
One of the most successful military strikes in history? Sure, Donald
He stood on a podium beneath a banner that read 'Mission Accomplished' and said: 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed ... because the regime [the Iraqi dictatorship of Saddam Hussein] is no more.'
Wrong. The Iraqi insurgency developed into an outright sectarian war, with the vast majority of casualties – coalition and Iraqi, military and civilian – AFTER that premature victory declaration. Indeed, British and American troops occupied Iraq for eight more years, before withdrawing completely in 2011.
Here we go again.
READ MORE: Kelly Given: If Zohran Mamdani can do it, left must believe it can make it anywhere
It took years for George Dubya's claim to be fully discredited. Donald Trump's 'mission accomplished' in Iran is falling to pieces within days.
First of all, he's killed Iranians – which never warms any population to a 'liberator' – and he's made life infinitely more difficult for those in Iran who oppose the regime. The state-affiliated Fars News Agency says 700 people have been arrested as 'mercenaries of Israel', and the BBC Persian Service reported three executions yesterday. Commentators fear the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) 'will likely get stronger, consolidating even more power'.
Was that the aim? Was there any aim?
Second, the strikes that 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, did not.
Leaked reports from the Pentagon suggest the targeted nuclear bases were not destroyed, a stockpile of enriched uranium was removed beforehand and therefore not destroyed and the centrifuges are 'largely intact'. So, Trump's big bazooka bombing has probably just caused a few months' delay to an Iranian nuclear weapons programme … and has made that progression more likely.
Iran's parliament has just suspended co-operation with the UN nuclear watchdog and is drafting legislation to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). That's not good news.
Mark Fitzpatrick, former director at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, told Al Jazeera that he expects Tehran to leave the NPT, build a nuclear weapon within a year and create a ripple effect. If Iran pulls out, Saudi Arabia has vowed to match Iran in nuclear weapons and would also consider quitting the NPT. Egypt is also concerned that Israel doesn't face international monitoring (Israel won't admit to having nuclear weapons and hasn't joined the NPT but is widely believed to have 80 warheads). What a result.
Trump, in the Netherlands, stands by his claim that Sunday saw 'one of the most successful military strikes in history'.
READ MORE: MSPs pass legislation to abolish Scotland's exams body
Yet he has postponed classified briefings for Senate and House members till Friday to figure out how to spin all this. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer says the delay is 'outrageous' – especially since many believe Trump's unilateral decision to attack Iran is unauthorised and unconstitutional.
The president won't care about that – but he will care about antagonising his own MAGA support. Trump was elected on a specific pledge not to drag the US into foreign wars and certainly not to use US hardware and personnel as a proxy for Israel. Of course, MAGA trouble hardly counts as a downside, for most of the world's progressives. Nor does the terminal damage to Trump's rumoured hopes of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.
The head of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign committee has withdrawn his nomination of Trump for the prize, saying he has 'lost any sort of faith and belief' that the US president could make peace between Russia and Ukraine. The Pakistani government is under pressure to rescind its nomination.
If that gong was ever on the table, it's back in the box now.
Thirdly, while all eyes have been on Iran, the situation in Gaza has worsened and casual, daily killing by IDF forces around food aid centres has become normalised. Almost.
I'm not sure how many people knew of Palestine Action before Yvette Cooper decided to turn them into a terrorist organisation on Monday coming, with a potential 14-year prison sentence for anyone turning out to support them.
But we've certainly heard of them now. If there's a protest I can get to, I'll be there. And I suspect I won't be alone.
Every time the Prime Minister raises the bar to weaken the resolve of those who have supported the Palestinian cause their entire lives, he further damages a party whose democratic credentials are almost non-existent.
Indeed, for Labour, next week is shaping up to be a hebdomadis horribilis (horrible week).
There's the Welfare Bill and the spectacle of Labour's own backbenchers ganging up to defeat a Liz Kendall bill that will cut disability benefits. With more than 130 signatories so far, the only way Labour can escape defeat is via the poisoned chalice of Kemi Badenoch's Tories.
