Wrexham MP highlights importance of Hightown Barracks
MP for Wrexham
In 2027 we will mark 150 years since the establishment of the Hightown Barracks in Wrexham.
The symbol of the proud military history of our city.
In both World War One and World War Two, the Barracks were the site of regimental basic training before new recruits were deployed.
This is particularly poignant as this week marks the 80th Anniversary of VE Day.
On a recent visit to Hightown Barracks, I met with Colonel Nick Lock to explore the work of the Hightown Barracks today.
It was saved in 2013 after a huge community effort led by former MP Ian Lucas and local councillors Graham Rogers and Brian Cameron amongst many others, including myself.
I was struck by Colonel Lock's description of the pride that Wrexham feels in its connection with the Royal Welsh Fusiliers, embodied by the campaign to save the barracks.
Colonel Lock and I also discussed the difficulties our armed forces currently face after years of cuts and in the context of a rapidly changing global situation.
As a former Air Cadet myself and having met current cadets, serving personnel and veterans, I understand the value of a military career, the skills that are developed but also the challenges that can be faced when that career ends.
Earlier this year I was proud to be a member of the bill committee for the Armed Forces Commissioner Bill.
The Commissioner will be a direct point of contact for personnel and their families to raise service issues affecting their lives, from kit, to housing, to childcare.
The independent Commissioner will have proper powers to investigate issues affecting service life, make recommendations, and report to Parliament.
They will also have access to personnel, information, and to defence sites.
And we want them to hold us to account, too.
According to the House of Commons Library, there are an estimated 3,450 households in Wrexham who have at least one military veteran.
Veteran support is crucial, which is why the UK Government has launched the VALOUR system to ensure easier access to essential care and support.
For most service personnel, a career in the Armed Forces sets them up for success and can be a great tool for social mobility.
VALOUR aims to help unlock veterans' full potential and foster the enterprising spirit of veteran charities.
And where Veterans have complex needs, Valour will help ensure the support on offer is data driven and better tailored to their need.
VALOUR is backed by £50 million of funding, which will help ensure that every veteran, regardless of where they live, can access joined up support.
That funding will establish a new network of VALOUR-recognised support centres in every nation of the UK and deploy Regional Field Officers to connect local, regional and national services – using data to shape better services.
As we mark 80 years since Victory in Europe this week, our grateful nation looks forward to joining our brave Armed Forces and veterans to reflect, commemorate and remember.
We are deeply proud of our Armed Forces personnel, veterans, and the families who support them, for the contribution they make to our country.
Theirs is the ultimate public service.
These are serious times, with war in Europe, conflict in the Middle East, growing Russian aggression and increasing global instability.
The lessons of the Second World War where countries and peoples came together to defeat fascism and defend our freedoms must never be forgotten.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer is about as frightening as a stick of celery… but I'm more scared of him than Putin – here's why
CAN you imagine what would have happened if Neville Chamberlain – our Prime Minister when Germany invaded Poland – had announced Britain was in grave danger and, as a result, would increase funding for the Armed Forces and therefore be ready to do 'war fighting' by 1975. Or maybe a bit later. Hitler would have just laughed at him. But that's exactly what happened this week when Sir Starmer announced that because of Russia's expansionist tendencies, he was going to totally overhaul our Armed Forces so we'd be ready to fight, and fight hard by, er, some point in the future. He would build 12 new nuclear subs, and a wave of new fighter-bombers that could rain atomic death on our enemies. And in addition, our fighting men and women, and all those who are neither, would be trained to become ten times more effective and lethal. According to Starmer, we'd go from a country that can't even stop a rubber dinghy reaching the shores of Kent to a country that would shake fear into the entire Russian naval machine. It all sounds a bit preposterous, frankly, because first of all, where's the money coming from? He's already spent what little he had on train drivers, junior doctors and solar parks. So how can he suddenly afford 12 new submarines and a murder of fighter jets so complex they haven't even been invented yet. And who's he going to get to operate all this new kit, and run around in the muddy trenches, shooting at Ivan? Back in the Thirties, everyone in the country knew their duty. Not any more. Everyone's too busy shoplifting or choosing a gender or glueing themselves to the road. From tactical nuke to 7,600mph missile & 50k-troop assault…6 ways Putin could respond to Ukraine blitz after Trump call There's another issue too. As we have seen in the Ukraine war, an entire squadron of bombers can now be destroyed by someone with a lorry and a few drones, made from stuff you can buy for a tenner at Dixons. But by far the biggest problem we have is Keir Starmer himself, because he is very possibly the least war-like leader the world has ever seen. He is a stick of celery in a crap suit. Putin ran the KGB. So at one point he will definitely have used his thumbs to push a man's eyes into his brain. Starmer hasn't done that. Starmer is a human rights lawyer. If the balloon went up, he'd be on the side of a trans