
School board past colors Scranton Democratic mayoral primary election
SCRANTON — The race for city mayor has raised issues of transparency, fairness and residency.
Incumbent Democratic Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti faces in the May 20 primary Scranton Democratic Party Chairman Bob Sheridan. Two Republicans, Patricia 'Trish' Beynon and Lynn Labrosky, are running against each other for the GOP nomination.
Scranton's first female mayor, Cognetti switched from Democratic to independent for the 2019 special election to fill the unexpired term of corrupt former Democratic Mayor Bill Courtright and won that crowded race. She sought reelection in 2021 as a Democrat to a full, four-year term and handily defeated Republican Darwin Shaw.
Seeking reelection to another four-year term, Cognetti has cited as achievements her stewardship in improving city finances and stabilizing budgets, restoring integrity at City Hall, modernizing processes and upgrading technology, helping local businesses and improving parks throughout the city. While challenges remain, the city has been on the right track, she contends.
The challengers, in their own ways, think the city is not on the right track in areas including crime, blight and taxes. The Republicans have refrained from fighting each other and have focused on Cognetti's tenure. During debates April 22 at the University of Scranton, the three challengers also separately raised as issues transparency, fairness and residency. Sheridan and Labrosky each stress they are lifelong city residents, while Beynon has lived in the city for over 34 years. Cognetti, a native of Beaverton, Oregon, made Scranton her home in 2016, about two years after earning her MBA from Harvard Business School.
School board bad blood
Previous challengers tried to paint Cognetti as an opportunistic interloper using City Hall as a stepping stone to higher office. Sheridan raised that opinion during the debate.
Cognetti and Sheridan both previously served on the Scranton School Board, though not at the same time. Sheridan, a former eight-year member on the school board, lost in the 2017 primary and his second term ended Dec. 4, 2017. He was board president in his final two years.
In October 2017, then-Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale issued a scathing audit of the Scranton School District that he called the worst he'd ever seen. The audit sharply criticized the district's poor financial condition and its bus contract payment of $26.1 million to Dunmore-based DeNaples Transportation over a 10-year period, including more than $4 million in questionable fuel surcharges.
In mid-December 2017, the school board voted 8-0 to appoint Cognetti to fill the last two years of a vacancy. At that time, her MBA and experience as an adviser at the U.S. Treasury and an investment adviser at Goldman Sachs made her a strong candidate to help the financially struggling school district.
She resigned from the school board in December 2018 to become a special assistant with an emphasis on school transportation contracts in the state Auditor General's Office. During her year on the school board, Cognetti questioned the legitimacy of the district's no-bid busing contract that was highlighted in DePasquale's audit. Board members viewed her contributions as helping increase transparency and accountability.
At the April 22 debate, Sheridan cited comments Cognetti made on an April 10 podcast that 'she blamed me for … forging a contract.'
During the podcast by The Philadelphia Citizen titled 'How to Really Run a City, Powered by Accelerator for America, Where Local Matters,' Cognetti spoke of her motivations in joining the school board and running for mayor, as well as her tenure so far and seeking reelection. She recalled how in 2017 she was reading in the newspaper about 'this corruption on our school board and in our school district,' and how she then spent 2018 on the board pushing for reforms. Then, Courtright's resignation in disgrace in 2019 also pointed to an 'unfortunate culture of corruption' in Northeast Pennsylvania, and she ran for mayor and won. Now, her primary election challenger is 'the school board president who just drained that district and gave health care to non-employees and forged bus contracts, things like that, he's running against me in the primary,' she said on the podcast, without mentioning Sheridan by name.
During the debate between the Democrats, Sheridan said he'd like to see her back up that assertion of him forging bus contracts. In an interview Wednesday, Sheridan said he never forged a bus contract.
'Absolutely wrong. Lie,' Sheridan said. 'She outright lied. Outright lied. There was no evidence, ever. … She's trying to run on what happened to Bill Courtright and now putting me in that pail. Not right. Not right at all.'
In an interview Thursday, Cognetti said, 'Bob was the president of the school board at a time when there was false billing for auto maintenance, there was non-employee health care, there were no-bid bus contracts and addendums to those bus contracts that were not procured, which was not legal. The district at the time had a financial adviser who was pulling in a commission-based payment to the tune of over $2 million in the course of four years. Bob Sheridan was the school board president when all of this happened. In the case of the health care and the auto maintenance bills, two people pleaded guilty to felonies in that. Sheridan was the board president at that time and it's interesting that he's trying to rewrite history. We're not going to let him do that.'
