logo
Democratic Party chair lashes officer in leaked call, prompting more infighting

Democratic Party chair lashes officer in leaked call, prompting more infighting

Washington Post4 days ago

Months of infighting at the Democratic National Committee escalated into a new round of open warfare Sunday, with several top party officials accusing an embattled member of their leadership team of leaking a portion of a private and emotional meeting.
During a May 15 Zoom meeting, DNC Chair Ken Martin said he had recently questioned whether he wanted to continue in his role and blamed Vice Chair David Hogg for destroying his ability to lead the party, according to a portion of the audio posted by Politico.
After the leaked audio was published Sunday, five of the nine DNC leaders on the Zoom call at the time of the leaked clip closed ranks around Martin and accused Hogg, or people associated with him, of leaking it, in statements and interviews with The Washington Post. None provided evidence for their claims. Hogg denied leaking the audio.
The DNC officials who pointed fingers at Hogg included fellow vice chair Malcolm Kenyatta, who said Hogg 'proves he has no relationship with integrity if he's willing to record and leak private conversations'; Association of State Democratic Committees President Jane Kleeb, who said 'the deliberate leaking of private conversations — by David Hogg and his allies must stop'; and DNC Secretary Jason Rae, who said 'there is no doubt in my mind that David Hogg leaked this recording.'
'Does David Hogg benefit from this? Yes,' said Washington Democratic Chair Shasti Conrad, who would face Hogg if the DNC votes to hold a new election this week.
Martin declined to comment on the source of the leak, but said in a statement about the call that he is not going anywhere and that he took 'this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats.'
Hogg, who is facing a possible ouster this week as part of a separate dispute, denied leaking the audio in a statement posted on X on Sunday afternoon.
'A lot of people are accusing me of leaking this recording. These are the messages from the reporter who wrote the story,' said Hogg, who in his post shared a screenshot showing he did not appear to respond to texts from the reporter who broke the story contacting him for comment.
The open hostilities come as the party debates larger questions over rebuilding its reputation and winning back core voters following a disastrous 2024 election that saw Republicans win the presidency and both chambers of Congress. An April Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll found that Americans see the Democratic Party as somewhat more out of touch 'with the concerns of most people' than either President Donald Trump or the Republican Party.
The skirmish over the meeting and the leak is the latest in an increasingly bitter fight over Hogg's April announcement that he would back primary challengers to incumbent House Democrats. Some DNC members are uneasy with Hogg serving as a party officer while doing so, concerned that it gives the appearance that the DNC is interfering in primary contests. Martin has said he is committed to introducing a pledge that 'will require all party officers — including myself — to remain neutral in primaries' to 'ensure no party official can abuse their position to tilt the outcome of an election.'
In the May 15 Zoom meeting, Martin said 'I don't know if I want to do this anymore,' and told Hogg 'you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to.'
Hogg, a 25-year-old gun-control activist who survived the deadly 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, was elected to his DNC role in February and is the first Gen Z member to serve as a vice chair. In April, he announced a $20 million effort to challenge 'out-of-touch, ineffective' incumbent House Democrats in party primaries, which he has framed as a way to get Democrats into 'fighting shape.' Hogg has said he would only back challengers in safe Democratic districts.
Critics of the effort have called it a distraction and argued that it will divert resources and distract from taking back control of the U.S. House.
Last month a DNC panel found that Hogg and Kenyatta were not properly elected earlier this year, setting off a process that could lead to their ouster. The challenge that prompted those findings, involving the party's gender diversity rules, came before Hogg's announcement that he would get involved in primaries. It was filed by Kalyn Free, an Oklahoma activist who unsuccessfully sought one of the vice chair slots in the Feb. 1 election.
But the primary debate has led some DNC members to view the vote as a convenient way to get rid of Hogg and the drama around him, while others have warned that his removal would send a bad message about the party's unity and outreach to young voters. Hogg, in a statement after the panel's decision, said it is 'impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party which loomed large over this vote.'
On Monday, the DNC will begin an electronic vote on the committee's resolution. If the full body accepts it, new elections will be held for two vice chair positions; if it's rejected, Hogg and Kenyatta will maintain their positions.
The new elections, which would begin later this week, would be limited to the same five candidates who ran in February: Hogg, Kenyatta, Free, Kansas Democratic Party Chair Jeanna Repass and Conrad.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The great American race to the bottom
The great American race to the bottom

