logo
Sadhguru Pinpoints America's Drinking Water Problems

Sadhguru Pinpoints America's Drinking Water Problems

Newsweek10-07-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Despite being one of the richest nations on Earth, the United States is struggling to provide all its citizens with clean drinking water—a situation that Indian yogi and mystic Sadhguru calls not just an oversight, but "a crime."
"The United States of America is the place in the world which should never have any issue about drinking water," he said. "But there are issues with water because we have learned to contaminate everything."
In an interview with Newsweek, Sadhguru, who has become known for his large-scale environmental campaigns, challenged the country to rethink its approach to providing this most basic of human needs.
Earlier this year, the American Society of Civil Engineers released its Report Card for America's Infrastructure, giving drinking water a grade of C- and wastewater infrastructure a D+, grades that have not changed since 2021.
"Access to safe, clean, reliable, and affordable water is not a given for all Americans," John Griffith, incoming CEO of the water and wastewater utility company American Water, wrote for Newsweek in May.
The U.S. is 15th in Yale University's Environmental Performance Index, lagging behind the United Kingdom, Finland, Switzerland and Germany, which ranked joint first.
This is despite the fact that the U.S. ranks among the top five countries globally in terms of total renewable freshwater resources, with 9,500 cubic meters of renewable water per capita.
For comparison, India, which has a population of 1.2 billion, has just 1.5 thousand cubic meters of renewable water per capita, according to World Atlas records.
"Water quality in United United States not being good is a crime," Sadhguru said. "Because for 330 million people they have more water than most nations can ever imagine."
Sadhguru went on to blame "industrialization and the overuse of fertilization and pesticides" for the problems.
He told a story from when he embarked on a 10,000-mile motorcycle journey across the U.S. to delve into the spiritual heritage of Native American cultures and raise awareness with his Isha Foundation.
Sadhguru spoke about how when he would stop to drink water from a river or a stream we warned not to, with people telling him that "it's all poison, there is lead in it, there is mercury in it."
"Flowing water—why is it poisonous?" he asked. "Even if I put poison, it should go away, unless I am continuously putting poison into it."
Sadhguru speaking during an interview with Newsweek at the Taj Hotel in London, on July 3.
Sadhguru speaking during an interview with Newsweek at the Taj Hotel in London, on July 3.
Isha Foundation
PFAS (Forever Chemicals)
In recent years, particular attention among public health campaigners has focused on PFAS (per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances) chemicals, otherwise known as "forever chemicals," which can lead to cancers, ulcerative colitis, and other serious health conditions such as hormone disruption and impaired immune systems.
Last spring, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under former President Joe Biden introduced new federal limits on six of these "forever chemicals," added to everyday products to repel oil and water.
Public water systems are expected to monitor these chemicals for three years and be fully compliant by 2029.
The American Chemistry Council and the National Association of Manufacturers have filed a court order challenging these levels, arguing that it "significantly underestimates nationwide costs, does not take into account the latest PFAS data, and will add to affordability challenges for many households."
The Biden administration put $9 billion into his Bipartisan Infrastructure Law dedicated to address PFAS and other contaminants in drinking water but critics have questioned who will fund the treatments required to meet these new containment levels.
The American Water Works Association, a nonprofit working to improve water quality and supply, predicted in June 2024 it will cost about $40 billion (between $2.5 and $3.5 billion a year) to operate and maintain water treatment systems.
"The whole world is talking economy," Sadhguru said. "When all of us are asking our elected governments—the only thing that matters is how much money I have, naturally they will think of marketing and whatever the market forces will decide."
"We have to reframe the life value itself," he added. "What is most valuable for human beings? Now I'm saying, you being joyful, loving, ecstatic is more important."