Sheridan stressed he was never charged with forgery. Asked by The Times-Tribune if he committed forgery, Cognetti said, 'Bob Sheridan was president of the school board when a host of bills and contracts and documents went through the school board that allowed criminal activity to happen.'
Residency rumors
During the debate at two different times, Sheridan asked Cognetti whether she would serve out the full term if elected and whether she has lived in Scranton during her entire time as mayor. She did not reply to either question. During the first question, the moderator asked Sheridan, 'are you finishing your response,' and then moved on to another topic. During the second question, the moderator said, 'There won't be questions between the candidates' and 'Questions between the candidates will not be answered,' because the candidates agreed beforehand to rules of the debate that included not questioning each other.
On Thursday, Cognetti said she has lived in the city since 2016. Regarding contentions otherwise, she said, 'It's been a false rumor for years. It's a very, very silly thing.'
As for whether she would serve out another full term, Cognetti was noncommittal.
'I am running again because we have a great deal of more work to do. We have come a very, very long way from the disappointment of the former mayor, the disappointment of corruption in our area. People don't want corruption. They want good government.'
Sheridan several times during the debate noted he is a retired city police officer and he knows what being an officer entails.
Cognetti said of him, 'This is also a person who was involved in 'Exam Scam' (a conspiracy to rig city civil service tests) in the Police Department testing in 1985. People have not forgotten that. He can try to rewrite history as much as he wants but we're just going to do what the people of Scranton want, which is to run good, clean government.'
Sheridan said he was a victim in Exam Scam and he passed the test fair and square.
'That was 40 years ago. I was just a victim like everybody else. There was 20 police officers. I took the test honestly, passed the test honestly. Nobody went to jail for that, no police officers went to jail. There was nothing (there) — it was administrative,' Sheridan said. 'There were 20 police officers, highly decorated officers, retired now most of them, living a happy life with their pensions, with their families. She's trying to make me into that whole 'back room boys.' I'm not.'
Sheridan has recused himself as chairman of the city Democratic Committee while he runs for mayor.
Financial transparency
Beynon, who has lived in the city for over 34 years, is an accounting executive with Don Scartelli Construction Services and General Contractors of West Scranton. Her job includes managing the entire office, including preparing and submitting city and state documents, overseeing budgets, processing payroll, balancing the company's books and executing and submitting bids for construction projects, according to candidate background information posted online by the university for last month's debate.
The Cognetti administration and the Scartelli firm have battled in court in recent years in two lawsuits involving renovation of the former Serrenti Army Reserve Center at Pine Street and Colfax Avenue, the Novembrino Splash Park in West Side, the South Tower of City Hall and the Capouse Splash Pad and Playground Project. The city sued the firm in 2023 to rescind the Serrenti Center contract with Scartelli, and that lawsuit referenced disputes over the Novembrino and South Tower projects. Last year, Ralph Scartelli sued the city over its rejecting the low bid of $1.99 million from the Scartelli firm for the Capouse project. This lawsuit aimed to prevent the city from awarding the contract to a different bidder, and the city agreed to rebid the project. The rebid held last month split the project into two parts.
The city and the Scartelli firm were working on a joint settlement of both cases as recently as Thursday, according to a court scheduling order.
During the debate between the Republican candidates, Beynon cited as a top priority transparency, saying, 'We don't know where all the money is going in the city of Scranton. … I would say have an audit of the city of Scranton to find out where the money is going. If we do a complete audit, we'll have a better understanding of where the money is going … something is going on behind closed doors, we need to find out what that is.'
The city has an annual audit done.
In an interview Wednesday, Beynon — who is engaged to Don Scartelli — said she'd like to see more details of finances and spending in annual budgets and audits, 'to break it down more so people could see more what's happening.' She also expressed frustration with what she believes have been unfair bidding processes.
Cognetti replied Thursday that city budgets and audits are available on the city website. The administration also presents annual proposed budgets in detail to Scranton City Council during caucuses.
'Our administration is the most transparent administration that Scranton has ever seen,' Cognetti said. 'We came in because of a lack of transparency, as was the case with the Scranton School District, when I got a board seat there to try to clean things up.'
Funding fairness
The city received $68.7 million under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the debate, Labrosky, who along with her husband owns Labrosky's Automotive Service Center in South Scranton, found fault with the city's handling of the federal funds.
'I don't believe that that money was maybe managed as it could have been,' Labrosky said. 'We had applied for an ARPA grant for our business and we did not qualify for that grant, even though we qualified in every way, except at the end we were told we could not get the grant because we didn't have an occupancy permit.' She continued: 'Not funding a small business just because they don't have an occupancy permit doesn't make sense because there's things in place in Scranton, like grandfather laws and things like that, that could have helped with that.'
