The PKK's dissolution: A calculated move or a genuine path to peace?
The PKK's announcement did not arise in a vacuum. Years of sustained Turkish military pressure, particularly through cross-border operations such as 'Claw-Lock' in northern Iraq, have considerably weakened the group's logistical capabilities and territorial presence. Moreover, Turkey's extensive surveillance and drone warfare have left the PKK with few safe havens.
On the geopolitical front, the PKK finds itself increasingly isolated. Labeled a terrorist organisation by both the EU and the US, the group has lost international sympathy. Even within broader Kurdish political circles, especially in Syria and Iraq, competing factions like the PYD may be urging the PKK to scale down its militancy so as not to jeopardize hard-won political leverage.
The PKK's retreat may create a vacuum in the Kurdish geopolitical landscape. In Iraq, Iran-backed militias could exploit this power shift to expand their influence. In Syria, the YPG, though organizationally distinct from the PKK, may face increased scrutiny from Turkey.
Europe, meanwhile, is placed in a diplomatic dilemma. Should the EU reassess the PKK's designation if it truly disbands? This could significantly affect Kurdish diaspora activism across European capitals.
The United States must also walk a tightrope, balancing its alliance with NATO-member Turkey against its reliance on Syrian Kurdish forces in the fight against the Daesh terror group.
History cautions against premature optimism. Militant groups have often declared pauses not as a path to peace, but as opportunities to rearm or rebrand. The PKK might be rebranding, transitioning into a civilian political movement by leveraging legal Kurdish parties within Turkey's parliamentary system. Alternatively, it may be regrouping, using the ceasefire to restructure its fragmented ranks. A further risk is splintering, with hardline offshoots potentially rejecting the ceasefire and undermining any future negotiations.
Several factors could enhance the prospects for a lasting peace between Turkey and the PKK. First, mutual exhaustion after four decades of conflict may prompt both sides to acknowledge the diminishing returns of continued warfare and seek compromise. Second, international mediation, particularly through a US, or EU-backed framework, could provide critical incentives for disarmament, offering political recognition or economic aid in exchange for credible steps toward peace.
Beyond domestic resistance, external interference poses another risk. Regional actors like Iran and Syria, wary of a stable Turkish-Kurdish détente, may seek to undermine negotiations to preserve their own strategic leverage. Unless these challenges are directly addressed, even the most promising peace efforts risk unraveling.
This announcement may be the closest the conflict has come to a peaceful resolution in decades. But let's be clear, disarmament is not peace. Real peace requires political courage, cultural recognition, and international accountability.
Mahmoud Ali Abu-Rumman is a seasoned expert in financial oversight and environmental governance, with a distinguished career spanning over 30 years in public service, international peacekeeping, and sustainability strategy. A former Colonel in Jordan's Public Security Directorate, he brings deep institutional insight and leadership experience. His background also includes contributions to United Nations missions and national policymaking in financial and environmental sectors. He currently serves as the Financial Controller at the Jordan Press Foundation (Al-Rai).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Bawaba
20 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
"Blue Homeland" at sea: Turkey challenges rivals with a modernized navy
Published August 17th, 2025 - 05:59 GMT ALBAWABA - With naval might as a major component of its regional policy, Turkey is once again demonstrating its might at sea, fifty years after its military intervention in Cyprus. What started out as a force mainly responsible for protecting the straits in 1974 has developed into a tool of influence that spans the Mediterranean, the Aegean, and the Black Sea. The "Blue Homeland" ideology, which was first proposed in the middle of the 2000s, is the foundation of this expansion. It states that more than 460,000 square kilometers of surrounding waters are vital to Turkey's security and sovereignty. In addition to spurring investments in naval modernization, this ideology has intensified disagreements over offshore gas development and maritime borders with Greece, Cyprus, and their European allies. When Turkey's fleet conducted simultaneous operations in the Black Sea, the Aegean, and the Mediterranean during the biggest naval exercises in its history in 2019, its aspirations were clearly visible. Many saw the exercise as a sign that Russia was prepared to defend its maritime claims against competing coalitions that were emerging in the area. By establishing a military facility in Somalia, trying to get port access in Sudan, and bolstering its presence in the Indian Ocean, Ankara has attempted to expand its influence outside of its nearby waterways. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the Turkish Navy has rapidly modernized. With the ability to deploy Bayraktar drones and helicopters, its flagship, the TCG Anadolu, has gone into service as the first drone carrier in history. Modern frigates and corvettes have been constructed by the MILGEM shipbuilding program, and the fleet is expanding with new Type-214 submarines. Plans are also in place to have a totally indigenous submarine within the next ten years. The TF-2000 destroyer and a new aircraft carrier called MUGEM are planned for the future, which would increase Turkey's military projection even more. In addition, Ankara has turned its shipbuilding sector into a geopolitical instrument and a financial asset by exporting weapons to countries like Pakistan, Ukraine, and Turkmenistan. Notwithstanding these developments, Turkey's naval ascent remains fraught with difficulties. In a regional conflict, competing coalitions of France, Israel, and Egypt may provide a powerful counterweight, while Greece's geographic advantage in the Aegean limits Turkish naval movement. 