READ MORE: 100 charities challenge Ian Murray and Scottish Labour to oppose UK welfare cuts
It's a horrible look either way. And presents a horrible fiscal challenge.
The Welfare Bill was meant to save £5 billion a year – though actual savings will be minimal if disabled people denied support simply turn up more at A&E.
Still, defeat will give Rachel Reeves an immediate £5bn black hole in her own calculations to add to the £43bn black hole created this week by Starmer's Nato commitments. Rishi, with your relatively tiny £20bn black hole – eat your heart out.
And apart from the fiscal turmoil, there's the look.
Labour will precede their Welfare Bill misery on Tuesday with the certainty of ugly scenes on Monday as Palestine Action protesters are arrested and hauled off to jail. That's what happens when you are on the wrong side of history.
But coming back to Trump, his gung-ho approach creates another risk – sympathy for the Iranian regime as the plucky little underdogs.
This would be a travesty because Iran's is a truly horrible regime.
There were protests across the country in 2022 after the death of Mahsa Amini – a young woman who died in police custody, after failing to wear a headscarf. The Norway-based Iran Human Rights group say 537 protesters were killed by state security forces who blamed the deaths on foreign agitators. Now, the rallying cry used during those protests – 'woman, life, freedom' – has been cynically repeated by Benjamin Netanyahu. On Friday, he urged Iranians to 'stand up and let your voices be heard'.
As one campaigner observed: 'Netanyahu is hiding behind Iranian nationalist slogans and pretending to help Iranians reach freedom while actually targeting residential areas. It's going to take years to rebuild the country. I've seen what Netanyahu did to Gaza – do you really think he cares about Iranians? This isn't about us, it's about [Israeli] politics.'
People aren't stupid. The big boy bluster and double standards over Israel in the US and UK are nauseating.
So, well done, Donald.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pete Hegseth's wild tantrum at media for 'overshadowing' Trump Iran strikes amid devastating leaks nukes weren't obliterated
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth went ballistic on reporters at a Pentagon press conference Thursday, lashing out at reports that U.S. airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were ineffective. The defense secretary was joined by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, to tout to reporters the 'historic success' of last weekend's B-2 bombing run. A fired-up Hegseth was also adamant that journalists in the Pentagon press corps are decidedly anti-Trump. 'You cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and blood,' he accused the press in the room. 'You have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.' 'Your people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful, it's irresponsible,' he charged. The press conference - a rarity for Hegseth - came within days of CNN reporting that the U.S. strikes would only set back Iran 's nuclear sites by a couple of months. The report cited seven individuals briefed on a battle damage assessment done by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) of the Iranian sites. It directly contradicted President Donald Trump and the defense secretary's claim that the sites were destroyed - and clearly enraged the administration. CIA Director John Ratcliffe asserted the strikes had 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear program, according to a New York Times report, a declaration that fell far short of the president's claims of total obliteration. When pressed on whether the strikes took out Iran's enriched uranium, Hegseth responded cagily. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' he explained without offering further evidence that the uranium was destroyed. He went on to lambaste CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times and other outlets that reported on the preliminary report completed by an intelligence agency within the Pentagon. Unnamed sources, who reportedly have seen the Defense Intelligence Agency report, say that the sites could be online within months. The centrifuges used to enrich uranium went undamaged and the country's stockpile of enriched uranium was possibly relocated ahead of the strikes, they said. The DIA assessment concluded with 'low confidence' that the site sustained 'moderate to severe' damage, Hegseth told reporters at NATO on Wednesday. The administration, Hegseth said Wednesday, believes it was 'far more likely severe and obliterated.' Hegseth also had a notable clash with his former Fox News colleague Jennifer Griffin, the outlet's Pentagon correspondent, during the briefing. Griffin, a veteran Pentagon reporter who's been with the channel for decades, asked Hegseth to clarify whether Iran's already enriched uranium was destroyed by the U.S. strikes. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' the Pentagon secretary responded cagily. Griffin then asked: 'That's not the question, though. It's about highly enriched uranium. Do you have certainty that all the highly enriched uranium was inside the Fordow mountain, or some of it?' 'There were satellite photos that showed more than a dozen trucks there two days in advance? Are you certain none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?' 'Of course, we're watching every single aspect,' Hegseth responded before bizarrely turning on his old colleague. 'But Jennifer, you've been about the worst, the one who misrepresents the most intentionally what the President says.' The veteran Pentagon reporter immediately interjected, highlighting to Hegseth how she was the first journalist to reveal how the operation targeted the nuclear facility's ventilation shafts and more. 'I was the first to report about the ventilation shafts on Saturday night, and in fact, I was the first to describe the B-2 bombers, the refueling, the entire mission, with great accuracy,' the Fox News correspondent retorted. 'So I take issue with that,' she added.


