Kale surplus takes top honour
The kale paddock won best overall crop at the Central Otago Winterfeed Competition recently.
As it was the first time he had entered the competition, he was considering never entering again so he could maintain a perfect record.
"It might be the last time," he said.
Mr Peter was the production manager for Sustainable Prospects Ltd, dairy grazing, beef finishing and small seed cropping on 575ha flat-to-rolling farm in Springvale, north of Alexandra.
All of the 575ha was irrigated and included 210ha of winter crop, about 70% fodder beet and 30% kale.
With a surplus of winter feed, he was trying to find some stock to fill the gap. Hopefully a contract could be sorted to graze cattle or cattle could be bought to fatten, or it might be a combination of both.
But having too much feed going into winter was a better problem than not having enough.
"I don't want to waste it ... either because we don't have enough mouths to eat it," he said.
Cattle had been harder to secure this season, as many farmers were in the same boat and had plenty of feed available.
A crystal ball was needed when deciding on the amount of crops to plant in spring, he said.
To produce the prize-winning kale crop, SovGold seed was sown at the start of November.
The weather had played ball since the seed was sown.
Asked for the secret to grow a top kale crop, the soil quality was discounted.
"It is not our best dirt on the farm," he said.
The paddock had been producing crops for the past four years and went through a fairly intensive cropping rotation.
About 2000 dairy cows were arriving this week and would start grazing the kale.
Kale was used to transition cattle on to fodder beet.
Judge Richard Copland, of Poolburn, said the kale crop won the top prize because it was even, high-yielding, clean of weeds and bugs and fit-for-purpose.
Other kale crops entered in the competition were higher yielding, but they were so tall they would be harder to utilise, Mr Copland said.
The two-yearly competition had record entries of 93 crops.
More than $100,000 was raised and would be split between Otago Community Hospice, Poolburn School and Ōmakau School. Results
2025 Central Otago Winterfeed Competition results:
Best overall crop: Ben Peter.
Irrigated fodder beet: Chris and Jaimee Pemberton.
Irrigated kale: Ben and Anna Gillespie.
Dryland kale: Brad and Kirsten McEwen.
Irrigated swede: Elliott and Jardene Morgan.
Dryland swede: Tom Goble.
Irrigated rape: Evans Family.
Dryland rape: Glen and Renee Harrex.
Irrigated mixed crop: Mark and Vicki O'Neill.
Dryland mixed crop: Scott and Briar Milne.
Irrigated turnip: James and Chris Armstrong.
Biggest weed: The Rutherford family.
shawn.mcavinue@alliedpress.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
03-08-2025
- RNZ News
'Go woke, go broke' is no longer true. Socially aware capitalism is the future of corporate responsibility
By Peter Underwood* of Ben and Jerry's ice cream is displayed on a shelf at a grocery store. Photo: AFP / Justin Sullivan Analysis: The phrase "go woke, go broke" is often used by critics of corporate social responsibility. It implies that companies face a binary choice: embrace progressive values or pursue profit. But this dichotomy between "wokeness" and capitalism is both simplistic and increasingly out of step with corporate reality. Many companies are learning to navigate a middle path. They are embedding social, environmental and ethical considerations into their business strategies - not in spite of profit, but because it contributes to long-term value creation. Understanding this shift - and the backlash to it - is fundamental to grasping modern corporate responsibility. Our research examines the growing tension between evolving "woke" agendas within firms and the enduring demands of shareholder value, known as "shareholder revanchism". We explore this dynamic using academic Archie Carroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility , where economic responsibility forms the foundation for higher legal, ethical and philanthropic obligations. Ultimately, we argue for a reassessment of the prevailing emphasis on shareholder profit and short-termism. Directors should adopt a more balanced approach when pursuing profit and discharging their duties. The idea that directors must choose between shareholders and stakeholders - between profit and progressive causes - has deep roots in law and economics. For decades, shareholder