China Tells Brokers to Stop Touting Stablecoins to Cool Frenzy
Some leading brokerages and think tanks in late July and earlier this month received guidance from financial regulators, urging them to cancel seminars and halt disseminating research on stablecoins, people familiar with the matter said.
Regulators are also concerned that stablecoins could be exploited as a new tool for fraudulent activities in mainland China, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the details are private.
While China has a blanket ban on crypto-related transactions, recent official comments have stoked speculation the country is warming to the industry. Authorities have also given the green light to develop Hong Kong as a digital asset hub and the city this month rolled out new legislation governing stablecoin issuers, prompting a surge in interest from mainland Chinese firms.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission and The People's Bank of China didn't immediately respond to faxed requests for comments.
'Chinese policymakers don't favor too much fanfare in some topics just to avoid a herd rush to any particular asset class,' said Christopher Wong, a Singapore based currency strategist at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. 'There's still a worry that not everyone knows adequately about crypto and policymakers being pragmatic don't want herd mentality when investors buy into something that they do not know what the risks are.'
Despite China's crypto ban, there has been brisk over-the-counter digital asset trading in the country. It reached $75 billion in the first nine months of 2024, according to estimates from Chainalysis Inc., in evidence of a large presence of avenues for such transactions.
Illicit fundraising activities linked to virtual currencies and stablecoins have also flourished amid the hype, prompting China's local authorities including those in Beijing, Suzhou and Zhejiang province to issue risk warnings in the past month.
Stablecoins, typically backed by cash-like assets and issued by private firms, are gaining traction as a faster, cheaper option for cross-border payments. Most are pegged to the dollar and backed by US assets like short-term Treasuries, with the world's total supply projected to reach as much as $3.7 trillion by 2030.
The regulators are stepping in after recent official comments stoked speculation the country is warming to the notion of cyptocurrencies that track the yuan, as it seeks to challenge the US dollar's dominance in global finance and promote the usage of the Chinese currency.
PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng said in June that stablecoins could revolutionize international finance, particularly as rising geopolitical tensions highlight the fragility of traditional payment systems.
Hong Kong, widely viewed as a regulatory sandbox for China, is one of a number of markets in the Asia-Pacific region to have pushed forward with a licensing regime of its own in recent months.
As of Friday, Hong Kong has granted license for 11 crypto exchanges, alongside 44 companies with permit to trade digital assets for clients. These include Chinese state-backed firms such as CMB International Securities Ltd., Guotai Junan Securities Ltd. and TFI Securities and Futures Ltd.
US President Donald Trump on July 18 signed the first federal bill to regulate stablecoins, hailing it as 'giant step to cement American dominance of global finance and crypto technology.' The vast majority of stablecoins in circulation today are pegged to the US dollar.
With assistance from Suvashree Ghosh, Julia Zhong and Kiuyan Wong.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
How Wang Yi's Delhi visit, Jaishankar's Moscow mission reflect India's quest for strategic autonomy
The message is clear: India will engage, but on its terms; it will negotiate, but from a position of strength. The US tariffs may have triggered this latest flurry of activity, but the deeper motivation is strategic India stands today at a pivotal crossroads in its foreign policy. As tensions simmer on multiple fronts, from the western borders with Pakistan to the Himalayan standoff with China, and now with trade uncertainty with the US—New Delhi is recalibrating its diplomatic outreach. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's upcoming visit to Moscow and the arrival of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in New Delhi are not just routine diplomatic exchanges; they are strategic manoeuvres in a complex geopolitical chess game. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The backdrop is telling. The US, once touted as India's most promising strategic partner in the 21st century, has recently imposed high tariffs on Indian goods. This move, paired with Washington's growing unpredictability under President Donald Trump's 'America First' economic nationalism, has sent a clear message that India cannot afford to put all its eggs in the US basket. For a country that aspires to be Vishwaguru and Atmanirbhar, diversifying its international engagements is no longer a matter of choice but of necessity. Jaishankar's Moscow visit on August 21 to meet his counterpart Sergey Lavrov is part of the preparatory consultations for the Russia-India annual summit, which President Vladimir Putin is expected to attend later this year. The Indo-Russian friendship is no stranger to turbulence, but it remains deeply rooted in decades of trust, particularly in defence, nuclear energy, and strategic coordination. This visit gains significance in light of recent high-level contacts. National Security Adviser Ajit Doval was in Moscow days earlier, meeting Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu. Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself spoke to Putin over the phone, signalling a steady, deliberate strengthening of ties. Unlike the transactional approach of the US, Russia's strategic partnership with India is one of mutual reliability. It is Moscow that has stood by New Delhi at the UN Security Council during the darkest hours, whether during the 1971 war or in the aftermath of the Balakot strikes. Yet, this relationship is not without its strategic pressures. Russia's growing closeness to China, driven largely by Western sanctions, complicates the calculus. But India's approach is pragmatic: engage Moscow deeply enough to ensure that Russia does not tilt entirely into Beijing's orbit. If the Moscow leg is about deepening bonds with an old friend, the visit of Wang Yi to New Delhi is about managing a complicated, often tense, neighbour. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The India-China dynamic is unlike any other. Only three months ago, India had a limited conflict with Pakistan under Operation Sindoor, during which Chinese military inputs reportedly reached Islamabad. The shadow of the unresolved border dispute looms large. Beijing's strategy is clear: maintain economic engagement while keeping military pressure alive on the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Wang Yi's visit sees discussions on the stalled border talks. Beyond breakthroughs, New Delhi's hosting the Chinese Foreign Minister sends an important message: India is ready to talk, but it will not compromise on sovereignty. The timing of Wang's visit is also noteworthy. It comes ahead of Prime Minister Modi's expected visit to China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Tianjin. That New Delhi is engaging China at the foreign minister level before such a high-profile meeting shows a calculated approach to set the tone, draw the red lines, and explore potential trade-offs. One cannot discuss India-China relations without factoring in Pakistan. China's deep strategic embrace of Pakistan, from the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (Cpec) to military assistance, remains a sore point for India. Lt General Rahul R. Singh's statement in July that China provided 'live inputs' to Pakistan during the conflict serves as a stark reminder of the challenges New Delhi faces. Every handshake with Beijing carries the weight of this reality. For China, Pakistan is a convenient proxy to keep India strategically distracted. For India, this necessitates a twin approach: strengthening border preparedness while keeping diplomatic channels open to avoid miscalculations that could escalate into conflict. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The larger strategic picture here is one of balancing three major powers—the US, Russia, and China—each of which has its competing interests. The US offers technology, investment, and a counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific, but it also wields economic pressure through tariffs. Russia offers defence cooperation and energy security but is deepening ties with Beijing. China offers trade opportunities but continues to challenge India's territorial integrity and security environment. In this three-way balancing act, India is playing the long game. The Modi government has demonstrated that it will engage all sides without being beholden to any. This is the essence of strategic autonomy, a principle rooted in India's post-independence foreign policy but now adapted for the multipolar world order. The immediate takeaway from these back-to-back engagements is that India is not retreating into a defensive posture despite challenges on multiple fronts. Instead, it is doubling down on high-level diplomacy. Jaishankar in Moscow, Wang Yi in New Delhi, and Modi in Tianjin – these are not isolated events but part of a coordinated push to safeguard India's interests. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For the Indian right, which views foreign policy through the lens of civilisational resurgence, this approach aligns well with the vision of a strong, self-reliant Bharat that commands respect on the world stage. The message is clear: India will engage, but on its terms; it will negotiate, but from a position of strength. The US tariffs may have triggered this latest flurry of activity, but the deeper motivation is strategic. In an era where alliances are fluid and power is increasingly multipolar, India's ability to balance, hedge, and assert will determine not just its economic prosperity but its civilisational destiny. Each handshake, each discussion, will carry the weight of history and the promise of a Bharat that stands tall, unbowed, and ready for the challenges of the 21st century. The writer is a technocrat, political analyst, and author. He pens national, geopolitical, and social issues. His social media handle is @prosenjitnth. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Japan Startup JPYC To Issue First Yen-Pegged Stablecoin Amid Global Revival
Japanese startup JPYC plans to issue the first stablecoin pegged to the yen later in the year after receiving a licence this week. The government's advisory panel had recommended an increase of 41 yen to 1,002 yen for this fiscal year.(REUTERS) The stablecoin, which will be called JPYC, will be fully convertible to the yen and backed by domestic savings and Japanese government bonds, CEO Noritaka Okabe told a news conference in Tokyo. 'Initially, we expect demand to come from institutional investors, hedge funds and family offices in Japan,' he said. 'Eventually, we aim to have JPYC used overseas as digital yen and delivered to people across the world.' JPYC, which plans to issue the stablecoin around autumn, said it would not charge transaction fees. Instead, the more stablecoins it issues, the more Japanese government bonds it will hold, and it would earn money from the interest on those holdings. Blockchain-based stablecoins, which are typically pegged to a fiat currency and offer faster and cheaper transactions, are gaining much momentum worldwide. In the US, President Donald Trump in July signed into law federal rules and guidelines for stablecoins to facilitate their usage in everyday payments and settlements. Financial companies from Bank of America to Fiserv are preparing to launch their own dollar-backed crypto tokens, although experts warn the path forward may not be simple. In contrast, in mainland China, where crypto trading is banned, Chinese regulators have asked big local brokers to halt publication of research endorsing stablecoins in a bid to curb a surge in interest among domestic investors.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
