logo
Defence's Waiouru Housing Project Fails To Break Ground After Deal With Ngāti Rangi Falls Over, Sources Say

Defence's Waiouru Housing Project Fails To Break Ground After Deal With Ngāti Rangi Falls Over, Sources Say

Scoop12-06-2025
Article – RNZ
RNZ understands a deal with Ngti Rangi that underpinned the project fell over at the last minute.
The Defence Force's flagship project to fix up poor housing that is bad for soldiers' health has failed to break ground two years after it was funded, according to sources in Waiouru.
None of the 50 houses promised for Waiouru have been started, according to feedback from the town, which the NZDF has not disputed.
Budget 2023 earmarked the thick end of $75 million for the new houses.
A Defence tender to find a builder went out a year ago.
But on Wednesday the government said, 'Discussions regarding Waiouru are ongoing and progressing well, as part of a wider Treaty Settlement.'
Asked what the talks were about, Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk's office said, 'We don't have anything further to add outside of our existing statements currently.'
NZDF did not address what the new discussions were about either. It did not respond when asked what had happened to the project and any contract.
RNZ understands its deal with Ngāti Rangi that underpinned the housing project fell over at the last minute.
Ngāti Rangi is hosting the National Hautapu Ceremony for Matariki next week at Tirorangi Marae.
The iwi referred RNZ's questions to the NZDF.
A spokesperson for Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk, in a statement sent after the publication of this article, said the Government did not accept the suggestion any deal had fallen over.
It said in 2021 that, 'Housing is on the top of our priority list. As part of our settlement we have an arrangement with the New Zealand Defence Force out at Waiouru to build 50 homes. That project we're still working on with NZDF.'
Penk told Cabinet colleagues last year that NZDF's widespread 'dilapidated' housing was harming military output.
Defence has vacancy rates of about 30 percent and 'ten percent of personnel leave the NZDF predominantly due to the unsatisfactory working, training and living environments', he said.
Budget 2025 signalled the start of $9 billion in promised new defence spending by 2029, containing about $3 billion for 15 projects, mostly to do with weapons or IT systems.
However, the Budget provided just a fraction over the next four years to address the billion-dollar backlog in maintenance and renewals that is outstanding; past Cabinet papers gave this figure, and NZDF confirmed on Tuesday that its spending on defence regeneration was half a billion dollars behind what the 2019 plan demanded.
In August 2024, Penk expressed shock after seeing photos of black mould in Waiouru families' homes.
'No family should have to live like that, let alone the families of those who sacrifice so much to serve their country,' he said.
The temperature low in Waiouru over the last 30 days has been under one degree on 17 days.
Some housing 'poses potential health risks and can cause housing-related stress to … personnel and their families', and was linked to health conditions like asthma, a Cabinet minute in 2023 said.
The 50-house project was announced as settled a year ago, under the Te Tiriti settlement with Ngāti Rangi seven years ago.
Ruapehu district mayor Weston Kirton and his council celebrated the deal 11 months ago.
'I don't have any detail, only to say that it seems to be stalled in some shape or form,' Kirton told RNZ on Wednesday.
No building appeared to have taken place – a playground and community park were in the tender, too – and the council was not privy to why, or to Defence talks with iwi.
'The minister should give us an update on what progress there is on the Defence presence in the Waiouru community,' Kirton said.
NZDF had earlier threatened to shut up shop entirely at the central North Island settlement and head south, so he had been delighted when the settlement secured the army's training area and the housing deal began to firm up.
'It was all go,' Kirton told RNZ.
'They were very excited, they wanted to retain the training area at Waiouru.
'We were excited, the fact that they were going to put resouces back into Waiouru.'
