logo
I covered live music for the BBC. Here's how to fix its disastrous Glastonbury coverage

I covered live music for the BBC. Here's how to fix its disastrous Glastonbury coverage

Telegraph6 days ago
As the dust still settles on Somerset, it is looking likely that Glastonbury 2025 will be remembered less for sunshine, champagne-swilling celebs or even for stellar sets than for another cack-handed attempt at censorship by the BBC.
Is that really fair? Well… BBC bosses, always so desperate to signal that their fingers are firmly on the pulse of popular culture and the latest cutting edge technology, literally took their eyes off the box.
Instead, they were gazing at live-streaming. It's the future. Or it was.
Because with it the BBC forgot its role – to provide public service broadcasting. To select what to show and programme it accordingly for the enjoyment of their TV and radio audiences. It lost control.
Music festivals are bound to be an absolute minefield for the BBC. They are not strictly structured and controlled like, say, a football tournament. Imagine if a player on the pitch at the World Cup was wired for sound. You couldn't control their language. You couldn't edit out the rude bits, stop matches or choose not to show them altogether.
You can't control front musicians with mics, and egos bigger than that of the entire baying crowd, either. I'm thinking of Snoop Dogg on the Pyramid Stage one afternoon at Glasto, clutching his crotch while rapping that women are asking to be f---d and demanding: 'What's my motherf---ing name?'
You can't tame them. And you shouldn't try. Bands shouldn't fear having their collar felt when they're in full flow because of an off remark between songs.
I'm not talking about mouthing off at a mob and inciting to kill by the way.
Glastonbury has always been billed as celebrating counter-culture and promoting protest and provocation.
But then the BBC gets involved with its remit to reflect popular culture, desperate to get down with the kids and yet to comply with the law of the land. On top of the BBC Charter, Ofcom, the BBC Board, its own editorial guidelines and compliance policy, and the court of public opinion constantly on its back. What are the dozens of Auntie execs on site supposed to do?
How about spending less time being starstruck in the VIP hospitality tent? Get out into where the music, and possible trouble, is being made.
The BBC's role and responsibility is not to host the freeloaders. It is to be selective.
Since 1997, when the BBC took Glastonbury on, this has often left those licence payers on the sofa in front of the set furious if their favourite act doesn't show up in the schedules. The excuse has been time constraints and limited resources. The suspicion is that their heroes were at odds with Auntie's agenda. You know, DEI and all that.
But now there's no time restraint on how much or what can be shown and, with the BBC eager to exploit the endless possibilities provided by the latest technology, it has slavishly committed to showing everything from everywhere on site.
I was at another festival on Saturday where, backstage, the bands were being given written instructions on how to behave. The organisers, Labour-controlled Coventry city council, (40 of 54 seats) demanded that performers refrained from: using language that may be deemed offensive; making political statements; references to political, religious or other affiliated groups to be categorised as unlawful or hate speech of any kind; or the show could be stopped.
One band blurted out: 'It's not like Glastonbury is it, where they tell you to be political and provocative? We refused and got banned for four years.'
Another band told me that they fell out of favour at Worthy Farm back in the 1970s when they refused to vocally support nuclear disarmament on stage when Glastonbury was championing and donating to CND. They have only played there once since and that was only when their agent agreed to supply them and Worthy Farm favourites The Worzels as a package.
Let's not forget, the BBC does not book these bands. It does not curate the festival.
But did nobody at the BBC anticipate that an artist with previous for inciting violence and murder from festival stages might kick off – especially as he was the warm-up act for a band they had already very publicly and controversially banned? Had anyone done their homework?
BBC bosses still can't seem to explain why they banned Kneecap – a bunch of blokes from Belfast with their Irish 'rebel' music, one of the boys wearing a tea cosy on his head that his mammy probably knitted for him – and yet they let loose Bob Vylan, two self-styled punks who also had form at recent festivals.
Was anybody monitoring the live stream as it went out? Was anybody of the right pay grade around to pull it? Were the production staff all ignorant, incompetent or deviant? We deserve to be told which exec on site on the day and on a six-figure salary was responsible for fulfilling their main responsibility to provide an impartial public service.
It's not enough to say: 'The livestream was monitored in line with the agreed compliance protocols and a number of issues were escalated but the editorial team decided not to cut the feed.' Or even to admit: 'That was an error.'
The track record of production staff handling live situations has often been a bit hit and miss. My friend who was a very busy BBC head of complaints told me this week: 'Of course it's always easier with a presenter on hand to deal immediately with a situation.'
DJ Bruno Brookes and I learnt this very quickly in 1980s Ireland. Another band of angry young men were set on causing mayhem at our Radio 1 Roadshow in Ulster's second city.
All the advice we'd been given before we anxiously took to the stage, overlooked by paramilitaries perched on the city walls, was to alternate the name Derry with Londonderry. The bosses were confident that would keep all those sectarians on side, and were very relaxed even when the producer shoved a bloke up from the crowd to be our competition contestant, handed him a mic, and he immediately launched into a rant about the British and their political prisoners, chanting: 'Free The Birmingham Six!'
The crowd went wild. And not in a good way.
'Fantastic. You've won, mate. Liz, give him a goody bag. Let's get him off the stage. More fun from Northern Ireland after Rick Astley!'
A few years ago a legend of punk was suggested for an 'in conversation' at the 6 Music festival.
On stage he was straight into character. Anarchic effing and blinding, and fantastically funny. The audience in the venue were lapping it up as he slagged off his rivals. but particularly when he explained that he had chosen his famous instrument because 'it's an extension of my penis'.
All this apparently offended nobody in the room. Except our producer. It was all too rock'n'roll for radio.
So it was duly sent off to be considered by the compliance committee. It took nearly a week for a ruling to come back. But it was well worth the wait.
'His penis is fine. That can stay in. But there are to be no f---s under any circumstances.'
BBC bosses have now announced that they won't be live-streaming the festival. Ever again. Good. Let Glastonbury do it themselves. As I'm sure Michael Eavis knows, Karl Marx said that 'the workers must have the means of production'. Eavis has certainly got the means.
So just dent those multimillion annual profits with a few cameras and a website. Crack on. Then sit back and broadcast whatever you've booked. And you deal with the er…mud… when it hits the fan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Truth about how 'frugal' 24-year-old junior sales executive who wants to retire at 40 REALLY saved £95,000
EXCLUSIVE Truth about how 'frugal' 24-year-old junior sales executive who wants to retire at 40 REALLY saved £95,000

