Today Show slammed for out of touch advice to struggling Aussie renters
During a segment on the rental shortage on Thursday morning, Gibson shared advice for renters who want to stand out from the hordes of other applicants at an inspection.
'It's important to treat this like a military operation, treat it like a job interview,' Gibson said.
'When you go into that first inspection, you need to make an impression on that agent. Bring a printed version of your application, dress like it's a job interview.
'You can still offer more rent or money upfront in most states at the moment. Rent bidding is becoming illegal in Victoria in November. It's illegal in Queensland.'
Specifically, Gibson recommended offering to pay more than the quoted amount, or to offer two to three months of rent upfront in advance.
In response to hearing the practice is illegal, or capped at a few weeks' worth of rent, Karl said, 'What about a little bit of a...' and made a 'backhander' motion to suggest making a covert payment.
The segment drew widespread criticism at a time when many are struggling to find a rental, and even those who have are having difficulty paying very high rent prices.
'Two to three months up front? Sure, everyone has $5,000 they can just fire off,' one wrote.
'Treat it like a job interview? What is wrong with these people? Why not: "practice your lowest bow and curtsy",' another said.
'Who can afford three months of rent and bond in advance?' another wrote.
'Who needs a social life when you can pay to live in some random a***ole's fifth investment property?' another said.
On top of Gibson's suggestion to treat rental inspections 'like a job interview', offer a higher rent or pay in advance, and pre-prepare an application - he called for prospective renters to call real estate agents within 24 hours to follow up their application and make a personal pitch.
He also said hikes in average rental prices appear to be slowing this year, having reached a tipping point that made them unaffordable for many prospective tenants.
'Rents are up 43 per cent over five years, it's added $10,000 to the average rent in the last five years,' Gibson said, looking at the median price across five cities.
'But we have seen in the last quarter the lowest increase since 2020 so there maybe is a glimmer of hope that the trend is kind of coming back down.
'When you look at Sydney and Melbourne, they've actually gone up by only about 1.5 per cent in the past year, whereas other medium-sized capitals - Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide - they're the ones that are still rising quite fast at around five per cent.
'It looks like the really bad years of the last few years might be coming to an end for renters, so there is a bit of a glimmer of hope.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Little India has been part of Melbourne's multicultural fabric for decades. Some traders fear they'll soon have to leave
Sudesh Singh is surrounded by sequinned saris that hang on the walls of her clothing store. For more than 30 years, Singh has sold clothing in Dandenong's Little India precinct in Melbourne's south-east. The precinct spills out from train station in Dandenong – one of Melbourne's most culturally diverse suburbs. Colourful clothing shops sit alongside sweet stores selling confectionery from Kolkata. But as the construction date for a private redevelopment of the area looms, Singh and other traders fear they won't survive. They say a planned revitalisation of the area – which will transform it into one made up of apartments, shops and offices – risks the preservation of the Indian shopping hub that began in the mid-1990s. Traders say business is slow and empty windows suggest some shop owners have already left the precinct. Others say they will close their doors before the end of the year, instead of temporarily relocating, before the first stage of construction starts in 2026. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The plan for the renewal includes a new Little India precinct. But Singh says traders remain uncertain whether rent increases will make them unable to compete with newer businesses in the area. Rendered images of the development show 'Little India' shops lining an open-air laneway. But Singh says the traders have not been given assurances they will be able to lease shops in the new Little India. 'Parliament didn't make this street. The council didn't make this street. The traders did,' Singh says. 'But what have they given to Little India? Or what are they promising to give to Little India? Have they given anything in writing to Little India traders? No.' Victoria's minister for development Victoria and precincts, Harriet Shing, told state parliament's budget estimates inquiry last month that the new Little India would be a 'fantastic addition to the heart of Dandenong' and would 'reflect and respect the culture of the area'. 'It will also offer modern and new facilities and improved retail spaces for tenants, creating more opportunities for businesses to thrive,' she said in a written response to parliament's public accounts and estimates committee. Singh said the private developer, Capital Alliance, was contacting traders to commence discussions about the new tenancies planned. She said all current traders would be given an opportunity to be part of the area's redevelopment but noted this would be on 'commercial terms that reflect market values', due to the landlord being a private developer. Singh is blunt in her assessment of what this means for current Little India shop owners: 'The bottom line is, we can only survive if the rental is reasonable. 