crazy. I'm sorry, but if you need to export at a loss, do not export.' Statistics will not reveal Chinese workers as 'the main losers' in the trade war because 'they will not become unemployed, but they will get unpaid leave of absence or work fewer hours,' she added.
Chai has already lost two key customers in his main market of Australia after other Chinese firms cut their prices and his factory is operating at half-capacity.
'All those who have left America have come to Australia,' he said. 'A lot of new supply is knocking on my customers' doors.' While Chinese exports to the U.S. dropped 21.7% year-on-year in July, they rose by 9.2% to the European Union, 16.6% to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and 14.8% to Australia.
Chai plans to cut prices by about 10%. To afford that, he is also cutting overtime, which previously made up more than a third of workers' income, from 28 days per month in total to about 10. On average, his workers earn 5,000 yuan ($697) a month before overtime.Factory bosses are also turning to temporary workers, hiring them for new orders and dismissing them when demand dries up.
Dave Fong, who co-owns three factories in southern China making everything from school bags to climbing gear and industrial machinery, says he laid off 30 full-time workers at one of the plants, then rehired some of them temporarily to fulfil unexpected orders.
'We prefer temporary contracts so we don't need to pay pension or insurance,' said Fong. 'It's by day or by hour.' 'If we don't do that, the company hits a dead end.
The market is weak because consumption power has decreased. Another factor is trade, especially with the U.S.' Temporary work is common in China, especially among its nearly 300 million rural migrants.
Chen Chuyan, a recruiting agent in the central city of Wuhan, says the going rate has dropped to 14 yuan per hour from 16 yuan last year.
'There's a long line of people waiting for job interviews every day, but the factories don't have that much demand,' Chen said.
Alan Zhang has taken such jobs in Datang village, a cluster of small garment factories in the southern city of Guangzhou, since 2021. Back then, he earned 400 yuan a day, but now he struggles to find work paying even half that amount.
'If it's just a couple hundred yuan, I won't take it,' said the 30-year-old, after scanning handwritten ads for temporary work held by recruiters lounging on scooters.
'I don't know what happened. Suddenly, it got tough to find anything. Prices dropped fast,' said Zhang, who pays 700 yuan per month to rent a studio flat in Datang with his wife, who also works in clothing factories.
He worked just 14 days in July, which worries him because he must raise 10,000 yuan every year for his son's kindergarten fees.
The boy lives with his grandparents in Zhang's hometown, located in neighboring Fujian Province.
'If manufacturing wages are being squeezed, then the wider economy would feel deflationary pressure,' said Richard Yarrow, a fellow at Harvard Kennedy School's Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government.
'This is definitely a growing issue for some of the lower-skill types of manufacturing in China, such as textiles, furniture and simple electronics.' At the Longhua employment market in Shenzhen's tech hub, dozens of people browsed bulletin boards for electronics factory jobs that pay 17-28 yuan per hour.
Mo, 26, who holds a degree in digital marketing but has been unable to find a job in the field, had already had two interviews by early afternoon. He declined the offers because the terms were not as advertised.
'They'll say 23 yuan, but actually give you 20,' said Mo, only giving his surname for privacy reasons. 'Then they'll take management fees, housing, cleaning and whatever else they can deduct.' Huang, 46, was checking the market for a fifth straight day, having arrived by bus from the southwestern province of Yunnan.
He managed real estate projects before the property market crash. Now he is divorced and lives on a diet of 10 yuan meals, paying 25 yuan per night for a bed in a dormitory. He cannot afford anything else until he finds work.
'I had one interview this morning, but they asked for an upfront placement fee of 80 yuan,' said Huang, dragging a small suitcase.
