44% reservation for BCs in legislative bodies demanded
The event was led by RPS and REF founder Dr Potula Nagaraju and presided over by REF State President Dr R Narayana Naik at Lalita Kala Parishad.
The programme highlighted the urgent demand for 44% reservation for Backward Classes (BCs) in Parliament and legislative assemblies, in proportion to their population share.
Leaders urged all parties to push for a resolution in the Union Cabinet to implement this demand. Speakers emphasised equitable representation for BCs across all sectors.
Key guests included BCY Party President Ramachandra Yadav, V Varaprasad, Pulivendula Municipal Chairman Potula Suresh, former MLC and Nataka Academy Chairperson Chamalluru Haritha, and 93 BC Castes United Forum State President Makireddy Bhaskar Ganesh Babu. Other notable attendees included Akbar Basha (PCC Karnataka Minority Cell), Prashanth Simha (Karnataka Youth Congress), P Venkateshwarlu, artist Warangal Srinivas, and RPS National Vice President Chintala Mohan.
Several state and national-level coordinators and secretaries from RPS and REF also participated, including J Nagabhushanam, T Raja Ramesh, Chinta Chintanna, Vitthal Goud, Pullayya Balaraju, Vivek Yadav, Nag Madhu Yadav, Katik Jayaram, Anand (AIBSP), Narayanaswamy, Srinivas Yadav (NSUI), and Dr Chinta Chandramohan.
The event concluded with a strong collective call for reservation justice and political empowerment of BC communities across India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
BRS's ‘BC Kadhana Bheri' meeting postponed again due to heavy rain forecast
Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS)'s public meeting christened as 'BC Kadhana Bheri' scheduled to be held in Karimnagar on August 14 has been postponed due to forecast of heavy rains in the erstwhile Karimnagar district and elsewhere in the State in the next three days. The party leadership has chosen Karimnagar, the political nerve centre of north Telangana, for its 'BC Kadhana Bheri' to galvanise Backward Class (BC) communities to mount pressure on the government to implement the 42% reservations for BCs. New date of the public meeting will be decided by the BRS leadership in due course, the party sources said. It was originally scheduled for August 8 in Karimnagar. Inclement weather forced the organisers to postpone the meeting to August 14. The meeting has been postponed twice within a week.
Scroll.in
14 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Misleading to frame caste census as social justice vs social harmony: MP Manoj Kumar Jha's new book
The controversy over the caste census is not just partisan politicking. It reflects a deeper ideological divide in India about how we should pursue social justice. On one side are the proponents of naming and targeting social inequalities. This camp includes Ambedkarite Dalit activists, OBC and Bahujan leaders, leftists and many progressive academics. They argue that caste is a lived reality that must be confronted, not ignored. Counting caste, in their view, simply acknowledges this reality in order to change it. Many feel that mobilising around caste grievances can be a necessary jolt to an indifferent society. Indeed, leaders from Kanshi Ram to Lalu Yadav and Tejashwi Yadav have persistently demanded a caste census as a logical extension of India's commitment to affirmative action. For them, 'standing up and being counted' is an empowering act. It is a way for marginalised communities to claim their share of representation and resources. Rahul Gandhi's recent endorsement of the caste census is only a re-articulation of a long-standing demand. On the other side, however, are sceptics who worry that caste-based politics entrenches division and can hinder the broader goal of a casteless society. Interestingly, this camp spans the spectrum from conservative cultural nationalists to some liberal commentators. While the RSS historically opposed the Mandal-style emphasis on caste categories, arguing it would be highly detrimental to India's social fabric, some eminent sociologists like MN Srinivas, too, warned that an official obsession with caste was reminiscent of colonial 'divide and rule' strategies. Even liberal critics like Pratap Bhanu Mehta – who fully acknowledge the persisting injustices of caste – have expressed unease at how the public discourse on caste is framed. Mehta cautions that an 'invocation of caste' can become a substitute for deeper thinking and structural reform, merely solidifying identities without addressing the root causes of inequality. These critics ask: in a society already polarised along multiple lines, can a big caste census ignite endless wrangling among groups for bigger slices of the pie, to the detriment of meritocracy and national unity? This critique cannot be dismissed outright. India's experience since Mandal has indeed seen both empowerment and backlash. Quotas alone are not enough for comprehensive social justice. They need to be accompanied by investments in education, health and anti-discrimination enforcement. However, far from negating the need for a caste census, these nuances strengthen the case for granular data. Naming a problem is not the same as solving it, but without naming it, one cannot even begin to solve it. The experience of the past decades suggests that ignoring caste has not made it disappear. As one analyst put it, caste is 'stronger than ever' in social practice precisely because groups find strength in numbers when competing for limited opportunities. Policies that are officially 'caste-blind' can in fact end up caste-biased – often reflecting the biases of those who hold power, since no corrective data exists to challenge the status quo. From university faculties to corporate boardrooms and the higher echelons of government, upper castes remain heavily overrepresented. This fact stays out of sight in the absence of statistics. A caste census would lay bare