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Netanyahu agreed to end Gaza war after US strike on Iran
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu agreed on a rapid end to the war in Gaza during a phone call after the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, Israeli media has reported quoting a source 'familiar with the conversation'. The two leaders agreed that four Arab states, including the United Arab Emirates and Egypt , would jointly govern the strip in place of Hamas , Israel Hayom is reporting. Leaders of the Hamas terror group would be exiled and all hostages released, a source is said to have told the outlet. But it remains unclear how such a proposal would be implemented, with Hamas vowing it will not leave the territory and Arab states repeatedly asserting that they would not step into a governing role. Trump and Netanyahu held the call on Monday a day after US bombers hit nuclear targets in Iran , with a source reportedly describing the call as 'euphoric'. They were joined on the call by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, according to the report. Under the agreement, Palestinians who wished to leave Gaza would be taken in by unnamed states, the men reportedly said, and Saudi Arabia and Syria would establish diplomatic ties with Israel. Israel in turn would express support for a future two-state solution on the condition that the Palestinian Authority bring in reforms, according to the report. The United States would recognise Israeli sovereignty over parts of the West Bank as part of the agreement, it also said. Israel Hayom reports that the 'ambitious' nature of the plan explains Trump's fury over Israel's planned retaliation against Iran for its 'minor' breach of the US-brokered ceasefire on Tuesday. Trump called the Israeli prime minister and warned him to 'stop the planes', reportedly telling him he did not understand why Netanyahu was 'disrupting' their agreed upon 'plan for peace' because of a 'small tactical incident'. The outlet also claims that Trump's post calling for an end to Netanyahu's trial was also linked to the plan. The Mail has contacted the White House for comment regarding the report. It comes as Trump has received praise from world leaders for his part in ending the 12-day conflict, with suggestions that the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities forced Tehran to the negotiating table. Among those who commended him was Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who spoke to reporters as he departed from the NATO summit. 'I told Trump that, referring to his efforts in the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the same level of effort is expected to help end the conflicts in Gaza as well as in the Russia-Ukraine war,' Erdogan said. In March, the US and Israel rejected an Arab plan for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, which was designed to allow the 2.1 million Palestinians living in the Strip to remain. The proposal was backed by Arab leaders at a summit in Cairo, and was drawn up as an alternative to Trump's suggestion for the US to take over Gaza and permanently resettle its population. Trump suggested that the US could 'own' Gaza and turn it into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'. His suggestion was deemed 'unacceptable' by the Arab League and sparked outrage across the world, with many condemning it as amounting to the forced displacement of Palestinians from their homes. 'This is against international law and, we have said this time and again, this is not a way to treat this man-made crisis,' Assistant Secretary General of the Arab League, Hossam Zaki, told the BBC. The UN estimates that more than 1.9 million people have been internally displaced in Gaza amid Israel's unrelenting bombardment of the territory, which has been ongoing for more than 600 days. The war in Gaza began when Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, killing nearly 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 others hostage into Gaza. In response, Israel launched a military campaign that has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians, according to local health authorities in Gaza. At least 118 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since Wednesday, local health authorities said, including some shot near an aid distribution point, the latest in a series of such incidents. Twenty hostages remain in captivity in Gaza, while Hamas is also holding the bodies of 30 who have died. Israel this afternoon announced that it has stopped aid entering Gaza for two days to prevent it being seized by Hamas. Images have been circulated of masked men on aid trucks. Clan leaders have said these individuals were protecting aid, and are not Hamas stealing it from civilians. Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer later told reporters that aid was still entering Gaza from the south, but did not specify whether any supplies were entering the north. A United Nations source said that all aid that was due to enter northern Gaza had been put on hold.


