Nvidia eases concerns about China with upbeat sales forecast
Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang soothed investor fears about a China slowdown by delivering a solid sales forecast, saying that the AI computing market is still poised for "exponential growth.'
The company expects revenue of about $45 billion in its second fiscal quarter, which runs through July. New export restrictions will cost Nvidia about $8 billion in Chinese revenue during the period, but the forecast still met analysts' estimates. That helped propel the shares about 4% Wednesday in extended trading.
The outlook shows that Nvidia is ramping up production of Blackwell, its latest semiconductor design. The chipmaker — now the world's largest by revenue and market value — dominates the field of AI accelerators, the components that help develop and run artificial intelligence models. And an ever-broader lineup of hardware and software is letting Nvidia sell more products to customers.
As part of that push, the company is offering its chips as part of whole computer systems — a move it says is necessary to speed up the deployment of more complex and powerful technology. Nvidia expects AI infrastructure to eventually transform economies around the world.
"Every nation now sees AI as core to the next industrial revolution — a new industry that produces intelligence and essential infrastructure for every economy,' Huang said on a conference call with analysts.
Nvidia shares had earlier closed at $134.81 in New York, leaving the stock little changed in 2025.
Sales in the first quarter, which ended April 27, rose 69% to $44.1 billion. That compared with an average estimate of $43.3 billion.
That growth would be enviable for most chipmakers, though it was the smallest percentage gain in two years. Profit was 96 cents a share, minus certain items. Wall Street was looking for 93 cents.
The data center unit, a division that's larger by itself than all of Nvidia's nearest rivals combined, had sales of $39.1 billion. That was just shy of the average estimate of $39.2 billion. Gaming-related sales — once Nvidia's main business — were $3.8 billion. Analysts projected $2.85 billion on average. Automotive was $567 million.
One lingering question is whether U.S. trade restrictions on China will hinder Nvidia's long-term growth. In April, the Trump administration placed new curbs on exports of data center processors to Chinese customers, effectively shutting Nvidia out of the market. The chipmaker said on Wednesday that it incurred a $4.5 billion writedown because of the issue.
Attendees walk through the exhibition hall at Nvidia GTC, a global artificial intelligence conference for developers, in San Jose, California, on March 19. |
Mike Kai Chen / The New York Times
"The broader concern is that trade tensions and potential tariff impacts on data center expansion could create headwinds for AI chip demand in upcoming quarters,' Emarketer analyst Jacob Bourne said in a note.
Nvidia also disclosed that it's facing scrutiny inside China, where regulators have demanded that it keep supplying local companies in return for regulatory approval of its acquisition of Mellanox. The company warned that it may face penalties in that case. Nvidia completed the purchase of Mellanox, a maker of networking technology, in 2020.
"Regulators in China are investigating whether complying with applicable U.S. export controls discriminates unfairly against customers in the China market,' it said in a filing. "If regulators conclude that we have failed to fulfill such commitments or we have violated any applicable law in China, we could be subject to financial penalties, restrictions on our ability to conduct our business.'
On the call with analysts, Huang was asked whether the company will produce a new chip that will let it resume shipping to China. It had earlier created the less-powerful H20 product for that purpose, tailoring it to meet previous U.S. rules. But stricter curbs now limit its sale in the country.
Huang said that Nvidia couldn't reduce the capabilities of the H20 further and still field a product that was useful. However, the company is pondering whether it can come up with something "interesting' for the market. He said Nvidia is just discussing the idea and has nothing currently. Nvidia will consult with the U.S. government if it's able to design something.
The CEO used the call to renew his appeal to the Trump administration to allow it to produce chips for China again. Without getting that clearance, global leadership in AI isn't guaranteed, he said. Chinese companies will succeed in AI by themselves, Huang said.
"Losing access to the China AI accelerator market, which we believe will grow to nearly $50 billion, would have a material adverse impact on our business going forward and benefit our foreign competitors in China and worldwide,' he said.
Nvidia isn't the only tech company grappling with the Trump administration's tougher stance toward China. HP, which also released results on Wednesday, warned of "trade-related' costs in the face of tariffs and a slowing economy. Its shares tumbled about 8% in late trading following the report.
Some providers of chip design software, meanwhile, have been warned by the administration to stop selling their products in China.
Nvidia, which first gained fame selling graphics cards to gamers, has become an AI powerhouse in the past two years. The Santa Clara, California-based company was quick to realize the potential for what it calls accelerated computing — a hardware-and-software arrangement that is setting the stage for machines that can learn and reason like humans.
The chipmaker's ascent to a market value of more than $3 trillion, about 10% of the total value of the Nasdaq, has investors judging it by extremely high standards. They've become accustomed to rapid growth and stratospheric profitability. Even marginal misses relative to those lofty estimates stoke fears about the AI boom slowing down.