'It's no longer a precinct, it's no longer Little India.' 'They're selling it as a Little India. But if we look at that, they've got hotels, motels and accommodation. They want to make it like Bourke Street.' Development Victoria informed Singh, who previously ran two shops on Foster Street, she was required to vacate one of her stores by the end of November due to the first phase of the redevelopment. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion A short walk along Foster Street, Purabi Das runs two clothing shops. She says business has been particularly sluggish since the start of the year. She points to the usual pressures on brick-and-mortar retail and a rise in home-run businesses for Indian clothing. 'From Covid times, some people have been doing businesses from home. Every garage, people are selling stuff from home,' she says. In 2020, Development Victoria selected Capital Alliance to continue a wider revitalisation project for the suburb – first promised by the Bracks Labor government in 2006 – that will transform a two-hectare area of land opposite the Dandenong train station, which includes Little India. An estimated completion date for the new precinct is expected to be confirmed within the next year. Last October, the state's planning minister greenlighted the development's masterplan. The Allan government said the development would deliver 470 new homes, alongside commercial and retails spaces. The wider Revitalising Central Dandenong project includes $290m of state government funding and $1bn fron private investment. Singh wants all Little India traders to be given the opportunity to move into the new precinct. 'They need to be given a fair opportunity. Not an opportunity where they can't survive. That's the only way,' she says. Ronan Mellan, acting group head of precincts at Development Victoria, said it was developing a 'brand new Little India precinct in Central Dandenong – offering modern facilities and creating more opportunities for businesses to thrive'. 'We do not comment on confidential tenant-landlord arrangements' he said. Capital Alliance was contacted for comment.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How will Australia's under-16s social media ban be enforced, and which platforms will be exempt?
Australians using a range of social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and X will need to have their age checked to ensure they're 16 or older when the social media ban comes into effect from early December. Sign up: AU Breaking News email How will it work? And what information will people need to hand over? From 10 December, new laws will apply to platforms that meet the government's definition of an 'age-restricted social media platform', which has the sole or significant purpose of enabling social interaction with two or more users, and which allows users to post material on the service. The government has not specified by name any platforms that will be included in the ban, meaning any site that meets the above definition could be included except if they meet the exemptions released on Wednesday. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has said that the covered platforms include – but are not limited to – Facebook, Instagram, X, Snapchat, and YouTube. The communications minister, Anika Wells, said these platforms would be expected to take reasonable steps to deactivate accounts for users under 16, prevent kids registering new accounts, check ages, and also prevent workarounds to bypass the restrictions. The government said platforms would be exempt if they had the primary purpose of: Messaging, emailing, voice calling or video calling. Playing online games. Sharing information about products or services. Professional networking or professional development. Education. Health. Communication between educational institutions and students or their families. Facilitating communication between providers of healthcare and people using those providers' services. It will be up to the eSafety commissioner to determine which platforms meet the criteria for an exemption. In practice, this means that LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Roblox, and Coursera would likely be exempt if assessed to meet the criteria. LinkedIn had previously argued to the government it was not of interest to children. In theory, it could also mean YouTube Kids could be exempt from the ban if it meets the criteria for an exemption, given it does not allow comments on videos. But the government has not confirmed this, and YouTube has not commented on whether it would seek an exemption for its service designed for children. Platforms that have not been named by the government but do not meet the exemption criteria will also need to consider whether they need to bring in age assurance by December. This would include services like Bluesky, Donald Trump's Truth Social platform, Discord and Twitch. A common misconception about the social media ban is that it will only apply to children. In order to ensure teens remain off social media, the platforms will need to check the ages of all user accounts in Australia. How they will do that is not prescribed, but it will be informed by the outcome of the age assurance technology trial, the full report of which is due in August. The government has legislated that although ID checks can be one form of age assurance, it can't be the only one accepted. It's expected Australia will follow a similar path for age assurance that launched in the UK in July, which includes options such as: Allowing