Philippine Senate shelves VP Sara Duterte's impeachment case
The motion to archive - approved by 19 of 24 senators - adheres with the Supreme Court ruling voiding the complaint against Duterte, Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva said during livestreamed proceedings. Four senators voted against the motion and one abstained.
The move renders the impeachment complaint against the vice president as "dead' unless the top court reverses its ruling, according to Senator Alan Peter Cayetano.
That means the Senate won't proceed with the impeachment trial against the vice president which was set to begin this month, in yet another relief for the embattled politician.
"Restraint is not weakness. It is obedience to constitutional order,' said Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri who voted in favor of archiving.
The Supreme Court last month unanimously decided that the complaint against Duterte defied the constitutional rule that only one impeachment proceeding may be initiated against the same official within one year.
The House of Representatives, which impeached Duterte, on Monday asked the court to reverse its decision. It said impeachment is a political process entrusted to Congress, and that the proceedings followed the Constitution.
Sara, daughter of ex-leader Rodrigo Duterte, was impeached in February by the House on accusations that include plotting to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and misusing public funds. She denies the charges.
The vice president has feuded with Marcos after their 2022 election team-up collapsed due to policy differences and public criticisms against each other's families.
The Duterte clan showed its political clout during the midterm elections in May, where Marcos' Senate slate underperformed.
"The 1987 Constitution entrusted the duty to try and decide all cases of impeachment to the Senate. Today we are voting to abandon this mandate,' said opposition Senator Risa Hontiveros who voted against archiving the complaint.
"It is our institution which, in the words of colleagues, killed the articles of impeachment.' - Bloomberg
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
6 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Jalur Gemilang - Symbol of country's dignity
The improper use or display of the flag not only tarnishes the country's image but can also undermine the nation's dignity. 11 Aug 2025 10:26am Some students of Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Jitra waved the Jalur Gemilang while attending the 2025 Kedah State-level Kembara Merdeka Jalur Gemilang programme here recently. KUALA LUMPUR - Any dissatisfaction or discontent with the country is not a licence or permit to insult the national flag. Legal and constitutional expert Associate Professor Datuk Dr Shamrahayu A. Aziz said public awareness of the correct and respectful use of the Jalur Gemilang must be strengthened to safeguard the country's dignity and sovereignty. She said the adult generation must serve as role models for the young, as reflected in the saying "bapa borek, anak rintik', where good practices in handling and displaying the flag become a legacy for future generations. "In recent years, we have seen various mistakes made by our people when using or hoisting the flag, for example, flying it upside down, darkening its colours, displaying flags with the wrong number of stars or points, and so on. "When such errors occur, they reflect the identity of Malaysians themselves,' she told Bernama recently. Shamrahayu added that the improper use or display of the flag not only tarnishes the country's image but can also undermine the nation's dignity. Although there is no specific constitutional provision on national symbols, Shamrahayu said government guidelines regarding the flag should be more widely publicised, and if offences become frequent, formal regulations could be developed based on the principles of the Rukun Negara and the Constitution. "If we find that offences relating to the flag and national symbols are occurring often, then perhaps we should formalise guidelines based on the Rukun Negara and the Constitution to ensure proper and respectful use of the Jalur Gemilang,' she said. Shamrahayu emphasised that the Jalur Gemilang is not merely a piece of coloured cloth, but a symbol of national sovereignty and identity. She urged Malaysians to understand the meaning behind each colour and symbol, and to fly the flag with pride, not only during Merdeka celebrations, but throughout the year. The Jalur Gemilang has been put up to enliven the National Month celebrations in conjunction with National Day on August 31. Photo by Bernama Meanwhile, Chairman of the Centre for Development, Social and Environmental Studies at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Prof Dr Novel Lyndon, said that the act of flying the national flag reflects a person's level of respect and love for the country. "This act is a symbol of patriotism that appreciates the services of freedom fighters and the history of building a sovereign nation," he said. He said the act of hoisting a flag that is worn, torn or not in accordance with the rules gives the impression that some people are less sensitive to the symbols of the nation, thus affecting the image of the country in the eyes of the local and international community. Such attitudes, he warned, could weaken national identity and erode patriotic spirit among the young generation. To address this, Novel proposed strengthening patriotic education from the school level through history and civics lessons, while using mass media, community programmes, and National Month celebrations to foster love for the nation. "Without this awareness, the flag will only be seen as a piece of cloth, no longer a symbol of dignity, pride, and the spirit of the struggle for independence,' he stressed. - BERNAMA
The Star
9 hours ago
- The Star
