
School board past colors Scranton Democratic mayoral primary election
SCRANTON — The race for city mayor has raised issues of transparency, fairness and residency.
Incumbent Democratic Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti faces in the May 20 primary Scranton Democratic Party Chairman Bob Sheridan. Two Republicans, Patricia 'Trish' Beynon and Lynn Labrosky, are running against each other for the GOP nomination.
Scranton's first female mayor, Cognetti switched from Democratic to independent for the 2019 special election to fill the unexpired term of corrupt former Democratic Mayor Bill Courtright and won that crowded race. She sought reelection in 2021 as a Democrat to a full, four-year term and handily defeated Republican Darwin Shaw.
Seeking reelection to another four-year term, Cognetti has cited as achievements her stewardship in improving city finances and stabilizing budgets, restoring integrity at City Hall, modernizing processes and upgrading technology, helping local businesses and improving parks throughout the city. While challenges remain, the city has been on the right track, she contends.
The challengers, in their own ways, think the city is not on the right track in areas including crime, blight and taxes. The Republicans have refrained from fighting each other and have focused on Cognetti's tenure. During debates April 22 at the University of Scranton, the three challengers also separately raised as issues transparency, fairness and residency. Sheridan and Labrosky each stress they are lifelong city residents, while Beynon has lived in the city for over 34 years. Cognetti, a native of Beaverton, Oregon, made Scranton her home in 2016, about two years after earning her MBA from Harvard Business School.
School board bad blood
Previous challengers tried to paint Cognetti as an opportunistic interloper using City Hall as a stepping stone to higher office. Sheridan raised that opinion during the debate.
Cognetti and Sheridan both previously served on the Scranton School Board, though not at the same time. Sheridan, a former eight-year member on the school board, lost in the 2017 primary and his second term ended Dec. 4, 2017. He was board president in his final two years.
In October 2017, then-Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale issued a scathing audit of the Scranton School District that he called the worst he'd ever seen. The audit sharply criticized the district's poor financial condition and its bus contract payment of $26.1 million to Dunmore-based DeNaples Transportation over a 10-year period, including more than $4 million in questionable fuel surcharges.
In mid-December 2017, the school board voted 8-0 to appoint Cognetti to fill the last two years of a vacancy. At that time, her MBA and experience as an adviser at the U.S. Treasury and an investment adviser at Goldman Sachs made her a strong candidate to help the financially struggling school district.
She resigned from the school board in December 2018 to become a special assistant with an emphasis on school transportation contracts in the state Auditor General's Office. During her year on the school board, Cognetti questioned the legitimacy of the district's no-bid busing contract that was highlighted in DePasquale's audit. Board members viewed her contributions as helping increase transparency and accountability.
At the April 22 debate, Sheridan cited comments Cognetti made on an April 10 podcast that 'she blamed me for … forging a contract.'
During the podcast by The Philadelphia Citizen titled 'How to Really Run a City, Powered by Accelerator for America, Where Local Matters,' Cognetti spoke of her motivations in joining the school board and running for mayor, as well as her tenure so far and seeking reelection. She recalled how in 2017 she was reading in the newspaper about 'this corruption on our school board and in our school district,' and how she then spent 2018 on the board pushing for reforms. Then, Courtright's resignation in disgrace in 2019 also pointed to an 'unfortunate culture of corruption' in Northeast Pennsylvania, and she ran for mayor and won. Now, her primary election challenger is 'the school board president who just drained that district and gave health care to non-employees and forged bus contracts, things like that, he's running against me in the primary,' she said on the podcast, without mentioning Sheridan by name.
During the debate between the Democrats, Sheridan said he'd like to see her back up that assertion of him forging bus contracts. In an interview Wednesday, Sheridan said he never forged a bus contract.
'Absolutely wrong. Lie,' Sheridan said. 'She outright lied. Outright lied. There was no evidence, ever. … She's trying to run on what happened to Bill Courtright and now putting me in that pail. Not right. Not right at all.'
In an interview Thursday, Cognetti said, 'Bob was the president of the school board at a time when there was false billing for auto maintenance, there was non-employee health care, there were no-bid bus contracts and addendums to those bus contracts that were not procured, which was not legal. The district at the time had a financial adviser who was pulling in a commission-based payment to the tune of over $2 million in the course of four years. Bob Sheridan was the school board president when all of this happened. In the case of the health care and the auto maintenance bills, two people pleaded guilty to felonies in that. Sheridan was the board president at that time and it's interesting that he's trying to rewrite history. We're not going to let him do that.'