The Labroskys bought the garage in 2012, according to the candidate background posted by the university. In an interview Wednesday, Labrosky said the couple applied last year to the city for a matching grant from ARPA funds to install new windows at the business, to recoup half of the total $10,000 cost. She spent weeks preparing the application but only found out at the end they didn't qualify for lack of a certificate of occupancy. When they bought the building, the garage was the same use as the prior owner and they were 'grandfathered in' and did not need a certificate of occupancy, she said. Labrosky said she suggested 'why not give money to help such those (grandfathered) businesses to mitigate to get up to code' to qualify for an occupancy permit.
Cognetti said she could not speak specifically to Labrosky's ARPA grant application, but the city contributed almost $5 million in grants during the COVID years to help small businesses stay afloat. 'We are very proud of what we were able to do to help small businesses,' Cognetti said. 'We have very specific processes. We want to make sure that all of our recipients have all of their documents in order. We make sure everybody is all paid up on their taxes. We certainly want everything to be right from a code enforcement perspective. We're very particular. We have very high standards and we were successful in pushing out quite a lot of rescue plan dollars to help keep our economy going and keep family businesses afloat.'
The winners of the primary will advance to the Nov. 4 general election.
*
Scranton Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, at left, and Bob Sheridan, Democratic candidates for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election, shown during a debate on April 22, 2025 at the University of Scranton. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
*
Patricia 'Trish' Beynon, at left, and Lynn Labrosky, Republican candidates for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election, shown during a debate on April 22, 2025 at the University of Scranton. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
*
Scranton Mayor-Elect Paige Gebhardt Cognetti at Scranton City Hall in Scranton on Nov. 7, 2019.
*
Robert 'Bob' Sheridan, candidate in the 2025 Democratic primary election for mayor of Scranton. (PHOTO SUBMITTED / COURTESY OF BOB SHERIDAN)
*
Patricia 'Trish' Beynon, Republican candidate for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
*
Lynn Labrosky, Republican candidate for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election. (PHOTO PROVIDED / COURTESY OF LYNN LABROSKY)
*
Current mayor Paige Cognetti reacts to comments from candidate Bob Sheridan during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Democratic candidate Bob Sheridan responds to a question during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Republican candidate Patricia Beynon responds to questions during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Republican candidate Lynn Labrosky responds during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Show Caption
1 of 10
Scranton Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, at left, and Bob Sheridan, Democratic candidates for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election, shown during a debate on April 22, 2025 at the University of Scranton. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
Expand
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break.
Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break. | Opinion The knives are now out inside the Democratic Party. And the party is bleeding, not only Americans' support and trust but also its last remaining drops of honesty and truth. Show Caption Hide Caption Karine Jean-Pierre talks exit from Democratic party in new book Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre talks about leaving the Democratic party in her upcoming book slated for release in October. The Democratic Party continues to self-destruct, and I am here for it. Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has teased a tell-all memoir about former President Joe Biden and the administration she served for nearly three years. 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines' is stoking claims that Jean-Pierre is a grifter, profiting off her time in the administration by trashing the former president and the political party that gave her prominence. Knives are out among Democrats for one of their own who has now betrayed them. Like other books that have recently exposed details about Biden's poor health, Jean-Pierre's book raises questions about the White House cover-up that attempted to hide the president's mental and physical decline from voters. It also calls into question Jean-Pierre's honesty: Why did she wait until now, when she can profit from it, to tell the truth about the former commander in chief? Former White House colleagues turn on former Biden press secretary Democrats are now a minority party in America. The GOP controls the White House, the Senate and the U.S. House along with a majority of governor's offices and state legislatures. The Democratic Party has lost Americans' trust because of its leaders' penchant for gaslighting, not just about Biden's health but also on issues like immigration, border security and the economy. Jean-Pierre, who now claims to be an independent, certainly isn't helping her former colleagues rebuild that lost trust. Details from the book are still sketchy, but Jean-Pierre should provide readers with an inside look at what happened after Biden's disastrous debate with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump a year ago this month. Jean-Pierre's coworkers have already reacted to the book with contempt. "Former colleagues expressed confusion at how Jean-Pierre seemingly intends to paint Biden as a victim while pinning her own decision to leave the party on his 'broken' White House," Politico reported, citing multiple former Biden administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. Opinion: Biden's cancer diagnosis raises the question: Was he ever in good enough health? Caitlin Legacki, a Democratic strategist who worked on the Commerce Department's communications team during Biden's presidency, took umbrage with Jean-Pierre's assertion that the Democratic Party betrayed Biden. 