banks and mobile providers to confirm a user is over 18. Asking site users to upload a photo that is then matched with photo ID. Use of facial age estimation technology. In addition to that, platforms could potentially infer user ages based on account behaviour or age. For example, if you signed up for Facebook in 2009, you would be over 16 by now. YouTube has also flagged it will use artificial intelligence to determine user ages. Albanese has compared the social media ban to alcohol restrictions, and said there will no doubt be children who manage to get around the ban, but he argued it was still worth doing. In the UK, where age verification was brought in this week for accessing pornography websites, there has been a surge in people using virtual private networks (VPNs), which hide a user's real location, enabling access to blocked websites. Four of the top five free apps on the Apple app store in the UK on Thursday were VPN apps, with Proton, the most popular, reporting a 1,800% increase in downloads. The Australian government has said it expects the platforms will implement 'reasonable steps' to account for how teens may seek to avoid the ban. Platforms that do not take what the eSafety commissioner determines to be 'reasonable steps' to keep kids off their service can face a fine of up to $49.5m that will be determined in the federal court. What 'reasonable steps' means will be up to the commissioner to determine. When asked on Wednesday, Wells said: 'I think reasonable steps is reasonable.' 'These are meant to be working rules, and they also need to sort of correct any errors as they arise. Because these are not set-and-forget rules, these are set-and-support rules. They are world-leading. But this is manifestly too important for us not to have a crack.'
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Australia's intelligence boss reveals the common act that is putting the country at risk - so are YOU guilty of it?
Australia's intelligence boss has warned that people who boast about their access to sensitive information are openly painting themselves as targets for foreign spying operations. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess chided people who held security clearances or who had access to classified information openly promoting themselves on social media at the annual Hawke lecture at the University of South Australia on Thursday. More than 35,000 Australians indicated they had access to classified or private information on a single professional networking site, he said, adding 7000 referred to working in the defence sector and critical technologies. Nearly 2500 boasted about having a security clearance, he said. 'All too often we make it all too easy,' he said. Almost 400 people explicitly said they worked on the AUKUS project, under which Australia will acquire nuclear-powered submarines as the keystone of its military power. Mr Burgess put the cost of espionage - including the theft of intellectual property resulting in lost revenue and responding to incidents - at $12.5 billion in 2023/24. This included cyber spies stealing nearly $2 billion of trade secrets and intellectual property from Australian companies. The number came from a conservative Australian Institute of Criminology analysis that took into account details for ASIO investigations, he said. Hackers stealing commercially sensitive information from one Australian exporter gave a foreign country a leg up in a subsequent contract negotiation, 'costing Australia hundreds of millions of dollars', Mr Burgess said. The director-general also revealed details of multiple espionage operations as he warned officials, businesses and the general public about interference threats and the impact of lax security. Russian spies were deported in 2022 after an ASIO investigation found they were 'recruiting proxies and agents to obtain sensitive information, and employing sophisticated tradecraft to disguise their activities', he said. Russia, China and Iran were singled out as adversaries but 'you would be genuinely shocked by the number and names of countries trying to steal our secrets', he said. ASIO, the nation's domestic intelligence agency, disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the last three years, more than the previous eight years combined. Mr Burgess said spies used a security clearance-holder to obtain information about trade negotiations and convinced one state bureaucrat to log into a database to obtain details of people a foreign regime considered dissidents. The director-general also detailed how a foreign intelligence service ordered spies to apply for Australian government jobs, including at national security institutions, to access classified information. Another example included a visiting academic linked to a foreign government breaking into a restricted lab with sensitive technology and filming inside, he said. 'They are just the tip of an espionage iceberg,' Mr Burgess said. Foreign companies tied to intelligence services had also tried to access private data, buy land near military sites and collaborate with researchers developing sensitive technology. 'In recent years, for example, defence employees travelling overseas have been subjected to covert room searches, been approached at conferences by spies in disguise and given gifts containing surveillance devices,' Mr Burgess added. Hackers had also broken into the network of a peak industry body to steal sensitive information about exports and foreign investment, as well as into a law firm to take information about government-related cases, he said.