Sheridan stressed he was never charged with forgery. Asked by The Times-Tribune if he committed forgery, Cognetti said, 'Bob Sheridan was president of the school board when a host of bills and contracts and documents went through the school board that allowed criminal activity to happen.'
Residency rumors
During the debate at two different times, Sheridan asked Cognetti whether she would serve out the full term if elected and whether she has lived in Scranton during her entire time as mayor. She did not reply to either question. During the first question, the moderator asked Sheridan, 'are you finishing your response,' and then moved on to another topic. During the second question, the moderator said, 'There won't be questions between the candidates' and 'Questions between the candidates will not be answered,' because the candidates agreed beforehand to rules of the debate that included not questioning each other.
On Thursday, Cognetti said she has lived in the city since 2016. Regarding contentions otherwise, she said, 'It's been a false rumor for years. It's a very, very silly thing.'
As for whether she would serve out another full term, Cognetti was noncommittal.
'I am running again because we have a great deal of more work to do. We have come a very, very long way from the disappointment of the former mayor, the disappointment of corruption in our area. People don't want corruption. They want good government.'
Sheridan several times during the debate noted he is a retired city police officer and he knows what being an officer entails.
Cognetti said of him, 'This is also a person who was involved in 'Exam Scam' (a conspiracy to rig city civil service tests) in the Police Department testing in 1985. People have not forgotten that. He can try to rewrite history as much as he wants but we're just going to do what the people of Scranton want, which is to run good, clean government.'
Sheridan said he was a victim in Exam Scam and he passed the test fair and square.
'That was 40 years ago. I was just a victim like everybody else. There was 20 police officers. I took the test honestly, passed the test honestly. Nobody went to jail for that, no police officers went to jail. There was nothing (there) — it was administrative,' Sheridan said. 'There were 20 police officers, highly decorated officers, retired now most of them, living a happy life with their pensions, with their families. She's trying to make me into that whole 'back room boys.' I'm not.'
Sheridan has recused himself as chairman of the city Democratic Committee while he runs for mayor.
Financial transparency
Beynon, who has lived in the city for over 34 years, is an accounting executive with Don Scartelli Construction Services and General Contractors of West Scranton. Her job includes managing the entire office, including preparing and submitting city and state documents, overseeing budgets, processing payroll, balancing the company's books and executing and submitting bids for construction projects, according to candidate background information posted online by the university for last month's debate.
The Cognetti administration and the Scartelli firm have battled in court in recent years in two lawsuits involving renovation of the former Serrenti Army Reserve Center at Pine Street and Colfax Avenue, the Novembrino Splash Park in West Side, the South Tower of City Hall and the Capouse Splash Pad and Playground Project. The city sued the firm in 2023 to rescind the Serrenti Center contract with Scartelli, and that lawsuit referenced disputes over the Novembrino and South Tower projects. Last year, Ralph Scartelli sued the city over its rejecting the low bid of $1.99 million from the Scartelli firm for the Capouse project. This lawsuit aimed to prevent the city from awarding the contract to a different bidder, and the city agreed to rebid the project. The rebid held last month split the project into two parts.
The city and the Scartelli firm were working on a joint settlement of both cases as recently as Thursday, according to a court scheduling order.
During the debate between the Republican candidates, Beynon cited as a top priority transparency, saying, 'We don't know where all the money is going in the city of Scranton. … I would say have an audit of the city of Scranton to find out where the money is going. If we do a complete audit, we'll have a better understanding of where the money is going … something is going on behind closed doors, we need to find out what that is.'
The city has an annual audit done.
In an interview Wednesday, Beynon — who is engaged to Don Scartelli — said she'd like to see more details of finances and spending in annual budgets and audits, 'to break it down more so people could see more what's happening.' She also expressed frustration with what she believes have been unfair bidding processes.
Cognetti replied Thursday that city budgets and audits are available on the city website. The administration also presents annual proposed budgets in detail to Scranton City Council during caucuses.
'Our administration is the most transparent administration that Scranton has ever seen,' Cognetti said. 'We came in because of a lack of transparency, as was the case with the Scranton School District, when I got a board seat there to try to clean things up.'
Funding fairness
The city received $68.7 million under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.
During the debate, Labrosky, who along with her husband owns Labrosky's Automotive Service Center in South Scranton, found fault with the city's handling of the federal funds.