Nvidia accounts for about 90% of the market for AI accelerator chips, an area that's proven extremely lucrative. This fiscal year, the company will near $200 billion in annual sales, up from $27 billion just two years ago.
While Nvidia is being squeezed out of China, other policy changes may help open up additional markets. The U.S. president recently visited Saudi Arabia and other states in the Middle East, where he announced large AI projects. That reversed a push by his predecessor to clamp down on the region's access to AI technology.
Huang was asked whether he'll unveil similar plans in other countries. He said he's traveling to Europe next week.
"I will be in France, U.K., Germany, Belgium,' he said in an interview. "And I think it is very clear now that every country recognizes that artificial intelligence, like electricity, internet and communications, is part of a national infrastructure.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
China likely to top agenda at Shangri-La talks
Annual security talks known as the Shangri-La Dialogue get underway in Singapore, with China's growing assertiveness in focus and US tariffs in the background.
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
South Korea faces a triple challenge ahead of its election
Few countries have transformed themselves as dramatically as South Korea has over the last half-century. A poor, authoritarian country with annual per capita income of less than $400 has become a vibrant and prosperous democracy, with direct presidential elections, peaceful transfers of power and a per capita income of more than $33,000. But South Korea lately has been grappling with slowing economic momentum, rising political instability and an increasingly fragile security environment. Can the country transform itself again and meet these new challenges? Begin with the economy. After decades of rapid gross domestic product growth — averaging over 7% in the 1970s-1990s — the economy has slowed, growing by 2% to 3% in recent years. The growth rate is expected to fall further, to 1%, over the next decade. A key reason for this is demographic decline. With South Korea's fertility rate having dropped to just 0.75 — the world's lowest — its population is shrinking and aging fast. The country is set to cross the 'super-aged' threshold, with more than 20% of the population aged 65 and older, this year. Low productivity growth and high household debt are additional brakes on consumption and investment, increasing the risk of long-term stagnation, akin to Japan's 'lost decades.' It does not help that China is becoming increasingly competitive in sectors that South Korea once dominated, such as shipbuilding, steel, smartphones and, increasingly, semiconductors. More fundamentally, the export-driven model that fueled South Korea's past success is now vulnerable to protectionist trends and geoeconomic fragmentation. Domestic political volatility has risen as well. Corruption scandals and partisan gridlock persist and both Freedom House and the Economist Intelligence Unit have reported signs of democratic backsliding. Former President Yoon Suk Yeol's attempt to impose martial law for the first time since 1980 revealed that South Korea's democracy remains fragile, though the fierce backlash — including popular protests and a vote by the National Assembly to rescind the declaration — also highlighted the resilience of public support for democratic institutions. Mounting security risks further complicate the picture. North Korea, bolstered by deepening military ties with Russia and an enduring strategic alignment with China, has continued its regular provocations, including ballistic-missile tests. Meanwhile, South Korea is grappling with the question of how to approach the escalating geopolitical competition between China, with which the country maintains close economic ties, and the United States, an increasingly unreliable ally. U.S. President Donald Trump's past threats to scale back America's security commitments and cut deals with North Korea have revived calls within South Korea for an independent deterrent capability. Recent polls indicate that a growing share of South Koreans want their country to develop nuclear weapons. While the government remains committed to nonproliferation, the pressure for South Korea to ensure its own security is intensifying. Against this backdrop, South Korea will hold its next presidential election on Tuesday. Whoever wins — whether the progressive or conservative candidate — will have to confront head-on the intertwined challenges of boosting economic growth, implementing democratic reforms and providing strategic clarity. On the economy, a top priority must be shifting from export-led to innovation-led growth. This will require major investments in research and development, as well as support for startups in frontier industries such as AI, biotechnology, green energy and digital health care. It will also require continued industrial policies in key sectors (especially semiconductors, electric vehicles and batteries), together with regulatory streamlining. Revitalizing the underperforming service sector — especially through structural reform and digitalization — can unlock potential growth and help reduce inequality. Labor-market reform is also essential. Policymakers must tackle two features of South Korea's labor market that are undermining productivity and inclusion: its dual structure ('regular' workers enjoy more job security, better benefits and higher wages than their 'nonregular' counterparts) and its focus on seniority, rather than performance, in determining wages. To help offset demographic decline, policies aimed at boosting female labor-force participation, attracting skilled immigrants and retaining older workers are also needed. For example, the government could promote lifelong education and more flexible work arrangements. As for democratic reforms, South Korea's next president should focus on measures to strengthen the National Assembly's legislative capacity, uphold judicial independence and foster a civil society and media culture resilient to polarization and disinformation. The next administration might even consider pursuing constitutional reform, to allow presidents to serve up to two four-year terms (rather than one five-year term). Above all, the winner must demonstrate a commitment to restraint, institutional integrity and inclusive governance, especially by rejecting winner-takes-all politics and engaging constructively with the opposition. Finally, to strengthen South Korea's security posture, the next administration should reiterate its commitment to the alliance with the U.S., while seeking stronger security guarantees — possibly including deployment of nuclear weapons. It should maintain and deepen trilateral security cooperation with the U.S. and Japan, particularly on missile defense and intelligence. At the same time, South Korea should pursue greater strategic autonomy. While it must uphold all alliance commitments vis-a-vis China, it should limit participation in anti-China initiatives and maintain an open economic dialogue with the People's Republic. As for North Korea, any engagement should hinge on a credible, fundamental change in the regime's behavior. South Korea has shown a remarkable capacity for renewal in the past. With wise, unifying leadership that delivers a forward-looking vision that addresses economic vulnerabilities, bridges political divides and strengthens national security, this time will be no different. Lee Jong-Wha, professor of economics at Korea University, is a former chief economist at the Asian Development Bank and a former senior adviser for international economic affairs to the president of South Korea.