person who refused to fight until gender-neutral lavatories were provided on the battlefield. He can make as many 'war fighting' speeches as he likes but we know he doesn't even understand what he's on about. He's just making noises to try to make himself look tough. But he isn't tough. He's as frightening as Will from The Inbetweeners. You'd only have to snap his spectacles and he'd give in immediately. And he's in the hot seat for four more years. That scares me more than Putin does. RIGHT OFF THE MARK THE BBC told us this week that because Geert Wilders, the far-right leader of a party in the Netherlands, had left the ruling coalition, the government was in disarray. I'm always confused by the Beeb's idea of 'far right' because I've looked into the man and he's a long way from Hitler. He just wants a firm stance on immigration and an end to what he calls the 'Muslimification' of his country. In short, he's about as far to the right as Starmer is to the left. So how come the BBC never refers to our Prime Minister as 'far left'? Out of the Goop for 40 years 4 4 AS you probably heard, I had a bit of a problem with my heart last autumn. And if you want to know what caused it, have a look at the last two episodes of Clarkson's Farm, which are out now. There's no doubt in my mind that the unbelievable stress of opening a pub while trying to do the harvest caused the issue. Well, that and 40 years of living a life that in no way mirrored Gwyneth Paltrow 's. Game over, kids OBVIOUSLY, when I die, my farm will be confiscated by the Government so they can smother it with solar panels and sustainable houses for hard-working families in the immigrant community. Until then, however, it's mine, which is why I spent a chunk of the week clearing a stream, removing undergrowth and various trees that have fallen over so my grandkids are able to spend their afternoons in it, sploshing about, playing Pooh sticks and building dams. I may have been wasting my time though because a survey by the NSPCC has found that today, many children prefer to sit at home, on their iPads, all by themselves. Only a quarter regularly play with another child. This is a worry because a child that's spent its formative years shooting aliens in the face and watching mindless American cartoons is going to have no understanding of how to behave in society. They're going to meet people they don't like, and hear things they find offensive, and they're going to fall over occasionally and graze their knees. And they will have no idea how to cope. So they'll become intolerant and bitter and angry, lashing out at every little thing. And pretty soon, we'll end up, er… pretty much where we are now. With an entire generation of young adults who learned everything they know from sitting in their bedrooms. And think they can be excused from any responsibility by simply dreaming up an acronym for whatever they think is wrong with them. Hmmm. I'm no businessman and I'm terrible at maths. But if I wanted a flag from this particular battle, I'd probably go for the cheaper one.
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Council forced to U-turn on nursery mothballing plans
Despite previously insisting that the closures would go ahead, council officials have now indicated that they will abandon the plans and seek a review of the authority's approach to mothballing. In response to multiple requests to explain why unelected officers were able to make decisions on mothballing without consultation, a council spokesperson had previously suggested that government guidance – which includes clear instructions to consult with communities on any such decision – does not apply to nurseries, meaning that they did not need to discuss the matter with families before implementing the changes. In recent days, however, the council has come under increasing pressure over its plans. The matter has been raised in the Scottish Parliament, and government officials recently wrote to the council to warn that the proposals were not in line with statutory requirements. In a letter to Laurence Findlay, the Director for Education and Children's Services at Aberdeenshire Council, a government official explicitly stated that mothballing guidance applies to council-run nurseries, and highlighted a section of the document stating that any mothballing decision 'should be taken in consultation with the parents involved.' The government's letter also raised concerns about the mothballing of another nursery in 2024 which has since been removed from the options that parents can choose from when applying for a space for their child. Scottish Conservatives MSP Alexander Burnett has also written to the administration, which is led by councillors from his own party. His email, which has been seen by The Herald, sharply criticised several aspects of the council's approach and urged them to abandon the mothballing proposals. In addition to this, The Herald has been shown email correspondence in which the council is explicitly advised by a solicitor acting for parents that they considered the plans "unlawful". Officials are asked to state whether they agree with this, in which case they would have had to advise councillors of this, or disagree, in which case there would be no reason for families to delay further legal action. Opposition councillors had successfully demanded a special meeting of the council take place to consider the matter, with the session planned for Monday 9 June. When The Herald approached the council about this matter earlier today an official declined to comment, stating that they did not wish to 'pre-empt' any decisions that might be made by elected representatives. However, by mid-afternoon this position had changed, and the council's press team issued a release stating that the administration now intends to abandon the controversial mothballing plans: 'The Administration is minded to seek a review of our mothballing guidance to incorporate a consultation process with parents. 