"Over 70 percent of your body is water," Sadhguru later continued. "If you don't keep your waters happy and sweet you will not be sweet either."
Agriculture
Sadhguru went on to warn about the agriculture industry. "The fertilizer that I put in my land goes into the river water or the lake or whatever—it is contaminated seriously," he said.
"That part of it can only be handled if you have enough vegetation, that is tree-based vegetation," he added. "If you don't have enough strong vegetation it will not absorb, it will naturally go to groundwater and river water."
"Groundwater will be worse," Sadhguru said, "if river water is so contaminated, you can imagine what the well water will be."
Many environmental campaigners have long called for stricter restrictions on pesticides used in farming, but this, like many other environmental debates in America, often leads to a desire for environmental action competing with a desire to reduce regulatory burdens and promote agricultural productivity.
For example, a highly anticipated report from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Make America Health Again (MAHA) Commission is expected to be released soon, looking at the ramifications of the American lifestyle, including the medications prescribed to people and the food served to children at school.
Some farmers and Republicans are worried about what this report might say about glyphosate, the ingredient commonly used in pesticides sprayed on crops.
"I hope there is nothing in the MAHA report that jeopardizes the food supply or the livelihood of farmers," Iowa Republican Senator Chuck Grassley told the Senate in May, saying multiple farmers had reached out to him to voice their concerns.
The month before, a group of 79 Republicans made a similar plea to Kennedy in a letter, arguing that without glyphosate, agricultural "yields and quantity are negatively impacted."
"There's a reason why we still use it: It works," Missouri farmer Blake Hurst said at the time.
Kennedy has denied that the report will harm farming, saying: "There's not a single word in them that should worry the American farmer. We are not going to do anything to jeopardize that business model."
When asked what Sadhguru would say to Americans nervous about environmental restrictions, he said: "The thing is that with every administration the whole thinking shifts as if the facts have shifted."
"Facts have not shifted," he said, "but politics will shift according to one's needs, the narratives keep changing."
"A few facts have to be ascertained," Sadhguru continued, "which I don't think has happened in a very conclusive way. It needs to happen, though."
"It's very important a few facts are established," he said, "other opinions we can have about it—fundamental facts must be established without doubt, then people will respond to it in a more positive way."
Sadhguru went on: "Right now, I don't think that's been done in the United States, mainly because the population and land equation is very good for them. They can afford to deny a whole lot of things."
Sadhguru's Message to Americans
In the simplest terms, Sadhguru's ultimate message to Americans is to "fix vegetation, it'll fix the soil," which he says will in turn fix the quality of water.
He cited one of New York City's initiatives as an example. The city avoided building a water filtration plant, which would have lost more than $8 billion, by investing $1.5 billion into forests surrounding New York City's Catskill, Delaware, and Croton reservoirs that drain into their water supply systems.
"There is no better filtration system then the soil itself," said Sadhguru, who also runs a global organization called Save the Soil.
Guru Sadhguru speaks at an event as part of the "Save the Soil" campaign in North Rhine-Westphalia, Cologne, in 2022.
Guru Sadhguru speaks at an event as part of the "Save the Soil" campaign in North Rhine-Westphalia, Cologne, in 2022.
AP
"But the soil is capable of doing it only if it is organically rich," he added. "It can only be organically rich if there is a substantial amount of tree litter and animal litter."
"Organisms thrive on this organic material," he continued, "if they are there, they are doing a million functions...they are doing a million things in terms of soil chemistry which purifies the water, leaves the richer part of many, many things—minerals and bacteria, many things which are good for us."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman With Green Card Detained by ICE After 14 Years in US, Boyfriend Says
Woman With Green Card Detained by ICE After 14 Years in US, Boyfriend Says