primacy prevailed in global business. This principle was famously reinforced in court decisions such as the 1919 Dodge v Ford case in the United States. Henry Ford was found to have a duty to operate his company in the interests of shareholders. It was later popularised by Milton Friedman , who declared that "the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits". A stark example of this tension came with the ousting of Emmanuel Faber, chief executive of food giant Danone in 2021. Faber was accused by some shareholders of failing to "strike the right balance between shareholder value creation and sustainability". His critics felt he focused too much on people, the planet and social responsibility and not enough on profits. Yet corporate law has begun to evolve. In the United Kingdom, section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 still requires directors to promote the success of the company "for the benefit of its members". But the legislation also requires directors to consider employees, suppliers, communities and environmental outcomes. This model - sometimes termed "enlightened shareholder value" - preserves profit as the goal, while recognising that broader factors shape how it is achieved. New Zealand's brief experiment with section 131 of the Companies Act 1993, which allowed directors to consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, is another example. The amendment was introduced under Labour before being revoked by the National-led coalition. Canada has a similar provision. The phrase "woke capitalism" was popularised in a 2018 New York Times opinion piece about corporate activism. It originally described how firms were supporting progressive causes to attract younger, values-driven consumers - not out of altruism, but to strengthen brand appeal. In 2019, the US Business Roundtable - a group of 200 top chief executives - rejected shareholder primacy in favour of stakeholder governance. It pledged to run companies for the benefit of all stakeholders: customers, employees, suppliers, communities and shareholders. This followed a 2018 letter by Larry Fink, chairman of BlackRock, calling on firms to pursue a broader purpose and serve all their stakeholders. Yet corporate activism carries risks. Nike's campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick boosted sales but sparked backlash over the American football player's support for Black Lives Matter. Bud Light's brief partnership with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney triggered boycotts. Gillette's "toxic masculinity" campaign alienated many long-time customers. Jaguar's sales plunged after a rebrand was criticised as pandering. Even ice cream company Ben & Jerry's has clashed with parent company Unilever over the limits of its political expression. These examples show that progressive branding is not always rewarded - but nor is silence. Companies now risk criticism for failing to speak out on issues their stakeholders care about. It is clear consumers are increasingly attuned to corporate social responsibility. A central challenge in reconciling these tensions is the definition of profit itself. Traditional corporate law treats profit as the ultimate end of business activity. But scholars such as Edward Freeman argue that profit is a precondition for continuity - not an end in itself. As he puts it, profit to a company is like red blood cells to a human: essential for survival, but not the purpose of life. Under this view, profit becomes cyclical. It is a means of sustaining activity, not a fixed destination. This may seem open ended, but it avoids the fiction that companies ever reach a final "profit goal". Firms pursuing social impact are not abandoning capitalism; they are redefining it. In a polarised climate, "woke capitalism" remains a lightning rod. But the supposed conflict between ethics and economics is a false one. Courts, lawmakers and firms alike are recognising that social responsibility can support, rather than undermine, long-term value. Directors are no longer torn between duty and decency. They are navigating a broader understanding of corporate success - one in which "wokeness" and capitalism are not opposing forces, but interdependent elements of a sustainable business strategy. *Peter Underwood is a senior lecturer at University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau. This story was originally published on The Conversation.
