Cutting nature-friendly farming budget would be ‘devastating', Government warned
And farmers, who have already been hit by changes to inheritance tax and the abrupt closure of this year's sustainable farming incentive (SFI), the biggest strand of the environmental land management scheme (Elms), said cuts would be 'disastrous'.
The warnings come in the face of reports that the Environment Department (Defra's) nature-friendly farming budget, which has replaced EU agricultural subsidies based mostly on the amount of land farmed, will be cut in the forthcoming spending review.
The Government announced a 'record' £5 billion spending over two years on sustainable farming, but the long term future of the funding looks threatened by looming departmental cuts, while there are concerns cash could be targeted at small farms or in certain areas rather than across the countryside.
Environmentalists warned that the nature-friendly farming budget was the UK's biggest spend on nature and, with 70% of land used for farming, key to meeting the Government's manifesto pledge to achieve targets to halt declines in nature by 2030.
Barnaby Coupe, senior land use policy manager at The Wildlife Trusts, says: 'Rumours of further cuts to the farming budget are deeply concerning and, if true, would cripple funding for restoring nature and remove all hope of reaching the Government's targets for wildlife recovery.'
He warned the £2.5 billion a year in the current farming budget 'already falls short' of what was needed, adding: 'Whittling this down further will see progress stall and reverse.'
'If the cuts go ahead, the Government's promise to bring back wildlife will be in tatters – and farmers will be left unsupported to adapt to extreme climate change and exposed to the whims of market forces demanding unsustainable and intensified food production.'
Richard Benwell, chief of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said: 'Cutting the nature-friendly farming budget would be devastating for nature, farmers and rural communities.'
He said that a transition to nature-friendly farming could help reverse declines in rivers, woodland, wildflowers and wildlife, at the same time as reducing air, soil and water pollution, and supporting a thriving profitable farming sector and rural communities.
'But without a decent budget to pay farmers for the environmental benefits they provide, the future of entire ecosystems will be in doubt.'
Martin Lines, chief executive of the Nature Friendly Farming Network (NFFN), said: 'These cuts would be disastrous if implemented, with the negative impact felt far beyond farming and reaching the wider public.
'Investing in nature-friendly farming helps protect communities from the devastation of flooding.
'It reduces the impact of climate change by protecting and restoring carbon-storing habitats such as peatland.
'It also supports the delivery of affordable, renewable energy.'
He said that if the Government was serious about sustainable growth and long-term food production, it needed to invest in England's landscapes, adding: 'Farmers are ready to play their part, but they are being let down by ministers turning off the funding tap.
'The simplest, most cost-effective solution to the problems we face is to invest now.
'If we fail to act, and wait until the impacts of climate change worsen, the cost will be far higher,' he warned.
National Farmers' Union president Tom Bradshaw said: 'Alongside numerous rural, environmental and nature groups, including the RSPB and National Trust, we have repeatedly called for government to honour its commitments, with budget and partnership, to protect nature and restore habitats through agriculture.
'But without funding, this will be government giving up on its own environmental targets – targets which it relied on farmers to deliver.'
He warned that farmers would be left 'prioritising economic returns and balancing tough choices between farming the land as hard as they can just to make a living and continuing to focus on environmental works they have been proud to deliver'.
And he said farms of all sizes had a key role in helping deliver for food, nature and climate.