Deepfakes stir Duterte controversy
Days after the Philippine Senate declined to launch the impeachment trial of the country's vice-president, two interviews with Filipinos arguing for and against the move went viral. Neither were real. The schoolboys and elderly woman making their cases were AI creations, examples of increasingly sophisticated fakes possible with even basic online tools. 'Why single out the VP?', a digitally-created boy in a white school uniform asks, arguing that the case was politically motivated. The House of Representatives impeached Sara Duterte in early February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against former ally and running mate President Ferdinand Marcos. A guilty verdict in the Senate would have resulted in her removal from office and a lifetime ban from Philippine politics. But after convening as an impeachment court on June 10, the senior body immediately sent the case back to the House, questioning its constitutionality. Then, senators on Aug 6 voted to shelve the impeachment complaint against Vice-President Sara Duterte, after the top court ruled it as unconstitutional, Bloomberg reported. That means the Senate won't proceed with the impeachment trial against the vice-president which was set to begin this month. Duterte ally Senator Ronald dela Rosa shared the video of the schoolboys – since viewed millions of times – praising the youths for having a 'better understanding of what's happening' than their adult counterparts. The vice-president's younger brother Sebastian, mayor of family stronghold Davao, said the clip proved 'liberals' did not have the support of the younger generation. When the schoolboys were exposed as digital creations, the vice-president and her supporters were unfazed. 'There's no problem with sharing an AI video in support of me. As long as it's not being turned into a business,' Duterte told reporters. 'Even if it's AI... I agree with the point,' said Dela Rosa, the one-time enforcer of ex-president Rodrigo Duterte's drug war. The video making the case for impeachment – also with millions of views – depicts an elderly woman peddling fish and calling out the Senate for failing to hold a trial. 'You 18 senators, when it's the poor who steal, you want them locked up immediately, no questions asked. 'But if it's the vice-president who stole millions, you protect her fiercely,' she says in Tagalog. Both clips bore a barely discernible watermark for the Google video-generation platform Veo. AFP fact-checkers also identified visual inconsistencies, such as overly smooth hair and teeth, and storefronts with garbled signage. The man who created the fish peddler video, Bernard Senocip, 34, said it took about five minutes to produce the eight-second clip. Boiling over: Filipinos stage a protest following the Senate's decision to archive the impeachment case against Duterte, in Quezon City, - REUTERS Reached via his Facebook page, Senocip defended his work in a video call, saying AI characters allowed people to express their opinions while avoiding the 'harsh criticism' frequently seen on social media. 'As long as you know your limitations and you're not misleading your viewers, I think it's fine,' he said, noting that – unlike the Facebook version – he had placed a 'created by AI' tag on the video's TikTok upload. While AFP has previously reported on websites using hot-button Philippine issues to generate cash, Senocip said his work was simply a way of expressing his political opinions. The schoolboy video's creator, the anonymous administrator of popular Facebook page Ay Grabe, declined to be interviewed but said his AI creations' opinions had been taken from real-life students. AFP, along with other media outlets, is paid by some platforms including Meta, Google and TikTok for work tackling disinformation. Using AI to push viewpoints via seemingly ordinary people can make beliefs seem 'more popular than they actually are', said Jose Mari Lanuza of Sigla Research Center, a non-profit organisation that studies disinformation. 'In the case of the impeachment, this content fosters distrust not only towards particular lawmakers but towards the impeachment process.' While some AI firms have developed measures to protect public figures, Jose Miguelito Enriquez, an associate research fellow at Nanyang Technological University, said the recent Philippine videos were a different animal. 'Some AI companies like OpenAI previously committed to prevent users from generating deepfakes of 'real people', including political candidates,' he said. 'But... these man-on-the-street interviews represent a grey area because technically, they are not using the likeness of an actual living person.' Crafting realistic 'humans' was also getting easier, said Dominic Ligot, founder of Data and AI Ethics PH. 'Veo is only the latest in a string of rapidly evolving tools for AI media generation,' he said. For Ligot, guardrails around the swiftly evolving technology are a must, warning AI was increasingly being used to 'influence how real people feel, pressure decision-makers and distort democratic discourse'. — Agencies
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Marcos says court order has no bearing on the Merits of VP Duterte's impeachment case
Filipinos stage a protest following the Senate's decision to archive the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, in Quezon City, Philippines, on August 7, 2025. -- REUTERS/Eloisa Lopez MANILA (Bloomberg): The Philippine Supreme Court's decision that invalidated the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte did not determine the merits of the case but merely faulted the procedure, according to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. "The Supreme Court decision does not have any bearing on the rightness or wrongness of the merits of the impeachment case,' Marcos told reporters at a briefing in India on Friday, according to a video posted by