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Truth about how 'frugal' 24-year-old junior sales executive who wants to retire at 40 REALLY saved £95,000

She is seen as a twenty-something graduate who by living frugally has saved £95,000 towards being able to retire by the age of 40. Mia McGrath says she has saved her sizable nest egg by cutting back on life's luxuries like takeaways and boasts of eating pasta meals for as little as £1 a time while living at home with her parents. But despite urging followers to cut back on luxury spending, Mia is also cultivating a parallel brand as a model and lifestyle influencer. Mia, who is signed to both Memesis Models and W Model Management, runs a second Instagram account under her full name, showcasing a far glossier life - with shots from holidays in Paris, Barcelona and Corfu, nights out in Chelsea, and shopping sprees at Prada. The junior sales executive is also facing claims she is in fact paid thousands of pounds by big brands like the BBC, American Express, British Airways and Marshmallow car insurance to promote them. Quite how much she receives is unclear as Mia Rose McGrath - her username across multiple platforms - doesn't declare this publicly. So adept is Mia at offering her services as a way for corporations to 'reach' young people that she even provides a breakdown of her influencer profile in the style of a media sales executive. She details her audience reach by age (85% of those following her posts are aged 18-34, for example), by country and by audience numbers reached: an astonishing 3.1million at last count. She even pitches direct to potential sponsors: 'I'm a 24-year-old London-based creator who has grown a TikTok account to over 125k followers, specialising in personal finance and investing content. 'While my niche focuses on finance, I've also worked on creating UGC [user generated content - ie her posts] for skincare and lifestyle brands, blending creativity with authenticity to connect with audiences.' All this seems distinctly at odds with the tone of her main output to TikTok viewers, describing herself as a 'fashion girly' and 'your financially literate bestie'. And her USP on social media comes from that professed financial literacy: she routinely lectures young people on how to achieve wealth young and offers tips on how to emulate her savings success. And she provides links that go straight to online trading platforms to assist. Of course influencers being paid to produce or promote content for commercial organisations is nothing new - and there's no suggestion that Mia is flouting any of the rules around this practice. But when your whole personal brand is about being relatable on a financial level as you're just the same as other struggling 24 year olds, then perhaps there are issues with this. Social media marketing expert Hannah O'Donoghue Hobbs told MailOnline: 'Mia should be more transparent about how much money she is getting from these affiliated brands. 'I know she does admit to having some privileges, due to her being an influencer, which means she's been able to find things more affordable. But I believe she needs to be more loud and proud about it. 'If you're going to make a living out of posting on Instagram, shout about - literally explains every perk you're getting so you are being super real with your followers and be as open as you can be as a creator.' Mia has repeatedly spoken in videos about her plan to 'soft retire' in just 16-years time - when she turns 40 in 2041. By this, she apparently means that she will still do part time work or things she's 'passionate' about, but won't need to work full time to 'stay alive'. She added: 'I'm not underestimating the work that goes into content creating, it can be an absolute graft and to build the TikTok following she has is no joke but her income stream from paid promos etc should be made clear. 'A lot of these brands look at the numbers, rather than the actual content, and jump on board. 'It's called 'vanity metrics', it will appease board members but they sometimes don't necessarily give too much thought into what these influencers are actually posting.' WIth this underpinning goal, she tells how she has already accrued £80,000 in savings - and regularly shares insights on her frugal lifestyle which involves shunning treats like takeaways, daily coffees and croissants as well as boozy trips to the pub. She has also says that a significant part of her accrued savings had come from saving money on rent by living at home with her parents. On one of her TikTok videos she told how living at home for a year and a half after graduating from university helped her save ''50 to 70' percent of her income at the time- or £22,500. Of course, to be able to do this, it helps if the family home is a £900,000 house in a pleasant corner of Lewisham, South East London. For someone who lives her life so apparently openly online, Mia has been relatively guarded about her family but those parents are Danny McGrath, an actor and drama teacher, and mum Louise Balmain, who adopted her after she was born in China. She also has a sister, Emily. Apart from saving money from avoiding rent she also rails against wasting income on fripperies like food treats and throwaway fashion. 'These are the things I just don't spend money as a financially responsible 24-year-old who wants to retire early,' she said in one TikTok video, which has racked up more than 500,000 views. She then cites ordering food via her phone as a waste of money and says she doesn't even have the Deliveroo app on her phone: 'I won't get a takeaway if I can't be bothered to cook. If you can cook really good food, you just don't need to get a takeaway.' In a similar vein, she also says she won't treat herself to a daily coffee or a pastry: ''I don't see the point of buying one every single day. They're four or five pounds sometimes. That really adds up,' she says. She also appears to be unwilling to splash the cash on trinkets, referencing the viral 'labubu' trend - 'monster toys' that have grown popular on social media - and said she would never be caught buying one. She also doesn't buy 'extra' make-up and skincare beyond the 'capsule' collection she sticks to. She said: 'I couldn't tell you the last time I tried out a new product. I really just stick to the same routine of the same essential products and I just top up when they run out.' And when it comes to nights out, again abstemiousness is the rule, she says: 'I'm just not a big drinker. If I'm out with friends, I'll probably just have one or two.' Despite all this frugality, she is apparently now making enough money from her day job - her LinkedIn says she is a Junior Sales Account Manager for a fashion company - combined with what she calls her 'side hustles' that she can now contemplate spending £15,000 a year on rent. Because Mia has recently moved in with boyfriend Archie Steves a few months ago to a two-bedroom flat in Clapham, South London. She and Archie now pay £1250 each a month for the attractive property in London's Zone two. She says despite this big new monthly outgoing, she can still invest £1,300 in shares every month and has a dividend stock portfolio- with links so that fans can emulate her in this. She has also said she's hoping to increase her savings to £100,000 by the end of this year. Her commercial interests will certainly help.

Swansea City enlist Snoop Dogg to tease new kit and poke fun at Ryan Reynolds
Swansea City enlist Snoop Dogg to tease new kit and poke fun at Ryan Reynolds

Wales Online

time20 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Swansea City enlist Snoop Dogg to tease new kit and poke fun at Ryan Reynolds