'Kamala Harris and the entire Biden/Harris campaign did hero's work to avoid losing 400 electoral votes and giving Republicans a supermajority in Congress, which is what would have happened if he stayed on the ticket,' Legacki told Politico. 'It's more productive to focus on that, and thank Biden for doing the responsible thing by stepping aside, than it is to pretend this was an unwarranted act of betrayal.' But party insiders continuing to squabble over whether a now former president was or was not betrayed by fellow Democrats entirely misses the larger point. Opinion: Guess who Americans want to run the economy? Hint − it's not Democrats. Far too many Democrats, Jean-Pierre included, worked hard to deceive Americans. Their willful lack of self-awareness about their gaslighting and dishonesty is why the party has shown no signs of recovering from the last disastrous election cycle. Karine Jean-Pierre's book about Biden isn't the first Jean-Pierre's book will be far from the first to address the deception at the heart of the Biden White House. On May 20, journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson released "Original Sin," which describes in detail Biden's cognitive decline and the mind-boggling efforts with which his inner circle and the Democratic Party tried to hide the truth from Americans. Opinion: Texas woman's death would have been prevented if Biden had secured the border Conservatives had long been suspicious about Biden's health, but journalists with White House access failed to ask tough questions then. Now that it's too late to make a real difference, those who were silent when it mattered most are more than ready to profit from belated exposés about the former president's failing health. The knives are now out inside the Democratic Party. And the party is bleeding, not only Americans' support and trust but also its last remaining drops of honesty and truth. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox.


Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US States Seek To Ban Chinese Citizens From Buying Land, Property
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some U.S. states are attempting to ban Chinese citizens from buying land and property, amid souring diplomatic relations between the countries. By 2024, more than two thirds of states had enacted or considered laws limiting or barring foreign land ownership including states that specifically mention China by name, according to POLITICO. According to the non-profit membership organization the Committee of 100, in total 27 states have considered this kind of legislation. However, the group has not shared a list of those states. Newsweek has rounded up a non-exhaustive list of states that have been involved in this kind of legislation, based on publicly available information. Some states do not name China explicitly, but name foreign nations that would likely include China. A number of US stakes have advanced legislation to ban some land sales by foreign nationals and so-called "foreign adversaries." A number of US stakes have advanced legislation to ban some land sales by foreign nationals and so-called "foreign adversaries." Flourish Why It Matters There has been a wave of concern over Chinese land purchases in the United States, some of which have taken place close to military bases. This comes amid soaring tensions between the U.S. and China including trade clashes between the two giants and national security concerns. However, as of USDA data accurate to 2023, Chinese investors own land in the U.S. equivalent to roughly twice the size of the footprint of New York City. What To Know A number of states have considered legislation on the issue. In May, the Texas legislature passed a bill to ban people tied to the governments of China, North Korea, Russia and Iran from purchasing land in the state. In January, Republican senators in Arkansas introduced the Not One More Inch or Acre Act which would prohibit any Chinese citizen, entity or foreign person acting on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from purchasing public or private real estate in the U.S. On Tuesday, Arizona's Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed a bill to prevent the People's Republic of China from buying a 30 percent stake or more in land near military bases and other strategic assets. Meanwhile, Florida passed a bill to prohibit citizens from China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and Syria from owning agricultural land or property near military sites in 2023. Similar legislation has been passed in South Dakota, North Dakota, Indiana, Nebraska, Virginia, Utah, Iowa, West Virginia and Montana. Other states are considering legislation or bills regarding foreign nations' ability to purchase land including Ohio, Michigan and Georgia. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek, Michael McFaul, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Russia from 2012 to 2014, said: "Not every Chinese citizen is an agent of the Communist Party of China. Many of China's most successful entrepreneurs, engineers, and academics—especially those living and working in the United States—loathe the Chinese Communist Party. U.S. government officials must develop more sophisticated policies for decreasing the influence of the Chinese Communist Party in the United States that do not treat all Chinese citizens as enemies of America." Cole Hefner, a Texas Republican state representative, said of Texas' bill: "Senate Bill 17 will counter this threat and make Texas a leader in state security. We cannot, we will not, allow oppressive regimes who actively seek to do harm to cease control and dictate their terms over our economy, our supply chains, our daily lives, our critical infrastructure for our food supply." Advocacy group Asian Texans for Justice opposed the Texas bill, saying it revives "a shameful chapter in American history—when Asian immigrants were banned from owning land." What Happens Next Texas' bill will now go to the state's governor, who has indicated he will support it. The success of other bills as well as whether other states will advance legislation pertaining to the issue remains to be seen.

an hour ago
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
BATON ROUGE, La. -- As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said.