Defra said it would not comment on speculation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
Ross Greer pitches alternative Scottish independence strategy
The Scottish Greens MSP said he intends to publish it in full if he becomes one of his party's new co-leaders later this month, telling The National that it involves using existing powers effectively, as well as pushing the limits of devolution and picking more fights with the UK Government. The First Minister put forward his plans for Scottish independence last month, saying getting a second referendum could only be achieved if the SNP win a majority in Holyrood. It has been met by much opposition from SNP members, with at least 43 SNP branches backing a rival proposal, and a separate rebel meeting to be held in September ahead of the party's conference in Aberdeen in October. 'It's quite obviously a strategy to try and get the SNP re-elected without advancing the cause of independence,' Greer said of Swinney's proposal. READ MORE: Two charged after alleged 'gangland firebombing' of Edinburgh taxi firm 'We all know that having a clear majority in the Scottish Parliament is an essential prerequisite. But, in and of itself, that's not enough." He went on: 'What is essential to us actually achieving independence is building and sustaining majority support for it. And on a wider level, making the people of this country actually feel optimistic about Scotland's future.' The Scottish Greens MSP said that his strategy involves building support by 'maximising the good that we can do with the powers of evil'. 'We make it really clear to people that when powers are held here in Scotland, they're used to materially improve their lives,' Greer added. 'If we don't use the powers that we've already got to their full potential, it is very hard to sell people on the idea that giving our parliament more powers will solve their problems.' He then said that his strategy also involves going into the 'grey areas between what's devolved and reserved' and 'essentially dare the UK Government to stop us'. (Image: Fraser Bremner) 'If they want to step in and stop the Scottish Government from doing something that is popular and beneficial to the people who live here, that's not going to hurt the independence cause,' Greer said. He went on: 'And where we hit those limits, and there's something else that we need – specific powers that are currently reserved – we should be challenging the UK Government to devolve those too. We should at the very least make them say why they don't believe the Scottish Parliament should be able to exercise that power.' Asked for some examples of where he'd like to see the Scottish Government push the limits of devolution, Greer said there is 'much more' that could be done in the space of drugs policy and workers rights. 'There's much more we could do to crack down on exploitative and unscrupulous employers. There are conditions that we can attach to procurement – so, whether or not you get a public sector contract or to the grants that hundreds of thousands of businesses across Scotland receive from the Scottish Government and its agencies. 'We can attach conditions to crack down on really poor employment practices like banning unpaid trial shifts.' READ MORE: Scottish Labour councillor jailed for sex offences involving young girl He added: 'We can crack down on companies making workers here redundant and offshoring those jobs then receiving further public contracts. 'There are all sorts of ways in which we can really push the limits of devolution with employment law that will make a really tangible improvement in the lives of people in this country.' The Scottish Greens – when the party was in government as part of the Bute House Agreement – spearheaded legislation to introduce Scotland's own deposit return scheme. Despite the UK Government initially allowing devolved nations to design their own scheme, it refused to provide the Scottish Government with an exemption from the Internal Market Act, particularly in relation to the inclusion of glass in the scheme. This led to it being scrapped in 2023, with the Scottish Government now facing a £166m legal claim from Biffa Waste Services, which had been hired to collect recycled containers. With that being an example of the Scottish Government pushing the limits of devolution and facing a brick wall, The National asked Greer how this strategy would navigate such challenges. Greer responded by saying that the UK Government has been 'much smarter' when it comes to picking fights over devolution. 'The three most obvious examples are the deposit return scheme, gender recognition reforms, and banning traps to improve animal welfare,' he said. 'The vast majority of people in Scotland support some kind of deposit return scheme. [But] it's an issue that very few people care so deeply about that it's going to change how they vote on the constitution.' Greer added: 'Gender recognition reform is an incredibly important issue. But it's also very divisive within both Yes and No, so it's not the kind of issue that moves people from one side to the other. "And glue traps would also fit under the category of being something that the vast majority of people, if asked, would want to ban for the sake of animal welfare. But again, it's not going to shift how they vote.' He added: 'It was absolutely right to hold the line on gender recognition reform, both because that was a modest reform that would have improved the lives of trans people, and also because it was outrageous for the UK Government to step into what was unquestionably a devolved area like that. 'But if we can pick fights over areas that are unquestionably popular and where people could see the benefit of Holyrood winning the fight. That is either going to result in our success – we're then able to deliver that policy and improve people's lives – or the UK Government steps in and vetoes it, which makes it even clearer to people that these are the kind of powers they need to set here, not at Westminster.' He gave the example of powers over introducing a wealth tax in Scotland, which is currently limited by devolved powers. 'We can tax wealth. That is effectively what the council tax is. It's a tax on the most common form of wealth, which is property. But it's not what people are really talking about most of the time when they refer to a wealth tax,' Greer said. 'If that power were to be a wider power over taxation, we would be able to address the scandal that the top 2% of people in this country have more wealth than the bottom 50%. We would be able to tackle that inequality, invest in our public services, materially improve the lives of people who live here right now, and build that sense of hope and optimism that this country is improving – that it's getting better, that it's moving forward." He added: 'We know that wealth taxation and fair taxes on the super rich are overwhelmingly popular. 'And again, if the UK Government really wants to step in to defend the interests of the super rich and deprive the Scottish NHS of more funding then they're welcome to do that, but at that point they are once again making the argument for independence for us.'
