Noida, Greater Noida ready shelters after SC's order
While both Noida and Greater Noida officials said they have not yet received an official copy of the order, they have indicated readiness to act. Noida Authority CEO Lokesh M said the city already has shelters built in collaboration with public welfare associations. 'We will implement the order and put the stray dogs into shelters, which are already built,' he said.
Greater Noida authority's officer on special duty, Girish Kumar Jha, said his office would comment further once it had the directive in hand.
In recent months, Noida has set up new shelters in Sectors 34 and 135 to house aggressive or problematic strays from nearby residential areas.
Each facility spans at least 2,000 square metres and includes kennels, an operation theatre for sick or injured dogs, and other veterinary services. Together, they currently accommodate about 300 dogs.
Officials had earlier planned two additional shelters in Sectors 50 and 93B, but the projects were shelved due to funding constraints. Instead, work is underway on a 4-acre dog shelter and hospital to address the growing number of complaints about strays. This comes in addition to the city's older animal shelter in Sector 94, which is spread over 10 acres and already houses around 700 stray dogs -- well over its intended capacity.
Authorities estimate there are at least 100,000 stray dogs in Noida.
'Given the population size, we need a cluster approach, with each group of sectors having its own shelter away from residential areas,' said Rajiva Singh, president of the Noida Federation of Apartment Owners Associations. He suggested that resident bodies, NGOs, and civic authorities jointly manage shelter operations, feeding, and care for unwell dogs.
However, not all residents are convinced the order is workable.
'We are talking of thousands of dogs to be caught. That would in itself require a huge workforce. After that is putting them in a compound. Dogs operate in gangs and are territorial in nature, so you need 24/7 monitoring. Remember a similar diktat was given by the courts for cattle... What happened? You still see multitudes of cattle on the roads. Giving a ruling is one thing; getting it done is a totally different ball game. If they would have included culling, then I would have openly declared it a huge verdict, which would have had a great effect, but they gave a toothless ruling,' said Navneet Chandra, former apartment owners association president of Krishna Apra Residency and a pet lover.
Animal welfare groups have argued that the directive contradicts the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2023, which require sterilised and vaccinated dogs to be returned to their original territories.
'Noida over 120,000–130,000 stray dogs,' said Dr Sanjay Mahapatra, an animal activist. 'It is practically impossible to build and maintain enough shelters for such numbers. Overcrowding will cause immense suffering, spread disease, and lead to deaths. This is not public safety; it is an inhumane approach that will backfire.'
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
DU confirms over 67K UG admissions in 3rd round
Over 67,000 undergraduate admissions have been confirmed in the third round of Delhi University's (DU) admission process for the 2025–26 academic session, the university said on Wednesday. DU opened its mid-entry admission window at 5pm on August 8 for candidates who missed earlier rounds to apply for the academic session, which began on August 1. (HT Archive) According to data shared by DU, 67,582 admissions have been finalised after the release of the third Common Seat Allocation System (CSAS) list earlier in the day. The university has a total of 71,624 seats across 79 undergraduate programmes offered in 69 colleges for the current academic year. Allocations for extra-curricular activities (ECA), sports, and children and wards of university employees (CW) categories will be announced on August 15, the university said. As of Wednesday, the total number of allocations under performance-based programmes and ward quota stood at 7,061. DU opened its mid-entry admission window at 5pm on August 8 for candidates who missed earlier rounds to apply for the academic session, which began on August 1.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
The stray dog crisis is real. But the solution cannot be cruelty
Towards the end of the Mahabharata, the five Pandavas and Draupadi renounce their kingdom, wear clothes of bark and begin the arduous walk to Mount Meru. Only the most righteous gain heaven, and this is their goal. During their long walk, a stray dog tags along, as strays tend to do. One by one, each of the Pandavas drops dead because each has a flaw that makes them unfit for heaven. Only Yudhishthira, son of Dharma, reaches the gates of Heaven — with the dog. They are met by Indra, who welcomes Yudhishthira in, but tells him to leave the dog behind: 'Dogs disrupt sacrifices and offerings, make them impure. You abandoned your wife and brothers on the journey. Now abandon the dog!' To this, Yudhishthira says he would rather give up heaven than a loyal friend: 'This dog is alive and has taken refuge with me. I will not abandon one who is devoted to me. That would be a sin equal to killing a woman, robbing a Brahmin, or harming a friend.' It turns out that Dharma himself has taken on the guise of a dog. The test of integrity in this greatest of epics is a man's treatment of a stray dog. Indra tells Yudhishthira, 'King, you are the greatest of kings, with intelligence, morality and compassion. You have given up a chariot to heaven for the sake of a loyal dog. Because of this you have gained the highest heaven.' It would be futile and wrong to deny that the population of stray dogs in our country, and their capacity to cause injuries and fatal disease, is a huge problem. Other countries manage stray dogs efficiently, and we have only to look to the West or to China for two templates. The former is based on respect for non-human lives, sanity and compassion; the latter is as brutal and draconian as ethnic