Swansea City enlist Snoop Dogg to tease new kit and poke fun at Ryan Reynolds The Swans have offered fans a first glimpse of the new 2025/26 kit Snoop Dogg wearing the new Swansea City kit (Image: Swansea City ) First Luka Modric, now Snoop Dogg. It's already been quite the year for Swansea City, whose supporters were given a huge surprise when offered a long-awaited glimpse at the new home shirt. The club posted a snap of the rapper wearing the new kit on Saturday night, alongside a social media post from Wrexham co-owner Ryan Reynolds. ‌ Wrexham recently released their own new threads for the upcoming season, their first in the Championship since 1982. ‌ Hollywood star Reynolds posted a picture of himself wearing the latest shirt while holding a dog, with the caption: "Been waiting a year for this to make its debut - and it did not disappoint. Available NOW in the @wrexham_afc online store. Sign up to our Swansea City newsletter here. "Link in stories. Dog not included." Swansea, who don't have a derby with Cardiff City to contest this term following the Bluebirds' relegation to League One, have perhaps turned their attention to the Dragons for a bit of rivalry. Article continues below In an apparent playful dig at their north Walian counterparts, Swansea responded on social media: "Dogg included @SnoopDogg. "Nuthin' But A Wales Thang, the Jacks are ready. "We're the Pride of Wales." ‌ Content cannot be displayed without consent In a video posted a little later on in the evening, Snoop said: "Hail to Wales and to Swansea City. It's your boy big Snoop Dogg. "Coming to a hood near you. Oh yeah, these are the new jerseys." ‌ The move has predictably generated a big reaction on social media, with some speculating whether the Gin and Juice hitmaker might be about to make an investment in the club. It's not clear just how the Swans managed to get him on board with this latest announcement, although the rapper is believed to be a football fan. Indeed, he's and has actually been pictured in the kits of various clubs over the years. ‌ Burnley, Norwich City, QPR, Liverpool, Manchester United and even Cardiff are among the club whose kits he's been spotted in over the years. The Swans shirt itself is seemingly a slight update on last season's effort. Sign up to the Swansea City WhatsApp service to get breaking news and top stories sent to your phone. Here, there appears to be a retro-style circular badge, while there also appears to be a black and white tiled design as the trim on the sleeves and collar. Article continues below The release date for the new kit isn't yet known, but with the Swans set to take on Stevenage out in Spain for their opening pre-season friendly of the summer, it seems it won't be long before the players are wearing it.

EXCLUSIVE Village torn apart after woman writes '50 Shades of Grey' style erotic novel 'about her neighbours'... but 13 years later has peace broken out?
EXCLUSIVE Village torn apart after woman writes '50 Shades of Grey' style erotic novel 'about her neighbours'... but 13 years later has peace broken out?

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Village torn apart after woman writes '50 Shades of Grey' style erotic novel 'about her neighbours'... but 13 years later has peace broken out?