On Wednesday, Penk initially made no comment at all about Waiouru, then, when prompted again by RNZ, provided a single line about the 'discussions'.
Shortly before that, in a longer statement, he had said, 'The government is improving accommodation for our sailors, soldiers and aviators by addressing decades of underinvestment, which has left Defence housing stock in poor condition.'
Penk referred in that statement to projects in Devonport, Trentham and Manawatū, but not Waiouru, even though Waiouru had the lion's share of Budget 2023's tranche one funding for housing upgrades.
'The Waiouru New Build Housing is one of the first projects implemented under the Homes for Families Programme,' said its tender.
Two months ago on Facebook, Penk posted – next to a headline '$12 billion for a stronger NZ' cheering the defence capability plan released in April – that: 'This Government is rebuilding the Defence Force after decades of underfunding.'
'Defence housing, messing and dining spaces are going to benefit from fresh investment.
'Our military personnel deserve healthy and modern spaces to live and rest in while they serve our country.'
The 50-house Waiouru deal was designed to signal the starter's gun on a half-billion-dollar upgrade of the army camp over the next 25 years, and of an overall $3 billion overhaul of 1600 defence houses countrywide.
Most of those required 'upgrading urgently', past Cabinet papers said.
Penk a year ago told a Cabinet committee the estate was a 'critical enabler of military effect; providing the working, training and living environments required for generating and maintaining defence outputs'.
'The dilapidated condition of the NZDF estate is evident everywhere, but mainly in the living and training environments, and with utilities such as power, water supply and sanitation.'
A 2024 estimate put deferred maintenance at $480m across the estate, which includes not just houses but other facilities.
Some 'critical' defence assets were so poor in some places that a 'wholesale shutdown of operations at that location may be needed', Penk stated.
The NZDF's annual report a year earlier had said 99 percent of its houses met Healthy Homes standards.
Asked how that was possible given what Cabinet had been told, NZDF told RNZ: 'Healthy Homes compliance does not address the state of NZDF's barracks or working accommodation and does not necessarily address whether a home is aged, fit for purpose and or in an accelerated state of deterioration.'
Penk had said in August 2024 that funding was constrained but the government was looking at options for improving the housing.
Earlier, Budget 2024 funded 35 leased homes at Devonport Naval Base.
New initiatives in Budget 2025 funded just $4m of capital and $16m for housing over four years. More would be added 'once the business case is approved by Cabinet', NZDF said.
The business case related to a revision of its 2019 estate regeneration plan to fit a 2024-2040 timeline.
This had to be revised, in part, to 'address consequences of insufficient funding since the 2019 business case', official papers said.
'The business case is still being drafted and Cabinet's decision on it will be released when that occurs in the next couple of months,' it told RNZ.
NZDF mentioned about $30m for upgrades at Devonport Naval base, but this does not appear to be for housing.
Budget 2025 also had $120m for depreciated funding of estate assets. It put $26m into deferred maintenance this year, and $104m over four years, against the $480m backlog.
Penk said in his statement that three construction contracts and a future lease agreement had been signed for 61 new homes with Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei on Auckland's North Shore, and to lease additional houses in Sunnybrae.
A new tender signalled 'more housing solutions will be sought this year, including at Trentham and in the Manawatū', he said.
Budgets 2023 and 2024 provided $75.4m capital and a total $17.1m over four years, Defence said. This included a renovation pilot for 13 properties at Burnham, Linton and Ohakea.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cabinet paper leak suggests Minister Nicole McKee's U-turn on alcohol sales reform
Cabinet paper leak suggests Minister Nicole McKee's U-turn on alcohol sales reform