'So I didn't go. I bought some food instead.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Taliban marks fourth anniversary of return to power with internal threats
The Taliban's leader has warned that Afghans ungrateful for its hardline rule will be severely punished by God in a statement marking the fourth anniversary of the group's return to power. The statement from Haibatullah Akhunzada was made in a social media post on Friday to commemorate 'Victory Day', four years on from the chaotic United States and NATO withdrawal from the country after more than 20 years of war as the Taliban retook the capital, Kabul. The threat was a stark reminder of the sweeping restrictions and repression of rights, especially of women and girls, that has taken place under the Taliban's rule, which is based on its strict interpretation of Islamic law. In his statement, Akhunzada said Afghans had faced hardships for decades in the name of establishing religious law in the country, which he said had saved citizens from 'corruption, oppression, usurpation, drugs, theft, robbery and plunder'. 'These are great divine blessings that our people should not forget and, during the commemoration of Victory Day, express great gratitude to Allah Almighty so that the blessings will increase,' his statement said. 'If, against God's will, we fail to express gratitude for blessings and are ungrateful for them, we will be subjected to the severe punishment of Allah Almighty.' He also advised government ministers to remove the word 'acting' from their job titles, signalling the consolidation of his administration's rule in the country amid a lack of internal opposition. Victory Day Four years on from its return to power, the Taliban government remains largely isolated in the international arena over the severe rights restrictions imposed under its rule although Russia became the first country to officially recognise the Taliban administration in early July. It also has close ties with China, the United Arab Emirates and a number of Central Asian states although none of these officially recognises the Taliban administration. Victory Day parades were planned in several Afghan cities on Friday, and in Kabul, helicopters were scheduled to drop flowers across the city. Photographs of an official ceremony in Kabul to open the commemorations showed a hall filled exclusively with male delegates. 'An open wound of history' Rather than celebrating, members of the activist group United Afghan Women's Movement for Freedom staged an indoor protest in the northeastern province of Takhar against the Taliban's oppressive rule, The Associated Press news agency reported. 'This day marked the beginning of a black domination that excluded women from work, education and social life,' the group said in a statement to the agency. 'We, the protesting women, remember this day not as a memory, but as an open wound of history, a wound that has not yet healed. The fall of Afghanistan was not the fall of our will. We stand, even in the darkness.' Afghan women also held an indoor protest in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, the agency reported. Repression and death threats The United Nations, foreign governments and human rights groups have condemned the Taliban for their treatment of women and girls, who are banned from most education and work, as well as parks, gyms and travelling without a male guardian. Inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry require women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head, while a law announced a year ago ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be 'concealed' outside the home. Last month, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants against Akhunzada and the country's chief justice on charges of committing gender-based persecution against women and girls. ICC judges said the Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy, family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion. At least 1.4 million girls have been 'deliberately deprived' of their right to an education by the Taliban government, a UN report from August 2024 found. Among the restrictions imposed on women is a ban on working for nongovernmental groups, among other jobs. A UN report this month revealed that dozens of Afghan women working for the organisation in the country had received direct death threats. The report said the Taliban had told the UN mission that its cadres were not responsible for the threats and a Ministry of Interior Affairs investigation is under way. An Interior Ministry spokesman, Abdul Mateen Qani, later told The Associated Press news agency that no threats had been made. In the meantime, Iran, Pakistan and the US have been sending Afghan refugees back to Taliban rule, where they risk persecution.
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What to expect when Trump and Putin meet in Alaska
What to expect when Trump and Putin meet in Alaska NewsFeed US President Donald Trump is meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, but the White House is signalling that major agreements are unlikely. Trump gives the talks a 25 percent chance of failure, while European Union leaders and the Ukranian leader worry he could concede too much. Video Duration 01 minutes 04 seconds 01:04 Video Duration 03 minutes 00 seconds 03:00 Video Duration 01 minutes 01 seconds 01:01 Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46 Video Duration 02 minutes 42 seconds 02:42 Video Duration 01 minutes 00 seconds 01:00 Video Duration 00 minutes 35 seconds 00:35
Al Jazeera
12 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Gaza is no anomaly: Hunger and hoarding are the West's oldest weapons
For all the West's lofty claims about spreading freedom, prosperity and progress, the world remains scarred by chronic instability and mass hunger. Last month, as part of its wind-down of international food and medical aid, the United States destroyed 500 metric tonnes of emergency food aid in the United Arab Emirates. Over 60,000 tonnes of emergency food aid have remained stockpiled in warehouses around the world due to the shutdown of USAID. Meanwhile, Israel – with US and European Union support – has been systematically starving the nearly two million remaining Palestinians in besieged Gaza, part of the almost 320 million people globally who are malnourished or at risk of starving to death in 2025. It's part of a much larger pattern of hoarding and starvation that has its roots in Western norms around capitalism and settler-colonialism, a crime against humanity that rarely faces meaningful international repercussions. This is not an isolated atrocity: The rise of the West and the US was built on the massive hoarding of food resources for profit and the deliberate use of starvation to cow those already living under oppression. It is difficult to miss, in both the international news reports and the desperate social media posts of starved Palestinians begging for money, food and clean water, with many showing themselves and their children reduced to emaciated bodies. It should shame us all, yet Westerners and their allies have all committed themselves to genocide, with ample food mere kilometres away. A recent poll by the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research at the Israeli Democracy