Trump's FBI purge: at odds, you're out — ex-acting chief and Jan. 6 agents fired in sweeping political shake-up, here's who's gone
Who just lost their jobs in Trump's FBI shake-up?
Among those forced out is
Brian Driscoll
, who served briefly as acting FBI director earlier this year. Multiple reports say Driscoll refused a Trump administration demand to hand over the names of agents involved in
January 6 Capitol riot investigations
. His departure is set for this Friday.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Also fired:
Steven Jensen
, the former head of the FBI's Washington Field Office, and
Walter Giardina
, a special agent tied to high-profile January 6 prosecutions — including the case against ex-Trump adviser
Peter Navarro
.
Why is this FBI purge happening now?
Insiders point to an aggressive overhaul led by newly installed FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino. The shake-up appears to target those seen as resistant to the administration's approach on politically sensitive cases, particularly the January 6 prosecutions.
The White House has framed the removals as a bid to 'restore accountability' within the FBI. But critics warn the dismissals threaten the bureau's independence, fueling fears of politicized law enforcement.
Live Events
Will January 6 prosecutions be derailed?
The ouster of agents directly involved in Capitol riot cases has sparked concern that ongoing prosecutions could slow or even stall. Legal experts caution that such disruptions could have lasting effects on cases already in court.
The
FBI Agents Association
has condemned the firings, calling them a dangerous precedent that undermines due process and risks damaging public trust.
Could this be just the beginning?
Sources suggest more terminations may follow, potentially reshaping the bureau's leadership in one of the largest politically influenced overhauls in FBI history. Inside the agency, current and former officials describe morale as 'unsettled' and 'deeply divided.'
The key question now:
Will Trump's purge redirect the FBI's priorities — or fracture it even further?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Zelenskyy's off-ramp
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. There are no good options for Ukraine in Trump-Putin talks, but some may be better than others Friday will likely be wet in Alaska when Trump and Putin meet to discuss an end to the Ukraine war. The venue might make Putin wistful, for Alaska, like Ukraine, was once part of the Russian empire, sold to America in 1867 for 2 cents an acre. But the former KGB Lt Col is famously inscrutable, and when asked if he would annex Alaska after Crimea, in 2014, replied: 'What would you need Alaska for?' Alaska's either too cold for Putin, or as a realist, he accepts its status as a fait accompli. Likewise with Crimea. He's held it since a choreographed referendum in 2014, and considers it a fait accompli for the rest of the world. Europe doesn't, but Trump, whose politics are 100% transactional, might for a deal, which has become a matter of prestige for him. In April, he told Time: 'Crimea will stay with Russia…Zelenskyy understands that.' But a Russian Crimea isn't a fait accompli for Zelenskyy. On Saturday, he made it clear that his people 'will not gift their land to the occupier'. It's a position that Indians can appreciate. Although Pakistan illegally occupied a part of Kashmir over 75 years ago, India will never sign it off. There's a very clear distinction between de facto and de jure possession. Ukraine's seal on Crimea's Russian occupation will permanently end its claim on it. And this is a likely sticking point in whatever deal Trump and Putin thrash out. From Zelenskyy's point of view, the fact that he's been left out of the negotiations, is equally problematic. His people have fought Russia at great national cost for over 40 months. To now buy peace on Russian terms – endorsed by Trump – would be galling. But that might be the only peace on offer when Russia has been gaining ground. Putin's reportedly offered to end hostilities if Ukraine gives up Donetsk and Luhansk as well. Zelenskyy's in an unenviable position. If he rejects a Trump-brokered deal, he might find US military and other aid cut off. Fighting has already taken a heavy toll – Ukraine's GDP is where it was in 2008, and one of the lowest in Europe. He can swallow the bitter pill now, and take his country on a path of growth, backed by his Western friends. It's an unpalatable fait accompli, but also a realistic off-ramp for his country. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump slammed as 'insecure' for hiding Obama, Bush White House portraits
US President Donald Trump has ordered that the portraits of Barack Obama and George W. Bush be moved to a less prominent position. Obama's portrait was placed at the White House entryway, prior to this. Donald Trump earlier had Barack Obama's portrait moved across the White House foyer to make space for his photo from when he survived the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. (Bloomberg) Trump's move underscores the tension that has always been there between the 44th and 47th presidents. Along with Obama, portraits of George Bush and his father George H.W. Bush, have also been removed. They will now be kept on top of a restricted staircase, in an area rarely seen by the public, NBC-affiliate WSAZ reported. Where has Trump kept the portraits? The portraits have been moved to the top of the Grand Staircase, CNN reported, citing sources. This is the chief stairway which connects the State Floor and Second Floor of the White House. The publication further noted that the area is restricted to members of the First Family, Secret Service agents, and some White House and executive residence staff. Also Read | Why does Donald Trump