Daily Mirror
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
PM in talks with Labour rebels over DWP benefit cuts
Keir Starmer confirmed today the Government is locked in talks with rebellious backbenchers over welfare reforms. Here The Mirror looks at the PM's immediate options Keir Starmer confirmed today the Government is locked in talks with rebellious backbenchers over welfare reforms. In a Commons update on Thursday, the PM also addressed the growing rebellion and hinted at possible concessions in the coming days. He said he and his team "want to get this right". The PM said benefits claimants "are failed every single day" by a "broken system". Mr Starmer told MPs: "On social security, I recognise there is a consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform of our welfare system, because the British people deserve protection and dignity when they are unable to work and supported to work when they can. "At the moment, they are failed every single day by the broken system created by the Conservatives, which achieves neither.I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I. We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday." But with 126 Labour MPs signing an amendment that could torpedo the plan, the Government could face an embarrassing defeat if it goes ahead. Here The Mirror looks at the PM's immediate options. Press ahead with vote Keir Starmer could decide to press ahead with the vote even if concessions aren't reached. This would be perhaps the nuclear option. With over 120 Labour MPs now opposed to the plans, rebels have the numbers to wipe-out the government's majority and deliver a humiliating defeat. And it is likely there are many more backbenchers - possibly frontbenchers - who are opposed to the plans but have not said so publicly yet. A defeat on this scale - overturning the government's huge majority - would leave the government's welfare plans in tatters. It would also leave the Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a £5billion black hole in her plans. Concessions to rebels The most likely scenario is that Keir Starmer will thrash out concessions with rebels over the coming hours and days in an attempt to salvage the reforms. Under existing plans the eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) will be restricted. This is where most of the £5billion savings are being made. The benefit is paid to people both in and out of work and helps with daily tasks due to a long-term physical or mental health condition. Eligibility is calculated using a points-based system, based on how difficult someone finds it to perform tasks like washing themselves and getting dressed. But from the end of 2026 people would need to score a minimum of four points in at least one daily activity to qualify under the plans. Needing help to get in or out of the shower, or supervision to use the toilet are measures that don't meet this threshold. There have been suggestions this could be tweaked so people would need to score three points instead to make the new system slightly more generous. The Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests this could increase eligibility by 190,000 - at a cost of £0.8 billion. But even in this scenario it is extremely unlikely to satisfy all the rebels. There is a bloc of rebels opposed to the principle of taking away disability and sickness benefits full stop and will still vote against the proposals. Delay the vote - or pull the reforms If no concessions are reached, Mr Starmer may feel he has no other option but to delay the vote on Tuesday. This would allow time to speak to rebels and reach a compromise over the summer months, before a vote after the summer recess. It would be a screeching U-turn and politically messy. Over the last 24 hours both Mr Starmer and the Deputy PM Angela Rayner have insisted the vote will go ahead - a line repeated by No10 and a series of ministers. But it would mean avoiding a Commons defeat on one of the government's flagship policies almost a year to the date Labour won a historic victory at the general election. And if the rebels are not won over, pulling the reforms completely could also be on the cards.