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

The great American race to the bottom

In 2016 Donald Trump made history, by becoming the first person to be elected president with a net unfavorable rating. In 2024, he repeated that feat. But his opponents have not fared much better. American politics has turned distinctly negative in the last 10 years, and neither party has shown much interest in reversing that trend. Trump's favorability issues are well-known. He has rarely enjoyed a net favorable rating. With the exception of the brief inauguration honeymoon, Trump has been net negative his entire time as a candidate and as president. Yet he has taken two out of three elections, to the mass confusion of Democrats. There should be no confusion. If the Democratic Party and its media allies would take a break from their all-consuming anti-Trump rage, they would see that their own team is not popular at all. Hillary Clinton was net negative for much of her campaign in 2016, and Kamala Harris hovered around break-even last year but was dragged down by the enormous unpopularity of Joe Biden. This theme of unpopularity is not limited to presidential candidates; it is prevalent throughout American politics. The politicians who are not underwater with the public tend to have low name recognition. As name ID rises, as do negative perceptions. In American politics, the more you know, the less you like. Trump is doing surprisingly well, given his past polling. His favorability is in the same neighborhood as former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama at the same point in their second terms. It is true that Trump's average is boosted by several Republican-friendly polls, with Trafalgar having Trump at plus-8, Insider Advantage at plus-11 and Rasmussen at plus-5. But even the less Trump-friendly media polls have the president's favorability in the mid-40s, which is pretty good for Trump. In the most recent YouGov poll — a poll that tends to tilt against Trump — the president scores 43 percent favorable against 52 percent unfavorable. Eighty percent of Republicans approve of Trump, against 11 percent disapprove, whereas Democrats disapprove at 93 percent against 5 percent approve. Independents are net-negative on Trump, 56 percent to 36 percent. It is this partisan split that has come to define American public opinion. The RealClearPolitics favorability average shows JD Vance, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Republican Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) all in negative territory. Schumer has taken Mitch McConnell's crown for the most despised leader at a net-negative 18 points. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has managed to score roughly even on favorability, but he is also the least known of all the leaders. I am sure he will join his colleagues in public opinion purgatory if people get to know him better. In the June 2 YouGov poll, a laundry list of prominent Republican and Democratic politicians were polled and almost all of them were under water with independents. Those with low net negatives often had a majority of independents with no opinion. Schumer led the hit parade of disapproval at net negative 24 points with independents, followed by Trump (minus-20 points), Biden (minus-17 points), Gavin Newsom (minus-15 points) and Harris (minus-12 points). Vance, last polled in May, was at minus-21 points with independents. Outside of Harris and Newsom, most of the potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates were narrowly net negative, but also had low name recognition. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Pete Buttigieg were each at minus-3 points and Gretchen Whitmer was at just minus-2 points, but all of them had under 60 percent on name identification. The most curious feature of the polling is that Bernie Sanders is the only truly popular politician among the whole bunch. Sanders, the only Democratic-leaning contender currently out on tour (great merch still available!) enjoys 48 percent approval against 38 percent disapproval, including a gravity-defying 51 percent approval with independents. But Sanders's numbers are more a reflection of his political impotence and irrelevance than anything. He is doing great because there is little pushback, and he is generating little criticism because he has no power to do anything so he doesn't matter. Trump matters, Vance matters. Johnson matters, and Schumer and Newsom have actual power. Harris remains merely a possible 2028 Democratic nominee. The American media-political power structure for both the left and the right are not going to waste their time on someone who has no real political power in Washington, is not a serious threat to be a future presidential nominee and who is repeating the same old lines over and over. Sanders's free pass keeps him popular, while his opening act, Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who could be a force in the future, gets the scrutiny — and the weaker polling (minus-6 points overall and minus-7 points with independents). The sour mood by independents is both an Achilles' heel and an opportunity for Republicans and Democrats. The 'curse on both houses' attitude means that independents are up for grabs and can make either party the majority. Neither party seems interested in a selective moderation that could attract independents. Conflict and constantly shifting policy (particularly on economic matters) may excite Trump's partisans, but they are a turn-off for independents. Meanwhile, Democrats seem determined to cling to unpopular policies, like shielding violent illegal immigrants from deportation and the most extreme transgender ideologies. A permanent majority is available in America for both parties. Too bad nobody is paying attention. Keith Naughton, a longtime Republican political consultant, is co-founder of Silent Majority Strategies, a public and regulatory affairs consulting firm, and a former Pennsylvania political campaign consultant.

Live updates: Pritzker testifies before Congress on Illinois sanctuary laws
Live updates: Pritzker testifies before Congress on Illinois sanctuary laws

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Live updates: Pritzker testifies before Congress on Illinois sanctuary laws