RNZ News

time27 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Cabinet paper leak suggests Minister Nicole McKee's U-turn on alcohol sales reform

Associate Justice Minister, ACT's Nicole McKee, is reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A leaked Cabinet paper shows the government was planning to restrict the hours bottle stores and supermarkets could sell alcohol but then backed away to focus on reforms more friendly to the alcohol industry. The Associate Justice Minister - ACT's Nicole McKee - is reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act and had said that part of her focus would be reducing alcohol harm, which currently costs the country $9.1 billion a year. But documents leaked to RNZ, including a draft Cabinet paper, suggest the minister is now switching the focus of her reforms to making business easier for the alcohol industry. The documents show McKee initially proposed to change off-licence sale hours, from the current 7am to 11pm, to only allow alcohol sales between 9am and 9pm. The draft Cabinet paper says restricting opening hours could have had a major impact on violent crime - preventing 2400 "violent victimisations" each year. But that move has now been axed. A Ministry of Justice email, also leaked to RNZ, shows justice officials "were directed by Minister McKee to proceed with speed to lodge a revised Cabinet paper" to go before a Cabinet committee on 13 August. "The focus of the paper had changed during negotiations - it is now on reducing regulatory burden with some of the harm reduction measures no longer included - e.g. reducing maximum default trading hours." McKee told RNZ it was regrettable her draft Cabinet paper was leaked. "I won't be discussing a few cherry-picked parts of a draft paper through the media before I've even had an opportunity to discuss the issue with my Cabinet colleagues," she said in a statement to RNZ. "I am extremely disappointed that a draft Cabinet paper has been shared with media. This undermines the integrity of the public service and erodes New Zealanders' trust in public servants." The draft Cabinet paper says restricting opening hours could have had a major impact on violent crime. Photo: RNZ The leaks show that in an early version of her Cabinet paper, McKee proposed to restrict bottle store opening hours to between 9am and 9pm in a bid to reduce violent crime. "I am focused on hazardous drinking which can lead to violent crime. Evidence shows a strong correlation between later opening hours for off-licenses and violent crime," the Cabinet paper originally said. "Ministry of Justice analysis indicates that bringing forward the closing hour to 9pm could see up to 2400 fewer violent victimisations annually." The paper said restricting opening hours would reduce sales revenue for off-licences, as about 20 percent of sales were made between 8pm and 11pm and about 2 percent before 9am. The paper originally said the impacts on business had been "weighed carefully" against the benefits of reducing violent crime. But the leaks show this was changed in a later version. "I am not proposing any changes to the maximum trading hours for license holders," McKee wrote in the updated paper, noting Auckland and Christchurch had already set a 9pm closing time under their Local Alcohol Policies. "I consider that this is sufficient to manage concerns around license hours." McKee would not be interviewed by RNZ, but confirmed her reforms would now focus on making it easier for businesses in the alcohol industry. "My focus is on reducing red tape restricting businesses and New Zealanders who play by the rules. The law Labour left us with is a mess," she said. The draft Cabinet paper obtained by RNZ shows McKee is now proposing to make it easier for clubs and bars to serve alcohol outside normal trading hours when screening major sport or cultural events. McKee's Cabinet paper also proposes giving the alcohol industry more power when faced with objections to liquor licenses. The paper says changes in 2023 allowed any person or group to oppose a liquor license but that McKee wants to overturn this so objections only come from the community impacted. "To better balance community voice and impacts on business I seek agreement to only allow objections to licensing applications by people or groups and organisations in the same territorial authority as the premises." There are also moves to protect businesses impacted by changes to a council's Local Alcohol Policy (LAP) - where communities determine when and how alcohol is sold. "To protect existing businesses if a LAP is adopted or amended I also seek agreement to prevent a DLC (District Licensing Committee) from declining a renewal application if the license would be inconsistent with the relevant LAP." The changes would also give applicants for a liquor license a right of reply to objections received in DLC hearings. Andrew Galloway. Photo: supplied Andrew Galloway, executive director of Alcohol Healthwatch, funded by the Ministry of Health, said reducing trading hours for bottlestores and supermarkets would have had a major impact on reducing alcohol harm. "Off-licences sell over 80 percent of alcohol in Aotearoa and these off-licenses are over-concentrated in the most deprived areas. Restricting off-license supply of alcohol would be especially important in reducing alcohol-related harm." Galloway said that when he became aware the government was looking at restricting off-license trading hours he said to his team "we should prepare for a U-turn" once industry lobbying swung into action. "We will continue to miss every meaningful opportunity to reduce or prevent alcohol harm in New Zealand if we continue to allow unbridled access to power for harmful commodity industries." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Green Light For Garden Sheds And Garages
Green Light For Garden Sheds And Garages