'I don't believe that that money was maybe managed as it could have been,' Labrosky said. 'We had applied for an ARPA grant for our business and we did not qualify for that grant, even though we qualified in every way, except at the end we were told we could not get the grant because we didn't have an occupancy permit.' She continued: 'Not funding a small business just because they don't have an occupancy permit doesn't make sense because there's things in place in Scranton, like grandfather laws and things like that, that could have helped with that.'
The Labroskys bought the garage in 2012, according to the candidate background posted by the university. In an interview Wednesday, Labrosky said the couple applied last year to the city for a matching grant from ARPA funds to install new windows at the business, to recoup half of the total $10,000 cost. She spent weeks preparing the application but only found out at the end they didn't qualify for lack of a certificate of occupancy. When they bought the building, the garage was the same use as the prior owner and they were 'grandfathered in' and did not need a certificate of occupancy, she said. Labrosky said she suggested 'why not give money to help such those (grandfathered) businesses to mitigate to get up to code' to qualify for an occupancy permit.
Cognetti said she could not speak specifically to Labrosky's ARPA grant application, but the city contributed almost $5 million in grants during the COVID years to help small businesses stay afloat. 'We are very proud of what we were able to do to help small businesses,' Cognetti said. 'We have very specific processes. We want to make sure that all of our recipients have all of their documents in order. We make sure everybody is all paid up on their taxes. We certainly want everything to be right from a code enforcement perspective. We're very particular. We have very high standards and we were successful in pushing out quite a lot of rescue plan dollars to help keep our economy going and keep family businesses afloat.'
The winners of the primary will advance to the Nov. 4 general election.
*
Scranton Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, at left, and Bob Sheridan, Democratic candidates for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election, shown during a debate on April 22, 2025 at the University of Scranton. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
*
Patricia 'Trish' Beynon, at left, and Lynn Labrosky, Republican candidates for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election, shown during a debate on April 22, 2025 at the University of Scranton. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
*
Scranton Mayor-Elect Paige Gebhardt Cognetti at Scranton City Hall in Scranton on Nov. 7, 2019.
*
Robert 'Bob' Sheridan, candidate in the 2025 Democratic primary election for mayor of Scranton. (PHOTO SUBMITTED / COURTESY OF BOB SHERIDAN)
*
Patricia 'Trish' Beynon, Republican candidate for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
*
Lynn Labrosky, Republican candidate for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election. (PHOTO PROVIDED / COURTESY OF LYNN LABROSKY)
*
Current mayor Paige Cognetti reacts to comments from candidate Bob Sheridan during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Democratic candidate Bob Sheridan responds to a question during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Republican candidate Patricia Beynon responds to questions during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
*
Republican candidate Lynn Labrosky responds during the mayoral candidate debate at the Loyola Science Center at the University of Scranton on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Show Caption
1 of 10
Scranton Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, at left, and Bob Sheridan, Democratic candidates for Scranton mayor in the May 20, 2025 primary election, shown during a debate on April 22, 2025 at the University of Scranton. (JIM LOCKWOOD / STAFF PHOTO)
Expand
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

35 minutes ago
Appeals court to take up Trump's challenge to his criminal hush money conviction
Just over a year after Donald Trump became the first former president to be found guilty of a felony, an appeals court is set to hear the president's bid to move his case to federal court. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has scheduled oral arguments Wednesday to consider whether to move the president's criminal hush money case from state to federal court. Trump was found guilty last year on 34 felony counts after Manhattan prosecutors alleged that he engaged in a "scheme" to boost his chances during the 2016 presidential election through a series of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, and then falsified New York business records to cover up that alleged criminal conduct. Trump's lawyers have argued that the conduct at issue during his criminal trial included "official acts" undertaken while he was president, giving the president broad immunity for his actions and the right to remove the case to federal court. They say that the Supreme Court's landmark ruling last year granting the president immunity for official acts -- which was decided after Trump was convicted in May -- would have prevented prosecutors from securing their conviction. "The fact that it was not until after the conclusion of his state criminal trial that the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision defining the contours of presidential immunity -- including a broad evidentiary immunity prohibiting prosecutors from inviting a jury to probe a President's official acts, as President Trump's removal notice alleges occurred here -- supplies good cause