Relief for Arjun Rampal: Bombay HC quashes 'cryptic' non- bailable arrest warrant in 2019 tax evasion case
The Bombay High Court, on Thursday, quashed a non-bailable warrant issued against Bollywood actor Arjun Rampal in a 2019 tax evasion case, noting that the order was 'cryptic' and passed 'without application of mind.'
Vacation judge Justice Advait M Sethna hearing the case, noted that the order against Arjun Rampal is 'a cryptic order which lacks application of mind,' which "would cause prejudice to the petitioner in the given the facts and circumstances as he would face an order of non bailable warrant in a case of bailable offence,' Bar and Bench reported.
Arjun Rampal had approached the High Court seeking relief from a December 2019 order of the Mazgaon Magistrate, which ordered for the issue of a non-bailable warrant against him in a case initiated by the Income Tax (IT) Department.
Arjun Rampal, known for his roles in movies such as Don (2006), Om Shanti Om (2007), and Raajneeti (2010), is facing prosecution under Section 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which pertains to willful attempts to evade tax payments. It carries a maximum sentence of three years, and is bailable in nature.
The Income Tax Department had accused the actor of deliberately dodging a tax bill of ₹ 42.41 lakh for the assessment year 2016–17. According to Arjun Rampal however, upon receiving the notice, production giant Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd —which had hired him—stepped in and cleared ₹ 32.40 lakh on his behalf on May 13, 2018. Still, the IT Department wasn't convinced. On February 12, 2019, they froze Rampal's HDFC Bank account and issued a stern warning to the bank manager: no transactions were to go through, as per legal news agency Live Law.
During the hearing at the Bombay High Court, Arjun Rampal argued that no bail conditions had been imposed earlier, and the warrant was a violation of procedure.
Justice Advait Sethna found merit in Rampal's arguments, observing that the trial court's order was 'cryptic' and prejudicial. The High Court quashed the warrant, noting that the proceedings lacked legal justification given the bailable nature of the offence.
The matter is now listed for hearing on June 16, 2025, reported Live Law and Bar and Bench.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bengaluru stampede: Justice D'Cunha Commission told to focus on events at M. Chinnaswamy stadium
The seven-point Terms of Reference (ToR) for the one-man judicial inquiry commission of former High Court judge Michael D'Cunha to probe the stampede that killed 11 persons limits the scope of the inquiry to happenings at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium, and not the entire celebrations in Bengaluru on June 4. The police have argued that the open-air event on the grand steps of the Vidhana Soudha, organised by the government of Karnataka and Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), followed by the unilateral announcement by the RCB of a victory parade despite denial of permission by the police, brought lakhs of people to the streets, eventually causing overcrowding and stampede at the stadium. The ToR asks the Justice D'Cunha Commission to probe whether required permissions and clearances were obtained, and norms followed, while organising the event at M. Chinnaswamy stadium, based on the sequence of events what and who all were culpable for the stampede that killed 11 persons at the stadium, and precautionary measures taken to prevent such a mishap at the stadium, and lapses, if any, and whoever is responsible for the same. The commission has also been told to recommend measures to be taken to prevent such mishaps in the future. The government order constituting the inquiry commission under The Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, asks the commission to submit its report within one month, and also authorises Justice D'Cunha to rope in a retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officer and a retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer for technical and legal help, if needed.
Hans India
9 hours ago
- Hans India
Tight security for Bakrid celebrations
Rajamahendravaram: In view of Bakrid (Eid-ul-Adha) festival on Saturday, elaborate security arrangements have been made across the district, particularly at major mosques and Eidgahs, said District Superintendent of Police D Narasimh Kishore. Speaking after a coordination meeting with religious leaders on Friday, the SP stressed the need to uphold communal harmony and urged everyone to cooperate in maintaining law and order. Stating that special surveillance through solar-powered cameras and drones will be deployed, he assured that the police are fully prepared to ensure the festival is celebrated in a peaceful atmosphere. 'Muslims should celebrate Bakrid joyfully with their families,' he wished. Any attempt to disturb harmony through provocative speeches or objectionable posts on social media will invite strict legal action, he warned. The SP further clarified that illegal transportation of animals will not be tolerated. 'We are strictly implementing the directives of the High Court regarding cow slaughter. Any violation of these orders will lead to severe consequences,' he stated. He also mentioned that nodal officers have been instructed to promptly respond to complaints and enforce the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition of Cow Slaughter and Animal Preservation Act-1977, Animal Transport Rules-1978, The Animal Transport (Amendment) Rules-2001 and Slaughter House Rules-2001. Citizens are encouraged to report any information related to cow slaughter or illegal transport of cattle by calling 112. The identity of informants will be kept strictly confidential, the SP assured.
Hans India
9 hours ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court slaps notice on KTR over alleged Musi scam
Hyderabad: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to KT Rama Rao in the case related to the BRS leader's allegations of corruption by the Congress government to the tune of Rs 25,000 crore in Musi. A hearing was held in the Supreme Court on Friday on the petition filed by Congress leader Atram Suguna. A bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma heard the petition. Rama Rao had previously alleged that the Congress government had committed a scam of Rs 25,000 crore in the name of Musi rejuvenation. Expressing strong objection to the allegations made by KTR, Congress leader Atram Suguna filed a complaint at the Utnur police station. The police registered a case against KTR based on the complaint of the Congress leader. KTR had earlier approached the Telangana High Court to quash the case registered against him. After hearing the arguments, the High Court gave a verdict quashing the FIR registered against KTR. However, Suguna filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the High Court verdict. The hearing on this was held on Friday and the Supreme Court issued notices to KTR asking him to reply to the petition.
