South Korean court issues arrest warrant for ex-president Yoon again
The special counsel investigating Yoon and his wife, former first lady Kim Keon Hee, said in a statement that 'an arrest warrant has been issued today for former president Yoon Suk Yeol.'
Yoon plunged South Korea into a political crisis when he sought to subvert civilian rule on December 3, sending troops to parliament in a bid to prevent lawmakers voting down his declaration of martial law.
He became the first sitting president in the country to be taken into custody when he was detained in January after resisting arrest for weeks, using his presidential security detail to thwart investigators.
He was released on procedural grounds in March while his insurrection trial continued, but was detained again early July over concerns he might destroy evidence related to the case.
Prosecutors investigating allegations of parliamentary election tampering summoned Yoon for questioning — but he failed to appear, with his lawyers citing health issues.
On Wednesday, they filed a renewed request for a detention warrant.
Now that the warrant has been issued, prosecutors are authorized to enter Yoon's current detention facility and compel him to appear for questioning.
Legal troubles are also mounting for Yoon and his wife in cases unrelated to his martial law attempt.
Prosecutors are investigating allegations that a shaman, Jeon Seong-bae, received a diamond necklace and a luxury designer handbag from a senior official of the Unification Church and passed them on to Kim.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Brussels and Beijing can work together on climate transition
Earlier this year, the Chinese firm CATL, the world's largest battery-maker, unveiled an electric-vehicle battery capable of delivering a remarkable 520 km of driving range after just five minutes of charging. The announcement came a month after BYD, China's leading EV manufacturer, launched its own ultra-fast charging system. In solar, too, the numbers are staggering: Chinese firms can now produce over 1,200 GW of solar panels annually. These feats are a product of the global green-tech race, which China leads by a wide margin. Some frame this as a problem of Chinese oversupply. But another way of looking at it is that the rest of the world is not deploying these technologies fast enough. While China's green-manufacturing engine is running at high speed, others are idling. Given this, Europe confronts a strategic choice. It can respond with defensive industrial policy: securing supply chains, raising tariffs, and futilely attempting to catch up. Or it can forge a shared competitiveness agenda, which will allow Brussels to use its strengths — rulemaking, coalition-building, and norm-setting — to shape the deployment environment, define standards, and guide green investment frameworks. Despite the breakdown in ties between the EU and China in recent years, the idea of collaborating on clean trade and investment is not so far-fetched. The climate transition is the defining political and economic challenge of the 21st century. And on this front, the EU and China have become interdependent: If Europe pumps the brakes on decarbonization, Chinese assets could be stranded, whereas China could face retaliation if it refuses to collaborate or align with global norms. The question now is whether they can constructively shape their interdependence. Taking advantage of the narrow window for establishing a climate partnership requires a deal that promotes each government's core economic interests. For the EU, that means reducing reliance on Chinese imports while moving up the value chain. For China, it means maintaining access to a high-value export market amid a shifting global trade environment. Success requires pragmatism on both sides. Whether the EU and China can cooperate effectively depends on several factors. First, they must reach an agreement on local-content requirements. The EU should target domestic production of at least 40 percent of green technologies by 2030 — not just low-paid assembly, but higher-value activities such as research and development — to create jobs and build resilience. Second, any partnership must open the door for joint ventures, which have helped China reach the technological frontier and are already emerging in the EU battery and automotive sectors. If correctly structured, such partnerships can drive mutual gains while building cooperation into long-term industrial strategies. Third, trade measures must be carefully calibrated. While the EU has imposed tariffs as high as 45.3 percent on Chinese EVs, import barriers alone cannot close competitiveness gaps. At best, they can complement more strategic policy efforts such as local-content rules and industrial partnerships. If poorly implemented, they could further weaken Europe's technological position, rather than buying it time to catch up with China. Fourth, there is a need for structured mobility schemes. Some EU member states have begun restricting visas for Chinese engineers. This is short-sighted. Enabling European firms to host Chinese talent and vice versa would ensure that R&D and design, not just final assembly, occur in Europe. Ultimately, finding a way to collaborate on decarbonization efforts would yield economic and geopolitical dividends for both sides. Collaboration with China would strengthen the EU's resilience, bolster its industrial sector, and cement the bloc as a leader in clean tech. China would be able to offload surplus green goods; secure market access; and signal to the world that while the US is retreating from climate action, it remains dedicated to green growth. The EU and China are more aligned than many realize. Both are net fossil-fuel importers. Both are major producers of zero-carbon technologies, and thus have an interest in sustaining global demand for green products. And, amid growing uncertainty, both have bet on the energy transition as the most viable path to competitiveness and innovation. This window of opportunity will not stay open forever. As scientific and political timelines converge, the coming months are critical to keep the world on track to meet the Paris climate agreement's 1.5 C goal. The recent EU-China Summit laid the groundwork for closer cooperation on decarbonization. But, as pressure mounts to submit 2035 climate targets ahead of November's UN Climate Change Conference in Belem, the next meeting of the Council of the EU in September, under the Danish presidency, will