for post-trial removal," Department of Justice lawyers argued in an amicus brief filed with the court. Trump decried the prosecution as politically motivated and successfully delayed his sentencing multiple times before New York Judge Juan Merchan, on the eve of Trump's inauguration, sentenced the former president to an unconditional discharge -- the lightest possible punishment allowed under New York state law -- saying it was the "only lawful sentence" to prevent "encroaching upon the highest office in the land." "I did my job, and we did our job," Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the case, said following Trump's conviction. "There are many voices out there, but the only voice that matters is the voice of the jury, and the jury has spoken." Bragg has pushed back on Trump's attempt to remove the case from state court, arguing that a case cannot be moved to federal court after sentencing. "These arguments ignore statutory indicia that Congress intended for removal of criminal cases to happen before sentencing by anticipating that essential federal proceedings will take place prior to a final criminal judgment," prosecutors have argued. Trump's appeal will be heard by a panel of three federal judges, each of whom was nominated to the bench by Democratic presidents. With Trump's former defense attorneys now serving top roles at the Department of Justice, the president will now be represented by former Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall of the elite law firm Sullivan & Cromwell. In an usual step, lawyers with the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in support of Trump's request. "The United States has a strong and direct interest in the issues presented in this appeal," they argued. If the appeals court grants Trump's request, his conviction would still remain. The only change is that his appeal will play out in a federal, rather than state, courtroom. In either scenario, Trump could ultimately ask the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. Moving the case into federal court could also open up the possibility that Trump could potentially pardon himself.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Yeah, I've changed': Former Republican congressman runs as Democrat for governor
A former GOP congressman turned MSNBC commentator made his pitch for Florida's governorship in next year's election at a packed town hall meeting on June 9 at Florida Atlantic University's Jupiter campus. 'Yeah, I've changed,' said David Jolly, and he wants his Republican opponents to make that the centerpiece of their attacks against him. During the 90-minute moderated discussion, Jolly positioned himself as a candidate who can bridge political divides and appeal across party lines in a state that hasn't elected a Democratic governor in over three decades. Next November's election will be a battle for what will be an open seat as Gov. Ron DeSantis is term limited according to Florida's constitution. Jolly's political evolution spans what he describes as 'a period of about 10 years,' moving from registered Republican to independent to Democrat. The attorney and former lobbyist served as the Republican representative in the 13th congressional district in Southwest Florida from 2014 to 2017 before leaving Congress. Now a network political contributor, he frames his party switches as an asset. 'I want my opponents to hit me on change. 'Jolly changed.' Yeah, I did,' he said. 'Is it okay to change your mind? I think it is, and that's part of my story.' Then he pointedly added: 'You know who else has changed? Most elected Republicans have changed.' During his time as a Republican congressman, Jolly said he supported positions that put him at odds with his party as it tilted toward President Donald Trump's America first and Make America Great Again movement, which Jolly has lambasted in network appearances. 'I was a Republican in Congress who supported marriage equality, climate science, gun control, campaign finance reform,' he told The Palm Beach Post. One of Trump's most ardent supporters on Capitol Hill, Republican U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds, has already entered the race on the GOP side. The Naples congressman has the president's endorsement. Whoever the GOP nominee is will count on the party's more than 1 million-plus voter advantage over the rival Democrats. Not boding well for Jolly, either, is that the last Democratic nominee for governor, Charlie Crist, a former congressman who also was a Republican-turned-Democrat, got trounced by DeSantis in a nearly 20-point rout in November 2022. Jolly is centering his campaign on what he calls Florida's 'generational affordability crisis.' 'This is a lived experience for my wife and I. We have two young children, and I am not confident that our incumbent in Tallahassee or that the next Republican candidate for governor understands the urgency of it or a desire to fix it,' he said. This crisis transcends party lines, he argued. 'The affordability crisis doesn't know party. If you're a Democrat, independent, Republican, you're worried about your homeowners insurance, your rent, property taxes,' Jolly said His proposed solutions include a state catastrophic fund to remove hurricane and natural disaster coverage from private insurance markets. It is a proposal Jolly told the crowd that he offered in national scope during his term in Washington. 'In Congress, I introduced a national cap fund to aggregate fires out west, tornadoes in the midwest, ice in the northeast, hurricanes in the southwest into a national cap fund," he said. "It didn't pass. Republicans at the time called it socialism, I just called it cheaper insurance.' He said the fund could cut private insurance for homeowners by 50% to 60%. His platform includes education reform and social issues. He argues that 'public education has been abandoned in the state of Florida' and calls for ending what he calls 'culture wars' that target immigrant and marginalized communities. 