such disparities. It could tell us, for example, what proportion of Indian Administrative Service officers or judges come from each community, or which OBC sub-castes have benefited the most from existing quotas and which remain almost invisible. Such transparency can be uncomfortable, which is exactly why it is necessary. It forces a conversation on whether our institutions truly look like 'we, the people' or not. Of course, data by itself won't change power structures. But it can change the terms of debate. As Ambedkar often emphasised, political democracy is unsustainable without social democracy. One might add that social democracy, in turn, requires a clear recognition of social realities. Ambedkar and other framers of the Constitution provided the tools (like Article 340, which enabled commissions to explore the condition of Backward Classes), expecting that the republic would honestly assess who needs support and representation. Decades of avoiding a caste census meant that India was flying partially blind, relying on colonial-era data and sporadic surveys to guide major policies. The Modi government's new acceptance of a caste census, whatever its immediate motivations, offers a chance to finally illuminate the full spectrum of Indian society with 21st-century data. In the end, one might say that the first step to treating a wound is to look at it directly. India's caste wounds have long been glossed over by lofty rhetoric of unity that often serves as an excuse for inaction. Conducting a caste census is a way of naming our inequalities. It is a necessary exercise in a democracy that aspires to genuine equality. It does not erase those inequalities by itself. But it equips the public and policymakers with facts to hold the system accountable. When the numbers come, they may discomfort the privileged and embolden the marginalised. That is not a crisis to be feared, but a reality to be managed with wisdom and compassion. The battle ahead will be over what is done with the data. Will it lead to well-crafted policies—better-targeted education scholarships, health programmes and extension of opportunities to groups historically left out? Will it prompt a re-examination of the 50% cap on reservations, now that we know that some states have a 60–70 per cent backward majority? Or will it descend to a scramble of competitive populism, with every caste group vying for a larger slice of a stagnant pie? The answer will depend on the wisdom of our political leadership and the vigilance of civil society. What is certain is that not having the information was no solution at all. As India undertakes this enumeration, it might recall the words of Dr Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly: 'On the 26th of January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of contradictions.' He warned that we would have equality in law but not in social and economic life – and that such contradictions could not last indefinitely. More than 75 years later, those contradictions persist, caste being one of the starkest. Counting caste is not about entrenching those divisions; it is about charting a course to transcend them. In an era when data is power, the power of numbers can democratize power itself – making visible the invisible, and forcing the nation to confront the truths that decades of silence could not erase. The caste census may be belated, but it could become a milestone in India's unfinished project of social justice. If properly followed through, it will be a step towards the day when 'those left behind' are not left behind any more.
Hans India
16 hours ago
- Hans India
KCR to challenge ‘victimisation' by Ghose Commission in SC
Hyderabad: Taking a serious note of Justice P C Ghose Commission's findings against him, former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR) has reportedly decided to challenge the findings in the Supreme Court. The probe panel has alleged irregularities in the construction of Kaleshwaram project and the damage caused to three barrages – Medigadda, Sundilla and Annaram. The BRS chief held an emergency meeting with senior party leaders, including T Harish Rao and B Vinod Kumar, in his farmhouse. The Ghose commission report, the pending court judgment on the disqualification of 10 BRS legislators, who defected to the ruling Congress party, and a proposed public meeting in Karimnagar on the BC quota issue were discussed in the meeting. Party leaders pointed out that KCR was taking exception to the Ghose Commission targeting him. The BRS party will file a petition in the Supreme Court and challenge the panel for giving its findings without cross examining the statements of Irrigation officials that were recorded during the open hearing, when it was binding on the Commission to bring out all facts pertaining to every recorded statement. Instead, the panel held KCR responsible without any evidence, whatsoever. The BRS leaders said that the apex court's intervention would help to counter the commission's 'unsubstantiated' findings. Rao has reportedly instructed the party's legal team to fight for the disqualification of all their defected MLAs by filing additional petitions in the apex court. It may be recalled that the Supreme Court has already directed the Assembly Speaker to act against the BRS MLAs for switching over to the Congress within three months. As KCR is apprehensive about the Speaker's actions, he has decided to challenge the issue in the court seeking disqualification of the 10 legislators. Rao has also given specific instructions to the party leaders to make the ensuing public meeting on BC quota a big success by mobilizing many people from the BC community. He intends to send across a strong message to the ruling Congress besides sounding a warning about an impending political unrest if the state government fails to fulfil the promise of providing 42 per cent quota to BCs in the local body elections.