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

Green Light For Garden Sheds And Garages

Minister for Regulation Hon Chris Penk Minister for Building and Construction Thanks to the Red Tape Tipline homeowners building garden sheds, sleepouts, or garages will face less red tape and fewer delays by the end of this year, Regulation Minister David Seymour and Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk say. Cabinet has agreed to remove the minimum required distance between single storey buildings under 10 square metres and a property boundary or other residential building (setback distance). Cabinet has also agreed to reduce the setback distance to one metre for single storey buildings between 10 and 30 square metres. Previously, garden sheds and other single storey detached buildings like sleep outs or garages had to be as far from a boundary or residential building as they were tall. Anything closer than that required building consent. 'We've heard the frustration about this regulation through the Red Tape Tipline. Section sizes are shrinking, and the cost of living rising. Forcing people to put sheds in the middle of their lawn or pay for a consent to store tools doesn't make sense. 'There is no justification for such generous setback distances on private property. 'Today's housing market means space is tight and building costs are high. These types of property developments are practical and affordable improvements. We want people to be able to utilise them without hassle. 'We're acting on the tips we get through the red tape tipline by removing regulation and making it easier for Kiwis to get things done. We want to hear about red tape like this that's getting in the way – I encourage anyone with a red tape issue to report it on the Ministry for Regulation website.' The changes will make it easier and cheaper for property owners to build useful structures like: · Garden sheds for storing tools and bikes · Sleepouts or hobby spaces · Small garages or workshops 'This Government is relentlessly focused on making it easier and more affordable to build,' Mr Penk says. 'We don't believe Kiwis should be bogged down in bureaucracy when making practical use of their own backyard. 'By the end of the year, homeowners will be able to put up a small shed or garage closer to their boundary or another building without needing a consent. 'That's a real win for anyone short on space, giving them more freedom to add a bike shed, protect their tools, cover a vehicle, or even create a small sleepout for guests – all without extra paperwork. 'Frustration with the building consent system is one of the top issues flagged to the Red Tape Tipline. It's great to see action that cuts through delays and makes life easier for everyday Kiwis'. These changes are expected to be in force by late 2025. Notes: · Garden sheds and other small structures up to 30 square metres can be built without building consent, provided they meet certain criteria. · Currently, one of the criteria requires a garden shed be the same distance from any boundary or another building as its own height. If not, homeowners need a building consent. · Changes to the exemption conditions will: o Allow homeowners to build single storey detached buildings between 10 and 30 square metres in floor area one metre away from any boundary or another building without a building consent. o Remove the current setback requirement for building consent exemption for single-storey structures under 10 square metres, meaning a shed can be built up to the boundary or another building without a building consent. · These changes will be made by amending Schedule 1 of the Building Act. · Homeowners will still need to ensure that all building work is compliant with the Building Code and local district plans.

Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco
Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

Taranaki Regional Councillors Urged To Quit Election Over Treaty Principles Fiasco