'We have excellence today in public education only out of the sheer will and determination of public school teachers and administrators,' Jolly said. 'Politicians have tried to tell them how to teach, what to teach, what they can say. We don't respect them with pay, we don't respect them politically, and we need to be a state that celebrates public education.' At the town hall, he expanded on his social agenda. 'We have to return to a place where everyone is welcome and celebrated,' Jolly said at the town hall. 'Regardless of where you were born, the color of your skin, who you love or who you worship, we need to be a state that welcomes everyone and lifts everyone up.' On reproductive rights, Jolly supports leaving the decision up to the majority of voters, pointing to the support Florida's Amendment 4 on abortion received in November 2024. 'More than 50% of the state said they wanted it. There's no reason politicians in Tallahassee should stand in the way,' he said. The amendment received 57% support but failed to reach the required 60% threshold. The FAU event, moderated by political strategist Simon Rosenberg, drew supporters from across Florida, including some who drove from Sarasota, Fla., to hear Jolly speak. 'Bring sanity back,' said attendee and Sarasota resident Michele Zinser. 'I think [Jolly] is very calm. He listens, and I appreciate that.' Zinser, an independent, resonates with Jolly's mission to tackle the affordability crisis. 'I know he doesn't come in with a strong right-wing agenda, which is what we've been suffering in Sarasota county,' she said. 'I'm about to become a democrat, I'm afraid.' Scott Benarde, a registered Democrat, event sponsor and frequent watcher of MSNBC, attended to show support for Jolly. 'I really believe in this guy, I think he's knowledgeable, decent, honest and cares and knows what the heck he's talking about. I think he really has a shot of becoming Florida's next governor,' said Scott Benarde, a registered Democrat and event sponsor. Attendees emphasized how Jolly's Republican background could appeal to voters tired of current leadership. 'He was a Republican. He understands the republican party probably better than a lot of Democrats,' said Betsey Hull, who attended with concerns about affordable housing for her daughters. 'We need somebody that will unite the state.' With 16 months until the election, Jolly reports early conversations with national Democratic Party leadership about potential support, while working to build relationships with diverse communities across the state, including Black pastors in Orlando, Fla. 'A year from now, we'll be working with each other towards change,' he said. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: AT FAU, David Jolly embraces political shift in bid for Florida governor


Indianapolis Star
42 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Secretary of State Diego Morales gets flak for overseas travel. Is he breaking any rules?
Indiana lawmakers seemed to be sending a signal to Secretary of State Diego Morales with a new addition to the two-year budget they crafted this session: Tell us more about your world travel. Morales' 10-day trip to India had recently made headlines. Some legislators and naysayers questioned why the secretary of state needed an "economic development" sojourn and wanted to know who paid for it. But this new law requiring annual travel reports from statewide elected officials wouldn't even have applied to that trip, since taxpayer dollars allegedly weren't involved. Nor to Morales's recent "personal" trip to Hungary, during which he spoke at a Conservative Political Action Conference. Nor for his other trip to Hungary, in 2023. Nor does there seem to be any other state rule or law that requires Morales to share where he went, who paid for it, and how much it cost, given the specific circumstances of these trips. Morales can travel the world on a mystery dime, and there's little in Indiana law to compel him to share the details. "To me, he's getting while the getting's good," said Julia Vaughn, executive director of Common Cause Indiana. His wanderlust, however legal it may be, may have in part earned him some early competition in next year's Republican state convention, where delegates choose the next secretary of state. Both Knox County Clerk Dave Shelton, who ran against Morales in 2022, and 2024 gubernatorial candidate Jamie Reitenour have said in recent weeks that they intend to run. Morales himself announced his reelection campaign in a five-minute video in early May. Morales has defended this travel on the airways and social media and said his international speaking engagements fall well within his job description. "There are people that will say that I shouldn't be doing stuff like this or that it's not part of the job. I disagree respectfully," he told Fort Wayne radio station WOWO. "We charter new businesses every day in the office, and we want to let everyone know that Indiana is the top state to start a business." "I'm not choosing to take these trips over other things," he continued. "I do it all. I'm going 100 miles per hour." His potential challengers next year have other ammunition unrelated to travel. He's currently under investigation by the Marion County Election Board for potentially violating election law by allegedly using footage from an official visit in that campaign announcement video. He's caught flak for giving a lucrative job to a brother-in-law, and was in India during his agency's