The Brief Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker is testifying Thursday morning in front of a House committee about the state's sanctuary laws. Pritzker has said some GOP committee members want to question him "for a dog-and-pony show." The hearing could serve as another opportunity for Pritzker to position himself as a top contender in the Democratic Party. WASHINGTON, D.C. - Gov. JB Pritzker is set to testify before a U.S. House committee on Thursday morning about the state's "sanctuary" laws aimed at limiting local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Pritzker, along with fellow Democratic governors Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York, appeared in front of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The entire hearing is being streamed live in the media player at the top of this story. 9:34 a.m. - Pritzker addresses the busloads of migrants that Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas sent to Chicago starting in August 2022. "Illinois chose a different path. Faced with a humanitarian crisis, our state made sure children and families did not go hungry or freeze to death," Pritzker said. 9:30 a.m. - Pritzker begins opening remarks: "I have seen firsthand how states have had to shoulder the consequences of a broken immigration system. I'm proud of how we've and compassionate immigration policies I believe are vital." Pritzker then recounted his family history, the arrival of his great-grandfather escaping pogroms and coming to Chicago. It feels like Pritzker might utilize this moment to introduce himself to a national audience who might not be familiar with him. 9:24 a.m. - Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), similar to his role in the Brandon Johnson hearing, hyped up Pritzker's investments and leadership in Illinois. 9:21 a.m. - During Lynch's opening remarks, Florida Rep. Byron Donalds, who is running for Governor there, walks out and puts his finger to his head, mouthing the word "crazy." The political context of these hearings is inescapable: Chairman Comer is running as a Republican for Governor of Kentucky. Donald is running in Florida. Pritzker and Walz may be running for president. There will be fundraising pitches based upon the content today. 9:15 a.m. - Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) follows Chairman Comer, condemning the Trump administration's mass deportation policies. Lynch used his opening remarks to tie the hearing to the "militarization of American cities" under Trump and the administration's deportation of young U.S. citizens with undocumented parents. 9:07 a.m. - Hearing begins as House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer opens the meeting with opening statements on "dangerous sanctuary policies." "Let me clear, sanctuary policies don't protect Americans. They protect criminal illegals," Comer said. 8:56 a.m. - Pritzker has entered the building. 8:50 a.m. - Members of the Illinois House Freedom Caucus are in attendance for Pritzker's remarks. 8:40 a.m. 8:25 a.m. - Pritzker's office released his planned remarks hours ahead of the hearing. Among his talking points, Pritzker highlighted how Illinois mobilized quickly to offer shelter, food and services to over 50,000 migrants sent from the southern border without warning. Pritzker blamed both parties in Congress and the federal government for their failure to act. He also said that Illinois cooperates with federal authorities on criminal matters but won't misuse state resources for immigration enforcement that doesn't serve public safety. 8:12 a.m. - We are less than an hour away from the opening gavel. Pritzker, Walz and Hochul are expected to kick off the hearing with planned opening remarks. FOX 32's Paris Schutz laid out what he expects to hear from Pritzker's testimony. Hours ahead of the hearing, Pritzker released his planned opening remarks, which touched on how Illinois is handling the influx of immigrants and prioritizing public safety. Read his full remarks here. What we know The governor has said he believes some GOP members want to question him "for a dog-and-pony show" and who "simply want to grandstand in front of the cameras." He added, "I'm going there in a serious matter to give them my views about how we're managing through a problem that's been created for the state by the federal government." In a statement, Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Kentucky) said, "The governors of these states must explain why they are prioritizing the protection of criminal illegal aliens over the safety of U.S. citizens, and they must be held accountable." Back in March, the same committee hosted Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, along with the mayors of Boston, Denver, and New York, to testify about the city's sanctuary policies. The national spotlight could also serve as a chance for Pritzker to further cement his status as a top potential contender for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028. The 60-year-old has not yet said if he'll run for re-election to the governorship in 2026. Pritzker has been garnering national headlines from calling out "do nothing Democrats" during a speech in New Hampshire, a key primary state, to appearing on late night talk shows. The governor, who is worth $3.7 billion per Forbes, is seen as a top contender for his party's nomination in 2028. He boasts a long list of progressive accomplishments in Illinois since he first took office in 2019, including codifying abortion rights, banning assault weapons, a big infrastructure funding plan, the legalization of recreational marijuana, and stabilizing the state's notoriously shaky finances. Dig deeper In 2017, Illinois enacted the TRUST Act under Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner. The law bans local police from complying with federal requests to detain or arrest a person in the country illegally, unless ordered by a judge. Local law enforcement also cannot stop, search, or arrest anyone based solely on their immigration or citizenship status. In 2021, the state legislature passed laws expanding protections for immigrants in Illinois. The updated laws required local officials to end partnerships with ICE to detain immigrants. Lawmakers also prohibited officials from inquiring about the citizenship or immigration status of an individual in custody, unless they're presented with a federal criminal warrant. Among other measures, the state legislature also required state and local law enforcement agencies to report requests from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Despite the moves to protect migrants from potential arrests and deportations, Republicans have criticized the policies. U.S. Rep. Mary Miller, a Republican who represents much of the rural cental parts of the state, called on local sheriffs earlier this year to defy the state's sanctuary laws. She said such policies have turned Illinois into a "cesspool of crime and drugs."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store