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
The next great job churn is already starting
The geography of employment in the U.S. is being shaped by two distinct trends. The first is low levels of housing churn and, therefore, interstate migration, a normal part of the business cycle that should eventually turn around. More consequential are signs that artificial intelligence is beginning to suppress hiring in some of the most technology-centric parts of the country such as the San Francisco Bay Area — a shift that may portend a structural change in the labor market. This is a useful time to look at changes in employment growth in different parts of the country and compare these with the pre-pandemic economy, since overall job growth is currently only a touch lower than it was in 2019. U.S. employment grew 1.2% in April from a year earlier, close to the 1.3% growth seen in 2019. Let's start with the reduced migration from cold states to warm states that is showing up in the employment data of the metros most affected. House prices are a useful proxy for interstate migration. The two large metros with the weakest home price growth are Dallas, Texas, and Tampa, Florida, according to the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller indices. Employment in Dallas grew 1.4% in March from a year earlier, roughly half its 2019 pace, while in Tampa, it grew just 0.9%, a third of its 2019 pace. Reduced outmigration from the Northeast and Midwest, on the other hand, helps explain why job growth is above the pre-pandemic pace in Buffalo, New York and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In theory, less interstate migration should also boost the fortunes of the San Francisco Bay Area, a region famous for people leaving to get away from high housing costs. Yet employment in the region has been declining since its post-pandemic peak in November 2022 — coincidentally, the month OpenAI's ChatGPT launched. This could be chalked up to tech companies laying off workers in 2023 and early 2024 to preserve profitability after a hiring binge in the years previous. Meta Platforms's headcount fell by 22% on a year-over-year basis in its "year of efficiency' push in 2023. But that post-COVID-19 culling is behind us — big tech companies are collectively investing hundreds of billions of dollars into AI, and Meta's headcount has grown 10% over the past year. So, it's noteworthy that employment in the country's tech heartland continues to decline at a time when, in theory, the Bay Area has the tailwinds of massive investment and fewer people leaving the region. The most likely culprit is the impact that AI is having on labor demand. The types of white-collar jobs shrinking the fastest in the U.S. include categories such as software engineers, data engineers and application engineers. On recruitment site Indeed, job postings for software engineers are currently lower than they were in the spring of 2020. Some of this drop is likely due to efficiency gains from AI, while some may be due to companies needing to control headcount where they can while they pile huge sums of money into advanced chips and data centers. Boston is another knowledge job-centric metro area showing signs of labor market softness, with its unemployment rate rising from 3.5% to 4.5% over the past year, the highest level outside of the pandemic period since 2015. The education hub may be more vulnerable than some other cities to AI adoption since the technology tends to be good at the kind of work that would typically be offered to young college graduates. These are dynamics we should expect to see, according to "From San Francisco to Savannah? The Downstream Effects of Generative AI,' a paper by researchers at Louisiana State University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Metro areas with both high educational attainment and high costs of living are the most vulnerable to AI disruption. These metros have many of the kinds of jobs AI can replace and cuts there help reduce headcount expenses more quickly. Authors Scott Abrahams and Frank S. Levy highlight parallels with the 1980s when manufacturing-centric communities with a low share of educational attainment were hit hardest by the negative shock of automation and globalization. This doesn't mean that San Francisco will turn into a technological Rust Belt — the region is at the forefront of AI innovation, after all, and even if it ends up with fewer software development jobs, those could be replaced by different kinds of AI-enhanced knowledge work. Abrahams and Levy point out that the manufacturing shock benefited the southern U.S., not just Asian exporting countries, and it's possible an AI shock will lead to more balanced economic development across the U.S. That may take time, though, particularly while interstate migration remains constrained by a dysfunctional housing market. Given our experience with manufacturing job losses and signs that another labor-market reordering is coming, it's time policymakers at the local and national level start to take the potential for AI disruption seriously. Conor Sen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist.