budget request presentation to senators this year, during which his stand-in fielded rigorous questioning about the office's no-bid contracts. That followed a 2022 campaign season during which questions about his voting history, professional background and allegations of sexual assault came to light. If Morales were a member of Congress ― as he tried to become in 2018 ― Hoosiers would be able to find out a lot of information every time he hit the road. U.S. representatives and senators have to file travel reports for all "travel-related expenses reimbursed by non-government sources," known as "gift travel," as well as expenses related to all "official foreign travel." Their annual financial disclosure forms require great detail, including all sources and amounts of income and liabilities. Further, U.S. senators have to get approval 30 days in advance from the Select Committee on Ethics for privately sponsored trips. These requirements would likely have covered Morales's trip to India, which he said was initially sponsored by a private entity, as well as his second Hungary trip, for which he said CPAC Hungary covered his costs. But in Indiana, reporting requirements are far more lax. Statewide elected officials file annual financial disclosure forms on their own, without the assistance of their offices. In Indiana law, the definition of reportable "gifts" is anything worth more than $100 that they receive from a person who does business with the office-holder or their agency. The state budget's new language only applies to trips funded by state taxdollars and done in an "official" capacity. These rules let Morales off the hook for his two most recent trips. CPAC doesn't do business with his office, a spokesperson said. Same goes for the private sponsor of the India trip, Morales said on the radio, so disclosing that identity "never came up." Still, in light of public scrutiny, Morales said in the radio interview he decided to personally reimburse that private sponsor ― "because that's the right thing to do." The private funding sources for each of these trips exempts them from disclosure under the new state budget language. And even if that wasn't the case, Morales also billed the Hungary trip as "personal time," though he happened to also accept an invitation to speak in his official capacity at CPAC Hungary. "He's tourist Diego over in Hungary… but then he's public official Diego at the same time because they needed him," Vaughn said. "It's infuriating that there's this space in Indiana law that allows him to get away with this." His public speaking gigs likely fall through the cracks of campaign finance law, too, because Morales appears at such events as secretary of state and not as a secretary of state candidate ― even though he is now both of these things at once. The law doesn't necessarily account for activity that looks and feels like campaigning, even if it's not labeled as such ― like networking at CPAC Hungary with other high-profile conservative political figures, said Gregory Shufeldt, political science professor at the University of Indianapolis. This is where the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law can come into play, he said. "Even if there isn't a quid pro quo ― or it doesn't break the law ― the appearance of corruption can have the same disastrous effects on public confidence, support for institutions, and political efficacy," he said. Morales sees these trips differently. He told the Fort Wayne radio station that even while visiting family in Hungary, he would never turn down an opportunity to represent the state of Indiana, especially at a conservative conference. "I always enjoy these opportunities that allow me to showcase Indiana and let companies across the world know, we are open for business," he said. He also committed to never using taxpayer dollars for overseas travel. In India, accompanied again by his wife, Morales spoke at two tech conferences. He said a private business that doesn't work with his agency, but "saw the benefit of Indiana being represented in these conferences," paid for the travel arrangements. In response to many calls to disclose the funder's identity, Morales said he asked if he could, but the benefactor was "afraid of being targeted by the liberal media or the crazy left." More: Secretary of State Diego Morales faces criticism for 10-day India trip. Here's why he was there So Morales said he personally reimbursed the funder. In a statement to IndyStar, an office spokesperson said he did this "in an effort to be transparent and in respect of the business wanting to be anonymous." "Secretary Morales maintains the utmost commitment to transparency," the office said. But for observers, this action only made appearances worse. "The fact that he's working overtime to keep the original funder secret just makes it more suspicious," Vaughn said. "It's just not believable that somebody out of the goodness of their heart finances a trip like this." Even if everything is above board, speaking in an official capacity in Hungary, a country the European Union no longer considers a democracy, might not be a good look for Indiana's top election official, Shufeldt said. Morales' office did not respond to IndyStar's question about the appropriateness of networking in Hungary or whether he sought formal or informal ethics opinions on any of the international trips. "If nothing else, this is tone deaf and flouting the rules," Shufeldt said. "Whether he has broken any rules or not ― which speaks to how poor Indiana's campaign finance laws are, how perhaps toothless these new reforms passed by the IGA are or will be ― Morales has been subject to consistent controversies and bad press based on his own poor judgment. This is just another example."