Ousted Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina's party barred from contesting elections
Bangladesh 's election commission has suspended the registration of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina 's party, effectively blocking the Awami League from contesting polls.
The move comes days after the interim government of Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus banned all activities of the former ruling party, citing national security threats and a war crimes investigation into hundreds of deaths during the agitation that toppled Ms Hasina last year.
The former prime minister, who fled to neighbouring India after her rule collapsed, remains in exile. She is wanted in over 100 cases related to the killings of the protesters.
'With the home ministry's ban on all activities of the Awami League and its affiliated organisations, the election commission has decided to suspend the party's registration,' the federal body's secretary, Akhtar Ahmed, announced on Monday.
Asif Nazrul, law affairs adviser to the interim administration, said earlier on Saturday they had decided to ban Awami League's activities online and elsewhere under the antiterrorism law.
'This decision is aimed at ensuring national security and sovereignty, protection of activists of the July movement and plaintiffs and witnesses involved in the tribunal proceedings,' he said.
The Awami League, which ruled Bangladesh for over 20 years until Ms Hasina's ouster, is now barred from contesting elections.
This means there's now a comprehensive ban on all forms of activities of the Awami League and its affiliates, including publications, media appearances, online and social media campaigns, processions, meetings, rallies, and conferences.
The restrictions will stay in place until the International Crimes Tribunal concludes ongoing proceedings against the party's leaders and activists.
After her ouster, Ms Hasina and several top Awami League leaders were charged with murder.
The dramatic decision to ban the Awami League followed mass protests in the capital Dhaka on Saturday where thousands of people, including backers of a political party formed by students who led last year's agitation, issued an ultimatum to the interim rulers to outlaw Ms Hasina's party by that night.
On Monday, the interim rulers said the ban on Awami League's activities did not infringe upon the freedom of expression of any individual or political entity, according to the Dhaka Tribune.
In February, the UN human rights office estimated that as many as 1,400 people could have been killed during the agitation that toppled her government.
Another former prime minister, Khaleda Zia, returned to Bangladesh earlier this month after nearly four months of medical treatment in London, intensifying calls for the interim government to announce elections. Ms Zia had been jailed for several years during her rival's rule.
Mr Yunus has hinted that elections may be delayed until 2026. Speaking in a national broadcast last December to mark the 53rd anniversary of Bangladesh's independence, Mr Yunus said 'election dates could be fixed by the end of 2025 or the first half of 2026'.
Pressure has been mounting on Mr Yunus to set an election date for the country of nearly 170 million people. The interim leader has earlier called the task of restoring democracy in the country 'extremely tough'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
8 hours ago
- Times
Times letters: Getting Britain into battle-ready shape
Sir, Many people will agree with General Lord Dannatt when he proposes that taxes be increased to pay for the full implementation of the strategic defence review (letter, Jun 3), but how confident can we be that any additional tax revenues would be ringfenced for defence and not dissipated on other Labour Party priorities such as social security spending and political investments in the red wall? One can only hope that government rhetoric about national security is not being used as a tactical smokescreen to justify additional taxation destined to cover shortfalls in other departmental budgets, with only a token increase in defence spending. After his victory in the general election Sir Keir Starmer undertook to make the tough calls and promised action, not words. It is time to see that action and the rapid implementation of the defence review's recommendations in this parliament. Dr David Ryan Bournemouth
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Protecting Net Zero dreams over national security reality could prove an expensive mistake for Labour
Cold war NOTHING more sums up the madness of Government thinking than not being prepared to fund 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence, but deciding it IS still fine to lavish tens of billions on Net Zero. Britain is facing rising threats from the dictator regimes of both China and demented Putin's Russia. 1 Our Armed Forces have been hollowed out and urgently need a vastly upgraded Navy, Air Force and hi-tech weaponry to become a proper global force again. There is a real and present danger to this country NOW. Keir Starmer says the UK is firmly on a war footing. But he still won't commit to anything beyond 2.5 per cent by 2027 — even as Nato leaders meet to agree to pledge five per cent. Instead, the PM IS pressing full steam ahead with Labour's £13.5billion Warm Homes scheme. How much of a comfort will it be — as Russian bombers patrol our skies or Chinese cyber attacks knock out our infrastructure — that your roof has taxpayer-funded insulation and your shiny new heat pump performs worse than your old boiler? Protecting Net Zero dreams over national security reality could prove an expensive mistake in more ways than one. They are fed up of paying record taxes to put illegal migrants in hotels. Just as rage-inducing is watching our Government being powerless in the face of foreign criminals using human rights laws to avoid deportation. Years of broken promises have led to widespread despair among a disbelieving electorate. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch appears to be listening, with her policy review today putting the Tories on the path to quitting the ECHR. Playing by the rules of a foreign court that is mis-interpreting outdated laws springing from the Second World War has got us nowhere. Certainly the public is crying out for someone to end the madness. Becks appeal DAVID Beckham's incredible career has taken him from kicking a ball with his dad in his local park in Chingford to becoming a global sports megastar, fashion icon and philanthropist. The only thing missing in his glittering life was a knighthood. That final goal has been smashed into the back of the net. Sir Becks and Lady Posh — already with their own country manor — now well and truly have it all.
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Fighting the climate crisis is vital for national security
Former military leaders rightly point out that climate change is a matter of national security (UK must consider food and climate part of national security, say top ex-military figures, 29 May). What is required in response is a thoughtful, strategic approach that focuses in on actions that are practical and effective in these difficult times and will help build the UK government's 'strong foundations' of national security and secure borders. For example, arguably the biggest near-term threat to UK security is the 'mass population displacement' that Lt Gen Richard Nugee refers to. About 3.5 billion people live in an arc around Europe, across Africa, the Middle East and Asian countries such as Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. People in these regions are already confronting floods and heatwaves of up to 50C that are making large areas uninhabitable. Rural communities are being forced into conflict and migration, while food production and supplies to cities are being affected. Russia has already identified this as a strategic way to undermine European democracies. It stokes conflict and weaponises people – for example, pushing a wave of 4 million Syrian war refugees into Europe and Turkey. The payoff has been the rise of pro-Russian rightwing parties across Europe. With temperatures rising much faster than expected, this problem will accelerate during the present parliament. It requires immediate action as there's no way to contain it. What can we do? The UK has a strong track record of using international aid to promote farming in these vulnerable communities. The best approach is regenerative farming, which produces food, builds resilience to extreme weather and draws carbon out of the atmosphere as it rebuilds soil health. It is a strategy for mitigating, and adapting to, climate change. We must salvage and expand this programme within the remaining aid and climate finance budget. It is essential to our national security that we fight climate change at home, through decarbonisation, and that we promote regenerative agriculture at home and in frontline countries around Adam ParrHertford College, University of Oxford Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