The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
'Independence first, everything else later' is doomed to fail
In their view, Scotland should focus purely on achieving a Yes vote, leaving all questions about what an independent Scotland would look like to be settled afterwards. But that's a losing strategy, one that kept us stuck in a self-destructing UK back in 2014 and is keeping us stuck there now. In 2014, the campaign's instinct was to avoid scaring voters. We were told to 'reassure', to keep the pitch narrow, and avoid anything controversial. The hope was that by keeping our plans bland, we would make independence a safe, neutral choice. It didn't work, we offered a technical case (Scotland's Future publication) without painting a compelling enough vision of what life would be like after independence. The Yes campaign lacked any vision for radical change even though most independence supporters had their own personal vision founded on their personal core beliefs but we've been conditioned to be scared to share it, when speaking from the heart is what makes the difference. READ MORE: UN case will determine who is entitled to call an indy referendum We've got to stop trying to run the most conservative independence campaign in political history. Believe in Scotland is publishing the results of our 2025 Big Indy Survey. We posted that 92% of 7200+ Yes supporters want Scotland to be a republic, many commented that it harmed the cause to say so, as we need to stick to the 'independence first, everything else later' mantra. Wrong: in December we commissioned a poll by Norstat and the standard Yes/No question came back 54% Yes. When we asked the same respondents the Yes/No question if independence meant Scotland becoming a republic, Yes rose to 59%. The evidence for going big on key policies SINCE 2014, we've tested different messages and the evidence is clear. When we combine independence with bold, popular policies, independence support rises. A Republican Scotland: Polling shows that independence support increases 5% when tied to the promise of becoming a republic. This is because it's not just about removing the monarchy, it's about building a modern democracy, a society based on wellbeing and merit and not one headed up by inherited political power and massive wealth by birthright. Rejoining the EU: Brexit has been a disaster, and a clear majority in Scotland wants back in the EU. Linking independence directly to rejoining turns it from a vague change into a concrete route back to freedom of movement, cooperation, and prosperity. Thought to be worth 5% to the Yes cause as most new indy supporters cite Brexit as the reason for their change of heart. Wellbeing Economy and Wellbeing pension: A wellbeing economy, one that measures success by health, happiness, and fairness and not just GDP speaks directly to people's concerns. Coupling that with a wellbeing pension, protected from Westminster cuts, older voters will see that independence improves their standard of living. These policies connect to voters' real hopes and fears. They make independence a means to an end, not an end in itself. Takes independence support to 66%, (+12%). The trap of process-only politics SOME argue that adding specific policies now will 'divide the movement.' They fear alienating potential Yes voters who disagree on one or two points. But the truth is the opposite. A 'vote Yes, then we'll decide' approach alienates people by asking them to commit without knowing what they're signing up for. By refusing to commit to a bold vision now, we risk signalling that independence might just be the status quo with a saltire on top. That's not inspiring, the undecided will just see a set of Westminster politicians they don't trust, losing powers to a set of Holyrood politicians they don't trust – big deal. Breaking out of the deadlock BREAKING the deadlock means making independence the delivery vehicle for the radical changes that people desire for Scotland. We are selling a new Scotland so our campaign must be a campaign for a better Scotland and not just for a technical exercise in constitutional change. A winning vision – based on the will of the people. Building it with the people is the solution and that's why Believe in Scotland is campaigning for a Scottish Citizens' Convention. The Citizens' Convention is key to engaging the public in a new national conversation just as we did in 2014 when grassroots supporters moved the polls by sharing their hopes and dreams for a better, fairer, prosperous Scotland. It's a democratic process bringing together civic Scotland and citizens' voices from across Scotland to design the type of Scotland we want. Workers, communities, businesses, academics, and campaigners all have a seat at the table. And you will absolutely find that if we get the nation dreaming of a better Scotland that they will dream of an independent Scotland. READ MORE: Could Scotland challenge hotels housing asylum seekers? A legal expert explains This is how we co-create a credible, inclusive vision with the people. And here's the crucial part: the outcome can be put back to the people as a manifesto for independence. Because more than 80% of what the people will say they want can't be delivered without independence. That