🇹🇷 Mavi Vatan'da bir kere daha tarih yazıldı! TCG İSTANBUL'da yer alan Roketsan'ın geliştirdiği Milli Dikey Atım Lançer Sistemi'nden ateşlenen HİSAR-D RF füzesi hedef uçağı imha etti. — Savunma Plus (@savunmaplus) August 15, 2025 Long-distance flights are challenging because to logistical constraints, especially in refueling capacity, and the nation's economic instability raises questions about the viability of such expensive initiatives. However, Turkey's strong reliance on imported energy forces it to gain access to disputed Eastern Mediterranean gas deposits, which exacerbates tensions in the region. According to analysts, Turkey has already shifted the balance of power in the waters around it and established itself as a vital regional player. Ankara's expanding fleet and strong maritime policy have made it impossible to ignore its aspirations, even though it is still far from becoming a global naval force. They claim that the current issue is not if Turkey has a powerful fleet but rather to what extent it plans to employ it. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (

Ammon
a day ago
- Ammon
Israel says it targeted energy infrastructure site in Yemen
Ammon News - The Israeli occupation military said it had targeted an energy infrastructure site that was used by the Iran-aligned Houthis south of the Yemeni capital Sanaa early on Sunday, with Israeli media saying the Haziz power station had been hit. The military said in a statement that the strikes were in response to repeated attacks by the Houthis against Israel, including launching missiles and drones towards its territory. Israeli media reported earlier that the attack on the Haziz power station near the capital was carried out by the Israeli navy. Houthi-run Al Masirah TV said that the power station was hit by an "aggression", knocking some of its generators out of service. It did not indicate the source of the attack. At least two explosions were heard earlier in Sanaa, residents said. Reuters


Roya News
2 days ago
- Roya News
Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit
Donald Trump on Saturday dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favor of pursuing a full peace accord – a major shift announced hours after his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin yielded no clear breakthrough. Prior to the high-stakes meeting in Alaska, securing an immediate cessation of hostilities had been a core demand of Trump and European leaders including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, who will now hold talks with the US president in Washington on Monday. The shift away from an urgent ceasefire would seem to favor Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal -- a strategy that Ukraine and its European allies have criticized as a way to buy time and press home Russia's battlefield advances. "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform after the Alaska talks. Before the summit, Trump had warned of "severe consequences" if Moscow did not accept a ceasefire. In a call with European leaders on his flight back to Washington, Trump said the US was prepared to provide security guarantees for Ukraine -- an assurance German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hailed as "significant progress." But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to "drag out negotiations" with no commitment to end the bloodshed. "The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon," Kallas said. The New York Times, citing two European officials briefed on Trump's call with European leaders, said the president had expressed support for Putin's proposal for Ukraine to cede territory it controls to Russia in exchange for an eventual ceasefire. Zelensky back in White House The main diplomatic focus now switches to Zelensky's talks with Trump in Washington on Monday. An EU source told AFP that a number of European leaders had also been invited to attend. The Ukrainian president's last visit to the White House in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US help against Russia. Zelensky said Saturday after a "substantive" conversation with Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing "all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war." In an interview with Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin. "It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said. "And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit, but it's up to President Zelensky." European pressure The leaders of France, Britain and Germany are due to host a video call Sunday for their so-called "coalition of the willing" to discuss the way forward. In an earlier statement, they welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit, but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire. "We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace," the statement said. Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with Kyiv announcing Saturday that Russia had launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night. Back in Moscow, Putin said his summit talks with Trump had been "timely" and "very useful." "The conversation was very frank, substantive, and, in my opinion, brings us closer to the necessary decisions," he said. In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could disrupt what he called "this emerging progress."