Institute shows that 79 percent of Israeli Jews are 'not so troubled' or 'not troubled at all' by the reports of famine and suffering among the Palestinian population in Gaza. Gaza, though, is hardly alone in facing mass starvation as part of a genocidal campaign, whether in 2025 or in recent world history. What has been all too easy for the West to miss are famine-level crises in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and in Sudan. As of March, 'a record 27.7 million people are in the grip of acute hunger … amid ongoing conflict linked to massive displacement and rising food prices' in the DRC, according to the United Nations. The two-year-long conflict in Sudan, which has killed an estimated 150,000 people, many of whose deaths were linked to famine, disease and starvation, has also left nearly 25 million in need of food assistance, including nearly 740,000 in North Darfur's capital, el-Fasher, where the population faces starvation while under siege. To be sure, nearly every major power in human history has attacked or withheld food and water supplies in the process of conquering other nation-states and plundering their resources at one time or another. But the West, as the world knows it today, began its quest for global dominance with the First Crusade in the 1090s, and with it, perfected its tactics for siege warfare and the deliberate starvation of Muslim and Jewish populations in the Holy Land (present-day Syria, Lebanon and Palestine), all in the name of Catholicism. Those first Crusaders, short on food supplies themselves, also died in their thousands from hunger or committed acts of mass cannibalism to survive. Denying food and water in this Western-dominated world has always been a political and capitalistic weapon of imperialism, colonialism and nationalism. Western Europe's plundering of the Western Hemisphere not only formed the foundation of capitalism and the never-ending pursuit of profit worldwide, it also entrenched the use of famine, malnutrition and deprivation as tools to control and exploit subject peoples. From the 16th through the 19th century, the transatlantic slave trade, African chattel enslavement and forced labour of Indigenous peoples helped fill royal coffers in Europe and build great wealth for landowners across the Western Hemisphere. Enslaved and coerced labourers, denied adequate food and water, toiled in the fields to grow cash crops such as sugar, coffee and tobacco, or mined gold and silver, and frequently died from starvation, disease and abuse. One recent study estimated that as many as 56 million Indigenous people died between 1492 and 1600 alone. Outside the eventual United States, seven years was the average lifespan for most of the 12 million Africans who survived the horrors of the Atlantic crossing and arrived in the Western Hemisphere. Beyond the Americas, around 10 million people starved to death during the Great Bengal Famine of the 1770s because the East India Company prioritised collecting food for Europe's ports and imposing punitive taxes on South Asian peasants over saving lives. This famine, like so many others under colonial rule, was not an accident of nature but the outcome of deliberate economic policies that treated human life as expendable. Between 1904 and 1908, in what is now Namibia and Tanzania, the ruling Germans 'directly killed or starved to death' approximately '60,000 Herero' and '10,000 Nama' in Namibia, as well as 'up to 250,000 Ngoni, Ngindo, Matumbi and members of other ethnic groups' in crushing colonial uprisings. Perhaps the political and psychological impact of famine and bubonic plague in 14th and 15th-century Europe helps to explain both the West's penchant for colonisation and its weaponisation of food, and the denial of access to it, as punishment. As noted in the results of the 1944–45 Minnesota Starvation Experiment with 36 white men, the participants 'would dream and fantasise about food' and 'reported fatigue, irritability … and apathy,' including 'significant increases in depression, hysteria and hypochondriasis'. Imagine the psychological impact of generations of food insecurity and starvation across an entire civilisation, especially one that believed itself to be religiously and morally superior because of its Christianity. The West has been consistent in denying populations everywhere the fundamental human right to eat. As for the United States, the nation that began as the Jamestown colony in 1607 has operated under John Smith's words for the past 400 years: 'The greater part must be more industrious or starve. He that will not work, shall not eat.' America's own colonial history and post-independence expansion also involved stealing land from Indigenous groups, burning crops and ensuring famine and massive Indigenous population decline. Growing heaps of cash crops such as tobacco, indigo, rice, sugar and cotton left little land for enslaved Black folk to cultivate food for themselves. Enslavers often provided the enslaved with meagre rations such as corn mush and salted pork fatback, hardly enough to sustain life. Even when the United States became an agricultural juggernaut, the 'work or starve' song remained the same, its classist and racist message only evolving with the times. For the past 40 years, US presidents and Congress have enacted multiple bills requiring the nation's poor to work for minimal food benefits or go without, including new work requirements for SNAP (food stamps) benefits enacted under the One Big Beautiful Bill earlier this year. In 2015, then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell summed up the thinking of US business leaders and the Western world towards those living with food precarity: 'They're doing too good with food stamps, Social Security and all the rest.' I can attest to the impact of malnourishment and working just to eat. From the end of 1981 until I went off to college in 1987, one-third of every month at home in Mount Vernon, New York, was spent with little or no food in my belly, often with massive intestinal gas pains bloating my abdomen. It did not matter whether my mother worked full-time for Mount Vernon Hospital or relied on the US welfare system for food aid. Once, I dropped from 83 to 76 kilogrammes on my 188-centimetre frame in the 18 days after finishing my undergraduate degree, while working for Pitt's Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic in 1991. I walked the five kilometres each way to and from work for those three weeks because I only had $30 to get me through. Fantasies of hoarding food and controlling access to resources were definitely part of my experiences with moderate hunger and malnutrition. Today, the United States produces enough food to feed more than two billion people, and the world produces enough to feed more than 10 billion every year. Yet the quest for profit and markets for agribusinesses, and the continued deliberate denial of access to food for vulnerable and marginalised populations, all to subjugate them for their land, their resources and even the very food they grow, continues largely unabated. Hunger remains one of the West's most enduring weapons of control and domination. Geopolitically, there can be no peace in a world full of people whom the West has deliberately helped starve. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