Most people don't like their neighbours for various petty reasons. But most people don't live in Eccleshall. In 2012, a raunchy novel about a fictional village packed with anecdotes of bed-hopping and romps in the garden was published. Rotten Row was written by a vegetarian housewife Lesley Cleary (pen name Angela Hargreaves) from Eccleshall - a quaint village in Staffordshire. And despite being advertised as a fictional tale about 'living in close proximity to some neighbours', residents of Eccleshall felt the book rang a little too true. At the time, her neighbours were furious at the portrayal of an in-fighting, sex-obsessed bunch of cranks and Mrs Cleary insisted the similarities were pure fiction. But MailOnline can reveal that Mrs Cleary, now 70, and her husband Martin - a retired mine surveyor - fled Eccleshall to live a a quiet life in the seaside town of Ilfracombe in Devon. Two years after the book was released, the couple settled down in a pretty detached Victorian home close to beaches and museums for £220,000. It appears the move spelled the end of her literary career with Mrs Cleary now preferring dog walks and gardening. The Amazon page for Angela Hargreaves still shows just the two published titles. Despite being advertised as a fictional tale about 'living in close proximity to some neighbours', residents of Eccleshall felt the book rang a little too true Rotten Row published in 2012 and Hard Times, published in 2013, the cover of which shows a naked couple doing the hoovering. Set in the fictional village of Upton Green, it promised, according to its Amazon entry, a tale of 'petty spitefulness and complexity of living in close proximity to some neighbours'. It was compared with E. L. James's saucy bestseller Fifty Shades Of Grey, and is packed with stories of bed-hopping, romps in the garden, and gossipy accounts of drunken debauchery. Unfortunately for residents of Eccleshall, everything about the book - from the names of its characters to their bickering over damsons - rang a little too true. That, at least, was the claim of Lesley's neighbours, who were furious at the portrayal of an in-fighting, sex-obsessed bunch of cranks - or, to use the book's description, the most 'bossy, gossipy, hissy, humourless, competitive bunch of Hyacinth Buckets one could ever wish not to encounter'. Lesley, however, insisted any similarities between her book and life in Eccleshall was pure coincidence.'It's fiction,' she says, matter-of-factly. 'All I know is what was in my head. Some people just want to be in the book, I don't know why. I'm the one who's upset - my characters are being hijacked. It's silly.' The saga started in 2012 when Lesley told her next-door neighbours Emma and Kevin Williams she had been writing a novel to be published online in September. Emma and Kevin shrugged off the book as a pipe dream. It wasn't until a few months later, once the book had been published online, that they heard the book's title, Rotten Row, and decided to look it up. 'I had no idea it would seem to be about life here - or that it would be so revealing,' said Emma, who had lived in Eccleshall for decades. 'It's a little village and we all get along well. Or we did.' The cover image, drawn by Lesley, shows a pretty row of cottages at the end of a village High Street. With their pastel-coloured walls, picture windows, and sloping slate roofs, they are remarkably similar to cottages at the end of Eccleshall High Street, one of which is Lesley's home. 'It's definitely our street - you only need look at it,' she concluded at the time. Lesley claimed the cover 'could be a row of terraces anywhere in the country. It may look like here, but it isn't meant to be here,' she says, crossly. 'If you look closely you'll see there is a road continuing round a corner, which doesn't happen here. And the windows are different.' She said she'd been writing the book since 2006. 