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Woman With Green Card Detained by ICE After 14 Years in US, Boyfriend Says

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Colombian immigrant and green-card holder who has lived in Oklahoma for more than a decade and has American children has been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), according to her boyfriend. Newsweek reached out to ICE via email for comment. A GoFundMe was recently created to help raise funds for legal fees pertaining to the detainment of Daniela Villada Restrepo, who lives in Oklahoma City and works in health care. She has three children, all born in the U.S. She is a lawful permanent resident, meaning she has a green card. Why It Matters Restrepo's case underscores more widespread concerns by immigrants and attorneys warning caution about potential arrest and detainment, even to those without criminal records. Newsweek could not verify whether Restrepo has any type of criminal background. President Donald Trump has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, and immigrants residing in the country illegally and legally, with valid documentation such as green cards and visas, have been detained. Newsweek has reported dozens of cases involving green-card holders and applicants who were swept up in raids and various arrests. ICE agents detain immigrants and asylum seekers reporting for immigration court proceedings at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building's U.S. Immigration Court in New York City on July 24, 2025. ICE agents detain immigrants and asylum seekers reporting for immigration court proceedings at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building's U.S. Immigration Court in New York City on July 24, 2025. DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What To Know According to her boyfriend, Scott Sperber, ICE agents detained Restrepo on April 12 when she missed a mandatory mental health court appointment, incurring a warrant. ICE records show that she is being held at the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, which Sperber claims is unable to provide her mental health therapy. Her Facebook page says she is originally from Medellín, Antioquia, in Colombia. "Daniela has since been held in an ICE detention center located in Alvarado, Texas, unable to complete her mental health therapy," Sperber wrote on the GoFundMe page he started on July 23. "Prior to this detainment, Daniela has legally lived in America for almost 14 years. She was married to an American citizen for almost 10 years, and she has three children living in the United States that are American citizens." Newsweek reached out to Sperber via the GoFundMe page for comment. As of the afternoon of August 4, the page had received just two donations totaling $80. Sperber described his girlfriend as a "wonderful mother and wonderful companion who has had some trials in her life with abusive relationships. She has been fighting to heal and progress." She has worked for the Oklahoma State Health Department for nearly five years and as director of patient care services at The Bilingual Clinic PLLC, a business started by her ex-husband and father of her children. "She is bilingual and has always strived to help provide the best care for those here in America with language barriers," Sperber said. "She has a character that is caring and loving. Daniela wants, above all, to continue living here legally in the United States so she may care for her children and experience the joy of watching them grow up as any parent would." Daniela's Facebook and Instagram accounts use the name "Daniela Deweber," writing in a March post on Facebook: "Daniela Villada Restrepo is the name my parents gave me, Daniela Deweber is my married name." The GoFundMe was started by Sperber because of legal fees associated with Restrepo's hopeful release, as well as limited funds due to multiple health situations. What People Are Saying ICE, on X on August 4: "ICE is targeting illegal aliens, not law-abiding citizens." What Happens Next A lawyer has been hired in Restrepo's case. Sperber, who said he is just starting to recover financially following an automobile accident, is also his grandfather's sole caregiver. The grandfather receives medical treatment for skin cancer. "With all of these overbearing aspects of financial life at play, I do not have the adequate funds to pay for her legal fees, her awarded bond, nor to pay her attorney to continue the fight," Sperber said. "Also, I don't have adequate financial means to pay for all my grandfather's health-related financial obligations. "I am living day by day, one step at a time, and it has become so overwhelming I am finally choosing to ask for help."

Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party
Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party

Buzz Feed

time28 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party

Marjorie Taylor Greene is NOT happy with the Republican Party. She was pissed about the attack on Iran. She broke ranks with Republicans and called the crisis in Gaza a "genocide." And she won't stop talking about how Republicans won't deal with the national debt. Now, she's talking about breaking up with the Republican Party. In an interview with the Daily Mail, the Congress member said: "I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore. I don't know which one it is." She also said: "I think the Republican Party has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans." And finally, she criticized the way Republicans treat women: "I think there's other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women." Those anti-GOP quotes are going viral in a tweet by Brian Tyler Cohen: People in the replies are, like, duh: "What if she switches parties and becomes a normie dem," one person asked. "I really never thought i'd see that day she was saying shit like this and uttering the word 'genocide'…" another person said in disbelief. And then the Lincoln Project invited her to the party: "Welcome to the resistance, Marge." As this person said, "Trumps presidency is so goddamn bad that it wokeified marjorie taylor green."

