From France To Canada, List Of Countries That Recognise Palestine As A State
Together with more than 140 other nations, Portugal, Malta and the UK have also declared their intention to recognise Palestinian statehood in the forthcoming UN General Assembly session, CNN reported.
Following the establishment of the Palestine National Council (PNC), the majority of countries that recognise the State of Palestine did so in 1988. Similar actions followed, with multiple non-Western nations recognising the Occupied Lands as a state, in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s.
Several European countries, including the Czech Republic and Hungary, pursued a single agenda as members of the Communist bloc of Soviet-aligned countries when they first recognised a Palestinian state in 1988.
Which countries have recognised the Palestinian statehood?
The majority of the nations in Asia, Africa, and South America are among the nearly 150 of the 193 UN members that recognise Palestinian statehood. Only a small percentage of Western nations, primarily former Soviet states, have done it so far. But this trend seems to be changing.
According to TIME, Australia, Canada, Malta, and France may recognise a Palestinian state during the September UN General Assembly meeting. New Zealand declared on Monday that it would "carefully weigh up its position over the next month on recognition of a state of Palestine."
In 2024, Armenia, Slovenia, Ireland, Spain, and Norway recognised Palestinian statehood.
More European and Caribbean countries, including Barbados, Ireland, Jamaica, Norway, and Spain, recognised a Palestinian state in the spring of 2024.
The United Kingdom has said that it will recognise a Palestinian state if Israel fails to stop the war in Gaza and refuses a ceasefire.
Israel claimed that the recognition of Palestinian statehood by Western countries like France, Canada, and the UK "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, like Gaza became."
What does recognising Palestinian statehood mean?
According to international law, a sovereign state must have a functioning government, a constant population, a defined territory, and the capacity to engage in international relations. Sovereign statehood does not depend on a nation's official recognition by other nations, but it influences how nations engage with one another.
Since a large portion of the world already recognises Palestinian statehood, the change among Western nations is generally interpreted as an effort to put pressure on Israel to agree to a ceasefire in Gaza.
The Israeli Defence Forces have struck neighbourhoods, hospitals and schools, killing over 65,000 Palestinians since the beginning of attacks in October 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?
Aug 12 - U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold? European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump on Wednesday amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. WHAT KIND OF DEAL COULD EMERGE FROM SUMMIT? Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Putin. WHAT IF UKRAINE OBJECTS TO ANY TRUMP-PUTIN DEAL? Trump would face strong resistance from Zelenskiy and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Zelenskiy says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy U.S. weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of U.S. intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. HOW MIGHT A DEAL AFFECT TRUMP'S SUPPORT AT HOME? There would be big political risks in the U.S. for Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice in Putin's rape of Ukraine ... I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure", he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. HOW MIGHT UKRAINE'S EUROPEAN ALLIES RESPOND? EU member states said on Tuesday that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Israel opposition chief backs call for strike in support of Gaza hostages
Israeli opposition chief Yair Lapid on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) backed calls for a general strike in solidarity with hostages still held in Gaza. "Strike on Sunday," Mr. Lapid posted on X, saying even supporters of the current government should take part and insisting it was not party political. Sunday is the first day of the working week in Israel. "Strike out of solidarity. Strike because the families have asked, and that's reason enough. Strike because no one has a monopoly on emotion, on mutual responsibility, on Jewish values." Mr. Lapid's post followed a call on Sunday by around 20 parents of hostages still held by Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip for a strike. On Monday, the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, the main representative group for relatives, backed the idea. The group has been pressing the leaders of Israel's main trade union federation, Histadrut, to join in but it decided against doing so. Instead, it said it would support "workers' solidarity demonstrations", the Forum said. "Allow a citizens' strike, from the grassroots to the top. Allow everyone to take a day off on Sunday to follow the dictates of their conscience," the Forum added in a statement. "The moment has come to act, to take to the streets," it said, adding "675 days of captivity and war must end". The group again accused the government of sacrificing the remaining hostages "on the altar of an endless, aimless war". Last week, Israel's security cabinet approved plans to expand the war into the remaining parts of Gaza not yet controlled by the military, sparking fears that more hostages might die as a result. Of the 251 hostages taken captive by Palestinian militants during Hamas's October 2023 attack on southern Israel, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. In early August, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad released videos showing two hostages in emaciated conditions. Hamas's 2023 attack that sparked the current Gaza war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, the majority civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. Israel's retaliatory offensive in Gaza has killed at least 61,499 people, the majority civilians, according to the figures from the Hamas-run health ministry considered reliable by the United Nations.
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Andhra Pradesh shrimp farmers seek govt. support amid export tariff woes
In a joint meeting held in Ongole on Tuesday, shrimp farmers' associations from Tirupati, Nellore, Prakasam, Bapatla, Guntur, and Krishna districts urged the Andhra Pradesh government to step in and address pressing challenges facing the aquaculture sector. Prakasam District Shrimp Farmers Association president Duggineni Gopinath highlighted that the sector has been hit hard since former U.S. President Donald Trump increased tariffs on Indian shrimp imports. 'Nearly 40% of our exports go to the U.S., and the increased tariff has severely hurt our earnings,' he said. Gopinath appealed to the State government to provide 50% subsidy on bank loans for setting up mini processing plants. He also suggested including shrimp in the food menus of social welfare hostels and anganwadi centres to boost domestic consumption. The farmer leaders demanded a minimum support price (MSP) of ₹470 per kg for 30-count tiger prawns and ₹400 per kg for 30-count Vannamei shrimp. They also sought uninterrupted power supply at ₹1.50 per unit without additional charges, and urged feed companies to lower prices by at least ₹15 per kg. Resolving to diversify their markets, the farmers said they will focus more on domestic sales and explore exports to South Korea and European countries, rather than depending solely on the U.S. and China.