'We acknowledge the strong feelings concerning the four settings and appreciate the concerns of parents who highly value their local early learning facilities. We are trying to balance the needs of children and families, with a challenging financial position – but it is critical we do this in the right way. 'We will be recommending that we pause planning for all future mothballing activity currently underway, whilst we examine the guidance. Whilst we have been engaging with parents, we need to consult at a much earlier stage to inform the decision-making process, and we will explore how to integrate this into the procedure. 'We will also recommend reversing the budget decision identifying this as a saving in our 2025/26 budget process and seek to identify the saving from elsewhere. 'We are taking the unusual step of announcing our intention prior to the meeting in the hope that we remove further anxiety for the people who have made requests to speak.' The original proposals had been strongly opposed by SNP and some independent councillors who have welcomed the U-turn. Commenting, SNP Education and Children's Spokesperson, Cllr Louise McAllister, said: 'The decision to mothball these nurseries, without consultation or democratic oversight, was wrong from the get go, and that is a point we have strived to make since the announcements in April. 'As well as the U-turn on mothballing, I sincerely hope that the administration also accept that these decisions need to be fully returned to the hands of elected members, so that we can truly be a voice for the communities we represent. 'Whilst I am delighted for the children who can now continue to access their childcare provision in these settings, I think the administration must acknowledge and apologise for the hurt and distress caused by this short sighted decision making.' SNP Deputy Education and Children's Spokesperson, Cllr Jenny Nicol, added: 'From the outset we have voted against mothballing decisions being made by officers, and consistently challenged a process that lacked proper consultation and failed to consider the long term impact on rural families. 'For too long, decisions were being made behind closed doors, without the input of those most affected and facing the traumatic realities of mothballing. This reversal shows what can be achieved when communities stand up and are supported by Councillors who put people before 'process'.' 'We welcome this shift, but it must now be followed by a full review of the guidance and a genuine commitment to rural early years provision going forward.' SNP Cllr Dawn Black, who represents Stonehaven and Lower Deeside, praised local communities who 'have stepped up and fought this campaign so passionately and so successfully.' 'As Councillors our hands have been tied to a certain extent and we have done all we can to push this issue forward – and finally we see some change. We could not have done that without the dedication of local voices who took the time to email and speak with individual Councillors and at the education committee. 'Regardless of guidance from elsewhere, as a council we should want to consult with communities – to work with them to find sustainable ways forward – that should have already been in our guidance. Instead the Tory-led administration have tried to force change on communities, whilst hiding behind officers, and have realised that people just will not stand for it.'
The Herald Scotland
15 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Badenoch insists Tories are still the main opposition to Labour
Reform's rise in the polls has led Sir Keir Starmer to regard Nigel Farage's party as Labour's main opposition in the current Parliament, despite having only five MPs. Kemi Badenoch laughed off suggestions that Reform UK are now the main opposition party to the Labour Government (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Answering questions after a speech on Friday, Mrs Badenoch dismissed Reform as a 'protest party' and said claims it was the real opposition were 'nonsense'. Describing Reform as 'another left-wing party', she said: 'What they're trying to do is talk this situation into existence. 'Labour is going to be facing the Conservative Party at the next election and we're going to get them out.' The Conservatives' electoral struggles come as the party continues to languish in third place in most polls while Mrs Badenoch's personal ratings show widespread dissatisfaction with her performance. Ms Badenoch has so far failed to arrest the Conservatives' slide down the polls since last year's general election drubbing (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Meanwhile, senior Tory and former leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly appeared this week to split from Mrs Badenoch on her claim that achieving net zero by 2050 was 'impossible'. Speaking on Friday, she maintained that she would be able to turn things around, saying: 'I've always said that things would be tough, in fact in some cases would likely get worse before they get better. 'There is a lot that needs doing, but I am of very, very strong confidence that the public will see that the party has changed and that we are the only credible alternative to Labour.' WATCH LIVE: The system is rigged. It's time to rewrite the rules of the game 👇 — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 6, 2025 Her remarks followed a speech at the Royal United Services Institute in Westminster in which Mrs Badenoch launched a commission tasked with examining how leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) would work. While she stopped short of formally committing to leaving the convention, she said it was 'likely' that Britain would 'need to leave'. She said: 'I won't commit my party to leaving the ECHR or other treaties without a clear plan to do so and without a full understanding of all the consequences.'