Article – RNZ Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting. , Taranaki Whanganui regional correspondent Councillors involved in quashing debate over the Treaty Principles Bill at the Taranaki Regional Council have received a dressing down at a fiery meeting in Stratford. Council was considering a report which found councillors colluded not to make a submission on the bill and halt debate. New Plymouth District Councillor Dinnie Moeahu – whose deputation was shunted down the agenda in December – addressed council today in front of whanau and supporters. 'What unfolded that day was absolutely disgusting and shameful. I witnessed some elected members bully their way to getting what they wanted. 'And now your conduct has been extensively investigated, documented, reviewed and condemned and made public for the world to see.' He said what happened was not just a breach of process, but a breach of trust and the fundamental democratic and cultural responsibilities the TRC was obligated to uphold. Moeahu said a submission prepared by TRC which expressed concern about the Treaty Principles Bill was abruptly dismissed without discussion. 'Let's not mince words that was not governance, that was cowardice hiding behind collusion.' He said the offending councillors attempt to brush-off their actions as a miscommunication didn't wash with him. 'I was met with contempt, I was made to feel less.' Moeahu said the TRC had statuary obligations to take the Treaty of Waitangi into account and it had partnering with Māori explicitly enshrined as a strategic priority in its long-term plan. 'This isn't a training issue. It's an absolute failure in governance. When elected members treat Treaty matters as too political or not appropriate you betray your role.' He hoped the point of reckoning the report represented could be a turning point for the TRC. 'Leadership is a privilege you have been afforded… do better Taranaki Regional Council.' Dinnie Moeahu's father Peter – an iwi appointee to the council's Policy and Planning Committee – also made a deputation and took aim at councillors by name. 'People who spout democracy but connive behind closed doors to suppress it. 'People like councillor (Tom) Cloke, councillor Donald McIntrye and councillor (Neil) Walker who used their privilege position to bully the regional council chair and chief executive into submission at the December 10 meeting.' Peter Moeahu said whether the councillors adopted the report or not he would not trust them or forgive them for how they treated his son. He called on them to withdraw from the local government elections. 'Our community deserves better, our community deserves people who are open-minded, environmentally focussed … and willing to have a meaningful and open relationship with hapū, iwi and manuwhenua. 'My recommendation? Withdraw from the ballot.' At the closing of his deputation, the Moeahu whānau performed an impassioned haka. Council chief executive Steve Ruru then spoke briefly to the report which he authored. He reminded the council of its findings that the Treaty Principles Bill was relevant to TRC business and to make a submission and debate it appropriately. 'One of the big learnings coming out of this is that process issue again which is highlighted in there and obviously there are a range of recommendations made.' Taranaki Māori Constituency councillor Bonita Bingham believed council had underestimated 'the impact of the trampling of our mana' events of December had for Māori. 'I really thank Peter and Dinnie for their kōrero today because their words expressed what many of us are feeling. 'I would like all councillors to deeply reflect on the actions and collusion and predetermination that lead to the decision on December 10. 'This was no miscommunication this was a deliberate attempt to squash our voice.' After sitting in stoney silence Donald McIntyre was the only one of the three councillors directly under fire to speak during the meeting. 'Obviously I've upset some people with my actions and I'm sorry they feel aggrieved.' McIntyre acknowledge that it was correct the Treaty Principles Bill submission was on the December agenda. But he said if Dinnie Moeahu being shunted down the agenda was a problem someone should have raised it at the time. 'I have yet to see any reference of standing orders being breached and like I say if they were they weren't highlighted at the time.' McIntyre believed the procedures used on the day were appropriate and democratic because they were all voted on in an open meeting. 'Morally we may have been better to have discussed the item that is probably something we can reflect on in the future, but I still stand by the decision we made at the time.' McIntyre said iwi council relations had not been set back significantly 'there hasn't been a good relationship in the first instance'. That fired up councillor Susan Hughes. 'I find it extraordinary that you are sitting here today trying to justify what wasn't in fact and never could be justified. 'You set out to exclude myself and councillor Bingham from being involved in any of this. That was the plan and that was the plan that was executed. 'You undermined the integrity of this organisation by behaving as you did.' Council voted to adopt the report and all its recommendations with McIntyre voting against the motion. Following the meeting, Walker said he would not be withdrawing from the local government elections in October. 'I think we're done with this. We've done our thing and we'd like to draw a conclusion over it and put it aside.' He denied any collusion had ever occurred. 'As far as I'm concerned there was no meetings or any of those things. There was discussion at meetings like today but not meetings.' Walker was not inclined to apologise. 'What for?' Cloke declined to comment on whether he would pull out of the election race. McIntyre was not standing for re-election. He accepted councillors had colluded ahead of the December meeting. 'What's new about that? Of course we did, like I say, when we elect a chairman we collude before the meeting, is there something wrong with that.' McIntyre made an apology of sorts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store