RNZ News
01-08-2025
- RNZ News
Luxon to tell National faithful 'we're turning the corner'
National leader Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro National Party members are gathering in Christchurch to cap off a week in which MPs attempted to steer public minds back towards the government's cost of living policies. Members will also farewell a party stalwart, with former president Peter Goodfellow retiring from National's board of directors. While leader Christopher Luxon will be speaking to the converted, he will be acutely aware the cost of living has become front of mind . Earlier this week, he was asked what his message to the party faithful would be. "Look, they know it's been a tough time, they know that we're turning the corner," Luxon said. "But really ... this country's got great potential and a great future ahead of it, and we've just got to keep working at it." National's deputy leader, Nicola Willis, said the conference would be focused on the steps the government was taking to make the country "an easier, better place to do business, to hire people, to create well paying jobs". "It is our job as a government not to moan about the things we can't control, but to focus on how we can make things better here in New Zealand, and we're very proud of the efforts we're making," she said. It is a stark contrast to this time last year, where Luxon's message ahead of the first conference since National returned to government was its focus on action and delivery . It shows just how much the cost of living crisis is lingering, and National has spent the week attempting to convince the public it has got it under control. With no announcement to make at this week's post-Cabinet press conference (bar the card surcharge ban, which had already been announced), Luxon and Willis gave a more than 10-minute address about the economy and cost of living, and actions the government had taken. "The most important thing we can do to make you better off is to double-down on our long-term economic plan," Luxon said. Willis used her speech to remind people of National's tax changes, FamilyBoost policy and a falling Official Cash Rate. It prompted Labour to accuse the government of "more spin than a front-load washing machine" . The latest Ipsos Issues Monitor has Labour in front of National as the party New Zealanders consider most able to handle the cost of living, despite releasing no substantive policy since the election. In 2023, National won 38.06 percent of the party vote, but since then has failed to poll above that. Recent polls have had National in the low thirties, with some showing the left bloc would have enough numbers to form a government. Other polls give the coalition the numbers to form a government, but only just. National party ministers will hold panels on health, education, law and order, agriculture, and the economy and cost of living. Members will also elect board positions. Long-serving board member and former party president Peter Goodfellow will be retiring from the board. Goodfellow was president from 2009 to 2022 before stepping down but remaining on the board. ANZCO Foods founder Sir Graeme Harrison, who joined the National board in 2021, has also decided to retire. Current board member Rachel Bird is up for re-election. Under National's constitution and rules, board members serve three years and then retire. They can then be eligible for re-election. Craig Carr, Andrew von Dadelszen and Edgar Wilson have also put their names forward for the vacancies. Party president Sylvia Wood and board members Jannita Pilisi, Stefan Sunde and David Ryan are not up for re-election, and so will remain on the board. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
03-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Kale surplus takes top honour
A winter crop surplus, featuring award-winning kale, has Ben Peter searching for more mouths to eat it. The kale paddock won best overall crop at the Central Otago Winterfeed Competition recently. As it was the first time he had entered the competition, he was considering never entering again so he could maintain a perfect record. "It might be the last time," he said. Mr Peter was the production manager for Sustainable Prospects Ltd, dairy grazing, beef finishing and small seed cropping on 575ha flat-to-rolling farm in Springvale, north of Alexandra. All of the 575ha was irrigated and included 210ha of winter crop, about 70% fodder beet and 30% kale. With a surplus of winter feed, he was trying to find some stock to fill the gap. Hopefully a contract could be sorted to graze cattle or cattle could be bought to fatten, or it might be a combination of both. But having too much feed going into winter was a better problem than not having enough. "I don't want to waste it ... either because we don't have enough mouths to eat it," he said. Cattle had been harder to secure this season, as many farmers were in the same boat and had plenty of feed available. A crystal ball was needed when deciding on the amount of crops to plant in spring, he said. To produce the prize-winning kale crop, SovGold seed was sown at the start of November. The weather had played ball since the seed was sown. Asked for the secret to grow a top kale crop, the soil quality was discounted. "It is not our best dirt on the farm," he said. The paddock had been producing crops for the past four years and went through a fairly intensive cropping rotation. About 2000 dairy cows were arriving this week and would start grazing the kale. Kale was used to transition cattle on to fodder beet. Judge Richard Copland, of Poolburn, said the kale crop won the top prize because it was even, high-yielding, clean of weeds and bugs and fit-for-purpose. Other kale crops entered in the competition were higher yielding, but they were so tall they would be harder to utilise, Mr Copland said. The two-yearly competition had record entries of 93 crops. More than $100,000 was raised and would be split between Otago Community Hospice, Poolburn School and Ōmakau School. Results 2025 Central Otago Winterfeed Competition results: Best overall crop: Ben Peter. Irrigated fodder beet: Chris and Jaimee Pemberton. Irrigated kale: Ben and Anna Gillespie. Dryland kale: Brad and Kirsten McEwen. Irrigated swede: Elliott and Jardene Morgan. Dryland swede: Tom Goble. Irrigated rape: Evans Family. Dryland rape: Glen and Renee Harrex. Irrigated mixed crop: Mark and Vicki O'Neill. Dryland mixed crop: Scott and Briar Milne. Irrigated turnip: James and Chris Armstrong. Biggest weed: The Rutherford family.