be pivotal. With many European countries, most notably France, pushing for a clearer industrial and investment plan before committing to a strong 2035 emissions-reduction target, EU heads of state and government must devise a framework for transforming industry at the September meeting. An important part of that plan will be how the bloc engages with China. By coalescing around the belief that the new must be built before the old can be phased out, Europe is starting to follow China's strategy. But to do so, it must also learn from China's coherent and systematic execution, which centers on long-term planning across the entire clean-tech value chain. China, too, must step up with an ambitious 2035 emissions target that is aligned with its 2060 net-zero goal — meaning a roughly 30 percent reduction from peak emissions, which are expected to be reached this decade. This would bolster its international credibility and help create space for a strong EU target. Both Europe and China have wagered their future on green growth. To make it a winning bet, and capture the full benefits of decarbonization, they must find common cause on clean trade and investment — one of the few areas where strategic self-interest and global public goods still converge. • Emmanuel Guerin is a fellow and Special Adviser to the CEO at the European Climate Foundation. • Bernice Lee is a distinguished fellow and Special Adviser at Chatham House. ©Project Syndicate
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Japan opposes Israel plan to take control of Gaza City
TOKYO: Japan opposes Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City as it undermines the realization of a two-state solution, Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi stated. Japan is strongly concerned that this decision will further exacerbate the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. 'Japan once again urges all parties to return to negotiations and to work in good faith toward a ceasefire and the release of hostages,' Minister Iwaya said in an official statement issued by the Ministry. 'Improving the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza is an urgent priority. Japan calls on Israel to take substantive measures to end the serious humanitarian crisis, including starvation, and reiterates our strong demand for its full compliance with international law, including international humanitarian law,' the statement added. Japan has consistently supported a two-state solution, whereby Israel and a future independent Palestinian state live side by side in peace and security, through confidence building and negotiations between the parties. Japan remains committed to continuing to work for its realization, according to the statement.
Arab News
12 hours ago
- Arab News
Philippines' Marcos moves to address online gambling crisis amid calls for ban
MANILA: Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will examine policy options to address the online gambling crisis gripping the nation, his office said on Saturday, as calls mount for the government to enact tighter regulations, or ban internet betting completely. Concerns are growing over the rising number of Filipinos battling addiction to online gambling, which has become more accessible through social media and e-wallet platforms. Marcos is planning to convene a conference of stakeholders to help develop a policy to tackle the crisis, the Presidential Communications Office said in a statement issued on Saturday. 'The president underscored the need to carefully examine policy options, saying an outright ban on online gambling is not (necessarily the) solution,' the statement read. Marcos recently told a media gathering that 'a ban will not take care of the problem,' adding that his administration seeks to identify its root cause. 'We really have this tendency sometimes, when there's a problem, we just ban it. It's not necessarily the solution,' Marcos said, according to a transcript supplied by his office. 'Maybe it is. Maybe after all the discussions, we'll conclude that a ban is necessary — then we'll implement a ban. But let's study it properly. Let's not jump into it impulsively. We have to be measured in our responses. If it comes down to a ban, then we will ban. But if there are better solutions than a ban, we will take those on.' Online gambling has been called a 'silent epidemic' in the Philippines, amid a surge in cases that have sometimes reportedly torn families apart, depleted savings and pushed students into financial ruin. While there is no official data on how many Filipinos are addicted to online gambling, a 2023 survey by Capstone-Intel found that 64 percent of the nation's 117 million-strong population had tried online betting. More than 80 gaming platforms run by local operators are legally registered with the government, and the revenue from e-games has also become a key source of government revenue. In the first half of 2025, the government's gaming regulator — the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation — recorded a gross gaming revenue of 114.83 billion pesos, (around $2 billion) from the e-gaming sector alone, accounting for more than 50 percent of the government's total gaming revenues over the same period. Last month, Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri filed a bill seeking to ban all forms of online gambling in the country, saying in a statement issued on July 4 that the practice was 'quietly harming' Filipinos, especially minors and the most vulnerable. The Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines has also called on the government to 'declare any type of online gambling illegal.' CBCP president Cardinal Pablo Virgilio David said in a pastoral letter: 'This is no longer a simple problem of individuals. It is now a public health crisis in our society, just like drug addiction, alcoholism and other types of addiction. It destroys not only the individual but also their families.' Others, like Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, are pushing for tighter regulations — including raising the minimum age of players from 18 to 21 and prohibiting e-wallets from providing direct links to online gambling platforms — rather than an outright ban. DigiPlus Interactive, which operates gaming sites BingoPlus, ArenaPlus and GameZone, has said that banning licensed platforms 'does not eliminate demand for online gaming, but merely shifts users to unregulated black markets,' and that it supports tighter regulation.