cleansing. India long ago opted for the former, with policies to control dog populations and make it safe for both animals and humans. Corruption, laziness, and apathy have made sure those policies failed. As a consequence, humans and animals both suffer. Stray dogs multiply, they starve, they are subjected to horrifying cruelties. Human lives are lost to rabies and the dogs die wounded and in pain. This is not a situation that ought to continue. But the solution is not an authoritarian sweeping of the streets; it needs to be more humane, knowledge-based, and measured than the recent order of the Supreme Court. It needs to take into confidence those who look after strays all over the country: Ordinary people, NGOs. A couple of years ago, there was a rabies outbreak in Ranikhet, where I live. A few dogs died of it, and panic spread. The response from the population at large was to arm itself with sickles and lathis and attack any passing dog. The solitary animal NGO here, Himalayan Tails, went around tirelessly and fearlessly netting stray dogs and vaccinating them against rabies while euthanising those that were infected. In time, the threat passed. Since there is no government sterilisation facility here, the NGO holds camps, the public contributes funds, and dogs are vaccinated, sterilised, and returned to their spots on the streets. 'Why should that stray dog come back to that locality… What's the idea behind it?' asks Justice Pardiwala. This reveals a lack of understanding about animals, most of whom, from birds to dogs, have a homing instinct embedded in their genes. Like leopards and tigers, dogs are territorial. There are legendary stories of lost dogs running alone for hundreds of miles to return home. When you propose to vacuum them from their streets and cram thousands together in cages, it is an extermination order in disguise. The dogs have no idea that a cleansing is around the corner. There they still are: Wagging their tails and trying to be friends, cadging a bit of paneer here or a biscuit there, ambling around, scrounging for scraps, trying to survive somehow, as they always have. Those who look after them have long been pilloried for caring about dogs but not for humans — as if the two are mutually exclusive. In this myopic, petty, vindictive worldview, if you care for animals you do not care for the suffering of the underprivileged or oppressed human, nor for the mother who has lost her child to rabies. Compassion for animals is seen as the lordly affectation of the privileged. I've seen how at dawn, in Kolkata, patient knots of street dogs wait — for ordinary people, who are neither rich nor privileged, to come around with tubs of food and medicines. In the worn-out parks of East Delhi, I've seen labourers share scraps of their rotis with dogs. The stray dogs of our cities have always been cared for this way rather than by the state. A starring role in the Mahabharata hasn't cut much ice for strays in the ages since. Bulls get away with goring people to death because they are holy, and when tigers turn maneater, those particular animals are tranquillised and caged. The former is protected by religious beliefs, the latter by wildlife laws. The dog has neither. It is time for that to change, for protection to be put in place for this most gentle and loyal of animals. Those who have never known the love of a dog have never known heaven. Ever since 9/11, entire human populations have been punished for acts of violence by a few. If the Supreme Court has its way, all of Delhi's strays will pay the price for the few that have caused death or disease. What should the Indian state choose: Yudhishthira's dharma or blind brutality? Roy is a writer based in Ranikhet
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Adoption law frustrating, needs to be simplified: Supreme Court
NEW DELHI: Noting that the present adoption law is too cumbersome and frustrating for adoptive parents, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said the procedure needed to be streamlined and simplified to encourage childless couples to take the legal route to adopt rather than doing it illegally. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and K V Viswanathan, which was hearing a case on the menace of child trafficking in the country, said people take illegal routes to adopt children as the adoption process takes years. It said not having children is a social stigma and such parents "want a child badly but the process is cumbersome". The total number of adoptions crossed 4,500 in 2025-26 as of March 31, the highest in 11 years. Average waiting period for adopting kids is 3.5 years However, for many prospective adoptive parents (PAPs), the process of adopting a child continues to be a challenge with an average of 3.5 years waiting period for those seeking infants and young children. The Central Adoption Resource Authority (Cara) dashboard shows there are over 36,616 PAPs across various categories registered to adopt while the number of children available for adoption is merely 2,756. "The present adoption process is taking too long. Parents want a child badly but the process is cumbersome and frustrating for them," SC said. It added the existing flaw in the system was reflected in a case that was decided by it a day before, in which four parents from Telangana had adopted children, but not as per the procedure laid down by law, and police thereafter took away custody. The court allowed the plea of the four adoptive parents and restored custody of the children - aged between a few months and three years - to them by invoking its extraordinary power under Article 142 of the Constitution. In this case, the petitioners had adopted the children after they came to know that their biological parents were not willing to keep them. They did not involve the authority concerned in the process and took custody of the children without informing it. But state the police took away the children after it came to know about the adoption, and the children were handed over to the Child Welfare Project Director and Integrated Child Protection Services.
