logo

Sepagon connects with Genome for open banking payments

Finextra27-05-2025
Genome, a leading European Electronic Money Institution (EMI) regulated by the Bank of Lithuania, and Sepagon, an open banking technology provider specializing in seamless, card-free payments, are pleased to announce a partnership that enhances the efficiency of transactions.
0
Through this collaboration, Sepagon integrates Genome's secure incoming payment APIs and real-time webhook notifications to offer faster, more transparent C2B payments for businesses and their customers.
Powering real-time payments
Sepagon enables business clients to accept payments directly from customers' bank accounts without relying on card networks or third-party wallets. By using Genome's infrastructure, Sepagon now receives real-time updates on incoming transfers, allowing immediate payment confirmations, automated tracking, and smoother transaction flows.
The integration supports SEPA Credit and Instant Transfers, giving businesses flexible options to receive funds quickly and securely across Europe.
'Genome's robust APIs and webhook notifications significantly improve our ability to provide instant, verifiable A2A payments,' said Rotem Hamburger, CEO of Sepagon. 'It's a key step forward in making bank-based payments the default choice for businesses.'
'Our goal is to support forward-thinking companies like Sepagon in building seamless, transparent financial solutions,' said Daumantas Barauskas, CEO of Genome. 'This integration eliminates delays in payment recognition and helps businesses operate more efficiently.'
Redefining payment flow in open banking
The partnership signals progress toward real-time payments at scale. It enables businesses using Sepagon's platform to bypass card fees, reduce processing time, and improve user satisfaction while relying on Genome's compliant and resilient infrastructure for secure payment reception.
Both Genome and Sepagon are committed to driving innovation in financial services and supporting the shift toward faster, more cost-effective open banking solutions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion
Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion

North Wales Chronicle

time4 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion

The FA Cup winners were demoted to the Conference League by European football's governing body UEFA on July 11 after it determined that, as of March 1, American businessman John Textor had control or influence at both Palace and French club Lyon. Palace appealed, but on Monday the CAS announced the London club had lost their appeal, with Nottingham Forest expected to take the place in UEFA's second-tier competition. At a time when we should be celebrating our victory in the Community Shield at Wembley, the decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless. Full statement 👇#CPFC — Crystal Palace F.C. (@CPFC) August 12, 2025 A statement from the Eagles read: 'At a time when we should be celebrating our victory in the Community Shield at Wembley, the decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless. 'When we won the FA Cup against Manchester City on that momentous day in May, our manager and players earned the right to play Europa League football. 'We have been denied that opportunity. 'It appears that certain clubs, organisations and individuals have a unique privilege and power. 'This growing and unhealthy influence has shattered the hopes and dreams of Crystal Palace supporters, and does not bode well for aspirational teams all over Europe competing to progress when rules and sanctions are unevenly applied in the most flagrant way.' UEFA and the CAS have been contacted for comment by the PA news agency. UEFA regulations state that where one or more clubs are found to have shared ownership, they cannot play in the same competition, and Lyon held on to the Europa League spot by virtue of their higher league position. Textor has since sold his shares to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, a purchase completed in late July. The Eagles' stance, as outlined in a July statement, was that 'it's clear for everyone to see that we are not part of a multi-club operation and never have been'. On Tuesday, Palace wrote in their statement: 'Multi-club structures hide behind the charade of a 'blind trust' while clubs such as ours, who have no connection to another club whatsoever, are prevented from playing in the same competition. 'To compound the injustice, clubs that appear to have huge informal arrangements with each other are also allowed to participate and even possibly play against each other. 'While we respect the CAS tribunal members, the process is designed to severely restrict and, in our case, make it almost impossible to receive a fair hearing. 'The denial of all disclosure requests to obtain correspondence between the relevant parties, the refusal to allow witness testimony from those involved, and the general lack of formality and respect for law mean decisions cannot be properly challenged, leading to pre-determined outcomes.' Palace have called for UEFA to consider both its regulations and the application of those rules. A post shared by Crystal Palace Football Club (@cpfc) The club statement concluded: 'UEFA's decision has wider implications for the governance of the sport. A combination of poorly conceived regulations and their unequal application means our brilliant fans will be deprived of the chance to watch this team compete in the Europa League for the first time in our history. 'This should be a turning point for football. 'UEFA must fulfil its mandate to pass coherent rules which are properly communicated and applied, with reasonable cure periods to resolve uncertainty and consistent sanctions, treating all clubs equally with a proper appeal process. 'The European Court of Justice has made it clear that rulings similar to this will be under greater scrutiny from national courts in future. Only then will fairness and due process be granted to every team. 'Although we continue to take legal advice on the next steps, we will compete in the Conference League with the same determination and will to win that characterises this incredible club.' A full CAS explanation, with grounds, will be published in due course unless parties request confidentiality. The CAS statement on Monday explained: 'After considering the evidence, the panel found that John Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in CPFC and OL and was a board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of UEFA's assessment date. 'The panel also dismissed the argument by CPFC that they received unfair treatment in comparison to Nottingham Forest and OL. The panel considered that the UEFA regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as CPFC claimed.'

Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion
Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion

South Wales Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion

The FA Cup winners were demoted to the Conference League by European football's governing body UEFA on July 11 after it determined that, as of March 1, American businessman John Textor had control or influence at both Palace and French club Lyon. Palace appealed, but on Monday the CAS announced the London club had lost their appeal, with Nottingham Forest expected to take the place in UEFA's second-tier competition. At a time when we should be celebrating our victory in the Community Shield at Wembley, the decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless. Full statement 👇#CPFC — Crystal Palace F.C. (@CPFC) August 12, 2025 A statement from the Eagles read: 'At a time when we should be celebrating our victory in the Community Shield at Wembley, the decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless. 'When we won the FA Cup against Manchester City on that momentous day in May, our manager and players earned the right to play Europa League football. 'We have been denied that opportunity. 'It appears that certain clubs, organisations and individuals have a unique privilege and power. 'This growing and unhealthy influence has shattered the hopes and dreams of Crystal Palace supporters, and does not bode well for aspirational teams all over Europe competing to progress when rules and sanctions are unevenly applied in the most flagrant way.' UEFA and the CAS have been contacted for comment by the PA news agency. UEFA regulations state that where one or more clubs are found to have shared ownership, they cannot play in the same competition, and Lyon held on to the Europa League spot by virtue of their higher league position. Textor has since sold his shares to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, a purchase completed in late July. The Eagles' stance, as outlined in a July statement, was that 'it's clear for everyone to see that we are not part of a multi-club operation and never have been'. On Tuesday, Palace wrote in their statement: 'Multi-club structures hide behind the charade of a 'blind trust' while clubs such as ours, who have no connection to another club whatsoever, are prevented from playing in the same competition. 'To compound the injustice, clubs that appear to have huge informal arrangements with each other are also allowed to participate and even possibly play against each other. 'While we respect the CAS tribunal members, the process is designed to severely restrict and, in our case, make it almost impossible to receive a fair hearing. 'The denial of all disclosure requests to obtain correspondence between the relevant parties, the refusal to allow witness testimony from those involved, and the general lack of formality and respect for law mean decisions cannot be properly challenged, leading to pre-determined outcomes.' Palace have called for UEFA to consider both its regulations and the application of those rules. A post shared by Crystal Palace Football Club (@cpfc) The club statement concluded: 'UEFA's decision has wider implications for the governance of the sport. A combination of poorly conceived regulations and their unequal application means our brilliant fans will be deprived of the chance to watch this team compete in the Europa League for the first time in our history. 'This should be a turning point for football. 'UEFA must fulfil its mandate to pass coherent rules which are properly communicated and applied, with reasonable cure periods to resolve uncertainty and consistent sanctions, treating all clubs equally with a proper appeal process. 'The European Court of Justice has made it clear that rulings similar to this will be under greater scrutiny from national courts in future. Only then will fairness and due process be granted to every team. 'Although we continue to take legal advice on the next steps, we will compete in the Conference League with the same determination and will to win that characterises this incredible club.' A full CAS explanation, with grounds, will be published in due course unless parties request confidentiality. The CAS statement on Monday explained: 'After considering the evidence, the panel found that John Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in CPFC and OL and was a board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of UEFA's assessment date. 'The panel also dismissed the argument by CPFC that they received unfair treatment in comparison to Nottingham Forest and OL. The panel considered that the UEFA regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as CPFC claimed.'

The simple car hire hack that saves travellers £610 this summer
The simple car hire hack that saves travellers £610 this summer

Scotsman

time4 hours ago

  • Scotsman

The simple car hire hack that saves travellers £610 this summer

As thousands head off on their summer holidays, many will want to hire a car to explore the local area. However, recent research from Gigasure found that in many cases, customers will be paying up to £610 more than they need to by purchasing car hire excess insurance from the car rental company. This is often more than the cost to hire the car itself. Gigasure says that purchasing a separate standalone policy saves travellers hundreds of pounds and is urging travellers not to get caught out by car hire companies. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Buying car hire excess insurance as a stand-alone policy rather than through a car rental company can save holidaymakers up to £610 on a two-week holiday and up to £360 on a week's break. Research from Gigasure, the car hire insurance experts, found that car hire excess insurance can often cost more than hiring a car. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad For example, 8 days of car hire rental for a standard compact vehicle in Spain with Europcar costs £291.41. The cost of Europcar's Compact+ insurance purchased for the same duration is £348.43 – this amounts to 54% of the total hire car cost of £639.57. For comparison, a European single trip standalone car hire excess policy with Gigasure for the same duration costs £27.24. Car hire trick that saves travellers hundreds of pounds Gigasure's analysis of car hire excess costs shows that the car hire excess cover offered by rental companies can be an expensive way of getting cover. Their research looked at the cost of car hire excess insurance across popular rental companies in Europe and found that purchasing a separate standalone policy from a specialist provider can be up to 96% cheaper, in some cases saving the hirer over £700 in insurance costs, and often offering more superior cover. Ernesto Suarez, CEO, Gigasure, says: 'Purchasing a separate standalone policy saves you hundreds of pounds, and offers a higher level of protection at a fraction of the cost. 'Taking out car hire excess insurance when hiring a vehicle is vital protection in the event that something happens while using the hire car, but purchasing this directly through the rental company is extremely expensive and we urge travellers not to be bullied into purchasing this at the rental desk. Instead take out a standalone policy before you travel. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store