want the Nobel Peace Prize so badly? It's his self-image, and Obama, say analysts Obama's portrait is now firmly out of view of any visitor. The same fate has befallen the portraits of the Bush father-son duo. White House protocol and precedent calls for the portraits of most recent presidents to be placed most prominently – at the entrance of the executive mansion – so guests can see them during official events, and visitors can see them on tours, CNN reported. Notably, this is not the first time the Obama portrait has been moved either. In April, the portrait was moved across the grand foyer of the White House to make way for Trump's own portrait from when he survived the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. It has also been reported that Trump is involved in almost everything that is done to the aesthetic of the White House – be it big or small. The new ballroom he wants, for which the President has offered to pay $200 million out of his own pocket, and the recent redesign of the Rose Garden are testament to this fact. Trump called 'insecure' over removal of portraits Trump's move was slammed by many on X as 'insecure'. 'Trump has to be the most insecure president in US history,' one person said. Another commented, 'Trump is one of the most insecure presidents in history.' As is the case in such matters, Trump's move also found support from some quarters. 'Good, very good - where they belong, down the pecking order in history,' one X user noted about the decision to remove the Obama and Bush portraits. Trump vs Obama saga continues Trump's recent decision to remove the portraits comes after the President has already launched scathing attacks on his predecessor. Recently, Trump said from the Oval Office 'It's time to go after people', repeating the claim that Barack Obama and other officials had engaged in treason. This came after a new report from his intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, aimed at casting doubt on long-established findings about Moscow's interference in the 2016 election. Trump's attack had prompted a rare response from Obama's post-presidential office. 'Our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' said Patrick Rodenbush, an Obama spokesman. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' (With AP inputs)
India.com
12 minutes ago
- India.com
US Vs BRICS: Why Did Donald Trump Go Silent After Threatening India With An 8-Hour Ultimatum?
Washington/New Delhi: When US President Donald Trump slapped an additional 25% tariff on India over its purchase of Russian oil, he warned that things would unfold dramatically within eight hours. He said, 'Wait for eight hours and see what happens.' Many expected more tariffs or sanctions against India soon after. But more than 40 hours have passed, and Trump has remained silent. Behind this sudden pause, several significant developments took place. India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a visit to China. Putin and Modi spoke on the phone. Brazil's President Lula da Silva also called Modi. All these events share one connection: Brazil, India, Russia and China are founding members of BRICS. The question arises: did Trump retract his aggressive stance after BRICS showed unity? Experts believe BRICS countries are preparing a major announcement, possibly about a new currency that could shake the US dollar's global dominance. Contributing nearly 35.6% to global GDP, BRICS seems to be uniting firmly against Trump's tariff policies. How Are BRICS Standing United Against US? Though BRICS has expanded, many new members remain close to China, with most maintaining friendly ties with India, like the UAE. South Africa remains a consistent member. Experts say conversations among BRICS leaders have moved beyond formalities, including lengthy talks between Modi and Putin. Brazil's Lula and Modi discussed boosting bilateral trade to $20 billion by 2030. Modi's upcoming visit to China after seven years signals a thaw in relations and possibly a fresh chapter. Even China's state media, Global Times, appears to soften its tone on India, defending it against Trump's tariffs. Trump openly threatened a 10% tariff on any BRICS nation opposing U.S. interests. India called the tariffs 'unfair' and said its ties with Russia are based on trust, not external views. Brazil's Lula rejected direct talks with Trump and announced using BRICS chairmanship for a collective response. The key question remains: as BRICS grows stronger, has Trump stepped back or is he preparing a new counterstrategy? If BRICS announces a new currency, it will pose a serious challenge to the United States. India has been the main obstacle to the BRICS currency plan so far. Can Cryptocurrency Counter BRICS? Once a critic of cryptocurrencies, Trump now seems to be steering the United States toward becoming a crypto capital, possibly to counter the BRICS currency threat. The coordination among BRICS countries is deepening. Lula plans to visit India next year. Modi's call for a 'people-centric partnership' for the Global South directly counters Trump's policies. Meanwhile, India's growing ties with Russia and PM Modi's participation in the upcoming SCO summit in China hint at shifting strategic priorities amid deteriorating US relations. Analyst Mario Navfal states, 'The world's largest democracy and South America's biggest player (Brazil) are now playing hardball with the United States.' Trump, in nut shell, has been forced to face the reality of BRICS closing ranks and challenging dollar supremacy. The Global South, which once faltered due to diverging agendas, is now united, signalling rapid changes in the global order. Experts predict that in coming months, BRICS will unveil new policies and plans that will highlight a move toward a multipolar world challenging American dominance.