'I've kept a file over the years with all sorts of snippets and bits from my life. My idea was just to write a little book that would sell a few copies - not to cause a fuss like this. I thought I'd get a few royalties for dog food.' But it wasn't long before her novel became the talk of the village. One Friday evening, a group of locals gathered in the cosy, red-walled sitting room of Brenda Chatterjee, a glamorous widow who lives in the white-washed Old Bakery next door to Emma and Kevin, to read the book on Brenda's Kindle. Soon they were compiling mental check-lists of everything that sounded familiar. The book's narrator, Louisa, enjoys interior design, and moves to Upton Green having lived in London and Hampshire - both of which apply to Lesley. Her cottage, like Lesley's, is at the end of the 'Georgian High Street' and has a pretty wrought-iron fence and side entrance. Meanwhile, the book is packed full of events that villagers say have really happened, and conversations that they've really had. They include such pulse-racers as an argument about damson-picking rights, a row over a leaking loo, and a dispute with the florist over past-their-best roses. 'It's as if she's been following us,' says Brenda. 'I feel like she's been looking at us through binoculars the whole time.' Many of the lead characters have similar names, physical characteristics or jobs to Lesley's neighbours. Brenda believes she is the inspiration for the character 'Babs', and her good friend, former company director Rob Johnson, the inspiration for Bab's lover, 'Barbour Bob'. Their neighbour Martin Ratcliffe an architect, is certain the fictional architect Declan is based on him. And Emma and Kevin, who keep chickens and grow vegetables, believe chicken-loving, veggie-growing Lucy and Jeremy are their mirror images. Gordon Dale is sure parish councillor Reg is him - they both even have matching gold teeth. Amusingly, when it came to the book's racier passages, the villagers deny any similarities at all. The book has architect Declan engaging in an illicit romp with Babs (Martin insists 'I've certainly never broken any antique beds!') and Louisa the narrator receives a sloppy, unsolicited snog from a stranger in the supermarket. Are the villagers sure they weren't imagining the similarities, and a tiny part of them rather liked being immortalised in print? 'Not at all!' says Brenda, horrified. 'I just want a quiet life. This is all so awful - it's upsetting.' Nobody answered the door at the immaculately renovated five-bed home when MailOnline visited this week. Neighbours described Leslie and Martin as a 'friendly and charming couple'. None knew of her literary past or had ever heard of the pen name Angela Hargreaves. One told MailOnline: 'I had no idea she was an author, they are nice and we've said hello a couple of times but keep themselves to themselves generally. 'I don't think there's much danger of my life being in one of those books, it'd send readers straight off to sleep.' The couple appear to have regularly visited Ilfracombe - famed for its stunning coastline, historic harbour and 66ft tall Damian Hurst statue - regularly for years before moving down. In 2008 - while she was writing Rotten Row - Leslie wrote a testimonial praising the town in the local newspaper the North Devon Journal. She wrote: 'Ilfracombe is a beautiful place with wonderful historic architecture, a museum that shouldn't be missed and the Landmark Theatre is fabulous.' Martin meanwhile has ventured into local politics, serving on the Harbour Board as well as being a site representative on the Ilfracombe Allotment and Leisure Gardens Association. In 2024 he stood unsuccessfully for the town council under the Ilfracombe First party. Meanwhile, back in Eccleshall her old neighbours have 'moved on' and brushed past the topic of their former resident author. But the original 'stars' of the novel still live on the same charming street, including Brenda Chatterjee who she believed was inspiration for the character 'Babs'. And while life in Eccleshall now seems uneventful... who knows what's going on behind closed doors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store