Why you're getting debanked, and how lawmakers can stop it happening
Why you're getting debanked, and how lawmakers can stop it happening

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Why you're getting debanked, and how lawmakers can stop it happening

For two decades, I have worked with policymakers and law enforcement in North America and Europe to strengthen the financial safeguards that keep state sponsors of terrorism, violent extremist groups, weapons proliferators and criminal networks from exploiting the U.S. banking system. I have supported tough sanctions. I have pushed to close loopholes that hindered enforcement. And I have worked to hold those who enable illicit finance and trade, wittingly or not, to account. From the beginning, banks have been essential partners in these efforts. Through 'Know Your Customer' procedures and the anti-money laundering laws that followed the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, financial institutions have supplied the data and intelligence that help law enforcement uncover illegal activities such as human-trafficking rings, fentanyl supply chains and terror-financing networks. These frameworks played a critical role in safeguarding the country. Unfortunately, some of the tools intended to identity and stop criminal activity are now targeting and unjustly driving lawful customers lawful customers out of the financial system — a phenomenon widely known as 'debanking.' Most Americans are unaware that any cash transaction over $10,000 triggers the creation of a Currency Transaction Report that is filed with the federal government. That dollar amount threshold was set when Lyndon Johnson was in the White House and, incredibly, has never been updated to account for inflation. In today's economy, $10,000 might barely cover the cost of a used car. Yet banks are still required to flag such transactions, regardless of context, producing millions of reports every year that offer little value to law enforcement. Suspicious Activity Reports are yet another layer of government scrutiny. Banks filed more than 4 million Suspicious Activity Reports just last year, according to the Treasury Department. Former officials concede this avalanche of paperwork does little to improve public safety. In fact, it can create a burden for investigators seeking to identify and separate the truly suspicious activity from the mundane. When enforcement cannot separate the signal from the noise, it becomes dangerous. Meanwhile, regulators continue to pressure banks to apply broad risk labels to entire industries simply because they involve cash-heavy businesses, serve overseas clients or operate in unfavored sectors — all in the name of keeping our financial system 'safe and sound.' This isn't theoretical. Religious charities, international aid organizations and countless immigrant-owned businesses have all faced the threat of debanking. They are not terrorists or criminals. They are fellow Americans being pushed to the financial margins by a system that confuses bureaucracy with vigilance. Congress is beginning to address the problem through the Financial Institution Regulatory Modernization Act. This legislation would increase transparency and accountability in how agencies issue guidance and conduct examinations of financial institutions and their customers. It would help ensure that banks are not penalized for serving lawful customers in politically sensitive sectors. It's an encouraging start, but it will not be enough by itself. The single most effective step policymakers could take today to address the unintended debanking of lawful citizens is to modernize the anti-money laundering framework. Modernization should ensure banks provide relevant and actionable information that truly helps investigators and allows financial institutions to replace box-ticking alerts and reporting with data analysis that spots real patterns of abuse. Banks would still verify identities, monitor accounts and file reports the moment they see suspicious activity. These reforms would sharpen these responsibilities and make our country and the banking industry safer. Further, clear standards would let financial institutions maintain relationships with lawful customers while giving authorities faster access to data when real dangers emerge. The U.S. led the world in building a financial system hostile to terrorist financing and illicit finance. That leadership depends on a financial system that is both secure, credible and widely accessible. When honest actors are pushed out incorrectly, arbitrarily, and without transparency, and financial access is treated as a privilege rather than a right, the foundation of that leadership begins to erode. Policymakers do not need to choose between security and fairness. A modernized anti-money laundering regime would strengthen both. It would allow regulators and institutions to focus attention on those posing a real risk and reduce the burden on both law-abiding financial institutions and their customers I have spent much of my life trying to make America safer by making our financial system harder to exploit. That mission still matters. But the tools we built decades ago are not suited to today's challenges. Without reform, the anti-money laundering regime will continue to fail in its most basic duty: distinguishing between friend and foe. Congress and the administration should act now. The stakes are too high to allow inertia to carry the day. regulations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store