makes independence not just a political pitch, but a nation in agreement on what independence will deliver from day one. It should also lead to a festival of democracy– a series of confirmatory referendums on the key issues, such as joining the EU etc, so the people can say yes to the bigger picture but reject individual parts of it if they want to. The cost of timidity IF we stick with 'independence first, everything else later,' we risk another 2014. We'll be cautious when we need to be bold, defensive when we need to be visionary, on the backfoot in every debate like we were in indyref1. And we could lose again, not because independence isn't the answer but because we refused to give independence a moral purpose, and failed to give them a reason to believe. The stakes are too high, we are not just fighting for some academic technical constitutional change. We are fighting for the chance to transform Scotland into a fairer, greener, happier, healthier and more democratic place to live and work. That transformation must be built into the case for independence from the very start and the Citizens' Convention is the best tool to do that. Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp is an economist, the CEO of Business for Scotland, the founder of the Believe in Scotland campaign consisting of 143 local and national Yes Groups, and the author of Scotland the Brief
The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Fishing leaders demand stop to offshore wind farm expansion
The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) said Scottish Government plans to install up to 40GW of offshore wind capacity by 2040 are 'far too high'. It said achieving the target will cause irreversible damage to the marine environment and displace fishing fleets from grounds they have worked for generations. The call is included in the SFF's official responses to two major Scottish Government consultations: the updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement and the draft Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy. The Scottish Government outlines that offshore wind could ensure Scotland meets its net zero target by 2030 and provide scores of green jobs as part of the just transition away from dependency on oil and gas. READ MORE: UK inflation rate rose 'more than expected' in July Last month, First Minister John Swinney visited Scotland's newest wind farm – Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) off the coast of Fife. During his visit he said offshore wind is 'one of Scotland's greatest modern success stories'. He said: 'Driving economic growth and tackling the climate emergency are two of my Government's priorities, and NnG is a shining example of how these priorities can work hand-in-hand to reshape Scotland's future for the better.' The UK Government has also expressed support for the expansion of Scotland's wind farms. It announced in March that the Port of Cromarty Firth in the Highlands will be a major hub for the UK's world-leading floating offshore wind industry, and it awarded more than £55 million for its expansion. Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the SFF – which is Scotland's biggest fishing industry body – said: 'This isn't a plan – it's a stampede. The Government is charging ahead without the faintest idea how to protect the people and places that will be trampled in the rush. 'We've been telling them for years these plans will seriously damage our industry, but they haven't listened. Now their own assessments show the harm that will be done to fishing, and the environment on which it depends. 'Until they can prove our industry and our seas will be safeguarded, the only responsible choice is to slam on the brakes.' The SFF said current mitigation measures are almost non-existent and there is no credible plan to compensate fishing businesses for the losses they will face. READ MORE: Labour 'lose control' as gilt yields rise above worst of Liz Truss era It also says the Government's updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement published in June made repeated references to economic benefits but failed to mention the climate crisis. Macdonald added: 'Fishing is one of Scotland's original green industries. The Scottish fleet has been putting healthy, renewable and sustainable food on plates for generations. 'But we're being shoved aside for projects that feel like a last gamble for a Government to revive an ailing Scottish economy.' Fishing leaders say the cumulative impact of existing and emerging marine conservation policies, renewable energy projects alongside fishing being expected to offset environmental impacts of offshore wind developments, is leaving the industry at 'breaking point'. Macdonald said: 'The Scottish Government's approach is picking winners and losers, and fishing seems to lose every time. 'We need ministers to step up and support our industry with positive action. 'Renewable food cannot be the price to be paid for renewable energy. Betting the house – and Scotland's fishing industry – on offshore wind that is far from 'clean' and where all the evidence points to both known and not yet fully known environmental damage is a very high-risk strategy.' The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