China's first Tiltrotor prototype takes flight, sparking comparisons with US V-22 Osprey and Italian Leonardo AW609
China has achieved a major milestone with the successful maiden flight of its first tiltrotor aircraft prototype , developed by the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC). This breakthrough test marks China's entry into the complex domain of tiltrotor technology, which combines the vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities of helicopters with the speed and range of fixed-wing aircraft. Images shared on Chinese social media display the white prototype hovering with its rotors oriented vertically, indicating helicopter mode. The cockpit features suggest it is crewed, though confirmation of a pilot onboard remains uncertain. The aircraft has also been photographed inside a hangar alongside another incomplete prototype, revealing some of its mechanical framework. What exactly is a tiltrotor aircraft? A tiltrotor aircraft combines helicopter-like vertical takeoff and landing with airplane-style forward flight by rotating its engine nacelles and rotors from vertical to horizontal positions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Knee pain prices might surprise you Knee pain | search ads Find Now Undo Design and technical features compared to foreign models This new Chinese tilt-rotor closely resembles the Italian Leonardo AW609 in size and configuration, reports The War Zone. It features a cabin suspended below a straight wing and engine nacelles at the wingtips, each equipped with a pivoting proprotor that adjusts for different flight modes. Unlike earlier tilt-rotor designs, the aircraft uses a newer generation technology where only the front portion of each nacelle rotates, a design innovation that reduces mechanical complexity while improving reliability and performance unlike the Bell V-22 Osprey's fully rotating nacelles. Live Events A distinctive feature of the Chinese model is its conventional high-mounted T-tail with a rudder, differing from the AW609 which lacks a rudder and relies on its proprietors for yaw control. The aircraft also has retractable tricycle landing gear, with a single wheel on each leg. Size, capacity, and pressurization In terms of size and weight, the new Chinese tilt-rotor is considerably smaller than the U.S. V-22 Osprey , which has a maximum gross weight of around 52,000 pounds in VTOL mode. It is pressurized and can reportedly carry a similar number of passengers as the AW609 (up to 12 in high-density seating). In contrast, the Osprey can accommodate roughly double the personnel and includes features such as a rear ramp for rapid loading, aerial refueling capability, and external cargo sling load transport. Performance-wise, the AW609's established metrics include cruising speeds of 270 knots and a range of up to 1,000 nautical miles with auxiliary fuel, desirable benchmarks for tiltrotors with both military and civilian applications. While specific performance data for the Chinese prototype has not been disclosed, its design choices suggest capabilities aligned with these parameters. Operational roles and strategic implications Tilt-rotor aircraft are particularly suited to missions requiring vertical lift and extended range, including combat search and rescue, special operations, amphibious assaults, as well as humanitarian aid and disaster relief. The versatility of tilt-rotor designs makes them attractive for the People's Liberation Army (PLA), especially in contested Indo-Pacific regions such as the South China Sea , where rapid deployment to island outposts without conventional airstrip infrastructure is a strategic necessity. While the prototype may be publicly positioned for commercial or civilian use initially, it is believed it will significantly appeal to military planners for its potential to enhance the PLA's expeditionary and amphibious assault capabilities. It could eventually supplement existing helicopters like the Z-8/Z-18 medium-lift varieties and smaller Harbin Z-9 and Z-20 models already deployed on PLA Navy vessels. Despite the benefits, tilt-rotor technology also faces challenges. The mechanical complexity inherent in pivoting proprotor systems requires intensive development and maintenance efforts. The U.S. V-22 Osprey, though combat-proven, has experienced notable technical and readiness issues since its introduction. China's tilt-rotor program is still in early stages and may take time before entering operational service. However, the appearance of a flying prototype underscores a clear strategic intent to develop advanced VTOL platforms suited for modern amphibious warfare and island operations. It may also pave the way for future developments of larger or more capable tiltrotor aircraft within China's expanding aerospace industry. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): Q: How does China's tiltrotor compare to existing models like the V-22 Osprey? China's tiltrotor prototype appears simpler and possibly more affordable but may have lower payload and range compared to the U.S. V-22, which is a battle-proven tiltrotor operational since the early 2000s. Q: What are the military advantages of tiltrotor aircraft? Tiltrotors provide fast, long-range deployment without needing runways, ideal for rapid troop transport, supply missions, amphibious assaults, and operations in remote or contested regions. Q: What are the challenges of tiltrotor development? Tiltrotors involve complex mechanical systems, difficult aerodynamic challenges, and safety concerns, contributing to lengthy and costly development cycles.
