US Senate rejects effort to restrain Trump on Iran
US Senate Republicans on Friday blocked a Democratic resolution aimed at limiting President Donald Trump's ability to launch further military action against Iran, after US strikes targeted Iranian nuclear sites.
The resolution, which reaffirmed that congressional authorization is required before any new military engagement with Iran, was defeated in a 53-47 vote in the Republican-controlled Senate.
Republican lawmakers defended the president's actions, citing what they described as an imminent threat posed by Iran.
'Of course, we can debate the scope and strategy of our military engagements,' said Senator Bill Hagerty, a Republican. 'But we must not shackle our president in the middle of a crisis when lives are on the line.'
Trump, when asked on Friday whether he would consider further strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, responded, 'Sure, without question.'
Democrats had argued the measure was necessary to reassert congressional authority under the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 law requiring the president to consult with Congress 'in every possible instance' before deploying US forces into hostilities.
In a letter to Congress earlier this week, Trump said last weekend's strikes were 'limited in scope and purpose' and aimed at minimizing casualties, deterring further attacks and avoiding broader escalation.
Despite the heightened tensions, White House officials said the US still expects to resume diplomatic talks with Iran, although no timeline has been set.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
US Supreme Court hands Trump 'giant' win on powers of judges
US President Donald Trump hailed a "giant win" Friday, June 27, after the Supreme Court curbed lone judges from blocking the Republican's raft of controversial policies. The 6-3 ruling, with the court's liberal justices all dissenting, stemmed from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship. The court said individual district judges had likely exceeded their powers by issuing nationwide injunctions, which have also blocked a string of Trump's hardline policies on immigration, diversity and firing federal employees. "The Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law," 79-year-old Trump told a hastily arranged press conference at the White House. Trump said he would now proceed with "so many policies" that had been "wrongly" blocked, including stopping funding for transgender people and "sanctuary cities" for migrants. His initial reaction to the ruling came in a post on Truth Social, welcomed it as a "GIANT WIN." US Attorney General Pam Bondi, standing alongside Trump at the podium, said the ruling would stop "rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation." Trump separately hailed a "great ruling" by the Supreme Court to let parents opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed books at public schools. Critics say the move threatens secular education by opening the door to religious objections. 'Step toward authoritarianism' The Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order seeking to end automatic citizenship for children born on US soil. But the broader decision on the scope of judicial rulings removes a big roadblock to Trump's often highly contested policy agenda and has far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump – or future US presidents. The Supreme Court's majority decision was authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, and joined by the other five conservative justices. "Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch," wrote Barrett, who has previously been a frequent target of Trump loyalists over previous decisions that went against the president. The Supreme Court's three liberal justices dissented. Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the ruling was "nothing less than an open invitation for the government to bypass the constitution." Democrats swiftly blasted the decision, saying it would embolden Trump as he pushes the boundaries of presidential power in his second term. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called it a "terrifying step toward authoritarianism." Trump, however, rejected concerns about the concentration of power in the White House. "This is really the opposite of that," Trump said. "This really brings back the Constitution." Partner service Learn French with Gymglish Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day. Try for free Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship is just one of a number of his moves that have been blocked by district court judges around the country – both Democratic and Republican appointees - since he took office in January. 'Lawless actions' Past presidents have also complained about national injunctions shackling their agenda. But such orders have sharply risen under Trump, who saw more in his first two months than Democrat Joe Biden did during his first three years in office. The case was ostensibly about Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, which was deemed unconstitutional by courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. But it actually focused on whether a single federal district court judge has the right to issue a nationwide block to a presidential decree with a universal injunction. The issue has become a rallying cry for Trump and his Republican allies, who accuse the judiciary of impeding his agenda against the will of voters. Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship decrees that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become citizens. Trump said that the policy "was meant for the babies of slaves," dating back to the US Civil War era in the mid 1800s.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Iran condemns Trump's 'disrespectful and unacceptable' comments on Khamenei
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned Saturday, June 28, the "disrespectful and unacceptable" comments from Donald Trump, after the US president claimed to have saved Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei from an "ugly and ignominious death." "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt supporters," Araghchi posted on his X social media account. "The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults," the foreign minister said. The United States carried out strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites last weekend, with no consensus as to how effective they were. With those strikes, Washington joined Israel's bombardments of Iran's nuclear program in the 12-day conflict launched on June 13. 'Anger, hatred, and disgust' The foreign minister's condemnation on Saturday came after Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he had saved the Iranian leader from assassination, accusing Khamenei of ingratitude. "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life," Trump posted. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'" Trump also said that he had been working in recent days on the possible removal of sanctions against Iran, one of Tehran's main demands. "But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more," Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table. Iran has denied it is set to resume nuclear talks with the United States, after Trump said that negotiations would begin again next week.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
US Senate rejects effort to restrain Trump on Iran
US Senate Republicans on Friday blocked a Democratic resolution aimed at limiting President Donald Trump's ability to launch further military action against Iran, after US strikes targeted Iranian nuclear sites. The resolution, which reaffirmed that congressional authorization is required before any new military engagement with Iran, was defeated in a 53-47 vote in the Republican-controlled Senate. Republican lawmakers defended the president's actions, citing what they described as an imminent threat posed by Iran. 'Of course, we can debate the scope and strategy of our military engagements,' said Senator Bill Hagerty, a Republican. 'But we must not shackle our president in the middle of a crisis when lives are on the line.' Trump, when asked on Friday whether he would consider further strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, responded, 'Sure, without question.' Democrats had argued the measure was necessary to reassert congressional authority under the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 law requiring the president to consult with Congress 'in every possible instance' before deploying US forces into hostilities. In a letter to Congress earlier this week, Trump said last weekend's strikes were 'limited in scope and purpose' and aimed at minimizing casualties, deterring further attacks and avoiding broader escalation. Despite the heightened tensions, White House officials said the US still expects to resume diplomatic talks with Iran, although no timeline has been set.
